30.01.2015 Views

Novita Research Report January 1999 - Novita Children's Services

Novita Research Report January 1999 - Novita Children's Services

Novita Research Report January 1999 - Novita Children's Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

<strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


table of contents<br />

Foreword 1<br />

Summary of research reports 2<br />

Overview of research at <strong>Novita</strong> 4<br />

Our research partners 5<br />

Selecting research projects 6<br />

<strong>Research</strong> teams 8<br />

Projects 12<br />

Publications 64<br />

Conference presentations 65


foreword<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Inc (formerly The Crippled Children’s Association of South<br />

Australia Inc) has demonstrated a commitment to research for many years, as an<br />

essential part of providing quality services to people with disabilities. We are very<br />

pleased to endorse the first <strong>Novita</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, which showcases research activities<br />

undertaken during the past five years.<br />

<strong>Research</strong> at <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> (<strong>Novita</strong>) is conducted within two streams. The<br />

<strong>Research</strong> and Development Department of <strong>Novita</strong>Tech has a history of over 8 years of<br />

leading-edge research in the Rehabilitation Engineering field. The Clinical <strong>Research</strong><br />

Department was established five years ago, as the first clinical research department within<br />

a disability organisation in Australia. Both areas have achieved outstanding results in<br />

research and the dissemination of research findings.<br />

As a service delivery organisation, <strong>Novita</strong> is ideally placed to undertake research that makes<br />

a difference to clients and has direct benefits to service provision. A particularly important<br />

part of this report is the implications section which identifies the client and service delivery<br />

outcomes achieved from each research project.<br />

1<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> research activities are possible because of generous community support, effective<br />

fundraising by the Marketing and Public Relations Division and through specific research<br />

grant funding. <strong>Research</strong> activities are also supported by partnerships with many community<br />

agencies, including universities and other disability and health organisations.<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> is committed to the importance of research as an investment into the current and<br />

future quality of services in the disability sector.<br />

Jane Hyde<br />

President<br />

Glenn Rappensberg<br />

Chief Executive<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


summary of research reports<br />

The following pages contain the summaries of <strong>Research</strong> Projects undertaken by or in collaboration<br />

with <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Inc (formerly The Crippled Children’s Association of SA Inc). These Projects<br />

are reported in greater detail later in this <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong>. Projects are arranged alphabetically by the title<br />

of the project and with the primary investigator named.<br />

PRIMARY<br />

INVESTIGATOR PROJECT TITLE PG<br />

Children’s Physical Functioning<br />

Opperman K Paediatric dysphagia and physical disability: the evidence base 13<br />

Russo R<br />

Pilot study into the use of Botulinum-A Toxin in the management of spasticity<br />

in the upper limb of children who have spasticity of central origin<br />

13<br />

Bostock S Serial casting after Botulinum Toxin: A retrospective study of outcomes for dynamic equinus 14<br />

Children’s Activity and Participation<br />

Manson P Can typically developing preschool children learn the meaning of graphic symbols through play 15<br />

Durand S Early Intervention: when is it too late A case study of a 6 year old boy with mild cerebral palsy 15<br />

Murchland S<br />

DuBois L<br />

Evidence based practice review of occupational therapy interventions to assist pre-school children with physical<br />

disabilities to become spontaneous and independent players, and guidelines for clinical practice<br />

Handwriting of children who have hemiplegia: a profile of abilities in children aged 8 – 13 years from a parent<br />

and teacher survey<br />

16<br />

17<br />

2<br />

Bricher G ‘If you wanted to know about it just ask!’ Exploring disabled young people’s experiences of health and health care 18<br />

Ising M<br />

Now I can eat too: the impact of an intensive community based feeding program on a four year old with severe<br />

feeding difficulties<br />

19<br />

Guidera A Participation of Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) users in school settings: research evidence 19<br />

Leane J<br />

Reading and phonological awareness in children with complex communication needs:<br />

literacy outcomes of internet-based assessment and intervention<br />

20<br />

Grace E School vocabulary in typically developing 6 year old Australian children 21<br />

Centre for Allied<br />

Health Evidence<br />

Systematic review of strategies used by therapists to work effectively with teachers and aides to implement<br />

programs which address client goals<br />

22<br />

Murchland S<br />

Unravelling handwriting: an investigation into the factors that influence handwriting ability in primary school aged<br />

children with hemiplegia<br />

23<br />

Equipment<br />

Communication Equipment<br />

Raghavendra P Clinical pathway for voice output communication aid recommendation and training for adults with disabilities 24<br />

Symonds B Convergence of AAC and portable computers 25<br />

Symonds B Effective mounting solutions 26<br />

Bebb M Predictors of device abandonment: transitioning from school to the community 27<br />

Garrett R Vocabulary Organiser – development of the program 28<br />

Garrett R Vocabulary Organiser – enhancement and commercialisation 29<br />

Bradley M Vocabulary Organiser – marketing 30<br />

Hobbs D Vocabulary Organiser – the addition of the merge function 31<br />

Environmental Control Equipment<br />

Ingram R The design and development of a range of cordless switches 32<br />

Hobbs D Movement-to-music therapy 33<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


PRIMARY<br />

INVESTIGATOR PROJECT TITLE PG<br />

Mobility and Transferring Equipment<br />

Sanders D Computer aided customisation of walker designs 34<br />

Symonds B Integrated control of wheelchairs and communication devices 35<br />

Shepherd A<br />

Introduction of a hoist into the family home – a qualitative study into the perspectives of three mothers who care<br />

for a child who has a severe physical disability<br />

Svistounov A Remote monitoring of the testing laboratory 36<br />

Telecommunication Equipment<br />

Nguyen T Focus group to assess home and mobile phone needs 37<br />

Hobbs D Making the home phone accessible for people with a disability 38<br />

Nguyen T Mobile phone access via an augmentative and alternative communication device 39<br />

Nguyen T Survey of accessible mobile communication for people with disabilities 40<br />

Nguyen T Technological options for people with physical disabilities through use of telecommunications equipment 41<br />

Website Accessibility<br />

Ziersch T Development of accessible websites 42<br />

Garrett R Using product features to select appropriate AT products 43<br />

Spizzo M<br />

Assessment Tools<br />

Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the Tardieu Scale to quantify spasticity in biceps brachii<br />

in children with cerebral palsy<br />

Lyons T Use of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: therapists’ and parents’ views – a pilot study 45<br />

