Ohio Tax - Manufacturers' Education Council
Ohio Tax - Manufacturers' Education Council
Ohio Tax - Manufacturers' Education Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2011 <strong>Ohio</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> Conference<br />
<strong>Ohio</strong> Commercial Activity <strong>Tax</strong> (CAT) Audit Experiences<br />
Appendix A<br />
GROSS RECEIPTS<br />
1. Warranty allowance<br />
<strong>Tax</strong>payer received an allowance for handling warranty repairs for the manufacturer. The taxpayer<br />
accounted for the receipts in its warranty expense account. The Department determined that the<br />
receipts were taxable and picked up 100% of the allowance (no deduction for expenses).<br />
2. Co/op advertising<br />
<strong>Tax</strong>payer received cash from manufacturers for placing the manufacturer’s products in the<br />
taxpayer’s weekly advertisements. The taxpayer accounted for the receipts as offsets in its<br />
advertising expense account. The Department determined that the receipts were taxable and<br />
picked up all amounts received from the manufacturers (no deduction for expense).<br />
3. Recycling receipts<br />
<strong>Tax</strong>payer recycled the cardboard boxes that it received when purchasing products from its<br />
manufacturers/suppliers. The taxpayer accounted for the receipts received from the recycler as<br />
other income. The Department picked up the entire amount of recycling receipts.<br />
4. Pass-through of Freight<br />
The taxpayer sold and delivered stone to its customers charging separately for the stone and the<br />
delivery. The taxpayer hired third parties to deliver the stone. The taxpayer used the following<br />
accounting entries:<br />
Account Debit Credit<br />
Time of sale:<br />
A/R 105<br />
Sales 100<br />
A/P (Delivery) 5<br />
Payment from customer:<br />
Cash 105<br />
A/R 105<br />
Payment to delivery vendor:<br />
A/P (Deliver) 5<br />
Cash 5<br />
The taxpayer argued that the amount for freight was just a pass-through to the delivery vendor.<br />
The Department determined that the taxpayer did not have an agency relationship with either the<br />
7