29.01.2015 Views

Rocznik_2014-215

Rocznik_2014-215

Rocznik_2014-215

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

14<br />

Mladen Karadzoski, Artur Adamczyk<br />

due to the unsolved dispute over the name, was joined by Bulgaria,<br />

which accuses Skopje of conducting an anti-Bulgarian campaign and<br />

of falsifying history. In line with the EU’s decision-making procedures,<br />

the European Council decisions on commencing negotiations and on<br />

Macedonia’s possible accession have to be unanimous, which means<br />

that as long as FYROM does not normalise its relations with Greece<br />

and Bulgaria, the accession process is up in the air.<br />

2.<br />

Greece’s policy towards the FYROM<br />

and the Greek veto in the European Union<br />

The dissolution of Yugoslavia and the establishment of the Republic<br />

of Macedonia on 19 December 1991 came as a surprise to Greek politicians.<br />

Initially, the government in Athens perceived it as a threat to<br />

Greece’s territorial integrity, as during the formation of the new state<br />

some people had called for incorporating the territories inhabited by<br />

Macedonians in neighbouring countries. As Macedonian politicians<br />

mainly strived for international recognition, which would stabilise<br />

the country’s situation in the international arena, they quickly backed<br />

out from the aspirations to establish a United Macedonia. The newly<br />

formed parliament in Skopje passed a declaration on relinquishing all<br />

claims to territories held by the neighbouring countries and on having<br />

all international disputes settled by peaceful means. 17<br />

This, however, did not dissipate all the concerns of Greek politicians<br />

and the relations between the two countries remained strained.<br />

The Macedonian issue essentially comes down to a dispute over the<br />

name and the national symbols of the new country. Greeks negate<br />

this name claiming that the new country may not be called Republic<br />

of Macedonia because Macedonia is connected with the historical<br />

and national heritage of Greece, a region which was part of the ancient<br />

Hellas. Despite the Macedonian’s reassurances of their peaceful<br />

intentions, Greeks perceived the adoption of this name as a pretext<br />

for potential territorial claims to territories held by the Republic of<br />

17 S. Pięta, Polityka Grecji wobec kwestii macedońskiej w latach 1991-1995, in: M. Waloński (ed.), Wybrane<br />

problemy współczesnych stosunków międzynarodowych, Wrocław 2008, p. 159 ff.<br />

<strong>Rocznik</strong> Instytutu Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej • Rok 12 (<strong>2014</strong>) • Zeszyt 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!