21.01.2015 Views

10-4912 - City of Sarasota

10-4912 - City of Sarasota

10-4912 - City of Sarasota

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Attachment 1<br />

Ordinance No. <strong>10</strong>-<strong>4912</strong><br />

Page<br />

#<br />

Issue<br />

39-40 Fences<br />

(<strong>City</strong>-wide)<br />

NA<br />

Design<br />

Guidelines<br />

(outside the<br />

Downtown)<br />

Applicant<br />

Staff<br />

<strong>City</strong> Attorney<br />

&<br />

<strong>City</strong><br />

Commission<br />

Zoning<br />

Code<br />

Section<br />

Vll-1<strong>10</strong>2<br />

Fences<br />

IV-506,<br />

Standards for<br />

Site Plan<br />

Review<br />

and<br />

Appendix D<br />

Design<br />

Guidelines<br />

General Description<br />

Clarifies the zoning code regulations for fences<br />

apply to walls and hedges.<br />

Restores non-mandatory design guidelines<br />

(removed on 11-2-09) to better address F.S.<br />

166.033 that requires a written notice for the<br />

denial <strong>of</strong> a site plan and to clarify the <strong>City</strong>’s intent<br />

for how an application can address the following<br />

site plan review standard. The guidelines<br />

illustrate how these criteria can be met. In<br />

response to concerns the guidelines are too<br />

controlling and could be used arbitrarily, two<br />

sentences were added about the “Role <strong>of</strong> these<br />

Guidelines” to further clarify the guidelines are<br />

advisory and voluntary.<br />

Staff<br />

Comment<br />

& Recommendation<br />

RECOMMENDED<br />

RECOMMENDED<br />

HISTORY:<br />

In 1987 the <strong>City</strong> established a<br />

downtown storefront program that<br />

included “design assistance” and<br />

“storefront guidelines” with an<br />

objective <strong>of</strong> promoting quality<br />

development. The program<br />

ended when the funding stopped.<br />

In 2002, this concept was<br />

continued with the adoption <strong>of</strong><br />

“Advisory Community Design<br />

Guidelines”, the Downtown Plan<br />

and Zone Districts.<br />

Public Comment<br />

No comments<br />

At the May 17, 20<strong>10</strong> public<br />

hearing one person<br />

questioned the need to<br />

regulate hedges. Staff<br />

clarified the only area<br />

regulated was RSM-9.<br />

DSA is not in favor <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Guidelines being restored.<br />

At the May 17, 20<strong>10</strong> public<br />

hearing several speakers<br />

were in support. One person<br />

spoke in opposition.<br />

Planning Board<br />

Recommendation<br />

RECOMMENDED<br />

(4-0 Vote)<br />

No discussion<br />

RECOMMENDED<br />

(4-0 Vote)<br />

No discussion.<br />

<strong>City</strong> Commission Action<br />

ADOPTED on 2 nd reading<br />

June 7, 20<strong>10</strong><br />

(5-0 Vote)<br />

APPROVED on 1 st reading<br />

May 17, 20<strong>10</strong><br />

(4-0 Vote)<br />

DENIED on 2 nd reading<br />

June 7, 20<strong>10</strong><br />

(5-0 Vote)<br />

DENIED on 1 st reading<br />

May 17, 20<strong>10</strong><br />

(2-2 Vote)<br />

COMMENT: Staff<br />

recommends continued<br />

discussion about how the<br />

guidelines can be improved<br />

and utilized and if some <strong>of</strong><br />

the guidelines could be<br />

incorporated into the zone<br />

districts as objective<br />

standards. Further<br />

discussion, with the Planning<br />

Board, about the<br />

Administrative Site Plan<br />

review process and<br />

compatibility standards is<br />

also planned for the next<br />

cycle <strong>of</strong> text amendments<br />

(June – Dec 20<strong>10</strong>).<br />

<strong>10</strong>-ZTA-01, June 7, 20<strong>10</strong> page 5 <strong>of</strong> 40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!