Educational Programming - Milford Public Schools
Educational Programming - Milford Public Schools
Educational Programming - Milford Public Schools
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Milford</strong> School Facility Utilization & Study<br />
<strong>Educational</strong><br />
<strong>Programming</strong><br />
August 20, 2013<br />
In Association with: Thomas Jokubaitis<br />
Prepared for <strong>Milford</strong> Board of Education<br />
1
Introduction of New Committee Chair<br />
Revisit Existing Conditions -<br />
Committee Member questions<br />
<strong>Educational</strong> <strong>Programming</strong> Review<br />
Work Group Discussion<br />
Next Steps<br />
Introduction<br />
In Association with: Thomas Jokubaitis<br />
Prepared for <strong>Milford</strong> Board of Education<br />
2
Revisit Existing Conditions – Questions<br />
In Association with: Thomas Jokubaitis<br />
Prepared for <strong>Milford</strong> Board of Education<br />
3
Conceptual Framework<br />
Variables<br />
impacting <strong>Milford</strong>’s<br />
preferred future<br />
Integration of each<br />
variable into<br />
recommendations<br />
Future<br />
programs<br />
Enrollment<br />
Preferred<br />
School<br />
Capacity<br />
Anticipating impact<br />
and adjusting<br />
thinking will<br />
optimize potential<br />
for success<br />
Technology<br />
Equity<br />
Future<br />
Community<br />
Support<br />
Economic<br />
Conditions<br />
In Association with: Thomas Jokubaitis<br />
Prepared for <strong>Milford</strong> Board of Education<br />
4
<strong>Educational</strong> Focus Groups Discussions<br />
Met with Superintendent and<br />
Administrators<br />
Met with All School Principals<br />
Discussed Future <strong>Educational</strong><br />
<strong>Programming</strong> Needs and Perceived<br />
Facility Needs<br />
In Association with: Thomas Jokubaitis<br />
Prepared for <strong>Milford</strong> Board of Education<br />
5
Elementary Focus Group Summary<br />
ES Organizational Design<br />
PreK Deployment<br />
7 PreK classes centrally located at Orange Ave<br />
Transportation provided to special needs / Nondisabled<br />
peers provide own.<br />
Non-disabled peer participation declined – lack of<br />
transportation<br />
Consider housing PreK at appropriate facilities<br />
throughout district<br />
In Association with: Thomas Jokubaitis<br />
Prepared for <strong>Milford</strong> Board of Education<br />
6
Elementary Focus Group Summary<br />
ES Organizational Design<br />
Too many transitions with K-2/3-5/6-8/9-12 organization<br />
Exacerbated by split feeder in some school alignments<br />
Parents often have students attending 2 or 3 schools –<br />
decline in volunteerism and sense of community<br />
Current K-2 organization poses concern for supervision<br />
on busses, requiring aides to assist young students<br />
Equity in class sizes is a major issue; a large disparity is<br />
perceived to exist.<br />
In Association with: Thomas Jokubaitis<br />
Prepared for <strong>Milford</strong> Board of Education<br />
7
Elementary Focus Group Summary<br />
ES <strong>Programming</strong><br />
Support for “Professional Learning Communities” –<br />
would need to add specialists to accomplish effective<br />
scheduling of PLCs<br />
Literacy interventionist as reading specialists and<br />
coaches - remediate and accelerate learning.<br />
World language should start in elementary schoolconsider<br />
as a special subject<br />
Science instruction less emphasized- consider science<br />
teacher specialist at elementary schools<br />
In Association with: Thomas Jokubaitis<br />
Prepared for <strong>Milford</strong> Board of Education<br />
8
Elementary Focus Group Summary<br />
ES Organizational Options & Considerations<br />
Overwhelming desire for PreK-4 / PreK-5 elementary<br />
organizational configuration<br />
Desire to better align elementary-middle-high feeder<br />
pattern to prevent splitting of students<br />
Desire to distribute PreK programming throughout<br />
elementary schools in order to ease transportation<br />
burden and increase non-disabled peer participation.<br />
Any changes in organization require sensitivity and<br />
open communication early and often<br />
In Association with: Thomas Jokubaitis<br />
Prepared for <strong>Milford</strong> Board of Education<br />
9
Middle Focus Group Summary<br />
MS Organizational Design<br />
Existing Middle School buildings originally designed<br />
as elementary schools<br />
Although renovations and improvements have been made –<br />
infrastructure and core facilities are not designed for modern middle<br />
school programs.<br />
Emphasis placed on climate and culture to achieve mission and vision –<br />
facility retrofit to achieve<br />
Lack adequate auditorium/gymnasiums for middle<br />
school programming<br />
Recess not offered at East Shore and Harborside due to<br />
