20.01.2015 Views

NYS Public Health Legal Manual: A Guide for Judges, Attorneys ...

NYS Public Health Legal Manual: A Guide for Judges, Attorneys ...

NYS Public Health Legal Manual: A Guide for Judges, Attorneys ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

§ 1.73 NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC HEALTH LEGAL MANUAL<br />

restrictions that background principles of the State’s law of property and<br />

nuisance already place upon land ownership.” Lucas v. South Carolina<br />

Coastal Council, supra, 505 U.S. at 1029. All property is held under the<br />

implied obligation that the owner’s use of it is not injurious to the community.<br />

Keystone Bituminous Coal Association v. DeBenedictis, 480 U.S.<br />

470, 491-92 (1987). The state is not required to provide compensation <strong>for</strong><br />

the seizure of property “to abate nuisances that affect the public generally,”<br />

Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, supra, 505 U.S. at 1029,<br />

or “<strong>for</strong> the destruction of ‘real and personal property, in cases of actual<br />

necessity, to prevent the spreading of a fire’ or to <strong>for</strong>estall other grave<br />

threats to the lives and property of others.” Id. at n.16, citing Bowditch v.<br />

Boston, 101 U.S. 16, 18-19 (1880). As the Supreme Court has stated,<br />

“[S]ince no individual has a right to use his property so as to create a nuisance<br />

or otherwise harm others, the State has not taken anything when it<br />

asserts its power to enjoin the nuisance-like activity.” Keystone Bituminous<br />

Coal Association v. DeBenedictis, supra, 480 U.S. at 491, n.20. Cf.<br />

PHL § 1306(1) [“The expense of suppression or removal of a nuisance or<br />

conditions detrimental to health shall be paid by the owner or occupant of<br />

the premises . . . .”].<br />

Whether compensation is due in a public health emergency <strong>for</strong> the use<br />

of property that is not itself a hazard, such as commandeering property to<br />

shelter victims or to serve as a dispensary <strong>for</strong> medical treatment, may depend<br />

on the circumstances. Actual physical possession of property, even if<br />

temporary, can be considered a “taking,” Tahoe-Sierra Preservation<br />

Council v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, supra, 535 U.S. at 322, and<br />

since the property is itself not producing the “nuisance-like activity,” Keystone<br />

Bituminous Coal Association v. DeBenedictis, supra, 48 U.S. at<br />

491, there may be a right to compensation. See New York City Charter<br />

§ 560 [during “an epidemic or in the presence of great and imminent peril<br />

to the public health,” the City Board of <strong>Health</strong> “may take possession of<br />

any buildings in the city <strong>for</strong> temporary hospitals and shall pay a just compensation<br />

<strong>for</strong> any private property so taken”]. However, where such property<br />

is needed in responding to an emergency where no statute requires<br />

compensation, no compensation may be due. See In re Cheesebrough, 78<br />

N.Y. 232, 237 (1879) [“in cases of actual necessity, [including] the ravages<br />

of a pestilence . . . the private property of any individual may be law-<br />

42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!