21.01.2015 Views

Joint Steering Committee for Revision of AACR

Joint Steering Committee for Revision of AACR

Joint Steering Committee for Revision of AACR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5JSC/Chair/11<br />

18 September 2006<br />

Table 1 - 19<br />

Term<br />

Edition<br />

(Intangible<br />

resources)<br />

Edition<br />

(Tangible<br />

resources<br />

Definition (draft <strong>AACR</strong>3 where given, or<br />

<strong>AACR</strong>2)<br />

A remote access resource that is<br />

distinctive with respect to scope <strong>of</strong><br />

content, language, presentation, etc.<br />

All copies produced from essentially the<br />

same master (whether by direct contact<br />

or by photographic or other methods) and<br />

issued by the same entity. See also<br />

Facsimile reproduction, Impression, Issue,<br />

Reprint.<br />

Comments<br />

concept <strong>of</strong> edition and its historical<br />

context within <strong>AACR</strong> is critical <strong>for</strong> a<br />

successful transition to [RDA]. In a<br />

response to the draft <strong>of</strong> Part 1 <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>AACR</strong>3, the CC:DA Task Force on<br />

FRBR Terminology has commented on<br />

this issue and encourages the JSC to<br />

consult the context <strong>of</strong> that full<br />

response document.<br />

ALA: ALA agrees that the definition <strong>of</strong><br />

edition does not apply well to remote<br />

access resources. However, we<br />

wonder whether it is necessary to<br />

apply the concept to intangible<br />

resources. These resources certainly<br />

have edition statements, but that<br />

doesn’t mean that the concept needs<br />

to be extended. ALA has argued that<br />

the concept <strong>of</strong> edition cannot be<br />

excluded from the rules, although we<br />

wish that it could. ALA is not<br />

com<strong>for</strong>table extending the concept<br />

further without good reason — and<br />

this entry does not currently present<br />

sufficient reason.<br />

ALA: The loss <strong>of</strong> the final sentence <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>AACR</strong>2 definition <strong>for</strong> Edition: Other<br />

materials, “A change in the identity <strong>of</strong><br />

the distributor does not mean a new<br />

edition.” will seemingly have an<br />

impact on when to make a new record<br />

<strong>for</strong> some materials. ALA is very<br />

concerned that this change may result<br />

in significant replicate records and<br />

unnecessary work.<br />

In<br />

<strong>AACR</strong>2<br />

In draft<br />

<strong>AACR</strong>3<br />

Required in<br />

Glossary<br />

X √ <br />

√<br />

(Edition<br />

(Other<br />

materials<br />

))<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!