Rufo v. OJ Simpson - Right Of Publicity
Rufo v. OJ Simpson - Right Of Publicity
Rufo v. OJ Simpson - Right Of Publicity
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Page 6<br />
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -End Footnotes- - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />
HEARSAY ISSUES REGARDING VARIOUS STATEMENTS BY NICOLE<br />
<strong>Simpson</strong> contends the trial court erred in admitting evidence of<br />
statements made by Nicole, which <strong>Simpson</strong> contends were inadmissible<br />
hearsay or irrelevant. n3 These may be divided into three categories:<br />
(1) statements made to police or security officers at the times of the<br />
1984 and 1989 incidents discussed in the previous section, (2)<br />
statements made by telephone to a battered women's shelter on June 7,<br />
1994, and (3) statements made in writing in Nicole's diary and a letter<br />
to <strong>Simpson</strong>.<br />
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Footnotes- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />
n3 "(a) 'Hearsay evidence' is evidence of a statement that was made<br />
other than by a witness while testifying at the hearing and that is<br />
offered to prove the truth of the matter stated. [P] (b) Except as<br />
provided by law, hearsay evidence is inadmissible. [P] (c) This section<br />
shall be known and may be cited as the hearsay rule." (Evid. Code, @<br />
1200.)<br />
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -End Footnotes- - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />
Factual Background<br />
Statements at the Times of the Prior Incidents<br />
Concerning the 1984 incident in which <strong>Simpson</strong> struck Nicole's<br />
automobile with a baseball bat, Mark Day testified that he was a<br />
security patrol officer who was called to the <strong>Simpson</strong> residence on<br />
Rockingham in response to a disturbance. As he approached the front<br />
door Nicole came running across the front yard. She was very upset. She<br />
stated that "he" (<strong>Simpson</strong>) had lost his temper and that she was afraid.<br />
Day then observed the damage to the Mercedes and spoke to <strong>Simpson</strong> who<br />
admitted he had lost his temper.<br />
Concerning the 1989 incident, Los Angeles Police Detective John<br />
Edwards went to the Rockingham residence in response to a 911 call.<br />
When Edwards buzzed at the gate of the residence, he observed Nicole,<br />
wearing only a bra and sweat pants, run from the bushes across the<br />
driveway to a control box and collapse onto it. She appeared to push on<br />
a button repeatedly [*588] while yelling to Edwards, "he's going to<br />
kill me, he's going to kill me." She then ran to the gate and when it<br />
opened she "came flying through that open area of the gate, ran<br />
directly to [Edwards] and collapsed onto [Edwards]." She was cold, wet,<br />
and shivering. "She was crying, she was hysterical, and appeared to be<br />
very frightened and exhausted." She repeated "he's going to kill me,<br />
he's going to kill me," and when Edwards inquired, who, she said O.J.<br />
<strong>Simpson</strong>. Edwards observed multiple injuries on her forehead, eye,<br />
cheek, lips, and neck and asked what happened. Nicole answered "O.J.<br />
had hit her, kicked her, slapped her, and pulled her hair."<br />
Telephone Call to Battered Women's Shelter<br />
After considering <strong>Simpson</strong>'s motion to exclude the following evidence<br />
entirely, the court admitted it for the limited purpose of showing<br />
Nicole's state of mind.