Joint Steering Committee for Revision of AACR
Joint Steering Committee for Revision of AACR
Joint Steering Committee for Revision of AACR
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
5JSC/Chair/11<br />
18 September 2006<br />
Table 1 - 19<br />
Term<br />
Edition<br />
(Intangible<br />
resources)<br />
Edition<br />
(Tangible<br />
resources<br />
Definition (draft <strong>AACR</strong>3 where given, or<br />
<strong>AACR</strong>2)<br />
A remote access resource that is<br />
distinctive with respect to scope <strong>of</strong><br />
content, language, presentation, etc.<br />
All copies produced from essentially the<br />
same master (whether by direct contact<br />
or by photographic or other methods) and<br />
issued by the same entity. See also<br />
Facsimile reproduction, Impression, Issue,<br />
Reprint.<br />
Comments<br />
concept <strong>of</strong> edition and its historical<br />
context within <strong>AACR</strong> is critical <strong>for</strong> a<br />
successful transition to [RDA]. In a<br />
response to the draft <strong>of</strong> Part 1 <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>AACR</strong>3, the CC:DA Task Force on<br />
FRBR Terminology has commented on<br />
this issue and encourages the JSC to<br />
consult the context <strong>of</strong> that full<br />
response document.<br />
ALA: ALA agrees that the definition <strong>of</strong><br />
edition does not apply well to remote<br />
access resources. However, we<br />
wonder whether it is necessary to<br />
apply the concept to intangible<br />
resources. These resources certainly<br />
have edition statements, but that<br />
doesn’t mean that the concept needs<br />
to be extended. ALA has argued that<br />
the concept <strong>of</strong> edition cannot be<br />
excluded from the rules, although we<br />
wish that it could. ALA is not<br />
com<strong>for</strong>table extending the concept<br />
further without good reason — and<br />
this entry does not currently present<br />
sufficient reason.<br />
ALA: The loss <strong>of</strong> the final sentence <strong>of</strong><br />
the <strong>AACR</strong>2 definition <strong>for</strong> Edition: Other<br />
materials, “A change in the identity <strong>of</strong><br />
the distributor does not mean a new<br />
edition.” will seemingly have an<br />
impact on when to make a new record<br />
<strong>for</strong> some materials. ALA is very<br />
concerned that this change may result<br />
in significant replicate records and<br />
unnecessary work.<br />
In<br />
<strong>AACR</strong>2<br />
In draft<br />
<strong>AACR</strong>3<br />
Required in<br />
Glossary<br />
X √ <br />
√<br />
(Edition<br />
(Other<br />
materials<br />
))<br />
√