30.01.2015 Views

PwC - WWF

PwC - WWF

PwC - WWF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Defining our corporate<br />

responsibility agenda<br />

Listening to, and engaging our<br />

Stakeholders about what it means for<br />

<strong>PwC</strong> to be a responsible corporate<br />

citizen, helps us do the right thing by<br />

our people, clients and our communities.<br />

An open dialogue helps build trustbased<br />

and transparent relationships,<br />

and that is what we at <strong>PwC</strong> highly value<br />

– this is our <strong>PwC</strong> Experience.<br />

We defined our most important internal<br />

and external stakeholder groups and<br />

engaged them through interactive<br />

dialogue sessions, written<br />

questionnaires and one-to-one feedback<br />

sessions. In addition, we looked at our<br />

internal employee satisfaction survey<br />

results for further insight into how our<br />

employees view our corporate<br />

responsibility efforts.<br />

Our main objectives for initiating a<br />

dialogue with our Stakeholders were:<br />

• to improve our understanding of what<br />

our Stakeholders would like <strong>PwC</strong> to do<br />

in the area of CR,<br />

• to gather comments and feedback to<br />

help us review our CR strategy,<br />

• to encourage an open, honest and<br />

constructive discussion, and<br />

• to determine the issues our<br />

Stakeholders most want to read about<br />

in this report.<br />

When defining our approach and<br />

methodology for the Stakeholder<br />

engagement process, we followed<br />

AA1000 Accountability Principles of<br />

Inclusivity, Materiality and<br />

Responsiveness. For defining the report<br />

content we followed the GRI G3.1<br />

Reporting Principles for Defining<br />

Content – Materiality, Stakeholder<br />

Inclusiveness, Sustainability Context,<br />

and Completeness**.<br />

Listening to our<br />

Stakeholders<br />

• 149 representatives gave us their<br />

feedback<br />

• 83 attended group dialogue<br />

sessions<br />

• 66 participated by telephone or<br />

by submitting a completed<br />

questionnaire<br />

We find the two standards<br />

complementary and by applying both we<br />

have been able to gain a better<br />

understanding of our Stakeholder’s<br />

expectations, adding value to our CR<br />

agenda.<br />

** Global Reporting Initiative http://www.<br />

globalreporting.org/ReportingFramework/<br />

G31Guidelines/<br />

We would like to extend our<br />

appreciation to our partners and<br />

employees, our clients and our business<br />

partners, and other groups and<br />

individuals who have contributed to the<br />

dialogue. Your input was invaluable.<br />

We hope you enjoy reading the report,<br />

which has taken your feedback and<br />

comments into consideration, in<br />

addressing our plans for the future.<br />

Our<br />

Stakeholders<br />

• Academia and researchers<br />

• Business and industry organisations<br />

• Clients<br />

• Governmental agencies<br />

• Graduates<br />

• Industry peers<br />

• Media<br />

• NGOs<br />

• People (staff and partners)<br />

• Vendors and suppliers<br />

Key areas of<br />

interest<br />

Based on the outcomes of the dialogue,<br />

we have developed a materiality index,<br />

using the top three issues identified by<br />

each group of Stakeholders. The<br />

‘importance of issues to external<br />

Stakeholders’ is based on the<br />

stakeholder dialogue analysis, and the<br />

‘materiality of issues to business’ is<br />

based on internal Stakeholders’<br />

feedback. This has been additionally<br />

verified by the CR Committee and <strong>PwC</strong>’s<br />

senior management.<br />

Our stakeholder dialogue in 2011 was<br />

the first one conducted to this scale.<br />

Next year we plan to involve more<br />

Stakeholders - especially governmental<br />

agencies - in discussions around the<br />

further development of our CR agenda<br />

and the way in which we report on this.<br />

We are committed to sharing more<br />

information and continuing a<br />

constructive dialogue on a regular basis<br />

with our Stakeholders.<br />

Importance of issues to external stakeholders<br />

CLIENTS<br />

NGOs<br />

Client feedback survey<br />

Brand health index<br />

Regular meetings<br />

Charity events<br />

Volunteering<br />

PEOPLE<br />

Global People Survey<br />

Pulse survey<br />

Internal corporate intranet (rise)<br />

<strong>PwC</strong><br />

Feedback & debriefing<br />

meetings<br />

Carbon footprint<br />

Environmental strategy<br />

VENDORS &<br />

SUPPLIERS<br />

Pro bono services<br />

Recycling<br />

Paper consumption<br />

Community investment<br />

Water use<br />

Active involvement in working<br />

groups and committees<br />

MEDIA<br />

Training and workshops for<br />

journalists on business hot topics<br />

Press conferences<br />

Media luncheons and roundtables<br />

BUSINESS &<br />

INDUSTRY<br />

ORGANISATIONS<br />

How we engaged with Stakeholders<br />

CR strategy & targets<br />

Employee volunteering<br />

People engagement<br />

in CR activities<br />

Materiality of issues to business<br />

Employee security & wellbeing<br />

Talent attraction & retention<br />

Training & development<br />

Anti-corruption,<br />

anti - bribery measures<br />

Data security<br />

Behavioural change<br />

- <strong>PwC</strong> Experience<br />

Client satisfaction<br />

Inclusion & diversity<br />

Maintaining<br />

exceptional<br />

ethical<br />

standards<br />

12 Corporate Responsibility Report 2011<br />

Corporate Responsibility Report 2011 13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!