29.01.2015 Views

by A thesis submitted to the University of Plymouth in ... - PEARL home

by A thesis submitted to the University of Plymouth in ... - PEARL home

by A thesis submitted to the University of Plymouth in ... - PEARL home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Hutch<strong>in</strong>gs (1938) as hav<strong>in</strong>g developed <strong>the</strong> approximate solution for this<br />

particular problem. Whitehead (1944) was chiefly concerned with heat<br />

conduction effects <strong>to</strong> and from underground pipes and cables.<br />

Carslaw and Jaeger (1948 pp. 280-286) noted that <strong>the</strong>ir solution for radial heat<br />

transport <strong>in</strong> a composite cyl<strong>in</strong>der, e. g. a <strong>the</strong>rmal probe with<strong>in</strong> a cyl<strong>in</strong>drical or<br />

<strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite sample, "corresponds roughly <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> transient heat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> a buried cable<br />

carry<strong>in</strong>g electric current" although "a still closer approximation" would <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

contact resistance between <strong>the</strong> cable and <strong>the</strong> surround<strong>in</strong>g medium. This contact<br />

resistance was also described as outer or exterior conductivity, termed H, with<br />

units WM-2 K-1 (Carslaw and Jaeger, 1948 pp. 13-14). H was considered a<br />

constant, with <strong>the</strong> heat flux between two <strong>to</strong>uch<strong>in</strong>g faces <strong>of</strong> material given as<br />

H(T, -T2), show<strong>in</strong>g that its effect was dependent on <strong>the</strong> temperature difference<br />

between <strong>the</strong> two faces. No calculations were given <strong>to</strong> allow <strong>the</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong><br />

H <strong>the</strong>oretically, although some example values were given. These showed that,<br />

at similar temperatures<br />

and pressures, H could vary greatly between one<br />

material, e. g. a <strong>the</strong>rmal probe, and various o<strong>the</strong>r materials, such as water and<br />

air<br />

It was ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed that, where a heat flux existed across two materials,<br />

temperature at <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>to</strong>uch<strong>in</strong>g surfaces could only be assumed equal where<br />

<strong>the</strong>re was <strong>in</strong>timate contact, such as <strong>in</strong> a soldered jo<strong>in</strong>t. A contact resistance<br />

would still exist even where two optically flat surfaces were pressed <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r<br />

(Carslaw and Jaeger, 1948 pp. 17-18).<br />

This was carried forward <strong>to</strong> a description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmal resistivity <strong>in</strong> a composite<br />

wall where <strong>the</strong> <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>the</strong>rmal resistance was described as be<strong>in</strong>g made up <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!