17.01.2015 Views

WMJ 05 2011 - World Medical Association

WMJ 05 2011 - World Medical Association

WMJ 05 2011 - World Medical Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Social Disparities<br />

NORWAY<br />

must ensure patient safety and not compromise<br />

the existing recognition and registration<br />

procedures and the necessary public<br />

safeguards.<br />

Giving the high relevance of the Professional<br />

Qualifications Directive, the CPME<br />

will hold a pre-conference on the subject<br />

in Warsaw ahead of its board meeting and<br />

General Assembly on 26 November <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

The conference will take place on 25 November<br />

and will gather the European<br />

<strong>Medical</strong> profession, representatives from<br />

the European Commission, the European<br />

Parliament and the Polish EU Presidency.<br />

More information is to be found on the<br />

CPME web-site: www.cpme.eu ; also, please<br />

do not hesitate to contact Birgit Beger<br />

(birgit.beger@cpme.eu).<br />

Dr. Konstanty Radziwill, CPME President<br />

Birgit Beger,CPME Secretary General<br />

Social Disparities in Health and the Physician’s Role: A Call for<br />

Clarifying the Professional Ethical Code<br />

Berit Bringedal Kristine Bærøe Eli Feiring<br />

In this article, the authors address the ethics<br />

of providing individual healthcare fairly<br />

in populations with a social gradient in the<br />

distribution of health. They expose a tension<br />

within the ethical recommendations of<br />

the <strong>World</strong> <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Association</strong> (WMA):<br />

The Physician’s Oath in the Declaration of<br />

Geneva states that socioeconomic factors<br />

should never come between the patient and<br />

the physician, while the WMA Statement<br />

on Inequality in Health emphasizes that<br />

the physician should contribute to a reduction<br />

in the unacceptable social inequality in<br />

health – an inequality that clearly correlates<br />

with social and economic factors. Empirical<br />

research indicates that this tension is not of<br />

theoretical interest only; it may have practical<br />

implications as well, in terms of a risk<br />

of reproducing and/or enhancing health<br />

inequalities in clinical practice. Empirical<br />

studies confirm that healthcare to some<br />

extent favors the advantaged. This gives no<br />

reason to assume the recommendation in<br />

the Oath is violated as such. However, the<br />

Oath’s recommendation of not taking nonmedical<br />

factors into account can explain an<br />

inaccurate understanding and awareness of<br />

the fair role of social and cultural factors in<br />

patient treatment. By clarifying the positive<br />

role of socioeconomic and cultural factors in<br />

healthcare and stating this explicitly in physicians’<br />

ethical guidelines, these factors may<br />

warrant attention both through medical education<br />

and in clinical practice. The authors<br />

conclude by suggesting a reformulation of<br />

the Physician’s Oath that may guide more<br />

effective and fair care of the disadvantaged<br />

and help reduce health inequities produced<br />

at the point of care.<br />

Introduction<br />

The <strong>World</strong> <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Association</strong> (WMA)<br />

International Code of <strong>Medical</strong> Ethics states<br />

that “(A) physician shall not allow his/her<br />

judgments to be influenced by personal<br />

profit or unfair discrimination”. At the same<br />

196

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!