Ohio Tax - Manufacturers' Education Council
Ohio Tax - Manufacturers' Education Council
Ohio Tax - Manufacturers' Education Council
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2011 <strong>Ohio</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> Conference<br />
<strong>Ohio</strong> Commercial Activity <strong>Tax</strong> (CAT) Audit Experiences<br />
Appendix A<br />
Example JV-3. The Department was conducting an audit of DEF and identified the joint venture<br />
(LLC) between DEF and XYZ. DEF filed as part of a combined taxpayer group and XYZ filed as<br />
part of a 50% consolidated elected group. Upon audit, the Department determined that XYZ<br />
would be required to pick up 100% of LLC’s taxable gross receipts because it constructively<br />
owns 50% of LLC.<br />
Diagram JV-3.<br />
DEF<br />
XYZ<br />
100% 100%<br />
50%<br />
A<br />
B<br />
49%<br />
1%<br />
LLC<br />
Multiple Groups<br />
Example MG-1. <strong>Tax</strong>payer initially filed three separate consolidated elected groups at 80%:<br />
Group 1: J, E, M and T (black shaded)<br />
Group 2: S and O (diagonal lines)<br />
Group 3: Y, Z and A (grey shaded)<br />
Under review, the Department determined that E constructively owned 100% of S and O and as a<br />
result the Department included S and O in the consolidated elected group of J, E, M and T.<br />
Further, the Department determined that a taxpayer cannot have more than one consolidated<br />
elected group within the same corporate structure. As a result, we eliminated the consolidated<br />
group of Y, Z and A. Y, Z and A was forced into a combined return with J, their common owner.<br />
(Note: J’s gross receipts would be reported with the consolidated elected group and not the<br />
combined group.) Based on the changes, S and O’s $1,000,000 exclusion was eliminated and the<br />
inter-member exclusion between Y, Z and A was eliminated.<br />
5