Ohio Tax - Manufacturers' Education Council
Ohio Tax - Manufacturers' Education Council
Ohio Tax - Manufacturers' Education Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
32. Oil Exchanges<br />
2011 <strong>Ohio</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> Conference<br />
<strong>Ohio</strong> Commercial Activity <strong>Tax</strong> (CAT) Audit Experiences<br />
Appendix A<br />
The taxpayer (an oil company) exchanges oil/gas it owns in Columbus, <strong>Ohio</strong> for oil/gas another<br />
oil company owns in Van Wert, <strong>Ohio</strong>. The taxpayer then sells the oil/gas it now owns in Van<br />
Wert, <strong>Ohio</strong> to a customer located in Van Wert. The taxpayer included the gross receipts from its<br />
sale of the oil/gas to its customer in Van Wert.. The Department determined that the taxpayer also<br />
should have included as taxable gross receipts the amount it exchanged with the other oil<br />
company. Further, the other oil company would also need to include as taxable gross receipts the<br />
amount it exchanged with the taxpayer.<br />
33. Agency<br />
The taxpayer argued that the relationship it had with independent contractors the taxpayer<br />
contracted with to distribute tangible personal property was an agency relationship. The taxpayer<br />
marked up the tangible personal property it purchased by 8% when selling the product to the<br />
independent contractors. As a result, the taxpayer argued that only the 8% mark up was subject to<br />
CAT. The Department determined that an agency relationship was not created by the taxpayer<br />
and the independent contractors and the entire amount the taxpayer received from the independent<br />
contractors was subject to CAT.<br />
34. R.C. 5751.013 gross receipts<br />
The taxpayer admitted to having the vendor ship widgets to an unoccupied address in Indiana so<br />
the vendor could avoid CAT on the gross receipts. The widgets actually never came to rest in<br />
Indiana, but instead were transported to <strong>Ohio</strong>. R.C. 5751.013 provides that the Department may<br />
assess CAT against any taxpayer who transfers tangible personal property into this state for the<br />
person's own use within one year after the person receives the property outside this state. The<br />
Department must prove that the person received the property outside the state to avoid in whole<br />
or in part the CAT.<br />
SITUSING<br />
35. Management fees for managing leases<br />
<strong>Tax</strong>payer provides lease management services for banks who lease property to bank customers.<br />
The taxpayer manages the billing, mailing, cash receipt, etc for the bank. The Department<br />
determined that the services could be sitused based on where the leased property is located/used,<br />
the banks’ headquarters or some other reasonable, consistent and uniform method.<br />
36. Airplane lease<br />
The taxpayer owns two single member LLCs that own one airplane each. The two planes are<br />
leased/rented to a third party (who has the pilots), who in turn, provides flights for the taxpayer.<br />
13