Facilities Study Presentation - Wissahickon School District

More documents

Recommendations

Info

WISSAHICKON SCHOOL DISTRICT Enrollment & capacity FACILITY STUDY SECONDARY SCHOOLS Jun 30, 2011 Building Capacity Comparison • PDE PlanCon FTE (PDE) Present PDE District * Middle School • Grades 6-8 1543 1286 Current enrollment: approx. 1,085 Surplus = 458 201 High School • 9-12 1865 1658 Current enrollment: approx. 1,490 375 168 * The Pennsylvania Department of Education (PDE) reduces the capacity of secondary schools by a 10% factor because students are not in every classroom for the entire day. The District Capacity uses a 25% reduction factor for the Middle School and a 20% reduction factor for the High School that represents the actual functional capacity for each specific school. BRESLIN RIDYARD FADERO ARCHITECTS DHUY Engineering, Inc.
Options considered OPTION 1 Detailed Construction Options and Cost Estimates Baseline Option Summary Elementary School Options Summary OPTION 1 Description: Maintain the existing school configuration of grade structure and number of schools. Improve each facility as required with capital project improvements over a 10 year time frame. Estimated Cost: Mattison Avenue Elementary School Improvements * $ 3,436,586 Shady Grove Elementary School Improvements * $ 10,732,787 Blue Bell Elementary School Improvements * $ 7,998,978 Stony Creek Elementary School Improvements * $ 8,565,895 Lower Gwynedd Elementary School Improvements * $ 6,084,163 Total Estimated Cost: $ 36,818,409 * See Capital Improvements Summary for detailed costs. Pros: • No redistricting is required. Cons: • 21 st Century Schools are not achieved. • There is an excess capacity of greater than 10% of the projected enrollment. • No major renovations are planned for any elementary school. • There are no Green building features, sustainable or energy efficient improvements. BRESLIN RIDYARD FADERO ARCHITECTS DHUY Engineering, Inc.
Page 1 and 2: WISSAHICKON SCHOOL DISTRICT Facilit
Page 3 and 4: Recognition of the District team AD
Page 5 and 6: Summary of facilities study • Tab
Page 7 and 8: Educational Specifications Instruct
Page 9 and 10: Building Profiles - finishes BRESLI
Page 11 and 12: Logic matrix & priority indexing Pr
Page 13 and 14: Energy portfolio • ENERGY STAR -
Page 15 and 16: Facility cost comparison WISSAHICKO
Page 17 and 18: Enrollment & capacity BRESLIN RIDYA
Page 19: Enrollment & capacity WISSAHICKON S
Page 23 and 24: Options considered Detailed Cost Es
Page 25 and 26: Options considered PEL projects a d
Page 27 and 28: Options considered BRESLIN RIDYARD
Page 29 and 30: Options considered SECONDARY SCHOOL
Page 31 and 32: Options considered SECONDARY SCHOOL
Page 33 and 34: Options considered + 102.7 m + 99.5
Page 35 and 36: Options considered - Sketches BRESL
Page 43 and 44: Copyright 2009 Breslin Ridyard Fade
Page 45 and 46: What’s next • Further Discussio

Facilities Study Presentation - Wissahickon School District

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?