14.01.2015 Views

Geofile Online - Richmond School District No. 38

Geofile Online - Richmond School District No. 38

Geofile Online - Richmond School District No. 38

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Geofile</strong><br />

<strong>Online</strong><br />

Ecotowns<br />

In 2008 the government announced<br />

proposals for 10 ‘ecotowns’, to be<br />

built in two phases: five by 2016 and<br />

a further five by 2020. Ecotowns will<br />

be small new towns of up to 20,000<br />

homes. They are intended to exploit<br />

the potential to create complete new<br />

settlements which can achieve zero<br />

carbon emission and more sustainable<br />

living, using the best new design and<br />

architecture. Ecotowns are known to<br />

be the brainchild of Prime Minister<br />

Gordon Brown, who sees them as a way<br />

to balance increased housebuilding<br />

with the needs of the environment.<br />

The key features the government wants<br />

to achieve are:<br />

• places with separate and distinct<br />

identities, but good links to<br />

surrounding towns and cities<br />

in terms of jobs, transport and<br />

services;<br />

• the developments as a whole to<br />

achieve zero carbon emission and to<br />

be exemplars in at least one area of<br />

environment technology;<br />

• a good range of facilities within<br />

the towns, including a secondary<br />

school, shopping, business space<br />

and leisure;<br />

• between 30 and 50 per cent<br />

affordable housing with a good<br />

mix of tenures and size of homes in<br />

mixed communities; and<br />

• a delivery organisation to manage<br />

the town and its development<br />

and provide support for people,<br />

businesses and community services.<br />

Figure 1: Proposed ecotown sites<br />

Leeds City<br />

Region<br />

Rossington<br />

Manby<br />

Rushcliffe<br />

Curborough<br />

Coltishall<br />

Pennbury<br />

Henley<br />

Middle Quinton<br />

Marston<br />

Grange<br />

Weston<br />

Elsenham<br />

Otmoor<br />

Imerys China Clay<br />

Community<br />

Bordon-Whitehill<br />

Ford<br />

The government is looking to<br />

encourage and support local<br />

authorities and the private sector<br />

to bring forward around 10 new<br />

schemes. The shortlist for the<br />

‘ecotowns’ is:<br />

• Pennbury, Leicestershire<br />

• Manby and Strubby,<br />

Lincolnshire<br />

• Curborough, Staffordshire<br />

• Middle Quinton, Warwickshire<br />

• Bordon-Whitehill, Hampshire<br />

• Weston Otmoor, Oxfordshire<br />

• Ford, West Sussex<br />

• Imerys China Clay Community,<br />

Cornwall<br />

• Rossington, South Yorkshire<br />

• Coltishall, <strong>No</strong>rfolk<br />

• Hanley Grange, Cambridgeshire<br />

• Marston Vale and New Marston,<br />

Bedfordshire<br />

• Elsenham, Essex<br />

• Rushcliffe, <strong>No</strong>ttinghamshire<br />

• Leeds City Region, Yorkshire.<br />

These are shown on Figure 1.<br />

Housing problems<br />

Between 1970 and 2000 housebuilding<br />

rates halved, while the<br />

number of households grew by 30%.<br />

The shortage of housing nationally<br />

is a barrier to economic success<br />

and a threat to services. Decreasing<br />

affordability affects the ability of key<br />

workers to live near their work. It<br />

encourages unsustainable transport<br />

systems.<br />

The government is still committed<br />

to the reuse of urban brownfield<br />

sites, town centre renewal and urban<br />

extensions. However, in some places<br />

the supply of previously used town<br />

centre sites is running low. There is<br />

also demand for public space, leisure<br />

facilities and jobs - not all land can go<br />

for housing.<br />

Potentially, new ecotowns could<br />

play a significant role in easing the<br />

affordability crisis, by ensuring that<br />

between 30 and 50% of the new<br />

housing is affordable. Nevertheless,<br />

the government believes that any new<br />

settlement must be of sufficient size<br />

to ensure a good level of services, jobs<br />

and community facilities, to create<br />

attractive and sustainable places to<br />

live.<br />

January 2009<br />

581<br />

Garrett Nagle<br />

The UK’s first generation of new<br />

towns, built in the 1950s and<br />

1960s, ranged in size from 20,000<br />

to 55,000 people and were not selfsufficient.<br />

They depended on large<br />

cities, London in particular, for<br />

employment. This led to large-scale<br />

commuting, and that had a negative<br />

impact on the physical environment.<br />

Whether smaller ecotowns could<br />

be economically self-sufficient<br />

is therefore questionable. The<br />

government also claim that there is<br />

a need for adequate and sustainable<br />

links to nearby larger towns and<br />