36<br />

44<br />

Gibson S<br />

What is the evidence for the use of the gross motor function measure (GMFM-88)<br />

as a functional outcome measure for children with cerebral palsy<br />

46<br />

Parent Support<br />

Ward N The prevalence of low back pain in parents of children with a physical disability aged 5 years or below 47<br />

Service Evaluation<br />

Raghavendra P Childhood therapy experiences of adults with cerebral palsy: implications for today’s children with cerebral palsy 48<br />

Morris R Comparison of feedback conditions in spelling instruction for a child using AAC 49<br />

Crettenden A Evaluation of behaviour management advice 50<br />

Bentley M Evaluation of family centred practice using the measure of process of care 51<br />

Jones J How occupational therapists at <strong>Novita</strong> train clients in the scanning access technique 51<br />

3<br />

Gibson S<br />

“Is more therapy better” A comparison of two models of intensive physiotherapy<br />

and “conventional” intensive physiotherapy for children with cerebral palsy<br />

52<br />

Durand S<br />

Motor and functional outcomes of children with physical and /or multiple disabilities living<br />

in rural and remote areas compared with their metropolitan counterparts – a pilot study<br />

Dryden L Single event multilevel surgery: a description of stakeholder experiences 54<br />

Service and Policy Development<br />

Walker L Australian representation on ISO TC173 SC1 55<br />

Hobbs D Churchill Fellowship research, experiences and outcomes 56<br />

Seeger B Development and delivery of an undergraduate subject in Rehabilitation Engineering at Flinders University 57<br />

Walker L Development of collaborative links with University of Pittsburgh 58<br />

Garrett R Disability Standards Working Group (DSWG) 59<br />

Svistounov A Enhancing innovation and development of new products in the Australian rehabilitation equipment sector 60<br />

Walker L Evaluation and scoping of a movement analysis facility in Adelaide 61<br />

Garrett R Phone accessibility information working committee 62<br />

Murchland S Resource allocation project 63<br />

53<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


overview of research at novita<br />

<strong>Research</strong>, development and evaluation have been a vital part of high quality services provided by <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong><br />

Inc, (formerly The Crippled Children’s Association of SA Inc). <strong>Novita</strong> provides therapy, equipment and family support services to<br />

over 1000 South Australian children and young people with physical and/or severe multiple disabilities. Children have cerebral<br />

palsy (approximately 65%), muscular dystrophy, spina bifida or other conditions that result in a permanent physical disability.<br />

4<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> employs occupational therapists, orthotists,<br />

physiotherapists, psychologists, rehabilitation engineers,<br />

speech pathologists, and social workers, totalling over<br />

150 staff. <strong>Services</strong> are delivered by multi-disciplinary teams<br />

of therapists in clients’ homes, kindergartens, and schools or<br />

other community settings. There are five regional offices in<br />

the Adelaide metropolitan area, with staff from each office also<br />

visiting one or more country areas to support country families<br />

and local service providers. In addition, <strong>Novita</strong> provides<br />

equipment services to children and adults through <strong>Novita</strong>Tech<br />

(formerly Regency Park Rehabilitation Engineering).<br />

Historically, research was undertaken by individuals or<br />

by key departments within <strong>Novita</strong>. A research culture was<br />

established by Dr Leon Stern, Medical Director, Dr Barry Seeger,<br />

Director of Regency Park Rehabilitation Engineering, and former<br />

Chief Executive, Dr David Caudrey. This was strengthened in<br />

1996 by the creation of a new <strong>Research</strong> and Development<br />

(R&D) Department within the Regency Park Rehabilitation<br />

Engineering division of <strong>Novita</strong>, now called <strong>Novita</strong>Tech, and<br />

then later in <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> with the establishment of the<br />

Clinical <strong>Research</strong> Department.<br />

<strong>Novita</strong>Tech’s new <strong>Research</strong> and Development<br />

Department was formed using staff from the Electronics<br />

Department, providing a much clearer focus for R&D efforts.<br />

The team aimed to maximise the usefulness and relevance<br />

of technology to the lives of people with disabilities by<br />

conducting meaningful research and product development.<br />

As a result of the history and experience of the team, there<br />

was a clear emphasis on projects and products related to<br />

electronics and computers.<br />

Since then, the R&D Department has continued to refine<br />

and improve its internal processes while making a significant<br />

contribution to research and development in the field of<br />

rehabilitation engineering. In recent years there has been a<br />

move to the employment of Rehabilitation Engineers as they<br />

graduate from the Flinders University School of Informatics<br />

and Engineering. Since its inception, the Department has<br />

seen an increase in the level of collaboration with academic<br />

institutions, an increase in the use of sub-contractors to<br />

ensure that professional standards are applied to all areas,<br />

and an increased requirement for marketing skills.<br />

The Clinical <strong>Research</strong> Department was established to enable<br />

a systematic research focus in the Therapy Division that ensured<br />

effective assessments, interventions and support were provided<br />

to clients and families. The Department aims to conduct<br />

research; facilitate a spirit of enquiry amongst therapists within<br />

<strong>Novita</strong>; and to reduce the research-practice gap with therapists.<br />

The Department encourages therapists to pose clinical questions<br />

and provides the support required to answer these questions in a<br />

systematic way. It also facilitates the implementation of outcomes,<br />

as well as evaluating the effectiveness.<br />

The Clinical <strong>Research</strong> Department manages research<br />

projects in a number of ways:<br />

1) Supporting and educating <strong>Novita</strong> therapists involved in<br />

providing direct services to clients who initiate research<br />

ideas and are often involved in doing the research;<br />

2) Conducting joint projects internally and with other agencies<br />

and academic institutions such as the Women’s and<br />

Children’s Hospital, the University of South Australia and<br />

Flinders University;<br />

3) Providing an interface and liaison between the external<br />

groups and students who initiate projects and the <strong>Novita</strong><br />

staff and families who may be involved in the study.<br />

<strong>Research</strong> projects are presented at bimonthly research<br />

seminars and biennial research days conducted by <strong>Novita</strong>; at<br />

state, national and international conferences; and published in<br />

newsletters and journals so that clients, their families, other staff<br />

and professional colleagues can benefit from the findings.<br />

Evaluating the evidence<br />

Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) is defined as “integrating<br />

best research evidence together with clinical knowledge and<br />

reasoning in providing assessments and interventions that<br />

are effective and efficient for particular clients”. To enhance<br />

evidence-based practice, <strong>Novita</strong> has focussed on:<br />

1) Staff Training in EBP • In July 2000, the Clinical<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Manager, the three research seniors and several<br />

physiotherapists from <strong>Novita</strong> attended a three-day course<br />

on EBP conducted by the School of Physiotherapy,<br />

University of SA. Over the subsequent four years, using a<br />

‘Train-the-Trainer’ model, most <strong>Novita</strong> therapists have been<br />

trained in EBP.<br />

2) Developing <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Appraisal<br />

