PLATTING BOARD MEETING - Municipality of Anchorage
PLATTING BOARD MEETING - Municipality of Anchorage
PLATTING BOARD MEETING - Municipality of Anchorage
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>PLATTING</strong> <strong>BOARD</strong> <strong>MEETING</strong> Page 6<br />
May 4, 2005<br />
<strong>BOARD</strong> MEMBER WALSH seconded. She <strong>of</strong>fered an amendment to reword condition 6<br />
to state “Resolve the need to construct Abbott Road to urban half street standards with<br />
curb, gutter and sidewalk on the north site from Old Seward Highway, west, extending at<br />
least 60 feet beyond the eastern boundary <strong>of</strong> the Long Street intersection pending<br />
resolution with the State <strong>of</strong> Alaska on their upcoming project.” This was accepted as a<br />
friendly amendment.<br />
<strong>BOARD</strong> MEMBER CARESS felt the implications <strong>of</strong> the letter were that the proposed<br />
project improvements by the State <strong>of</strong> Alaska would impact condition 6. Those<br />
improvements are widening the Seward Highway from 4 to 6 lanes, modifying existing<br />
interchanges, rehabilitating frontage roads and constructing a frontage road between<br />
Dimond and O'Malley, overcrossings at International Airport Road, 68 th Avenue, 76 th<br />
Avenue, and 92 nd Avenue, extension and upgrade <strong>of</strong> 92 nd Avenue to minor arterial<br />
standards through the New Seward Highway and Old Seward Highway and providing<br />
pedestrian and bicycle accommodation and drainage. <strong>BOARD</strong> MEMBER CARESS had<br />
concern, however, that all <strong>of</strong> the overcrossings proposed by this project could not be<br />
accomplished in one construction season. He had asked that condition 6 be reconsidered<br />
out <strong>of</strong> concern that he thought it was appropriate. He had concern, however, that these<br />
improvements might occur much later than the 2007 construction season while the Toyon<br />
Subdivision is being developed. He asked if the developer should pay to improve this<br />
road at this time or let the taxpayers do so later.<br />
MR. WEAVER explained the State <strong>of</strong> Alaska will be building an overpass at this location<br />
and this road will not be accessible in the future. He believed the Board required this<br />
condition at the request <strong>of</strong> PM&E because it is peripheral to the subdivision. He did not<br />
believe the proposed development was going to use Abbott Road as its access. When the<br />
overpass is constructed, these properties will probably have very limited access to it; only<br />
closer to the Old Seward Highway. It would be premature to build the road, particularly<br />
since they will not be using it as access. MR. SOULE stated PM&E would have no<br />
objection to deleting condition 6.<br />
<strong>BOARD</strong> MEMBER CARESS reworded his amendment to delete condition 6.<br />
<strong>BOARD</strong> MEMBER WALSH agreed as second.<br />
<strong>BOARD</strong> MEMBER KREGER asked in what way the Board erred in adopting this<br />
condition in its previous action. MR. WEAVER explained that peripheral road<br />
improvements are discretionary to the Board, the Board made this recommendation at the<br />
request <strong>of</strong> Staff, and Staff received new factual information that changed the Staff<br />
position. <strong>BOARD</strong> MEMBER KREGER asked what was the public testimony in this case.<br />
MS. O’BRIEN did not recall any public testimony being <strong>of</strong>fered in this case. CHAIR<br />
PHELPS stated that was also his recollection. VICE CHAIR WALSH noted that the<br />
Chair was not present for this case. CHAIR PHELPS stated this was correct. VICE