cities. This could be interpreted as a<br />

need for commuting to work.<br />

Ecotowns - guiding<br />

principles<br />

The new ecotowns draw on historic<br />

experience of garden cities. Ebenezer<br />

Howard’s vision of garden cities<br />

was of places which combined<br />

‘the health of the country with the<br />

comforts of the town’. Letchworth<br />

was the first garden city (1903),<br />

and was developed according to the<br />

principles of Howard’s design for<br />

new communities. This provided<br />

well-designed houses with gardens<br />

set in tree-lined avenues, and a<br />

pleasant and healthy environment<br />

in which to live, work and follow<br />

leisure pursuits.<br />

Key criteria<br />

Ecotowns are a major opportunity<br />

for local authorities, house builders,<br />

developers and registered social<br />

landlords to come together to build<br />

small new towns. Ecotowns should<br />

be well-designed, attractive places to<br />

live, with good services and facilities,<br />

and which connect well with the<br />

larger towns or cities close by. The<br />

essential requirements include:<br />

• Ecotowns must be new<br />

settlements, separate and distinct<br />

from existing towns, but well<br />

linked to them. They need to<br />

be additional to existing plans,<br />

with a minimum target of 5,000–<br />

10,000 homes.<br />

• The development as a whole<br />

should reach zero carbon<br />

standards, and each town<br />

should be an exemplar in at<br />

least one area of environmental<br />

sustainability.<br />

<strong>Geofile</strong> <strong>Online</strong> © Nelson Thornes 2009<br />

GeoFile Series 27 Issue 2<br />

Fig 581_01 Mac/eps/illustrator 11 s/s


January 2009 no.581 Ecotowns<br />

Figure 2: Weston Otmoor<br />

M40<br />

Brownfield<br />

MOD land<br />

Akeman Street<br />

M40<br />

A41<br />

Bicester<br />

Weston-onthe-Green<br />

Wendlebury<br />

Junction 99<br />

Weston-onthe-Green<br />

Junction 9<br />

A34<br />

M40<br />

Outer greenbelt<br />

boundary<br />

SSSI<br />

A34<br />

Potential area<br />

of development<br />

Railway line<br />

• Ecotown proposals should<br />

provide for a good range of<br />

facilities within the town - a<br />

secondary school, a mediumscale<br />

retail centre, good quality<br />

business space and leisure<br />

facilities.<br />

• Affordable housing should make<br />

up between 30 and 50% of the<br />

total through a wide range and<br />

distribution of tenures in mixed<br />

communities, with a particular<br />

emphasis on larger family<br />

homes.<br />

• A management body will help<br />

develop the town, provide<br />

support for people moving to the<br />

new community, for businesses<br />

and to co-ordinate delivery of<br />

services and manage facilities.<br />

Key design aspects<br />

1. Environment and carbon<br />

• Incorporate renewable energy<br />

systems such that not only<br />

homes, but schools, shops, offices<br />

and community facilities can<br />

reach zero carbon standards, with<br />

innovative town-scale generation<br />

of renewable energy. Zero carbon<br />

means no net carbon emissions<br />

from all energy uses, so the<br />

amount of energy taken from the<br />

national grid is less than or equal<br />

to the amount put back through<br />

renewable technologies.<br />

• Demonstrate excellence<br />

in one particular aspect of<br />

environmental sustainability<br />

- for example technological<br />

sustainability, such as more<br />

advanced renewable and energyefficient<br />

technologies, sustainable<br />

urban drainage/wastewater<br />

GeoFile Series 27 Issue 2<br />

Fig 581_02 treatment/grey Mac/eps/illustrator water recycling 11 s/s or<br />

NELSON waste management THORNES PUBLISHING systems.<br />

• Artist: Planned David in Russell a way Illustration which supports<br />

low carbon living and minimises<br />

carbon emissions from transport.<br />

• Incorporate high standards of<br />

water efficiency.<br />

• Incorporate environmentally<br />

sustainable approaches to<br />

managing waste, wastewater,<br />

drainage and flooding.<br />

• Integrate green space and<br />

features to enhance biodiversity.<br />

• Use construction methods and<br />

materials which have a low<br />

environmental impact and generate<br />

minimum construction waste.<br />

2. Design<br />

• A commitment to high standards<br />

of architecture and urban design.<br />

3. Transport<br />

• An area-wide travel plan should<br />

be provided for each ecotown<br />

scheme.<br />

• High-quality public transport<br />

links to reduce car dependency.<br />

• Minimising the need to travel<br />

by locating key public services<br />

together.<br />

• Management of demand through<br />