Forms to critically appraise research • The <strong>Research</strong><br />

Department found that the hierarchy of evidence model<br />

used in Evidence-Based Medicine, and the tools used to<br />

evaluate research, were not suitable to appraise research<br />

in disability. Via a process of evaluating existing tools, the<br />

Clinical <strong>Research</strong> department used an adapted appraisal<br />

form and the McMaster forms for all allied health discipline<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


esearch evaluations (http://bluewirecs.tzo.com/canchild/<br />

patches/qualform.pdf and http://bluewirecs.tzo.com/<br />

canchild/patches/quantform).<br />

3) Gathering and synthesising evidence for clinically<br />

relevant questions • Between 2001–2003, each therapy<br />

discipline investigated the evidence relating to one question<br />

of clinical relevance. All therapy staff were involved in the<br />

process of reviewing and critically appraising the literature,<br />

coordinated by research seniors. The outcomes of these are<br />

summarised on pages 13, 16, 19 and 46.<br />

4) Collaborating with the Centre for Allied Health<br />

Evidence (CAHE) (University of South Australia) –<br />

A collaborating Centre of Joanna Briggs Institute<br />

for Evidence Based Nursing • This has included<br />

contracting the CAHE to undertake a systematic review of a<br />

multi-disciplinary intervention question (page 22).<br />

our research partners<br />

Clinical <strong>Research</strong> (CR) and <strong>Research</strong> and Development<br />

(R&D) have strong links with university departments, hospitals<br />

and other external agencies within South Australia, nationally and<br />

some internationally. Our collaborative partners have provided an<br />

enriching relationship that has been of mutual benefit.<br />

Our Partners<br />

• Better Software<br />

• Colsoft (Computer Systems Management<br />

and Support <strong>Services</strong>) Pty Ltd<br />

• Flinders University of South Australia<br />

– School of Medicine,<br />

Department of Speech Pathology<br />

• Dr Ingrid Scholten PhD<br />

– School of Medicine,<br />

Department of Rehabilitation and Aged Care<br />

– Psychology<br />

– School of Informatics and Engineering<br />

• Prof Trevor Hearne B Sc (Hons) PhD<br />

• Assoc Prof Karen Reynolds MA M Sc PhD<br />

• Independent Living Centre<br />

– Adult Therapy <strong>Services</strong><br />

• Michael Bebb, Speech Pathologist<br />

• South Australian Department of Education<br />

and Children’s <strong>Services</strong><br />

– Regency Park School<br />

• Telstra Disability <strong>Services</strong><br />

• The Defence Science and Technology Organisation<br />

• Therapy Focus, Western Australia<br />

• University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania USA<br />

– School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences<br />

• Prof Rory Cooper BS MEng PhD ATD<br />

• University of South Australia<br />

– School of Health Sciences<br />

• Prof Esther May PhD<br />

• Dr Paul Grimshaw PhD<br />

– Division of Physiotherapy<br />

• Assoc Prof Marie Williams PhD<br />

• Dr Susan Hillier PhD<br />

• Dr Andrea Warden Flood PhD<br />

– Division of Occupational Therapy<br />

• Hugh Stewart Cert Tech (Electronic Engineering)<br />

B App Sc (OT) M App Sc (OT)<br />

– Joanna Briggs Institute, Center for Allied Health Evidence<br />

• Assoc Prof Karen Grimmer PhD<br />

– Louis Laybourne-Smith School of Architecture and Design<br />

• Women’s and Children’s Hospital<br />

– Department of Orthopaedic Surgery<br />

• Mr Philip Brook MBBS FRACS (Orth)<br />

– Department of Paediatric Rehabilitation<br />

Partnerships with some individuals have also been extremely<br />

productive, resulting in joint grant submissions, conference<br />

presentations, book chapters, journal articles and improved<br />

research processes. These include:<br />

• Jeff Clayton<br />

Director of Clayton Management Pty Ltd,<br />

Management Consultants<br />

• Prof Philip Darbyshire PhD<br />

Head of Nursing & Midwifery <strong>Research</strong><br />

Women’s and Children’s Hospital, SA<br />

• Prof Andrew Downing<br />

Foundation Professor, Biomedical Endineering<br />

School of Informatics and Engineering<br />

Flinders University, Adelaide SA<br />

• Dr Peter Flett<br />

Director of Paediatric Rehabilitation,<br />

Women’s and Children’s Hospital, SA<br />

• Jeff Groves<br />

Director of Innovation,<br />

Centre for Innovation, Business and Manufacturing<br />

• Dr Teresa Iacono PhD<br />

Senior <strong>Research</strong> Fellow, Centre for Developmental<br />

Disability Health Victoria, Monash University,<br />

Communication Resource Centre, Scope Victoria.<br />

• Dr Ralf Schlosser PhD<br />

Associate Professor,<br />

Dept. of Speech Pathology, NE University, Boston, USA<br />

• Peter Wilkinson<br />

Software Programmer<br />

5<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


selecting research projects<br />

The Clinical <strong>Research</strong> and <strong>Research</strong> & Development<br />

Departments have different committees<br />

and criteria for the approval of research ideas.<br />

6<br />

<strong>Research</strong> & Development Project<br />

Selection Process<br />

The <strong>Research</strong> & Development (R&D) Department has<br />

refined its project selection process since the creation of<br />

the Department, to establish and maintain ISO9001 Quality<br />

Accreditation and as a result of annual reviews of the<br />

Department. The essential criteria for project selection have<br />

not changed significantly over the past few years, however the<br />

process of evaluation against the following criteria has been<br />

modified. The criteria for project approval are as follows:<br />

• The idea must have the potential to enhance the lives of,<br />

or provide benefit to more than one individual;<br />

• Ideas should promote a collaborative relationship between<br />

R&D research staff and clinical staff, caregivers and<br />

end users;<br />

• The idea must provide an opportunity for the <strong>Novita</strong>Tech<br />

R&D Department to create an innovative, technological<br />

solution that meets the needs of people with disabilities<br />

in South Australia;<br />

• Where possible, the need for the idea should have arisen<br />

due to a lack of other existing, suitable or alternative solutions<br />

in the market. The idea should contribute to developing and<br />

piloting of a new product or service alternative;<br />

• The idea or problem solution must be in keeping with<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong>’ Strategic Plan;<br />

