21.01.2015 Views

View Article - Singapore Academy of Law

View Article - Singapore Academy of Law

View Article - Singapore Academy of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

15 SAcLJ Matrimonial Assets and the 3 rd Party 295<br />

“..the scope <strong>of</strong> the High Court’s power to transfer proceedings<br />

from a lower court to itself cannot be determined by looking<br />

only at the SCJA. In fact it would be wrong to do so as s 18(3)<br />

provides that the powers ‘shall be exercised’ in accordance with<br />

written law. Parliament had therefore intended the High Court to<br />

have regard to other applicable written laws before exercising<br />

the power to transfer proceedings to itself and to act in a manner<br />

that was ‘in accordance with’ or consistent with those provisions<br />

in so doing. In this case, the applicable written law is the SCA<br />

and the High Court can only exercise its powers <strong>of</strong> transfer <strong>of</strong><br />

proceedings as provided for in this Act.” (per Judith Prakash J, ,<br />

at paragraph 14)<br />

6.4.2.2 Civil Suit filed in High Court to be heard by Family<br />

Court—Transfer down from High Court<br />

207 An example <strong>of</strong> a case where this was done is Chia Kin Tuck v<br />

Leong Choon Kum and Anor (Suit 1665 <strong>of</strong> 1999). On 7 May 1998, the<br />

wife had commenced divorce proceedings against the husband in<br />

Divorce Petition No. 1621 <strong>of</strong> 1998. A decree nisi was granted on 7<br />

January 2000, and the ancillary matters were adjourned to be heard in<br />

chambers. The husband then filed a suit (i.e. Suit 1665 <strong>of</strong> 1999) in the<br />

High Court on 24 November 1999 against the wife and a 3 rd party for the<br />

return <strong>of</strong> a sum <strong>of</strong> $1 million which he alleged had been given to the<br />

wife to be deposited into two bank accounts for the purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting<br />

his sons’ educational expenses, and which had been wrongfully<br />

transferred to the account <strong>of</strong> the 3 rd party. The husband had applied to<br />

stay the ancillary matters proceedings until the High Court suit was<br />

disposed <strong>of</strong>. This application was granted by the Family Court. On<br />

appeal by the wife, the High Court ordered the High Court suit to be<br />

transferred to the Family Court, to be heard by the same judge dealing<br />

with the ancillary matters 127 .<br />

208 The provision governing the transfer <strong>of</strong> suits from the High<br />

Court to the Family Court is Section 37 SCA (“Section 37”):<br />

General power to transfer from High Court to District Court<br />

37. —(1) In any action commenced by way <strong>of</strong> writ <strong>of</strong> summons<br />

in the High Court in the exercise <strong>of</strong> its original civil jurisdiction,<br />

127 Order made on 23 October 2000. No judgment was written. A new suit number was<br />

given for the transferred suit—DC(T) 600872 <strong>of</strong> 2000

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!