site limitations<br />
In Association with: Thomas Jokubaitis<br />
Prepared for <strong>Milford</strong> Board of Education<br />
10
Middle Focus Group Summary<br />
MS Organizational Design<br />
Perceived inequity in terms of facilities and resources<br />
Desire to change community perception about <strong>Milford</strong><br />
<strong>Schools</strong> as ~25% of middle school students opt for<br />
private/magnet options at 9 th grade.<br />
Inadequate space for some programs – teacher room<br />
sharing & room-to-room on a carte<br />
Desire World Language for 6 th graders<br />
In Association with: Thomas Jokubaitis<br />
Prepared for <strong>Milford</strong> Board of Education<br />
11
Middle Focus Group Summary<br />
MS Organizational Options & Considerations<br />
Strong Desire to explore 5-8 middle school alignment<br />
Four‐year sequence affords greater continuity in programming,<br />
strengthens sense of community and increases parent involvement in<br />
school activities<br />
Combined with PreK‐4 elementary, the 4‐4‐4 grade level organization<br />
provides fewer transitions and improved continuity of experience<br />
If 6-8 organization is sustained, schools should be<br />
retrofitted to support mission and vision<br />
Did not support a grade 7-9 middle school organization<br />
– configuration does not align with mission and vision<br />
In Association with: Thomas Jokubaitis<br />
Prepared for <strong>Milford</strong> Board of Education<br />
12
High Focus Group Summary<br />
Law HS Program Needs<br />
Need additional computer labs or design a plan for<br />
accessibility in specific classes<br />
Design procedures for CAPSTONE Projects<br />
A new model for World Languages should be explored<br />
Career and Technical Education programs require<br />
better direction and increased emphasis<br />
In Association with: Thomas Jokubaitis<br />
Prepared for <strong>Milford</strong> Board of Education<br />
13
High Focus Group Summary<br />
Foran HS Program Needs<br />
Need a second gymnasium<br />
Parking areas should be improved<br />
Need to be thinking about offering more languages<br />
through a “virtual” learning experience; need teacher<br />
direction in a different learning model<br />
In Association with: Thomas Jokubaitis<br />
Prepared for <strong>Milford</strong> Board of Education<br />
14
High Focus Group Summary<br />
Alt. HS Program Needs<br />
Need to have more technical education experiences for<br />
students; move students toward career options<br />
Fifth-year transitional opportunities for special needs<br />
students<br />
Need to extend students’ school day beyond core<br />
academic courses<br />
Need to plan for twenty-five credit graduation<br />
requirement, including world language credits<br />
In Association with: Thomas Jokubaitis<br />
Prepared for <strong>Milford</strong> Board of Education<br />
15
High Focus Group Summary<br />
HS Organizational Options & Considerations<br />
High School Consolidation has some appeal if<br />
organized into smaller learning communities<br />
Convert Foran into a 10-12 consolidated city HS<br />
Convert Law into a 7-9 school; grades 7 & 8 operate<br />
under middle school, while 9 operates as high school<br />
format<br />
New High City High School with conversion of Foran &<br />
Law into 6-8 or 5-8 middle schools<br />
Facility could be tailored to 21 st century learning needs<br />
Reuse of high school facilities could enhance middle school learning<br />
opportunities.<br />
In Association with: Thomas Jokubaitis<br />
Prepared for <strong>Milford</strong> Board of Education<br />
16
Questions<br />
In Association with: Thomas Jokubaitis<br />
Prepared for <strong>Milford</strong> Board of Education<br />
17
Work Group Discussions<br />
Four Diverse Workgroups<br />
Focused and Timed Discussion<br />
Bearing in Mind Complete Existing<br />
Conditions Analysis<br />
In Association with: Thomas Jokubaitis<br />
Prepared for <strong>Milford</strong> Board of Education<br />
18
Work Group Discussion 1<br />
Establish Criteria for Organizational<br />
Changes. What are we weighing options<br />
against<br />
May include:<br />
Fiscal Responsibility / Operating Costs<br />
Parity<br />
Class Sizes<br />
Transportation<br />
<strong>Educational</strong> Objectives<br />
In Association with: Thomas Jokubaitis<br />
Prepared for <strong>Milford</strong> Board of Education<br />
19
Work Group Discussion 2<br />
Grade Configuration Options<br />
Opportunities to Reorganize School<br />
System to Improve Efficiency and<br />
Effectiveness<br />
What Ideas Should Be Explored, Given<br />
Criteria<br />
Program Expansion<br />
Grade/Organizational Reconfiguration<br />
Relocation/deployment of Programs<br />
Facility Consolidation<br />
In Association with: Thomas Jokubaitis<br />
Prepared for <strong>Milford</strong> Board of Education<br />
20