• There must be a ‘project champion’ (ideally the person<br />

who submits the idea) who is willing to be involved with the<br />

project through to completion;<br />

• The idea should potentially demonstrate one or more of<br />

the following measurable benefits, to justify the allocation<br />

of <strong>Novita</strong> resources:<br />

− enhance the lives of <strong>Novita</strong> clients;<br />

− provide a marketable/profitable end product;<br />

− provide a significant time or cost saving outcome<br />

(this could be to staff, clients, carers, etc.);<br />

− strive to enhance client satisfaction with the services<br />

of <strong>Novita</strong>;<br />

− clinical-based ideas should strive to increase the<br />

efficiency of <strong>Novita</strong> staff, and in doing so, benefit<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> clients.<br />

In the first instance, all project ideas that are submitted to<br />

R&D are filtered against these criteria. If an idea passes this<br />

initial filtering process, the idea is further developed into a<br />

strong business case before it is undertaken as a project.<br />

The secondary process (referred to as ‘Phase Zero’)<br />

is a more exhaustive evaluation that aims to identify and<br />

investigate any weaknesses or ‘areas of concern’ surrounding<br />

the submitted idea, to ensure that the project is feasible and is<br />

likely to produce a significant benefit. These concerns typically<br />

involve work to evaluate items such as the technical feasibility;<br />

an estimate of the significance to the lives of the people with a<br />

disability; an estimate of the number of <strong>Novita</strong> and other clients<br />

impacted upon; similar work occurring elsewhere in the world;<br />

alternative existing products; resolution of legal and ethical<br />

issues; and consideration of marketing issues.<br />

The output of ‘Phase Zero’ is a business and project plan<br />

that is tabled before an R&D Project Review Panel. This panel<br />

has skills in the assessment and review of business cases<br />

and has the authority to approve or reject project proposals or<br />

recommend additional work on particular parts of the business<br />

case. The panel may also rank or prioritise projects.<br />

The successful business case forms the basis of a request<br />

for project funding which may be sought from internal budget<br />

resources, the <strong>Novita</strong> Executive Reference Group or external<br />

funding bodies. Proposals where the scope extends beyond<br />

children’s services alone may require external funding, and their<br />

commencement is dependant upon the success of applications<br />

for such funding.<br />

If a project is approved through the selection process it will<br />

then be entered into the R&D project database and project plan.<br />

All projects are then required to be clearly defined, with sign-off<br />

by appropriate personnel at the end of each of the following<br />

stages throughout the life of the project:<br />

• design documents and production;<br />

• design document verification;<br />

• prototype construction or project implementation;<br />

• project internal validation;<br />

• project external validation;<br />

• project completion.<br />

If any of the above stages cannot be met then the project<br />

objectives are revised and re-evaluated at one of the earlier<br />

stages, or the project is cancelled because it is not feasible.<br />

Up until 2004, a group known as the ‘R&D Reference Group’<br />

was used to assist the selection of projects and the allocation<br />

of resources. Members of the group came from the other<br />

Departments within <strong>Novita</strong>Tech, the former Communication and<br />

Therapy <strong>Services</strong> division, the occupational therapy and speech<br />

pathology departments of <strong>Novita</strong>, and also included the parents<br />

of two <strong>Novita</strong> clients.<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Clinical <strong>Research</strong><br />

Selection Process<br />

The Clinical <strong>Research</strong> Sub Committee (CRC) was established<br />

in June 2000 to ensure that <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> has<br />

a cohesive clinical research program that aligns to the<br />

Association’s strategic directions and results in best practice<br />

outcomes for clients and families. Specifically, the committee<br />

ensures that equitable, objective project selection/acceptance<br />

is undertaken and that proposals gain appropriate ethics<br />

approval from relevant agencies prior to commencement;<br />

monitors all projects on a regular basis; and contributes to<br />

future directions of <strong>Novita</strong>’s research program. Criteria for<br />

project approval:<br />

• the project idea should reflect <strong>Novita</strong>’s research direction,<br />

mission, strategic and/or business plan objectives;<br />

• projects should be of benefit to clients, families, therapists,<br />

and the community;<br />

• the same clients and families should not be requested to<br />

take part in more than one research project. (Consideration<br />

given to avoiding excessive use of same clients);<br />

• there should be a balance of projects from various<br />

disciplines;<br />

• scientific merit; and<br />

• ethics approval from the appropriate Human <strong>Research</strong><br />

Ethics Committee.<br />

In 2003 a process of identifying the priority directions for<br />

Clinical <strong>Research</strong> at <strong>Novita</strong> commenced and was ratified by<br />

the Board in 2004. The priority areas for Clinical <strong>Research</strong> in<br />

2004–2007 are:<br />

1. projects that examine ways to enhance participation of our<br />

children and families in the community and measuring the<br />

effectiveness of those intervention methods;<br />

2. life span issues – research that investigates issues acrosss<br />

0–18 years, promoting personal autonomy and client and<br />

family centredness; and<br />

3. evaluations of interventions and aspects of service delivery<br />

reflecting outcomes at client Impairment, Activity and<br />

Participation levels.<br />

The Clinical <strong>Research</strong> Committee members are:<br />

Greg de Cure B A (Int Studies) Hons<br />

Parent & Project Officer (Curriculum Design)<br />

Office of Planning & Quality, University of Adelaide<br />

2002 – current<br />

Dr Peter Flett M B, B S, FRACP, FRACM, FAFRM (RACP), MRACMA<br />

Director of Paediatric Rehabilitation<br />

Women’s and Children’s Hospital, SA<br />

2001 – current<br />

Dr Tim Connell B A, Dip Soc Sc (Psychology), PhD<br />

Chief Psychologist, <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Inc<br />

2000 – current<br />

Terry Lyons Dip Tech (Occupational Therapy)<br />

Chief Occupational Therapist, <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Inc<br />

2000 – current<br />

Louise McCarthy B App Sc (OT)<br />

Manager, North Western Regional Office<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Inc<br />