traffic control measures and<br />

giving priority to public transport<br />

and high occupancy vehicles.<br />

• Consideration of the impact on<br />

roads and congestion when siting<br />

the ecotown.<br />

4. Community<br />

• Community empowerment<br />

– giving local people a part in the<br />

decision-making process.<br />

• Encourage active communities<br />

by creating the conditions for<br />

community participation and<br />

involvement in civic activity.<br />

5. Jobs as well as homes<br />

• A clear economic strategy for the<br />

town.<br />

• Encourage working from home<br />

through live/work units or in<br />

local resource centres, supported<br />

by wi-fi (wireless) and other<br />

information technology (IT)<br />

networks.<br />

6. Health<br />

• Promote healthy and sustainable<br />

environments.<br />

• Offer choices for healthy living.<br />

7. Land use<br />

• Schemes should make use of<br />

suitable surplus public sector land<br />

or brownfield land.<br />

• Appropriate use of land in terms<br />

of quality and mitigation of<br />

impacts on biodiversity.<br />

• Sustainable locations, which<br />

relate well to existing networks of<br />

surrounding towns and villages.<br />

Ecotowns in Oxfordshire<br />

Two separate schemes to build<br />

major ecotowns near Kidlington<br />

and also at Weston-on-the-Green<br />

were submitted to the government.<br />

Cherwell <strong>District</strong> Council’s<br />

executive expressed concern about<br />

the Weston-on-the-Green scheme<br />

and the other ecotown proposal<br />

to build 5,000 homes at Shipton<br />

Quarry, a former cement works<br />

between Woodstock and Bicester.<br />

<strong>Geofile</strong> <strong>Online</strong> © Nelson Thornes 2009


January 2009 no.581 Ecotowns<br />

A statement from the council said:<br />

‘The two candidate locations offer some<br />

advantages, such as the reuse of previously<br />

developed land and the potential to<br />

improve public transport.<br />

But there are significant disadvantages,<br />

including adverse effects upon the Green<br />

Belt, effects upon rural roads, the impact<br />

on nature conservation sites, the loss of<br />

agricultural land and the impact on the<br />

regeneration of existing towns.’<br />

Weston Otmoor<br />

A settlement of 15,000 new ecohomes<br />

near Weston-on-the-Green<br />

had made it on to the government<br />

shortlist of 15 proposed schemes, 10<br />

of which are expected to be built.<br />

Stretching across two sides of the<br />

A34, from Weston-on-the-Green in<br />

the west to the M40 in the east, and<br />

from RAF Weston-on-the-Green in<br />

the north to the Oxford–Bicester<br />

railway line in the south, the site<br />

totals almost 2,000 acres (Figure 2).<br />

According to the Weston Front<br />

Action Group, ‘The village [Westonon-the-Green]<br />

is resolved to defeat<br />

the proposed plans for Weston<br />

Otmoor by the developers Parkridge,<br />

and the landowners who have sold<br />

options.’ The fact that part of the<br />

site is in the Green Belt and contains<br />

a site of special scientific interest<br />

has not put off the Government, nor<br />

the fact that the massive site being<br />

put forward is bisected by the trunk<br />

road.<br />

Parkridge, the developers, is partowned<br />

by the global American<br />

property company US Reit<br />

ProLogics. What it wants to do in<br />

Oxfordshire is build a settlement<br />

bigger than Bicester that would be<br />

home to 25,000 people, growing<br />

eventually to 35,000, with 10 schools<br />

(two secondary, eight primary) and<br />

15,000 properties, offering a range of<br />

dwelling types, including affordable<br />

homes.<br />

Parkridge already controls 1,600<br />

acres of the site through options to<br />

buy farmland from a consortium<br />

of landowners. It is now in talks<br />

to acquire the remaining 325 acres<br />

from the Ministry of Defence to<br />

buy an airstrip used as a parachute<br />

training drop zone.<br />

Ironically, the Housing Minister’s<br />

statement referred to Weston<br />

Otmoor as a scheme to build<br />

between 10,000 and 15,000 homes<br />

‘on brownfield land three miles<br />

Figure 3: Shipton<br />

Wootton<br />

Woodstock<br />

Long Hanborough<br />

Key<br />

A44<br />

Bladon<br />

Church Hanborough<br />

Settlements<br />

Rivers<br />

Swinford<br />

Bunkers<br />

Hill<br />

Cassington<br />

Tackley<br />

SHIPTON<br />

Oxford<br />

Airport<br />

Begbroke<br />

Yarton<br />

A40<br />

Wytham<br />

A44<br />

south of Bicester’. According believed it made a mockery of the<br />

to the chairman of Oxfordshire GeoFile Series 27 term Issue 2‘sustainable’ development. The<br />

