Logistics Management - June 2010
Logistics Management - June 2010
Logistics Management - June 2010
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
lurs the line<br />
logistics applications in a seamless manner.<br />
“Customers are looking for tightly-integrated systems,”<br />
says Shepherd, who sees order management-to-fulfillment;<br />
warehousing-to-financials; distribution planning-to-manufacturing;<br />
and procurement-to-warehousing as the most<br />
critical ties that shippers are looking to make with their<br />
ERP systems.<br />
The economy is also driving more shippers to turn to their<br />
ERPs for supply chain software. “<strong>Logistics</strong> departments use<br />
to be able to pick whichever products they wanted to address<br />
their needs,” says Shepherd. “Now, the corporate IT department<br />
is more likely to be in charge of that selection process,<br />
and that group is more likely to select an ERP vendor to fulfill<br />
the need.”<br />
Trends coming into focus<br />
The fact that ERPs are making significant inroads in the<br />
supply chain space is no surprise to the analysts interviewed<br />
for this story. In fact, all four saw the trend taking hold more<br />
than five years ago and further cemented in 2005 when Oracle<br />
purchased G-Log, a privately-held firm that developed GC3<br />
(Global Command and Control Center), a transport management<br />
and freight optimization system that’s since been<br />
replaced by Oracle Transportation <strong>Management</strong> (OTM).<br />
“Here’s an ERP player that acquired a TMS provider, and<br />
that continues to win deals as a best-of-breed TMS provider,”<br />
says Adrian Gonzalez, director of Dedham, Mass.-based ARC<br />
Advisory’s <strong>Logistics</strong> Executive Council. “Oracle can also win<br />
deals by folding the otherwise standalone TMS as part of its<br />
own ERP system.”<br />
Oracle’s gutsy move into the best-of-breed supply chain<br />
software space was soon followed by other such acquisitions,<br />
and later by the internal development of WMS and<br />
TMS software by leading ERP providers. But even as the<br />
line between ERPs and supply chain software continues to<br />
blur, there are some key issues that shippers need to consider<br />
before deciding which route to take.<br />
“It really doesn’t matter where the solution is coming from;<br />
there are still integration challenges to deal with, business<br />
processes to understand and solutions to configure,” Gonzalez<br />
points out. “It doesn’t matter whether you’re using an ERP or<br />
a best-of-breed system, those challenges will still be there.”<br />
Gonzalez says shippers should also be aware that the<br />
age-old arguments regarding standardization and concerns<br />
about a single technology platform being easier to install and<br />
integrate are no longer valid. Thanks to open standards and<br />
service-oriented architecture (SOA), nearly all software solutions<br />
can be more readily “hooked into” existing systems.<br />
“There’s definitely some parity now in terms of integration,<br />
whether you’re taking the ERP or best-of-breed<br />
route,” says Gonzalez. “At this point, neither choice is easier<br />
or more difficult than the other.”<br />
What shippers should be thinking about is whether or not<br />
an all-encompassing ERP provider can offer up the depth of<br />
If purchasing/upgrading ERP software<br />
during the next 12 months, will your<br />
ERP application contain a...<br />
56%<br />
49%<br />
45%<br />
52%<br />
WMS module<br />
Not<br />
asked<br />
in 2007<br />
24%<br />
TMS module<br />
2007 2008 2009 <strong>2010</strong><br />
Source: <strong>Logistics</strong> <strong>Management</strong>’s <strong>2010</strong> Software User Survey<br />
34%<br />
27%<br />
<strong>June</strong> <strong>2010</strong> | WWW.LOGISTICSMGMT.COM <strong>Logistics</strong> <strong>Management</strong> 39