March 2004 – current<br />

Catherine Olsson B App Sc (Speech Pathology)<br />

Chief Speech Pathologist, <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Inc<br />

2000 – current<br />

Dr Parimala Raghavendra B Sc, M Sc, PhD<br />

Chairperson<br />

Manager, Clinical <strong>Research</strong>, <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Inc<br />

2000 – current<br />

Judy Sprod B App Sc (Physiotherapy)<br />

Chief Physiotherapist, <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Inc<br />

2000 – current<br />

Wendy Wake-Dyster Dip Tech (Physio) Grad Dip (Physio)<br />

Grad Dip (Mmt), AFAIM, CPMger<br />

Director, Client Programs, <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Inc<br />

2000 – current<br />

Past Members:<br />

Tori Wilckens B App Sc (Physiotherapy)<br />

Senior Physiotherapist, Communication & Therapy <strong>Services</strong><br />

2001 – 2002<br />

Pam Donnelly B Soc Sc (Community <strong>Services</strong>)<br />

Manager, Northern Regional Office,<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Inc<br />

2001 – 2003<br />

7<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


esearch teams<br />

The two research teams within <strong>Novita</strong> are<br />

Clinical <strong>Research</strong>, Therapy Division and<br />

<strong>Research</strong> and Development, <strong>Novita</strong>Tech.<br />

8<br />

Clinical <strong>Research</strong> Team<br />

Manager, Clinical <strong>Research</strong><br />

Dr Parimala Raghavendra B Sc, M Sc, PhD<br />

<strong>1999</strong> – present<br />

Adjunct Lecturer, Department of Speech Pathology<br />

& Audiology, Flinders University of SA<br />

The Manager is responsible for the development and implementation<br />

of an innovative and meaningful research and evaluation<br />

program. This is achieved by developing and maintaining a strong<br />

multidisciplinary research focus across <strong>Novita</strong> therapy services;<br />

identifying, formulating and conducting relevant research projects<br />

within the context of <strong>Novita</strong>’s policies and priorities; and working<br />

with <strong>Novita</strong> therapy staff, university schools and external agencies.<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Seniors<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Senior Occupational Therapist<br />

Sonya Murchland B App Sc (OT), M H Sc (OT)<br />

<strong>1999</strong> – present<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Senior Physiotherapist<br />

Sue Gibson B App Sc (Physiotherapy),<br />

G Dip Physiotherapy (Paediatrics), M App Sc Physiotherapy (Paediatrics)<br />

<strong>1999</strong> – 2002, 2003 – present<br />

Dr Trish Bate B App Sc (Physiotherapy), M App Sc, PhD<br />

2002 – 2003<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Senior Speech Pathologist<br />

Sandra Stewart B App Sc (Speech Pathology)<br />

April 2004 – present<br />

Kylie Opperman B App Sc (Speech Pathology)<br />

2003 – April 2004<br />

Angela Guidera B App Sc (Speech Pathology)<br />

<strong>1999</strong> – 2002<br />

The <strong>Research</strong> Seniors are the key link between therapists and the <strong>Research</strong><br />

Department by providing clinical services to clients and also working in<br />

the <strong>Research</strong> Department. They contribute to the development of research<br />

direction of their discipline and client programs; undertake and facilitate<br />

research projects within their discipline and disseminate research<br />

outcomes at conferences; promote evidence-based activities; and liaise<br />

with university departments and other agencies to promote research.<br />

Other staff<br />

Project Officer<br />

Julie Smith B A (Adelaide)<br />

<strong>1999</strong> – 2002<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Assistant Occupational Therapist<br />

Jocelyn Kernot B App Sc (OT) Hons<br />

2002 – 2003<br />

<strong>Research</strong> and Development Team<br />

Manager<br />

Rob Garrett B Tech, Grad Dip Maths, C P Eng, ATP<br />

Group Leader, <strong>Research</strong> & Development,<br />

Engineering & Support<br />

1985 – present<br />

The Group Leader is responsible for the development and<br />

implementation of innovative technological solutions that will<br />

enhance the lives of people with a disability.<br />

This is achieved by actively soliciting new ideas and projects,<br />

appropriate analysis of the potential benefits and costs, the<br />

creation of a business plan, the involvement of key stakeholders<br />

and review of the project at the end of critical development stages.<br />

Senior Rehabilitation Engineer<br />

David Hobbs B Sc (Physics), B Sc / B Eng (Biomed) (Hons)<br />

May 2001 – present<br />

Marketing Specialist<br />

Melissa Bradley B Des (Int Des), B Mgt (Intl Mktg)<br />

April 2000 – present<br />

Rehabilitation Engineers<br />

Ben Symonds B Sc / B Eng (Biomed) (Hons)<br />

March 2003 – present<br />

Toan Nguyen B Sc / B Eng (Biomed) (Hons)<br />

Masters Candidate, 2001 – present;<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Assistant 2003<br />

Rebecca Gallio B Sc, B Eng (Biomed) (Hons)<br />

<strong>January</strong> 2002 – <strong>January</strong> 2003<br />

Electronics Engineers<br />

Paul Davies B Eng (Electronics) (Hons), Grad Dip (Disability Studies), ATP<br />

May 1997 – Aug 2000<br />

Duane Stapleton B Eng (Computer Systems) (Hons)<br />

December 1994 – April <strong>1999</strong><br />

The <strong>Research</strong> and Development staff are assigned to one or<br />

more projects as a project co-ordinator, responsible for ensuring<br />

the involvement of stakeholders, collaboration with partners,<br />

development of business cases, liaison with sub-contractors,<br />

reporting on progress, publishing results and disseminating<br />

outcomes at conferences. They also contribute to the strategic<br />

direction of the department.<br />

Other staff<br />

Undergraduate students gain work experience and contribute<br />

to projects from time to time.<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


