21.01.2015 Views

View Article - Singapore Academy of Law

View Article - Singapore Academy of Law

View Article - Singapore Academy of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

280<br />

<strong>Singapore</strong> <strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> Journal (2003)<br />

5.3 Ancillary matters hearing<br />

168 What procedure should be adopted at the hearing <strong>of</strong> the ancillary<br />

matters proceedings involving 3 rd party issues, where the 3 rd party has<br />

joined the proceedings as a party i.e.<br />

a) An open court trial, with cross-examination as <strong>of</strong> right; or<br />

b) A hearing in chambers, without cross-examination as <strong>of</strong> right<br />

169 If the 3 rd party had taken out a separate civil suit in the ordinary<br />

civil court, he would have had a right to an open court trial, with crossexamination<br />

as <strong>of</strong> right. However, it is submitted that by joining the<br />

ancillary matters proceedings, the 3 rd party is taken to have consented to<br />

following the same hearing procedures as for all family cases, where, as<br />

a matter <strong>of</strong> practice, the ancillary matters are adjourned to chambers for<br />

hearing.<br />

170 In this regard, it should be noted that family disputes do not<br />

seem to be treated in the same way as civil cases, where crossexamination<br />

is an automatic right. Applications under Section 59<br />

(Questions between husband and wife as to property to be decided in<br />

summary way) <strong>of</strong> the Women’s Charter (Cap. 353), and the<br />

Guardianship <strong>of</strong> Infants Act, are by way <strong>of</strong> originating summons. The<br />

matters are heard in chambers, and the evidence is usually given by way<br />

<strong>of</strong> affidavits <strong>of</strong> evidence-in-chief and affidavits in reply. It seems to be a<br />

matter <strong>of</strong> policy that family disputes should be heard in chambers where<br />

all the evidence is usually tendered by way <strong>of</strong> affidavit, rather than in<br />

open court trials where witnesses take the stand. This may be to protect<br />

the privacy <strong>of</strong> the parties, as well as to save them time and costs.<br />

171 As the 3 rd parties to the proceedings are <strong>of</strong>ten closely connected<br />

to the husband and/or wife socially and emotionally, and/or related to<br />

either or both <strong>of</strong> them, it is submitted that the same policy regarding the<br />

protection <strong>of</strong> the parties’ privacy and the saving <strong>of</strong> time and costs should<br />

be extended to those ancillary matters hearings involving 3 rd party issues,<br />

where the 3 rd party has joined the proceedings as a party, i.e. such<br />

hearings should be done in chambers, without cross-examination as <strong>of</strong><br />

right.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!