Novita Research Report January 1999 - Novita Children's Services
Novita Research Report January 1999 - Novita Children's Services
Novita Research Report January 1999 - Novita Children's Services
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
selecting research projects<br />
The Clinical <strong>Research</strong> and <strong>Research</strong> & Development<br />
Departments have different committees<br />
and criteria for the approval of research ideas.<br />
6<br />
<strong>Research</strong> & Development Project<br />
Selection Process<br />
The <strong>Research</strong> & Development (R&D) Department has<br />
refined its project selection process since the creation of<br />
the Department, to establish and maintain ISO9001 Quality<br />
Accreditation and as a result of annual reviews of the<br />
Department. The essential criteria for project selection have<br />
not changed significantly over the past few years, however the<br />
process of evaluation against the following criteria has been<br />
modified. The criteria for project approval are as follows:<br />
• The idea must have the potential to enhance the lives of,<br />
or provide benefit to more than one individual;<br />
• Ideas should promote a collaborative relationship between<br />
R&D research staff and clinical staff, caregivers and<br />
end users;<br />
• The idea must provide an opportunity for the <strong>Novita</strong>Tech<br />
R&D Department to create an innovative, technological<br />
solution that meets the needs of people with disabilities<br />
in South Australia;<br />
• Where possible, the need for the idea should have arisen<br />
due to a lack of other existing, suitable or alternative solutions<br />
in the market. The idea should contribute to developing and<br />
piloting of a new product or service alternative;<br />
• The idea or problem solution must be in keeping with<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong>’ Strategic Plan;<br />
• There must be a ‘project champion’ (ideally the person<br />
who submits the idea) who is willing to be involved with the<br />
project through to completion;<br />
• The idea should potentially demonstrate one or more of<br />
the following measurable benefits, to justify the allocation<br />
of <strong>Novita</strong> resources:<br />
− enhance the lives of <strong>Novita</strong> clients;<br />
− provide a marketable/profitable end product;<br />
− provide a significant time or cost saving outcome<br />
(this could be to staff, clients, carers, etc.);<br />
− strive to enhance client satisfaction with the services<br />
of <strong>Novita</strong>;<br />
− clinical-based ideas should strive to increase the<br />
efficiency of <strong>Novita</strong> staff, and in doing so, benefit<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> clients.<br />
In the first instance, all project ideas that are submitted to<br />
R&D are filtered against these criteria. If an idea passes this<br />
initial filtering process, the idea is further developed into a<br />
strong business case before it is undertaken as a project.<br />
The secondary process (referred to as ‘Phase Zero’)<br />
is a more exhaustive evaluation that aims to identify and<br />
investigate any weaknesses or ‘areas of concern’ surrounding<br />
the submitted idea, to ensure that the project is feasible and is<br />
likely to produce a significant benefit. These concerns typically<br />
involve work to evaluate items such as the technical feasibility;<br />
an estimate of the significance to the lives of the people with a<br />
disability; an estimate of the number of <strong>Novita</strong> and other clients<br />
impacted upon; similar work occurring elsewhere in the world;<br />
alternative existing products; resolution of legal and ethical<br />
issues; and consideration of marketing issues.<br />
The output of ‘Phase Zero’ is a business and project plan<br />
that is tabled before an R&D Project Review Panel. This panel<br />
has skills in the assessment and review of business cases<br />
and has the authority to approve or reject project proposals or<br />
recommend additional work on particular parts of the business<br />
case. The panel may also rank or prioritise projects.<br />
The successful business case forms the basis of a request<br />
for project funding which may be sought from internal budget<br />
resources, the <strong>Novita</strong> Executive Reference Group or external<br />
funding bodies. Proposals where the scope extends beyond<br />
children’s services alone may require external funding, and their<br />
commencement is dependant upon the success of applications<br />
for such funding.<br />
If a project is approved through the selection process it will<br />
then be entered into the R&D project database and project plan.<br />
All projects are then required to be clearly defined, with sign-off<br />
by appropriate personnel at the end of each of the following<br />
stages throughout the life of the project:<br />
• design documents and production;<br />
• design document verification;<br />
• prototype construction or project implementation;<br />
• project internal validation;<br />
• project external validation;<br />
• project completion.<br />
If any of the above stages cannot be met then the project<br />
objectives are revised and re-evaluated at one of the earlier<br />
stages, or the project is cancelled because it is not feasible.<br />
Up until 2004, a group known as the ‘R&D Reference Group’<br />
was used to assist the selection of projects and the allocation<br />
of resources. Members of the group came from the other<br />
Departments within <strong>Novita</strong>Tech, the former Communication and<br />
Therapy <strong>Services</strong> division, the occupational therapy and speech<br />
pathology departments of <strong>Novita</strong>, and also included the parents<br />
of two <strong>Novita</strong> clients.<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004