- Page 1: IN SITU MEASUREMENTS OF BUILDING MA
- Page 5 and 6: Brian Pilkington In situ measuremen
- Page 7 and 8: A critique of late 20th century and
- Page 9 and 10: List of tables Table 1: Solver sens
- Page 11 and 12: Chart 26: AT/Int plots for measurem
- Page 13 and 14: List of fiqures Figure 1: Example c
- Page 15 and 16: List of equations Equation (1) ....
- Page 17 and 18: Acknowled-mments This study was sug
- Page 19: Nomenclature Units within the thesi
- Page 22 and 23: significant contributor to the sum
- Page 24 and 25: Best practice for energy use in new
- Page 26 and 27: material. The units used to describ
- Page 28 and 29: and concrete at room temperature ar
- Page 30 and 31: various building materials at the U
- Page 32 and 33: with known thermal properties (Toul
- Page 34 and 35: Regulatory framework The constructi
- Page 36 and 37: Energy Performance of Buildings Dir
- Page 38 and 39: "To dramatically improve the sustai
- Page 40 and 41: The National Institute of Standards
- Page 42 and 43: particular product, the manufacture
- Page 44 and 45: and involves very long times in sam
- Page 46 and 47: and volumetric heat capacity, of bu
- Page 48 and 49: The early history of the thermal pr
- Page 50 and 51: Hutchings (1938) as having develope
- Page 52 and 53:
deduced values for A and B, introdu
- Page 54 and 55:
instrument used, hence the process
- Page 56 and 57:
Hooper and Chang (1953), reporting
- Page 58 and 59:
and sample was significant. This pr
- Page 60 and 61:
unless the H value was known or cou
- Page 62 and 63:
Blackwell's 32mm diameter probe and
- Page 64 and 65:
methodology could not be carried ou
- Page 66 and 67:
methods, single needle thermal prob
- Page 68 and 69:
An attempt to use the resistance of
- Page 70 and 71:
whether they were as result of unkn
- Page 72 and 73:
minute measurements and concluded t
- Page 74 and 75:
9 Neglect of higher order terms in
- Page 76 and 77:
matching the thermal properties of
- Page 78 and 79:
calculations of Blackwell (1954) to
- Page 80 and 81:
sawdust; and fireclay using a therm
- Page 82 and 83:
sample of interest and a sample of
- Page 84 and 85:
values for thermal conductivity and
- Page 86 and 87:
cast into Araldite. With quartz, a
- Page 88 and 89:
sample's edge and end losses from t
- Page 90 and 91:
infinite homogenous sample heated b
- Page 92 and 93:
e considered negligible, i. e. towa
- Page 94 and 95:
measuring H independently. It is th
- Page 96 and 97:
Batty et al gave guarded hot plate
- Page 98 and 99:
This was to provide accurate data f
- Page 100 and 101:
Davis (1984), in a book reviewed by
- Page 102 and 103:
powders of such as brick dust, sand
- Page 104 and 105:
was said to be connected to probe s
- Page 106 and 107:
squares method was found. This was
- Page 108 and 109:
a measured radius, the radius value
- Page 110 and 111:
The new work was based on the Modif
- Page 112 and 113:
on the curve. The short time soluti
- Page 114 and 115:
measured for heat pump installation
- Page 116 and 117:
(1993) to assume volumetric heat ca
- Page 118 and 119:
in between. Measurements were taken
- Page 120 and 121:
The probe was calibrated in PTFE, a
- Page 122 and 123:
was highly accurate, even at very s
- Page 124 and 125:
materials. It seems only one refere
- Page 126 and 127:
Goodhew and Griffiths, at the Unive
- Page 128 and 129:
Results were reported for agar immo
- Page 130 and 131:
Identification of the linear asympt
- Page 132 and 133:
those found through computer simula
- Page 134 and 135:
grind rocks to dust for use with th
- Page 136 and 137:
none of these materials were of cer
- Page 138 and 139:
the use of the longest period over
- Page 140 and 141:
Thermal conductivity is then calcul
- Page 142 and 143:
A T(t) = the temperature change at
- Page 144 and 145:
"With the exception of the results
- Page 146 and 147:
marked differences between results
- Page 148 and 149:
1 tw7zý Recognition of the correct
- Page 150 and 151:
The effects of hole size for pre-dr
- Page 152 and 153:
overall discussion and conclusions
- Page 154 and 155:
new and simple method of assessing
- Page 156 and 157:
potential difficulties in different
- Page 158 and 159:
Chapter 4: Assessment of traditiona
- Page 160 and 161:
instance, be anywhere between zero
- Page 162 and 163:
the time window, were then averaged
- Page 164 and 165:
900 H: Agar and PTFE Compared 0H PT
- Page 166 and 167:
285 5796 1086772 -0 01471 22 17372
- Page 168 and 169:
"%error 2to4 constants" chart, whic
- Page 170 and 171:
It is of note that the estimated st
- Page 172 and 173:
Axis adiustments Various researcher
- Page 174 and 175:
worked back progressively from Os -
- Page 176 and 177:
7 using equation (6) over successiv
