28.01.2015 Views

Pediatric Clinics of North America - CIPERJ

Pediatric Clinics of North America - CIPERJ

Pediatric Clinics of North America - CIPERJ

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

310 GOLDENBERG & BERNARD<br />

other lung pathology exists and at centers wherein availability <strong>of</strong> (and expertise<br />

with) this modality is limited. CSVT typically is diagnosed by standard<br />

CT or CT venography or, alternatively, MRI or MR venography. The diagnosis<br />

<strong>of</strong> RVT most <strong>of</strong>ten is made clinically in neonates and supported by<br />

Doppler ultrasound findings <strong>of</strong> intrarenal vascular resistive indices; however,<br />

in some cases a discrete thrombus may be suggested by Doppler ultrasound<br />

(especially when extending into the inferior vena cava [IVC]) or<br />

disclosed further via MR venography. When RVT occurs in older children,<br />

Doppler ultrasound or CT <strong>of</strong>ten is diagnostic. Similarly, portal vein thrombosis<br />

typically is visualized by Doppler ultrasound or CT.<br />

When new-onset venous thrombosis is evaluated in patients in areas <strong>of</strong> anatomic<br />

abnormality <strong>of</strong> the venous system (eg, extensive collateral venous circulation<br />

due to a prior VTE episode, May-Thurner anomaly, or atretic IVC<br />

with azygous continuation), more sensitive methods, such as CT venography<br />

or magnetic resonance (MR) venography, <strong>of</strong>ten are required to delineate the<br />

vascular anatomy adequately and the presence, extent, and occlusiveness <strong>of</strong><br />

thrombosis. In some cases, conventional venography may be required.<br />

MR venography is more expensive than CT venography, typically requires<br />

sedation in children less than 8 years <strong>of</strong> age or those who are developmentally<br />

delayed or very anxious, and its feasibility during acute VTE evaluation may<br />

be limited by availability <strong>of</strong> MR-trained technologists. MR venography <strong>of</strong>fers<br />

a significant advantage over CT venography, however, in that it provides diagnostic<br />

sensitivity at least as great as CT venography, without engendering<br />

the significant radiation exposure <strong>of</strong> the latter modality.<br />

Laboratory evaluation<br />

Diagnostic laboratory evaluation for pediatric acute VTE includes a complete<br />

blood count, comprehensive thrombophilia evaluation (discussed previously),<br />

and beta-hCG testing in postmenarchal women. Additional<br />

laboratory studies may be warranted depending on associated medical conditions<br />

and VTE involvement <strong>of</strong> specific organ systems. Table 2 summarizes<br />

a panel <strong>of</strong> thrombophilia traits and markers identified as risk factors for<br />

VTE in pediatric studies and recommended by the Scientific and Standardization<br />

Committee Subcommitee on Perinatal and <strong>Pediatric</strong> Haemostasis <strong>of</strong><br />

the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis for the diagnostic<br />

laboratory evaluation <strong>of</strong> acute VTE in children [13]. The panel is comprised<br />

<strong>of</strong> testing for states <strong>of</strong> anticoagulant (eg, protein C, protein S, and antithrombin)<br />

deficiency and procoagulant (eg, factor VIII) excess, mediators<br />

<strong>of</strong> hypercoagulablity or endothelial damage (eg, APAs, lipoprotein(a), and<br />

homocysteine), and markers <strong>of</strong> coagulation activation (eg, D-dimer).<br />

Treatment<br />

A summary <strong>of</strong> conventional antithrombotic agents and corresponding<br />

target anticoagulant levels, based on recent pediatric recommendations

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!