<strong>Research</strong>er Profiles<br />

Susan Bostock B App Sc Physiotherapy<br />

Sue graduated from the Lincoln Institute of Health Sciences, Victoria<br />

in 1978 and has had over 20 years experience in paediatric<br />

disability and recent research experience. She is currently Senior<br />

Clinical Physiotherapist and is based in the Northern Regional Office<br />

of <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong>.<br />

Melissa Bradley B Des (Int Des), B Mgt (Intl Mktg)<br />

Melissa graduated from the University of South Australia with<br />

a design degree (majoring in Interior Design) in 1994 and a<br />

Management degree (majoring in International Marketing) in 1998.<br />

As part of her final year studies, Melissa travelled to Malaysia and<br />

the Philippines to investigate the business opportunities for Adelaidebased<br />

company, Sabco Australia. Since starting as Marketing<br />

Specialist with <strong>Novita</strong>Tech in April 2000, Melissa has worked with<br />

the <strong>Research</strong> and Development Department in investigating several<br />

market opportunities for various products in the small, unique and<br />

highly specialised disability field. A key element of her work has been<br />

the establishment of systems to project manage research and input<br />

from clients, families and staff. Melissa has also worked on<br />

the commercialisation of the Vocabulary Organiser program.<br />

She has been highly involved in the graphical representation of<br />

material produced by the Division, with a distinct goal to strengthen<br />

its profile. Melissa has also worked in a Marketing role for <strong>Novita</strong><br />

Children’s <strong>Services</strong>, <strong>Novita</strong>Tech’s parent organisation.<br />

Louise DuBois B App Sc (Occupational Therapy)<br />

Louise graduated from the University of South Australia in 1992 with a<br />

Bachelor of Applied Science in Occupational Therapy. Her first job was<br />

in Aged Care in Grafton, where she worked for one year before moving<br />

to Grafton Base Hospital where her case load included some paediatrics.<br />

After 2 years, Louise headed overseas and worked in a Children’s<br />

Development Centre in Basildon, Essex, UK. She returned to Adelaide<br />

and gained employment with <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> in 1997 and<br />

was appointed Senior Therapist later that year. Louise currently works<br />

as a Regional Senior in the Northern Regional Office of <strong>Novita</strong>.<br />

Sue Durand C Cert (Physiotherapy)<br />

Sue graduated from the Bristol School of Physiotherapy in 1971.<br />

She has many years of experience in paediatrics working, in<br />

England and different states of Australia. Sue began her employment<br />

in South Australia with the Spastic Centres of SA, Inc in 1989 and later<br />

transitioned to <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong>. Sue finished working with<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> in June 2004, at which time she held the position of Regional<br />

Senior Physiotherapist in the South Eastern Regional Office. For many<br />

years Sue was on the Australian Physiotherapy Association’s South<br />

Australian Paediatric Group Committee. Sue always had an interest in<br />

hydrotherapy and is now working in a private paediatric physiotherapy<br />

practice and is a consultant for specialised walking equipment.<br />

Dr Peter Flett MBBS, FRACP, FACRM, FAFRM (RACP), MRACMA<br />

Dr Peter Flett is a Consultant Physician in Paediatric Rehabilitation<br />

Medicine, and is currently the Director of Paediatric Rehabilitation,<br />

Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Adelaide, a strategic alliance<br />

position with <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong>. Following the conferring of<br />

his FRACP in 1981, he became the first paediatrician in Australia to<br />

become fully qualified as a specialist in rehabilitation medicine by<br />

examination and has been an examiner since 1986 for the Faculty<br />

of Rehabilitation Medicine. Dr Flett was also a member of the original<br />

<strong>Research</strong> and Development Sub-Committee of the Board of CCA,<br />

chaired by Dr Barry Seeger. Dr Flett has an interest in children with<br />

cerebral palsy, publishing widely in this area, and contributing to the<br />

establishment of the South Australian Cerebral Palsy Register.<br />

Rob Garrett B Tech (Electronics), Grad Dip Maths, MIEAust, CPEng, ATP<br />

Rob graduated from the University of Adelaide with a Bachelor<br />

Technology in Electronic Engineering in 1971 and completed a<br />

Graduate Diploma in Mathematics at the South Australian Institute<br />

of Technology in 1976.<br />

After working at the Defence Science and Technology Organisation at<br />

Salisbury South Australia for 22 years, in 1985 Rob became the first<br />

Electronics Engineer in Australia to work in the field of Rehabilitation<br />

Engineering at <strong>Novita</strong>Tech.<br />

Rob was awarded a Churchill Fellowship in 1990 to study the “Use<br />

of Computers to Enhance the Lives of People with Disabilities” for a<br />

period of 9 weeks in USA, Canada, UK and Sweden. Rob is also a<br />

certified Assistive Technology Practitioner.<br />

Rob has been a member of: the Australian Rehabilitation and<br />

Assistive Technology Association (ARATA) Board (<strong>1999</strong>–current);<br />

Modbury Hospital Board (2002 –2004); chair Modbury Hospital<br />

Community Consultative Committee; member Disability Advisory<br />

Body of the Australian Communications Industry Forum since<br />

inception in <strong>1999</strong>; Telstra Regional Consumer Council in SA (1996–<br />

2000); Telecommunications Consumer’s Group, SA since inception in<br />

2000; Technical Aid to the Disabled (past member of executive) and is<br />

a corresponding member of Engineers Australia’s National Committee<br />

on Rehabilitation Engineering.<br />

His interests include the application of Universal Design principles to<br />

the development of products and processes to enhance the lives of all<br />

people and especially those who have a disability with a particular<br />

interest in ensuring telecommunications products are accessible to all.<br />

Susan Gibson<br />

B App Sc (Physiotherapy), Grad Dip Physio (Paeds), M App Sc Physio (Paeds)<br />

Susan graduated from the South Australian Institute of Technology<br />

with a Bachelor of Applied Science (Physiotherapy) in 1978, a<br />

Graduate Diploma in Physiotherapy (Paediatrics) from the South<br />

Australian Institute of Technology in 1989, and completed a Masters<br />

of Applied Science in Physiotherapy (Paediatrics) at the University<br />

of South Australia in 1993. She has worked at several organisations,<br />

both in Australia and the UK, that provide therapy services for<br />

children and adults with disabilities. Susan commenced work at<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> in 1985. Her areas of interest include<br />

the promotion, and use of, research in clinical practice. Susan is<br />

currently employed as the Senior <strong>Research</strong> Physiotherapist, and<br />

has a clinical caseload in the Southern Regional Office of <strong>Novita</strong><br />

providing metropolitan and outreach services.<br />

Angela Guidera B App Sc (Speech Pathology), MSPAA, CPSP<br />

Angela graduated from the South Australian College of Advanced<br />

Education with a Bachelor of Applied Science (Speech Pathology)<br />

in 1989. She started working for <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> in 1993.<br />

