17.01.2015 Views

WMJ 05 2011 - World Medical Association

WMJ 05 2011 - World Medical Association

WMJ 05 2011 - World Medical Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Editorial<br />

Window of Hope<br />

This editorial is being written just days before<br />

the UN summit on Non-Communicable<br />

Diseases (NCDs), which marks only the<br />

second time in history that the UN General<br />

Assembly has set aside significant time to<br />

discuss a health issue. Preparations have<br />

been underway for more than a year and the<br />

expectations are high.<br />

Non-Communicable diseases now represent<br />

the greatest proportion of the global burden<br />

of disease. The <strong>World</strong> Health Organisation,<br />

in it approach to NCDs, has focused<br />

its attention on four disease groups: heart<br />

disease, lung disease, cancer and diabetes.<br />

Without doubt, these are crucial problems<br />

worldwide, but there is much more to it.<br />

Mental health, muscular-skeletal diseases, Otmar Kloiber<br />

accident and trauma are just a few examples<br />

of non-communicable diseases that are tremendously important but<br />

do not enjoy the same level of visibility within the WHO – including<br />

in its planning for the NCD summit. Some, such as mental<br />

health, have been pushed into the Summit agenda by governments,<br />

while others are largely being ignored. This piece-meal approach to<br />

NCDs resurrects critical concerns about a flawed approach to global<br />

health that we believed we had begun to move past.<br />

In the post-Alma Ata period, the work of international organisations,<br />

including WHO, was marked by donor-driven vertical programs<br />

tackling specific diseases like HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, river<br />

blindness and malaria. These programs were all well-meaning humanitarian<br />

efforts, driven by immediate, visible needs that health<br />

funders and the public found very compelling. Yet, as physicians<br />

concerned for the full health of our patients, we criticized the imbalanced<br />

prioritization of these discrete programs over other programs<br />

that would address the overall health needs in the affected regions<br />

and contribute to the build-up of comprehensive health care systems.<br />

We were encouraged by a sobering series of analyses and reports –<br />

most importantly, the <strong>World</strong> Health Reports on Human Resources<br />

for Health in 2006 and on Primary Care 2008, and a brilliant analysis<br />

on the Social Determinants of Health in 2009 – in which the<br />

WHO recognised the failures inherent in<br />

the silo-based paradigm and recommended<br />

an epochal shift to a more systematic, primary<br />

care-based approach to health. This<br />

new paradigm would focus on personcentred<br />

care and people-centred public<br />

health, building and strengthening health<br />

systems around a solid core of primary care.<br />

The WMA welcomed and supported this<br />

new approach. Thus, we are concerned and<br />

disappointed by the current NCD strategy,<br />

which appears be taking us back down the<br />

road of vertical programs and away from<br />

the holistic approach to human health that<br />

we believed that WHO was committed to<br />

pursuing. Certainly, a strong focus on heart<br />

disease, lung disease, cancer and diabetes is<br />

warranted. These are massive health problems<br />

that affect large populations and consume enormous amounts<br />

of health resources. And many of their causes are preventable<br />

through lifestyle changes, such as smoking cessation, reduction of<br />

alcohol consumption, increased physical activity, and better nutrition.<br />

However, preventive care can and should be addressed in the<br />

context of quality health systems, alongside the full complement of<br />

primary, secondary, and tertiary care. Building such comprehensive<br />

systems will simply not be achievable if funding is disproportionately<br />

funnelled into disease-specific programs. We have learned this<br />

lesson once already.<br />

During the upcoming Summit, the national leaders in New York<br />

have a chance to turn the focus back toward improved investment<br />

in health and in health care across the board – not only where there<br />

are donor-driven programs, but at the national level in each country.<br />

They can choose to apply the available resources toward the goal of<br />

building real health systems that take in account the social determinants<br />

of health and provide effective, accessible, quality health care<br />

for all persons. It is our sincere hope that they will recognize and<br />

seize the opportunity to do exactly that.<br />

Dr. Otmar Kloiber,<br />

Secretary General WMA<br />

161

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!