CPRE (Campaign to Fig Protect 581_03 Rural Mac/eps/illustrator trust also 11 s/s complains that no attempt<br />

England), the vast bulk NELSON of the THORNES PUBLISHING has been made to consult it about<br />

site is greenfield. The Artist: airfield David is Russell Illustration the scheme.<br />

the only brownfield area and that<br />

makes up about 10% of the site. The In another irony, villagers at<br />

land east of the A34 is Green Belt. Weston-on-the-Green were angry<br />

Green Belt land makes up about a to learn that their local councillor<br />

third of the site. He also claimed was, in fact, one of the landowners<br />

that the so-called eco credentials involved with Parkridge. Parkridge<br />

of the new settlement represented has an option to buy about 200 acres<br />

a smokescreen for making housebuilding<br />

on green fields appear section of the site.<br />

of his farmland on the south-western<br />

more palatable. The CPRE estimates<br />

Weston Otmoor would lead to at Oxfordshire County Council leader<br />

least 7,500 extra car movements a Keith Mitchell says the ecotown<br />

day on the A34 and M40.<br />

would affect plans to revitalise<br />

Bicester, which could end up as<br />

Weston Otmoor’s neglected, ageing,<br />

‘ugly sister’, condemned to be in<br />

the economic shadow of the ‘bright,<br />

shiny’ newcomer. In addition, the<br />

planned development of 4,000<br />

homes on Oxford’s Green Belt near<br />

Blackbird Leys would also come<br />

under question as a result of the<br />

planned ecotown at Weston Otmoor.<br />

The local wildlife trust, BBOWT,<br />

fears the scheme would result in the<br />

loss of one of its most important<br />

nationally designated wildlife sites,<br />

threatening an ancient woodland<br />

site, a nature reserve and numerous<br />

protected and priority species. The<br />

proposed site includes Woodsides<br />

Meadow Nature Reserve and other<br />

meadows owned and managed by<br />

BBOWT. The grassland habitats<br />

found at this site are extremely<br />

rare, supporting important species,<br />

including orchids, snipe and curlew.<br />

BBOWT’s conservation officer<br />

Thrupp<br />

Wolvercote<br />

Roads<br />

Railways<br />

Kidlington<br />

A4260<br />

Kirtlington<br />

Bletchingdon<br />

Hampton<br />

Poyle<br />

A34<br />

O X F O R D<br />

Islip<br />

Woodeaton<br />

Marston<br />

A40<br />

Shipton cement works<br />

However, Parkridge has pledged to<br />

revitalise the whole of Oxfordshire’s<br />

public transport system, with offers<br />

of massive investment that simply<br />

cannot be ignored. Most striking<br />

<strong>Geofile</strong> <strong>Online</strong> © Nelson Thornes 2009


January 2009 no.581 Ecotowns<br />

is the developer’s offer to fund the<br />

long awaited East–West Rail Link to<br />

Milton Keynes, which is estimated<br />

to cost £190m.<br />

Labour’s Housing Minister at the<br />

time, Caroline Flint, claimed that<br />

a key and indeed fundamental<br />

component of the scheme is the<br />

delivery of the East–West Rail Link.<br />

A new station will be built at Weston<br />

Otmoor. Up to five trains per hour<br />

in each direction (to Oxford in six<br />

minutes) will be provided. A chord<br />

line to Bicester will mean a one hour<br />

journey time to London.<br />

Residents would be provided with<br />

free tram and bus services around<br />

the town and into Oxford, with<br />

developers also proposing a large<br />

park-and-ride that will ‘take car traffic<br />

away from the motorway junction and<br />

will provide a quicker, more direct<br />

alternative for car commuters to<br />

Oxford’.<br />

Shipton Quarry<br />

Plans were also submitted to create an<br />

ecotown in a disused quarry north of<br />

Kidlington (Figure 3). The scheme<br />

planned to create at least 5,000 homes<br />

in a self-sustained community at<br />

Shipton Quarry. It was one of only<br />

about 30 schemes to have been<br />

submitted to the Government.<br />

Kilbride Properties were hopeful<br />

of meeting conditions set out in a<br />

Government prospectus for new<br />

settlements required ‘to achieve<br />

zero carbon development and more<br />

sustainable living’.<br />

The Shipton Quarry scheme shows<br />

schools, shops, sports facilities,<br />

businesses, a new rail station, a parkand-ride<br />

site, marina and nature<br />

reserve. Kilbride believes a scheme to<br />

transform the former cement works<br />

into a thriving community is in tune<br />

with government calls for sites with<br />

‘separate and distinct identity but<br />

