21.01.2015 Views

View Article - Singapore Academy of Law

View Article - Singapore Academy of Law

View Article - Singapore Academy of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

298<br />

<strong>Singapore</strong> <strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> Journal (2003)<br />

give the District Court jurisdiction to hear certain family matters which<br />

would otherwise be the exclusive province <strong>of</strong> the High Court, would be<br />

an example <strong>of</strong> such legislation.) It is submitted that if the High Court had<br />

the power to transfer down any case it saw fit under Section 37 SCA to<br />

the District Court, this would obviate the need for Section 28A SCJA.<br />

(c)<br />

Reason for transfer<br />

213 In the Australian Master Builders case, supra, the court was <strong>of</strong><br />

the view that the applicant for a transfer must show something more than<br />

a speedier trial and/or savings in costs (the latter merely being a<br />

consequence <strong>of</strong> the transfer) in order to be granted leave to transfer<br />

proceedings from the High Court to the District Court. It is submitted<br />

that if there are good reasons (<strong>of</strong> the kind set out in Section 6.1(a)-(d)<br />

above) for wanting the civil suit to be heard together with the ancillary<br />

matters proceedings, then this should suffice to justify the transfer <strong>of</strong> the<br />

civil suit to the Family Court. The Family Court would already have<br />

dealt with the divorce itself. It would therefore be an appropriate forum<br />

to hear both the civil suit and the ancillary matters proceedings. The<br />

more advanced the ancillary matters proceedings in the Family Court by<br />

the time the question <strong>of</strong> whether the civil suit should be transferred<br />

arises, the stronger the reason for transferring the civil suit to the Family<br />

Court.<br />

214 However, as stated in Australian Master Builders, supra, in<br />

situations;<br />

“…where the issues <strong>of</strong> fact may be complicated or are in respect<br />

<strong>of</strong> a subject matter not normally tried in such courts [i.e. the<br />

(ii) any proceedings relating to any <strong>of</strong> the matters referred to in section 17 (a) to (e); and<br />

(b) may make such incidental provision for the transfer <strong>of</strong> the proceedings to the District<br />

Court (including matters relating to procedure and costs) as the Chief Justice thinks<br />

fit.<br />

Section 17 (Civil jurisdiction — specific) SCJA states:<br />

17. Without prejudice to the generality <strong>of</strong> section 16, the civil jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> the High<br />

Court shall include —<br />

(a) jurisdiction under any written law relating to divorce and matrimonial causes;<br />

(b) jurisdiction under any written law relating to matters <strong>of</strong> admiralty;<br />

(c) jurisdiction under any written law relating to bankruptcy or to companies;<br />

(d) jurisdiction to appoint and control guardians <strong>of</strong> infants and generally over the persons<br />

and property <strong>of</strong> infants;<br />

(e) jurisdiction to appoint and control guardians and keepers <strong>of</strong> the persons and estates <strong>of</strong><br />

idiots, mentally disordered persons and persons <strong>of</strong> unsound mind; and<br />

(f) jurisdiction to grant probates <strong>of</strong> wills and testaments, letters <strong>of</strong> administration <strong>of</strong> the<br />

estates <strong>of</strong> deceased persons and to alter or revoke such grants.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!