Salmon Spawning Ground Surveys, 1989-92 Project F-73-R-15

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 14. Numbers of spring chinook salmon redds counted in Clearwater River drainage natural trend areas, 1966-1992. FIVE SELWAY BEAR RUNNING WHITECAP MOOSE YEAR YEAR RIVER CREEK CREEK CREEK CREEK TOTALS AVERAGE 1992 18 9 0 0 2 29 1991 12 8 0 1 2 23 1990 13 6 1 2 2 24 1989 5 7 0 3 3 18 38 1988 38 10 2 5 7 62 1987 36 9 4 6 8 63 1986 30 10 NC 7 9 56 1985 15 NC NC NC NC 15 1984 30 6 NC 6 7 49 44 1983 26 8 NC 4 6 44 1982 38 8 NC 3 5 54 1981 47 8 NC 4 6 65 1980 40 7 1 3 4 55 1979 21 3 0 2 4 30 90 1978 125 13 6 NC 17 161 1977 97 18 2 1 23 141 1976 58 14 3 4 15 94 1975 21 5 NC 1 4 31 1974 66 10 4 2 15 97 160 1973 261 26 21 7 32 347 1972 175 25 11 8 13 232 1971 55 14 8 NC NC 77 1970 65 19 10 4 NC 98 1969 57 6 21 NC NC 84 63 1968 16 7 4 NC NC 27 1967 22 7 NC NC NC 29 1966 36 8 NC NC NC 44 23
Table 15. Numbers of spring chinook salmon redds counted in Clearwater River drainage hatcheryinfluenced trend areas, 1967-1992. LOCHSA RIVER SOUTH FORK CLEARWATER CROOKED BRUSHY DRAINAGE NEWSOME CROOKED RED AMERICAN DRAINAGE RIVER DRAINAGE YEAR FORK FORK TOTAL FIVE YR. CREEK RIVER RIVER RIVER TOTAL FIVE YR. TOTAL FIVE YR. 1992 22 1 23 0 NC 46 1 47 70 1991 9 1 10 0 NC 5 1 6 16 1990 16 4 20 0 10 66 2 78 98 1989 8 9 17 27 4 3 45 1 53 78 70 105 1988 42 9 51 20 27 51 12 110 161 1987 28 10 38 15 17 81 31 144 182 1986 30 11 41 6 9 82 14 111 152 1985 47 14 61 7 10 92 23 132 193 1984 28 9 37 41 1 22 65 NC 88 111 125 152 1983 7 6 13 7 12 85 9 113 126 1982 34 17 51 5 4 82 21 112 163 1981 27 25 52 7 9 47 12 75 127 1980 16 10 26 7 6 31 7 51 77 1979 6 12 18 45 9 4 20 - 33 69 51 114 1978 37 25 62 22 17 52 - 91 153 1977 51 15 66 26 21 50 - 97 163 1976 33 13 46 5 13 15 - 33 79 1975 22 4 26 6 33 20 - 59 85 1974 22 6 28 45 - 5 12 - 17 22 45 66 1973 60 - 60 - - - - 0 60 1972 32 31 63 - - - - 0 63 1971 1 - 1 - - - - 0 1 1970 34 - 34 - - - - 0 34 1969 112 - 112 32 - - - - 0 0 112 32 1968 15 - 15 - - - - 0 15 1967 0 - 0 - - - - 0 0 24
Page 1 and 2: Salmon Spawning Ground Surveys, 198
Page 3 and 4: LIST OF TABLES (Cont.) Page Table 5
Page 5 and 6: LIST OF FIGURES (Cont.) Page Figure
Page 7 and 8: INTRODUCTION Each year chinook Onco
Page 9 and 10: information is used to determine th
Page 11 and 12: a critically depressed level from 1
Page 13 and 14: salmon passing the site as it was n
Page 15 and 16: Table 1. Numbers of spring chinook
Page 17 and 18: Table 3. Numbers of summer chinook
Page 19 and 20: Table 5. Numbers of adult and jack
Page 21 and 22: Table 7. Numbers of chinook salmon
Page 23 and 24: Table 9. Counts of spring chinook s
Page 25 and 26: Table 11. Comparison of aerial and
Page 27: Table 13. Comparison of aerial and
Page 31 and 32: Table 17. Numbers of spring chinook
Page 33 and 34: Figure 2. Numbers of spring chinook
Page 35 and 36: Figure 4. Numbers of spring chinook
Page 37 and 38: APPENDICES 32
Page 39 and 40: 1983-92 Aerial counts over two tran
Page 41 and 42: 1979 Aerial count from the mouth of
Page 43 and 44: downstream of the ranch upstream to
Page 45 and 46: Lower East Fork Salmon River 1957-5
Page 47 and 48: Moose Creek Transact For the years
Page 61 and 62: Table C1. Length frequency of sprin
Page 69 and 70: Table C9. Length frequency of summe
Page 71 and 72: Table C11. Length frequency of summ
Page 73 and 74: Table C13. Length frequency of spri
Page 75 and 76: Table C15. Length frequency of spri
Page 77 and 78: Table C17. Length frequency and age
Page 79 and 80:
Table C19. Length frequency and age
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Table C33. Length frequency of spri
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 124:
Appendix E. Maps showing 1990 chino
Page 172:
Appendix G. Maps showing 1992 chino
show all

Salmon Spawning Ground Surveys, 1989-92 Project F-73-R-15

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?