21.01.2015 Views

The Fallen Feather - Kinetic Video

The Fallen Feather - Kinetic Video

The Fallen Feather - Kinetic Video

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

First Nations people had no choice but to give up their children to the<br />

Government.<br />

Remember, that the Government would create its own rules and then enforce<br />

them without first nations input.<br />

Indian Children could be treated very differently then non First Nations children<br />

and their parents had no power no say and no legal recourse. <strong>The</strong>y were denied<br />

the right to vote. And it was against the law for them to seek legal council. Help<br />

from lawyers was forbidden.<br />

First Nations fell into a legal limbo status were laws would be passed that suited<br />

the needs of the Government, laws that would only apply to Aboriginals.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se laws were combined formally into the Indian Act of 1876. Authority over<br />

Indian life, property, culture and land was placed solely with the Superintendent<br />

of Indian Affairs. <strong>The</strong>se laws were designed to limit the Indians ability to challenge<br />

the government. All public gathering were outlawed. <strong>The</strong> Potlatch and Sun Dance<br />

ceremonies were banned.<br />

This Special Legal status still goes on today. With unique rules that apply just to<br />

First Nations.<br />

I just want to jump back, you defined wrongful confinement according to Indian<br />

Residential School Resolution, I just question, I’ve read a lot of definitions of<br />

wrongful confinement throughout the legal system and I’m just wondering why<br />

this one is so specific in the way that it was written.<br />

Jannica R Hoskins<br />

I guess I really can’t answerer why this was<br />

drafted the way that it was, we were given<br />

this to work with. But it says that the claimant<br />

was confined alone in a space where both the<br />

space and the duration was inappropriate for<br />

a child of their age.<br />

Hon Ted Hughes, ADR<br />

Would it be safe to say that the definition was<br />

written around what happened within Residential Schools<br />

Jannica R Hoskins<br />

Oh, it was written totally for Residential School situations, this wasn’t, whoever<br />

did the drafting in Indian Residential Schools Resolution Canada, that<br />

department of the federal department, was drafting solely for this process, and<br />

you wont find that definition as far as I know in the criminal law or statues of<br />

Canada.<br />

Hon Ted Hughes, ADR<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!