22.01.2015 Views

ICCB 2013 Program - Society for Conservation Biology

ICCB 2013 Program - Society for Conservation Biology

ICCB 2013 Program - Society for Conservation Biology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

...............................................<br />

Symposium: Analysing Social Networks <strong>for</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> Decision-making<br />

Room 302<br />

Monday, July 22, 8:00 to 10:00<br />

Organizer(s): Jonathan Rhodes, The University of Queensland; Örjan Bodin, Stockhom Resilience Centre<br />

Monday<br />

Integrating social science with ecology to in<strong>for</strong>m conservation is one of the greatest challenges we face as conservation scientists.<br />

Characterising social systems as networks of interacting actors provides a powerful tool <strong>for</strong> achieving this. This symposium will<br />

bring together a multidisciplinary panel of speakers to showcase novel approaches <strong>for</strong> integrating social networks with ecology to<br />

in<strong>for</strong>m conservation decision-making.<br />

The past two decades have seen an explosion of interest in structured approaches to conservation decision-making (Wilson et al.<br />

2009). However, the vast majority of these tools either fail to consider social processes, or consider them in a highly simplified<br />

way. At the same time, analyses of networks of interacting actors, based on tools such as social network theory and game theory,<br />

have emerged as important methods <strong>for</strong> understanding the influence of social processes on natural resource management success<br />

(Ostrom 1990, Bodin and Prell 2011). Despite this, it is only recently that conservation biologists have begun to integrate social<br />

networks into conservation planning (Bode et al. 2011, Vance-Borland and Holley 2011). By highlighting recent developments<br />

in how the analysis of social networks can be incorporated into conservation decision-making, and the benefits of doing so, this<br />

symposium will make a significant contribution to the ability of conservation scientists and practitioners to integrate human<br />

social processes into biodiversity conservation.<br />

08:00 How might insights gained from stakeholder network analysis be integrated into conservation decision-support<br />

tools<br />

Ken Vance-Borland, The <strong>Conservation</strong> Planning Institute<br />

08:15 ‘Treating networks seriously’ in conservation management: How a network approach enhances our understanding<br />

of collective action and adaptive capacity<br />

Annica Sandström, Stockholm Resilience Centre<br />

08:30 The Problem of Fit: Comparing Social and Ecological Connectivity in Land-use Planning using a spatially explicit<br />

network approach<br />

Örjan Bodin, Stockholm Resilience Centre<br />

08:45 Assessing the effectiveness of collaboration networks across large-scale conservation corridors<br />

Angela Guerrero-Gonzalez, The University of Queensland<br />

09:00 When do Social Networks Matter <strong>for</strong> Dynamic <strong>Conservation</strong> Planning Problems<br />

Jonathan Rhodes, The University of Queensland<br />

09:15 The organisation of social networks <strong>for</strong> the optimal management of ecological networks<br />

Iadine Chadés, CSIRO<br />

09:30 Interactions between independent mangers changes the invasion of widespread weeds<br />

Shaun Coutts, The University of Queensland<br />

Open discussion period follows from 9:45 to 10:00.<br />

...............................................<br />

Symposium: Integrating <strong>Conservation</strong> Research and Practice: Social Processes <strong>for</strong> a High-<br />

Impact Research Agenda<br />

Room 303<br />

Monday, July 22, 8:00 to 10:00<br />

Organizer(s): Heather Arnold, Nature Conservancy of Canada; Jensen Reitz Montambault, The Nature Conservancy;<br />

Marie Tremblay, The Nature Conservancy of Canada<br />

As the ceaseless urgency to curb the biodiversity crisis meets a battered economy with yet tighter public funding <strong>for</strong> research,<br />

there is a growing need to ensure that conservation research is both relevant to practitioners, and solution-oriented. Whereas<br />

practitioners and land managers require research that is applicable to evidence-based and adaptive management, barriers exist<br />

to generating and accessing it, leading to a continued and undue reliance on anecdote and unverified opinion. Meanwhile,<br />

dedicated researchers may be personally motivated to make meaningful contributions toward solving pressing conservation<br />

problems but professional disincentives and funding criteria, often biased against real-world applied research, may discourage<br />

them. While individual ef<strong>for</strong>ts in the last two decades have made great strides to bridge the gap between conservation research<br />

and practice, now is the time to break down the systemic barriers that continue to perpetuate the divide. In this symposium a<br />

coalition of academics, funders and practitioners builds on a growing array of success stories and proposes a new way <strong>for</strong>ward,<br />

one in which researchers and practitioners are full partners in the systematic co-creation of the research agenda. The proposed<br />

56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!