She has worked in various roles, including providing communitybased<br />

therapy services, providing country outreach services and<br />

working in the organisation’s Clinical <strong>Research</strong> Department. Angela<br />

is currently a member of the <strong>Novita</strong>Tech Support Team. Her role<br />

provides a consultative service in the use of technology, primarily in<br />

relation to augmentative and alternative communication (AAC),<br />

for children with disabilities. She has presented at several national<br />

conferences. Angela has previously worked in rural areas in South<br />

Australia and Western Australia.<br />

9<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


10<br />

David Hobbs B Sc (Physics), B Sc / B Eng (Biomed) (Hons), Exec Dip Bus Plan<br />

David graduated from Flinders University with a Physics degree in<br />

1994 and a double degree in Biomedical Engineering, with Honours,<br />

in 2000. He also has an Executive Diploma in Business Planning<br />

(2001) through the South Australian Enterprise Workshop. David<br />

started working at <strong>Novita</strong>Tech in May 2001, and is employed as a<br />

Senior Rehabilitation Engineer within the <strong>Research</strong> & Development<br />

Department and the Engineering (Testing Laboratory) Group.<br />

David is a member of the National Committee on Rehabilitation<br />

Engineering, through Engineers Australia, a Board member of<br />

ARATA, and was awarded a Churchill Fellowship in 2002. The<br />

aim of David’s Churchill research was to investigate how leading<br />

rehabilitation engineering centres around the world are using<br />

research and development, Universal Design, and the application<br />

of technology to assist people with a disability. David has<br />

recently been appointed as a ‘Flinders Ambassador in the<br />

Community’ by the Vice-Chancellor of Flinders University, and is<br />

a member of ‘Engineers Without Borders Australia’ at a state and<br />

national level.<br />

Merrin Ising B App Sc (Speech Pathology)<br />

Merrin graduated from Flinders University in 1996 with a Bachelor<br />

of Applied Science in Speech Pathology. Merrin began her career<br />

working with adults with acquired brain injury at Julia Farr <strong>Services</strong>.<br />

In <strong>January</strong> 2000 she accepted a position at <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong><br />

and has enjoyed working with children ever since. Merrin has an<br />

interest in working with children with complex communication<br />

needs and giving them a voice within our community. She has also<br />

maintained a particular interest in acquired brain injury and would<br />

one day like to pursue this further with children and adolescents.<br />

Merrin is currently the Senior Speech Pathologist at the Southern<br />

Regional Office of <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong>.<br />

Sue van de Loo B App Sc (Occupational Therapy)<br />

Sue is currently a member of the <strong>Novita</strong>Tech Support Team. She<br />

graduated from the South Australian Institute of Technology in 1988<br />

and gained employment with the Crippled Children’s Association<br />

(now <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong>) in the same year. She has worked in<br />

a broad range of therapy areas including Early Childhood <strong>Services</strong><br />

Speech and Language units, country outreach and been a senior<br />

therapist in the North East Regional Office. During 1990–91, Sue<br />

worked in Paediatrics in the United Kingdom. In 1996, Sue played<br />

a key role in the establishment of an internal <strong>Novita</strong>Tech Assistive<br />

Technology Support Team. Technology for people with disabilities<br />

has always been an area of interest, and Sue has a special focus on<br />

alternative controls for powered mobility and access to alternative<br />

and augmentative communication systems. Sue has presented papers<br />

at a number of national and state conferences and has been involved<br />

in running technology workshops both intra and interstate.<br />

Terry Lyons Dip Tech (Occupational Therapy)<br />

Following a cadetship during her training, Terry began working for<br />

the then Crippled Children’s Association of South Australia, Inc., and<br />

completed her qualifications in occupational therapy in 1974. She<br />

has worked in the area of services for children and adolescents with<br />

physical and/or multiple disabilities throughout her career, with a<br />

short period of employment in country South Australia. In 1988–91<br />

she held a joint position with the University of South Australia and<br />

Spastic Centres of South Australia as Student Unit Supervisor. Terry<br />

has an interest in occupational performance in children, and<br />

intervention methods to support their independence. Since 1997,<br />

Terry has been the Chief Occupational Therapist at <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s<br />

<strong>Services</strong>, and is the OT Australia – SA representative for the Paediatric<br />

and Adolescent Action Group. Terry has worked in most regions of<br />

<strong>Novita</strong>, and is currently based in the Northern Regional Office.<br />

Paul Manson B Sp Thy<br />

Paul completed his Bachelor of Speech Therapy at the University of<br />

Queensland in 1983. He started his career working with children<br />

with a disability in 1984 at the Hartley St School for Physically<br />

Handicapped Children in Canberra. He moved from Canberra in<br />

1985, and joined <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong>. Paul has maintained<br />

his interest in communication for people with a disability ever<br />

since, and is interested in the ways we can improve the quality of<br />

life for children with disabilities. Naturally, this has focused on<br />

augmentative and alternative communication. Paul has performed<br />

different roles within the organisation, including within the Head<br />

Injury Program and Technology Access Service and 3 different<br />

Regional Offices. Paul is currently the Senior Speech Pathologist at<br />

<strong>Novita</strong>’s North Western Regional Office.<br />

Sonya Murchland B App Sc (Occupational Therapy), MH Sc (Occupational Therapy)<br />

Sonya gained her occupational therapy qualifications in 1982<br />

graduating from the South Australian Institute of Technology, and then<br />

in 1995 she gained her Masters in Health Science from the University<br />

of South Australia. She commenced working with children who have<br />

disabilities in 1982 at the Spastic Centres of South Australia, and has<br />

gone on to work in a variety of children’s health settings in Adelaide<br />

and in Scotland. Sonya commenced work at <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong><br />

in 1998, following a secondment from the Women’s and Children’s<br />

Hospital. Her interests include the development of hand function in<br />

children, measuring outcomes of therapy, models of service delivery and<br />

resource allocation. Sonya has a commitment to the provision of services<br />

to children in rural and remote areas. She has worked in most regions<br />

of Adelaide and is currently acting as Manager of Clinical <strong>Research</strong><br />

before returning to the position of Senior <strong>Research</strong> Occupational<br />

Therapist with a clinical load in one of the regions in early 2005.<br />

Toan Nguyen B Sc / B Eng (Biomed) (Hons), M Eng (<strong>Research</strong>) Candidate<br />

Toan graduated from Flinders University with a double degree in<br />

Biomedical Engineering, with Honours, in 2000. He is now completing<br />

his Master of Engineering (<strong>Research</strong>) thesis entitled, “Accessible Mobile<br />

