29.01.2015 Views

Rocznik_2014-215

Rocznik_2014-215

Rocznik_2014-215

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12<br />

Mladen Karadzoski, Artur Adamczyk<br />

FYROM’s determination to join the EU was proven by the fact that it<br />

was the first country to sign the Stabilisation and Association Agreement<br />

with the European Union (already in 2001). 9<br />

Despite internal problems suffered by Macedonia in 2001, caused<br />

by an armed conflict with insurgents from the Albanian minority, the<br />

government in Skopje managed to convince the European Union of its<br />

democratic intentions. The signing of the Ohrid Framework Agreement,<br />

which ended the internal political crisis, showed that Macedonia<br />

was indeed a democratic and tolerant country that respected the<br />

rights of national minorities. In the following years, 2003-2005, in order<br />

to safeguard the still fragile peace in Macedonia, the European Union<br />

executed the EU Police Mission Proxima. The mission’s main task<br />

was to support the Macedonian Ministry of internal Affairs in maintaining<br />

the legal order and reforming the national police force. 10 The<br />

calming of the internal situation and the implementation of further<br />

reforms recommended by the European Commission induced the<br />

FYROM government to apply for full membership in the European<br />

Union, which it did at the 2004 summit of the European Council in<br />

Dublin. 11 In response, in November 2005, the European Commission<br />

issued an opinion that FYROM deserved the status of a candidate<br />

country, which was officially confirmed by a decision of the European<br />

Council in Brussels a month later. 12<br />

The decision of granting FYROM the status of a candidate country<br />

was a form of reward given to Macedonians for their immense effort<br />

in fulfilling the Copenhagen criteria and for their achievements<br />

resulting from the implementation of the legal solutions laid down in<br />

the Ohrid Agreement. It is worth noting that even Greece, with which<br />

Macedonia was still conducting negotiations on the country’s name,<br />

did not block this decision. There is no doubt that this was a political<br />

9 Македонија во ЕУ-трето дополнето и изменето издани, op. cit., p. 12.<br />

10 www.europa.eu/scadplus/leg/en/lvb/r18013.htm, last accessed on: 10 August <strong>2014</strong>.<br />

11 Analytical Report for the Opinion on the Application from the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia<br />

for EU Membership, Commission of the European Communities Brussels, 9 November 2005, SEC<br />

(2005) 1425, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/key_documents/2005/<br />

package/sec_1425_final_analytical_report_mk_en.pdf, last accessed on: 10 August <strong>2014</strong>.<br />

12 F. Nelli Feroci, The Future of Enlargement: Candidate and Potential Candidate Countries of the Western<br />

Balkans, in: F. M. Bindi and I. Angelescu (ed.), A Frontier of Europe: A Transatlantic Problem,<br />

Brooking Institution Press, Washington D.C.–Rome, p. 27.<br />

<strong>Rocznik</strong> Instytutu Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej • Rok 12 (<strong>2014</strong>) • Zeszyt 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!