View Article - Singapore Academy of Law
View Article - Singapore Academy of Law
View Article - Singapore Academy of Law
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
298<br />
<strong>Singapore</strong> <strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> Journal (2003)<br />
give the District Court jurisdiction to hear certain family matters which<br />
would otherwise be the exclusive province <strong>of</strong> the High Court, would be<br />
an example <strong>of</strong> such legislation.) It is submitted that if the High Court had<br />
the power to transfer down any case it saw fit under Section 37 SCA to<br />
the District Court, this would obviate the need for Section 28A SCJA.<br />
(c)<br />
Reason for transfer<br />
213 In the Australian Master Builders case, supra, the court was <strong>of</strong><br />
the view that the applicant for a transfer must show something more than<br />
a speedier trial and/or savings in costs (the latter merely being a<br />
consequence <strong>of</strong> the transfer) in order to be granted leave to transfer<br />
proceedings from the High Court to the District Court. It is submitted<br />
that if there are good reasons (<strong>of</strong> the kind set out in Section 6.1(a)-(d)<br />
above) for wanting the civil suit to be heard together with the ancillary<br />
matters proceedings, then this should suffice to justify the transfer <strong>of</strong> the<br />
civil suit to the Family Court. The Family Court would already have<br />
dealt with the divorce itself. It would therefore be an appropriate forum<br />
to hear both the civil suit and the ancillary matters proceedings. The<br />
more advanced the ancillary matters proceedings in the Family Court by<br />
the time the question <strong>of</strong> whether the civil suit should be transferred<br />
arises, the stronger the reason for transferring the civil suit to the Family<br />
Court.<br />
214 However, as stated in Australian Master Builders, supra, in<br />
situations;<br />
“…where the issues <strong>of</strong> fact may be complicated or are in respect<br />
<strong>of</strong> a subject matter not normally tried in such courts [i.e. the<br />
(ii) any proceedings relating to any <strong>of</strong> the matters referred to in section 17 (a) to (e); and<br />
(b) may make such incidental provision for the transfer <strong>of</strong> the proceedings to the District<br />
Court (including matters relating to procedure and costs) as the Chief Justice thinks<br />
fit.<br />
Section 17 (Civil jurisdiction — specific) SCJA states:<br />
17. Without prejudice to the generality <strong>of</strong> section 16, the civil jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> the High<br />
Court shall include —<br />
(a) jurisdiction under any written law relating to divorce and matrimonial causes;<br />
(b) jurisdiction under any written law relating to matters <strong>of</strong> admiralty;<br />
(c) jurisdiction under any written law relating to bankruptcy or to companies;<br />
(d) jurisdiction to appoint and control guardians <strong>of</strong> infants and generally over the persons<br />
and property <strong>of</strong> infants;<br />
(e) jurisdiction to appoint and control guardians and keepers <strong>of</strong> the persons and estates <strong>of</strong><br />
idiots, mentally disordered persons and persons <strong>of</strong> unsound mind; and<br />
(f) jurisdiction to grant probates <strong>of</strong> wills and testaments, letters <strong>of</strong> administration <strong>of</strong> the<br />
estates <strong>of</strong> deceased persons and to alter or revoke such grants.