Communication for People with Disabilities” at Flinders University,<br />

Adelaide. In 2003, Toan was employed as a <strong>Research</strong> Assistant at<br />

<strong>Novita</strong>Tech within the <strong>Research</strong> & Development Department to assist<br />

with a trial of “New Technological Options for people with physical<br />

disabilities, through the use of telecommunications equipment”. The<br />

objective of this research was to trial and evaluate new configurable<br />

“off-the-shelf” technological options that can improve the lifestyle,<br />

independence, security and social interaction of people with disabilities.<br />

At present, Toan is employed as a Rehabilitation Engineer to carry<br />

out further research into telecommunications options for people with<br />

disabilities, with a particular emphasis on mobile phone access for<br />

Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) device users.<br />

Kylie Opperman B App Sc (Speech Pathology)<br />

Kylie has been working as a Speech Pathologist in the area of<br />

paediatrics and disabilities for over 10 years. She has a particular<br />

interest in dysphagia in children, early communication development<br />

and the use of assistive and augmentative communication (AAC).<br />

Kylie has been a senior therapist since 1996, first as a Regional<br />

Senior Speech Pathologist, then Clinical Senior within specialist<br />

speech and language programmes, then in the area of dysphagia,<br />

before being appointed <strong>Research</strong> Senior in 2003.<br />

Dr Parimala Raghavendra B Sc, M Sc, PhD<br />

Dr Raghavendra has a PhD in speech pathology from Purdue<br />

University, USA. She has clinical, teaching and research experience<br />

in augmentative and alternative communication through her<br />

work in India, Singapore, USA, and Sweden. She has published in<br />

high quality journals and has over 60 national and international<br />

conference presentations. She has been a consultant editor for the<br />

Journal of Augmentative & Alternative Communication, since<br />

1990 and was the Vice-President without Portfolio, International<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (ISAAC),<br />

1995–1996. In 2002 she was on the selection panel for a statewide<br />

Therapy Service for people with a disability who have complex<br />

communication needs, Department of Human <strong>Services</strong>, Victoria.<br />

Currently, her work focuses on making research become an integral<br />

part of high quality services and on answering important clinical<br />

questions through research in paediatric disability.<br />

Dr Ray Russo MBBS FRACP FAFRM (RACP)<br />

Dr Russo is a Paediatric Rehabilitation Specialist working at the<br />

Women’s and Children’s Hospital, <strong>Novita</strong> Children <strong>Services</strong> and the<br />

Flinders Medical Centre. He is currently undertaking a PhD thesis in<br />

the area of upper limb function in children with spastic hemiplegia.<br />

His clinical work includes the rehabilitation care of children with<br />

chronic physical disabilities, and cognitive impairments associated<br />

with these conditions and in children with acquired brain injury.<br />

He is actively involved in the teaching programs for both adult<br />

rehabilitation physician and paediatric physician trainees and is<br />

an examiner in Paediatric Rehabilitation for the Australasian<br />

Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine. He is currently the Chairman<br />

of the SA Branch of the Australasian Faculty of Rehabilitation<br />

Medicine representing the local interests of both adult and<br />

paediatric rehabilitation at a state level.<br />

research investigating the use of mainstream laptop computers as<br />

communication devices and has investigated alternative controls<br />

for powered mobility. Most recently he has been working with the<br />

Mobility & Seating Department and has also developed an interest<br />

and involvement in wheelchair mounting systems for communication<br />

devices and alternative powered mobility controls. Ben’s other role at<br />

<strong>Novita</strong>Tech is in the Engineering Department (an independent N.A.T.A.<br />

Accredited mechanical testing facility) where he tests a range of<br />

rehabilitation engineering equipment.<br />

Alex Svistounov ME (Mech), MIE Aust<br />

Alex Svistounov graduated from the Bauman Moscow State Technical<br />

University in 1994 as an Electromechanical Engineer with specialisation<br />

in mechanical systems of underwater robotic complexes. After<br />

graduation he worked as a senior mechanical design engineer in one<br />

of the departments of the Russian Federal Marine <strong>Research</strong> and Project<br />

Centre. Alex migrated to Australia in 2000 and joined the <strong>Novita</strong>Tech<br />

team in 2002 as a senior testing engineer. Alex is currently undertaking<br />

his Masters studies by research with the Adelaide University. He is<br />

interested in advanced design, innovation, failure prediction and<br />

technical problem solving techniques and in the effects of legislation on<br />

innovation. Alex is a corresponding member of Engineers Australia’s<br />

National Committee on Rehabilitation Engineering and a member the<br />

ME67 Committee of Standards Australia.<br />

Dr Barry Seeger BE (Mech), PhD, FIE Aust, AM<br />

Dr Barry Seeger was Director of Rehabilitation Engineering for<br />

the Crippled Children’s Association of SA (now <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s<br />

<strong>Services</strong>) for 25 years until his retirement in 2002. He has a degree<br />

in Mechanical Engineering and a PhD in Biomedical Engineering<br />

from the University of NSW. He has obtained over 40 research grants<br />

and authored over 80 papers in scientific journals. He has been chair<br />

of Standards Australia’s Committees on wheelchairs, and access<br />

for children and adolescents with disabilities, and a member of<br />

international standards committees on wheelchairs. He is a Fellow of<br />

the Institution of Engineers, Australia. He is an advocate of Universal<br />

Design, and to that end continues to be a Board Member of the<br />

Coalition for Adaptable Housing SA, and is the SA representative to<br />

the Australian Network for Universal Housing Design. In 2002 he was<br />

made a Member of the Order of Australia for his work for people with<br />

a disability in the area of rehabilitation engineering and received the<br />

Cerebral Palsy Medal from the Australian Cerebral Palsy Association.<br />

Annabelle Tilbrook BA, B App Sc (Occupational Therapy) (Hons)<br />

Annabelle Tilbrook graduated from the University of Queensland<br />

in 1987 with a Bachelor of Arts (Economics, Modern History and<br />

Psychology) and in 1991 with a Bachelor of Occupational Therapy<br />

with Honours. Before joining <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> in 1998, she<br />

worked as a senior therapist in a range of children’s therapy services<br />

in both Australia and in the UK (Hobart 1992–93, 1996–97, Brisbane<br />

1993, London, 1994 and Inverness, 1995–96). