24.01.2015 Views

Safety, Quality, Efficacy: Regulating Medicines in the UK

Safety, Quality, Efficacy: Regulating Medicines in the UK

Safety, Quality, Efficacy: Regulating Medicines in the UK

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SAFETY, QUALITY, EFFICACY: REGULATING MEDICINES IN THE <strong>UK</strong><br />

products derived from biotechnology, and optional<br />

for o<strong>the</strong>r high technology or <strong>in</strong>novative products.<br />

Experts from one member state are nom<strong>in</strong>ated to<br />

carry out <strong>the</strong> assessment, and those of o<strong>the</strong>r member<br />

states have <strong>the</strong> opportunity to contribute to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al<br />

decision, which is <strong>the</strong>n b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g on all member states.<br />

1.19 The Agency plans to <strong>in</strong>troduce <strong>in</strong> 2002-03 a new<br />

'national rules' scheme for products that did not meet<br />

<strong>the</strong> eligibility criteria of <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al registration scheme.<br />

At this early stage <strong>the</strong> Agency is not able to estimate how<br />

many applications might be made to <strong>the</strong> new scheme.<br />

part one<br />

! <strong>the</strong> mutual recognition procedure, which beg<strong>in</strong>s with<br />

<strong>the</strong> company fil<strong>in</strong>g an application dossier with <strong>the</strong><br />

regulatory agency of a member state of <strong>the</strong>ir choice.<br />

This "reference member state" carries out an<br />

assessment and may grant a national market<strong>in</strong>g<br />

authorisation. It <strong>the</strong>n shares <strong>the</strong> assessment with o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

"concerned member states", who may comment on or<br />

object to <strong>the</strong> authorisation proposed for <strong>the</strong>ir own<br />

territory. Any unresolved objections are subject to<br />

arbitration by <strong>the</strong> European Committee on Proprietary<br />

Medic<strong>in</strong>al Products (known as CPMP). Once this is<br />

complete, a national market<strong>in</strong>g authorisation <strong>in</strong> each<br />

concerned member state is granted.<br />

1.16 In 2000, <strong>the</strong> European Commission began a process of<br />

consultation on wide rang<strong>in</strong>g changes to <strong>the</strong> regulatory<br />

system, partly <strong>in</strong> response to <strong>the</strong> likely expansion of <strong>the</strong><br />

European Union. Among o<strong>the</strong>r changes, <strong>the</strong> proposals<br />

envisaged fur<strong>the</strong>r development of <strong>the</strong> centralised<br />

procedure so that all new pharmaceutical products<br />

would be required to go through that route. Member<br />

States and <strong>the</strong> European Parliament are still discuss<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong>se proposals.<br />

The Agency is required to regulate an<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g range of products as a result<br />

of EU Directives<br />

1.17 The European Union regulatory environment works<br />

alongside <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>'s national regulatory environment, and<br />

EU Directives must be transposed <strong>in</strong>to <strong>UK</strong> law. Three<br />

European Directives have recently had an impact on <strong>the</strong><br />

range of products <strong>the</strong> Agency is expected to regulate.<br />

(a) Homoeopathic medic<strong>in</strong>es<br />

1.18 EU Directives <strong>in</strong> 1992 and 2001 set out requirements for<br />

each national regulatory authority to implement a<br />

simplified registration scheme for homoeopathic<br />

medic<strong>in</strong>es. The Agency implemented a scheme <strong>in</strong> 1994<br />

that required any homoeopathic products developed<br />

s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>n and <strong>in</strong>tended for sale on <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> market to be<br />

registered. So far, 356 homoeopathic medic<strong>in</strong>es have<br />

been registered with <strong>the</strong> scheme. The Agency has found<br />

no evidence of significant safety risks from <strong>the</strong><br />

approximately 3,000 older homoeopathic products that<br />

received licences "of right" as <strong>the</strong>y were already on <strong>the</strong><br />

market when <strong>the</strong> 1968 <strong>Medic<strong>in</strong>es</strong> Act was passed.<br />

However, some have been withdrawn from <strong>the</strong> market<br />

because of problems comply<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>the</strong> evolv<strong>in</strong>g EU<br />

quality standards.<br />

(b) Herbal medic<strong>in</strong>es<br />

1.20 There is no estimate of <strong>the</strong> number of herbal medic<strong>in</strong>es<br />

sold <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>. A 1999 market research report 2<br />

estimated that <strong>the</strong> value of herbal medic<strong>in</strong>e sales <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>UK</strong> was some £50 million a year and grow<strong>in</strong>g. Some<br />

500 herbal medic<strong>in</strong>es are licensed but an unknown<br />

number of o<strong>the</strong>rs are exempt from licens<strong>in</strong>g under <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Medic<strong>in</strong>es</strong> Act 1968, and can be sold as over-<strong>the</strong>counter<br />

products as long as <strong>the</strong>y make no claims on <strong>the</strong><br />

packag<strong>in</strong>g or <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form of a brand name, and are<br />

entirely herbal. Or, under <strong>the</strong> 'herbalists exemption',<br />

<strong>the</strong>y can be sold <strong>in</strong> personal consultations between<br />

herbalist and patient. Some herbal medic<strong>in</strong>es have been<br />

banned or <strong>the</strong>ir availability restricted on safety grounds.<br />

1.21 An EU Directive is currently be<strong>in</strong>g negotiated and <strong>the</strong><br />

Agency has consulted herbals manufacturers and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>in</strong>terested groups on its proposed requirements for a<br />

simplified compulsory registration scheme. This would<br />

cover any product that has been used as a traditional<br />

remedy and would be <strong>in</strong>tended to protect patients by<br />

br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se products with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> regulatory framework,<br />

allow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m to make limited efficacy claims.<br />

(c) Cl<strong>in</strong>ical trials of medic<strong>in</strong>es<br />

1.22 Cl<strong>in</strong>ical trials are currently regulated on a voluntary<br />

basis, and <strong>the</strong> Agency carries out <strong>in</strong>spections where<br />

requested. From 1st May 2004 an EU Directive will<br />

require, for <strong>the</strong> first time <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>, formal authorisation<br />

of Healthy Volunteer studies carried out for <strong>the</strong> purpose<br />

of assess<strong>in</strong>g cl<strong>in</strong>ical efficacy and safety. This will <strong>in</strong>volve<br />

<strong>in</strong>spection of sites <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> cl<strong>in</strong>ical trials work and<br />

audit of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigational medic<strong>in</strong>al products used <strong>in</strong><br />

cl<strong>in</strong>ical trials. The benefits of this <strong>in</strong>clude better<br />

adm<strong>in</strong>istration of cl<strong>in</strong>ical trials and safer use of<br />

medic<strong>in</strong>es under development.<br />

The Agency faces <strong>in</strong>creased competition<br />

with<strong>in</strong> Europe<br />

1.23 The Agency already faces competitive threats from o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

European regulators who can also bid for a share of <strong>the</strong><br />

reduc<strong>in</strong>g volume of new active substance licens<strong>in</strong>g<br />

work under <strong>the</strong> EU mutual recognition arrangements.<br />

More centralisation of licens<strong>in</strong>g work and <strong>the</strong> expansion<br />

of <strong>the</strong> European Union are likely to mean less work to<br />

share between more regulators <strong>in</strong> both <strong>the</strong> centralised<br />

and mutual recognition streams.<br />

14<br />

2 M<strong>in</strong>tel Market<strong>in</strong>g Intelligence, 1999.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!