good links to surrounding towns and<br />

cities in terms of jobs, transport and<br />

services’.<br />

the Oxfordshire campaign manager<br />

for the Campaign to Protect Rural<br />

England expressed grave concerns<br />

about Shipton Quarry as a site.<br />

He stated that the greatest problem<br />

was traffic. The surrounding roads are<br />

already clogged. Having thousands of<br />

people travelling to and from there,<br />

with a large park-and-ride, would<br />

make the situation far worse. There is<br />

no infrastructure for it.<br />

The Cambridge Challenge<br />

Cambridge’s hi-tech industry has<br />

had a major economic impact for the<br />

region and the national economy,<br />

but it has resulted also in a shortage<br />

of housing and soaring house prices.<br />

The lack of housing in the area is a<br />

major inhibitor to further economic<br />

development, and about 50,000 new<br />

homes are planned to be built there<br />

by 2020.<br />

The ‘Cambridge Challenge’ is a pilot<br />

scheme to develop and manage new<br />

affordable homes for three of the<br />

major growth sites in Cambridge.<br />

The three sites will provide a total<br />

of 16,000 homes by 2021, of which<br />

around 6,000 (nearly 40%) will be<br />

affordable. One of these sites is the<br />

new settlement of <strong>No</strong>rthstowe.<br />

<strong>No</strong>rthstowe is five miles north-west<br />

of Cambridge, on the route of the<br />

new Cambridgeshire Guided Bus.<br />

It has been earmarked as a new<br />

community of 9,500 homes on the<br />

former RAF Oakington barracks<br />

and airfield, and is intended to be a<br />

flagship of sustainability in the use<br />

of renewable energy sources, the<br />

minimisation of carbon emissions and<br />

the implementation of environmental<br />

best practice on waste and water<br />

management.<br />

<strong>No</strong>rthstowe is intended to include:<br />

• a secondary school, six primary<br />

schools and a civic hub including<br />

community health and cultural<br />

facilities;<br />

• a local business district providing<br />

5,000 jobs;<br />

• leisure facilities; and<br />

• shopping facilities suitable for a<br />

small town.<br />

<strong>No</strong>rthstowe is looking to achieve<br />

up to 50 per cent reductions in<br />

energy and mains water use by using<br />

approaches such as:<br />

• microgeneration, photovoltaic<br />

panels;<br />

• solar water heating (can supply up<br />

to 50 per cent hot water); and<br />

• design for reduced energy and<br />

water use.<br />

Conclusion<br />

On paper, ecotowns look<br />

environmentally friendly. However,<br />

whether they are economically viable,<br />

and therefore environmentally viable,<br />

is a big question. The case studies<br />

in this unit illustrate some of the<br />

issues connected to ecotowns. The<br />

ecotown concept reignites some of<br />

the concerns regarding new towns<br />

- would they work, where should<br />

they be located, and what impacts<br />

will they have On the one hand,<br />

the range of technological measures<br />

designed to minimise environmental<br />

impact is impressive. On the other<br />

hand, the term ‘ecotown’ may just be<br />

a label to appease the environmentally<br />

minded and hide the fact that these<br />

places are too small for self-sustaining<br />

economic growth, and will depend<br />

on commuting to large urban areas<br />

nearby, thus merely exacerbating<br />

current environmental issues.<br />

Websites<br />

http://www.communities.gov.<br />

uk/documents/housing/pdf/<br />

livinggreenerfuture, for the<br />

background on the 15 sites to have<br />

made the short-list.<br />

http://www.communities.gov.uk/news/<br />

corporate/newecotownscould, for<br />

ecotowns and climate change.<br />

A recent report by planning<br />

inspectors on housing numbers<br />

in the South East expressed little<br />

enthusiasm for thousands of homes at<br />

Shipton Quarry, arguing that it would<br />

exacerbate existing traffic problems.<br />

Shipton is an interesting location. It is<br />

a large site that would go some way to<br />

easing the housing shortage. However,<br />

F o c u s<br />

Q u e s t i o n s<br />

1. Describe the distribution of ecotowns as shown on Figure 1.<br />

2. Outline the advantages and disadvantages of ecotowns.<br />

3. Decide whether ecotowns are a positive policy or not, and justify your<br />

decision.<br />

<strong>Geofile</strong> <strong>Online</strong> © Nelson Thornes 2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!