- Page 178 and 179:
various measurements taken with the
- Page 180 and 181:
Figure 11: Laboratory based thermal
- Page 182 and 183:
A simple gauge of repeatability was
- Page 184 and 185:
It is interesting to note in Table
- Page 186 and 187:
Probe Temperature v Elapsed Heating
- Page 188 and 189:
Probe Temperature v Elapsed Heating
- Page 190 and 191:
Hole size and fillers This section
- Page 192 and 193:
probes ranged from 0.9 Wm-l to 6.5
- Page 194 and 195:
AT in a 2mm hole in aerated block,
- Page 196 and 197:
and its trend. The slope is slightl
- Page 198 and 199:
temperature stabilisation before an
- Page 200 and 201:
Material (probe direction) Mean Mea
- Page 202 and 203:
10 100 1000 s Chart 23: AT/Int plot
- Page 204 and 205:
Power Level Assessment, PTFE - Low
- Page 206 and 207:
it must be emphasised that the rise
- Page 208 and 209:
1 Hz, within the time window used,
- Page 210 and 211:
No theoretical or practical reason
- Page 212 and 213:
Power Level Assessment, Agar Immobi
- Page 214 and 215:
differences should appear in result
- Page 216 and 217:
20mm, 30mm and 50mm from, and paral
- Page 218 and 219:
Figure 15: Thermal images of a prob
- Page 220 and 221:
A number of measurements were carri
- Page 222 and 223:
Probe Temperature v Elapsed Heating
- Page 224 and 225:
Thermal Conductivity by TP08 of Aer
- Page 226 and 227:
could then be visually assessed to
- Page 228 and 229:
measurements, so switch gear could
- Page 230 and 231:
The power was measured using the vo
- Page 232 and 233:
ce: tcss Cr'Jflr te.: e Z,: Rex. 1
- Page 234 and 235:
A number of problems with this meth
- Page 236 and 237:
oom, both raising the ambient tempe
- Page 238 and 239:
proportion of the data to be used.
- Page 240 and 241:
Introduction to the case studies Th
- Page 242 and 243:
heating cycles, data were downloade
- Page 244 and 245:
approximately 0.03511C and chart 43
- Page 246 and 247:
The second cob building was a small
- Page 248 and 249:
1.20 , A calculated over 100s perio
- Page 250 and 251:
through the morning. Internal measu
- Page 252 and 253:
Base and Needle Temperatures Compar
- Page 254 and 255:
value would be significantly greate
- Page 256 and 257:
In Situ and Laboratory Results Over
- Page 258 and 259:
Case study 4, Straw bale garages Me
- Page 260 and 261:
0.08 In Situ and Laboratory Interna
- Page 262 and 263:
Measurements were taken internally
- Page 264 and 265:
Figure 27: The clay straw studio un
- Page 266 and 267:
The heating pipes in the wall were
- Page 268 and 269:
samples decreased. The thermographi
- Page 270 and 271:
electrical resistance and to avoid
- Page 272 and 273:
a and H on AT/Int so that they coul
- Page 274 and 275:
Forminci holes for the thermal Drob
- Page 276 and 277:
Contact with contemporary researche
- Page 278 and 279:
and from the probe at later times.
- Page 280 and 281:
measurements, the time windows for
- Page 282 and 283:
such extents. A thermographic study
- Page 284 and 285:
Conclusions This section provides a
- Page 286 and 287:
as the results required, which, for
- Page 288 and 289:
Described a new methodology to asse
- Page 290 and 291:
o Axial and end losses o Convection
- Page 292 and 293:
This draws into question the means
- Page 294 and 295:
The slope assessment methodology as
- Page 296 and 297:
A Calculated over 100s Periods - He
- Page 298 and 299:
The second series - virtual constru
- Page 300 and 301:
Appendix B: The experiment iog Belo
- Page 302 and 303:
I Ref Date Material Probe Heat Lab
- Page 304 and 305:
284
- Page 306 and 307:
Ref Date Material Probe Heat Lab Ra
- Page 308 and 309:
Ref Date Material Probe Heat Lab In
- Page 310 and 311:
I Rol Date Material Probe Heat Lab
- Page 312 and 313:
Ref Date Material Probe Heat Lab Ra
- Page 314 and 315:
Rat Date Material Probe Heat Lab Ra
- Page 316 and 317:
Ref Date Material Probe Heat Lab Ra
- Page 318 and 319:
Appendix C: Example of experiment r
- Page 320 and 321:
Appendix D: Voltra summary, series
- Page 322 and 323:
Appendix E: Voltra summary, constru
- Page 324 and 325:
References Abey J, Smallcombe J (20
- Page 326 and 327:
Blackwell JH (1956) The axial-flow
- Page 328 and 329:
Chambers N, Child R, Jenkin N, Lewi
- Page 330 and 331:
FPAG Fuel - Poverty Advisory Group
- Page 332 and 333:
Holman JP (1981) Heat Transfer, 5th
- Page 334 and 335:
Lazarus N (2003) Beddington zero (f
- Page 336 and 337:
Parkpoom S, Harrison GP, Bialek JW
- Page 338 and 339:
Singh R, Saxena NS, Chaudhary DR (1
- Page 340 and 341:
method, Rev. Sci. Instruments, v. 5
- Page 342 and 343:
Bibliography Asher GB, Sloan ED, Gr
- Page 344 and 345:
Gilbo CF (1985) Thermal conductivit
- Page 346 and 347:
Sharma RG, Pande RN, Chaudhary DR (