Earn CEU credit Cathy Garrey, Connect with your - Health Care ...
Earn CEU credit Cathy Garrey, Connect with your - Health Care ...
Earn CEU credit Cathy Garrey, Connect with your - Health Care ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SEC Disclosure: Managing information at FDA-regulated companies. ...continued from page 53<br />
information that a company may need to<br />
disclose, particularly if the company has<br />
previously disclosed information regarding<br />
a clinical investigation or trial. Significant<br />
changes or results from investigations previously<br />
discussed <strong>with</strong> the public will likely<br />
warrant prompt and accurate disclosure.<br />
Again, in order to accomplish this efficiently,<br />
the creation and implementation of an SOP<br />
regarding clinical investigation developments<br />
may be beneficial.<br />
For each ongoing clinical investigation,<br />
create a distribution list which includes at<br />
least one member from the regulatory affairs<br />
department, the General Counsel’s office and<br />
the corporate communications or investor<br />
relations department. Use this distribution list<br />
to promptly communicate any new and significant<br />
developments so that people outside<br />
the clinical investigation group are not only<br />
informed of the new information, but can<br />
make an assessment regarding whether or not<br />
disclosure is necessary. Consider including<br />
as part of this SOP a procedure for calling<br />
meetings among the distribution list on short<br />
notice, thus allowing for discussion about the<br />
new information across various segments of<br />
the company.<br />
SEC filings<br />
Creating SOPs for the drafting, review, and<br />
filing of any SEC filings is also an important<br />
component for disclosure policies and<br />
procedures. For each periodic filing on Form<br />
10-K or 10-Q, implement an SOP that not<br />
only sets forth the timeline for drafting the<br />
filing, but also includes the necessary sign-offs<br />
for each section. Of particular importance for<br />
many FDA-regulated companies, including<br />
medical device developers and manufacturers,<br />
is a section appearing in each periodic<br />
report called management’s discussion and<br />
analysis of financial conditions and results of<br />
operations (MD&A). This section requires<br />
management to discuss information that may<br />
cause the current financial condition to not<br />
be indicative of future financial condition.<br />
For medical device companies, this may<br />
include indications from the FDA regarding<br />
status of a pending application or events<br />
from a clinical investigation. Consequently,<br />
an SOP regarding the drafting and review of<br />
periodic filings needs to allow for review by<br />
members of the regulatory affairs and clinical<br />
investigation divisions to ensure that information<br />
pertinent to those divisions is included<br />
and accurately described.<br />
Similarly, SOPs for Forms 8-K and registration<br />
statements can be drafted to allow for<br />
review by relevant divisions at the company.<br />
These SOPs, however, may need to be streamlined<br />
because often time is of the essence<br />
when filing a disclosure on Form 8-K or a<br />
registration statement for an equity offering.<br />
In August 2004, revisions for the filing of<br />
Forms 8-K became effective, requiring that<br />
companies file disclosures regarding specified<br />
information <strong>with</strong>in four business days. And,<br />
although registration statements can integrate<br />
prior filings, a company must still ensure that<br />
it describes “any and all material changes in<br />
the registrant’s affairs” that were not previously<br />
reported on a Form 10-Q or 8-K.<br />
Regulation Fair Disclosure<br />
Finally, because many FDA regulated companies<br />
are frequently communicating <strong>with</strong><br />
the investing public, particularly institutional<br />
investors, developing an SOP that covers<br />
Regulation Fair Disclosure (Reg FD) may<br />
be useful. Under Reg FD, companies are<br />
prohibited from selectively disclosing material<br />
nonpublic information to certain parties,<br />
such as securities market professionals, institutional<br />
investors, and investment companies.<br />
If material nonpublic information is disclosed<br />
to a select party, Reg FD requires that the<br />
information be simultaneously disclosed to<br />
the public or if the disclosure is inadvertent,<br />
the information must be disclosed to the<br />
public as soon as practicable after discovering<br />
the disclosure. SOPs regarding communications<br />
<strong>with</strong> the investment community can be<br />
a valuable way to prevent running afoul of<br />
Reg FD. For example, an SOP to assist <strong>with</strong><br />
Reg FD compliance might require that:<br />
n All staff who interact <strong>with</strong> the investment<br />
community complete regular training<br />
about FD.<br />
n All communication <strong>with</strong> investors be<br />
logged into a central system, which includes<br />
the date of the communication and<br />
a description of the information provided<br />
to the investor.<br />
n All “road show” materials be reviewed and<br />
approved by specified personnel.<br />
Conclusion<br />
SEC disclosure requirements may not always<br />
be given the necessary attention at developing<br />
public companies that are regulated by the<br />
FDA. However, the cooperation between the<br />
FDA and the SEC, as well as the risk of civil<br />
suits, suggest that FDA-regulated companies<br />
need to take care when disclosing information<br />
to the investing public because the potential<br />
damage from making inaccurate disclosures<br />
can be significant. Using SOPs, a familiar<br />
format of control at FDA-regulated companies,<br />
is one possible way to make disclosure<br />
policies and procedures functional for these<br />
dynamic companies. n<br />
1 See “SEC and FDA Take Steps to Enhance Inter-Agency Cooperation,”<br />
SEC Press Rel. 2004-13 (Feb. 5, 2004) and “FDA and SEC Work to<br />
Enhance Public’s Protection from False and Misleading Statements,”<br />
P04-15 (Feb. 5, 2004).<br />
2 See SEC v. Shashikant C. Shah, Lit. Rel. No. 20034 (March 8, 2007)<br />
(“The staff acknowledges the assistance and cooperation of . . . the FDA<br />
in the investigation of this matter”).<br />
3 See Backmun v. Polaroid Corp., 910 F. 2d 10, 13 (1st Cir. 1990) (en<br />
banc).<br />
<strong>Health</strong> <strong>Care</strong> Compliance Association • 888-580-8373 • www.hcca-info.org<br />
57<br />
October 2008