Novita Research Report January 1999 - Novita Children's Services
Novita Research Report January 1999 - Novita Children's Services
Novita Research Report January 1999 - Novita Children's Services
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Systematic review of strategies used by therapists to work effectively<br />
with teachers and aides to implement programs which address client goals<br />
22<br />
Karen Grimmer 1<br />
Director<br />
Debashish Das 1<br />
Project Officer<br />
Saravana Kumar 1<br />
Project Officer<br />
<strong>Novita</strong><br />
Reference Group<br />
Bronwyn Timko<br />
Regional Senior<br />
Speech Pathologist<br />
Terry Lyons<br />
Chief Occupational<br />
Therapist<br />
Catherine Olsson<br />
Chief Speech<br />
Pathologist<br />
Parimala<br />
Raghavendra<br />
Manager,<br />
Clinical <strong>Research</strong><br />
Judy Sprod<br />
Chief Physiotherapist<br />
1<br />
Centre for<br />
Allied Health Evidence<br />
Objective<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> therapy staff work in kindergartens and schools with educational staff to achieve client goals, and enhance<br />
participation of children into their class environments. It has been recognised that therapists often struggle with<br />
how to effectively achieve client and family goals when the main intervention input is via support staff from other<br />
organisations. As there are no standard approaches or best practice guidelines, this study aimed to undertake a<br />
systematic review to identify evidence for strategies in use or different collaborative approaches.<br />
Method<br />
The Centre for Allied Health Evidence (CAHE) was contracted to undertake a systematic review that considered<br />
the evidence for effective training methods for therapists and education staff to work together with the purpose of<br />
supporting children with disabilities in the classroom. The <strong>Novita</strong> Reference group has been working with CAHE<br />
staff in refining the question, identifying the key databases and providing regular input into the appropriateness of<br />
the information retrieved.<br />
The parameters of the study were:<br />
• Population – Education staff (teachers/assistants/aides/para-professional);<br />
• Intervention – Strategies/methods that therapists (occupational therapists, physiotherapists, speech<br />
pathologists, psychologists) use in training and working with education staff (modelling, written information,<br />
verbal feedback, etc.);<br />
• Comparison – Effectiveness of two different strategies; and<br />
• Outcome – Before and after measures indicating positive change, maintenance of change in behaviour,<br />
attitude, etc.<br />
Results<br />
A synthesised report will be provided at the conclusion of the study.<br />
Implications<br />
The review may provide evidence to strategies already being used or may suggest different approaches in<br />
collaborating with education staff.<br />
Project commenced in 2004<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004