Pediatric Clinics of North America - CIPERJ
Pediatric Clinics of North America - CIPERJ
Pediatric Clinics of North America - CIPERJ
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ORAL IRON CHELATORS<br />
465<br />
<strong>of</strong> 50 children who had sickle cell disease and were receiving regular red<br />
cell transfusions for primary stroke prevention in the Stroke Prevention<br />
Trial in Sickle Cell Anemia (STOP), great variability in the rate <strong>of</strong> rise<br />
<strong>of</strong> serum ferritin despite similar transfusion regimens was found among<br />
patients [19]. Serum ferritin levels also underestimate liver iron concentration<br />
in patients who have thalassemia-intermedia and nontransfusionassociated<br />
iron overload [20].<br />
Given that the liver is the major target organ for iron accumulation after<br />
multiple transfusions, the liver iron concentration is a good indicator <strong>of</strong><br />
total iron burden [21]. Various methods are available to estimate liver<br />
iron concentration, but liver biopsy generally is considered the gold standard<br />
for accurate iron measurement. In addition, this procedure allows direct<br />
assessment <strong>of</strong> liver inflammation and fibrosis. Liver iron concentration<br />
is a useful predictor <strong>of</strong> prognosis in patients who have thalassemia: levels in<br />
excess <strong>of</strong> 15 mg/g dry weight are associated with an increased risk for cardiac<br />
complications and death [22]. Maintenance <strong>of</strong> the liver iron concentration<br />
between 3 and 7 mg/g dry weight in those receiving chelation therapy is<br />
considered ideal [23]. Several limitations to liver biopsy exist, however.<br />
First, it is an invasive procedure, which restricts the acceptability to patients<br />
and its frequent use to monitor trends over time. In addition, liver fibrosis<br />
and cirrhosis cause an uneven distribution <strong>of</strong> iron, which may lead to an<br />
underestimation <strong>of</strong> liver iron in patients who have advanced liver disease<br />
[24]. Finally, although high levels <strong>of</strong> liver iron predict an increased risk<br />
for cardiac disease, the converse not always is true: low levels do not always<br />
predict a low risk for cardiac disease [25]. This may reflect the different<br />
organ-specific rates <strong>of</strong> iron accumulation and iron removal in response to<br />
chelation therapy. In patients who have a history <strong>of</strong> poor chelation and<br />
high iron levels in the past who subsequently use chelation, hepatic iron<br />
may be removed more rapidly then cardiac iron, so liver iron levels can<br />
fall before cardiac iron levels improve [26].<br />
The superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) technique<br />
uses magnetometers to measure very small magnetic fields and can be<br />
used as a noninvasive technique to measure ferritin and hemosiderin in<br />
the liver [27]. Estimation <strong>of</strong> liver iron concentration by SQUID correlates<br />
linearly with concentrations measured by liver biopsy [27]. Because this is<br />
a noninvasive technique, repetitive iron concentration measurements by<br />
SQUID have been used to monitor the efficacy <strong>of</strong> chelation in several studies<br />
[16,28–30]. A major limitation to using SQUID is that it is a highly specialized<br />
and expensive approach. In addition, in recent clinical trials <strong>of</strong> the oral<br />
chelator, deferasirox, SQUID measurements underestimated liver iron concentrations<br />
obtained by biopsy by approximately 50% [15]. Currently, only<br />
four sites worldwide <strong>of</strong>fer the technology, limiting accessibility to patients.<br />
MRI increasingly is used to monitor iron overload. This technique takes<br />
advantage <strong>of</strong> local inhomogeneities <strong>of</strong> the magnetic field caused by iron<br />
deposition in tissues [31]. Magnetic resonance scanners are more widely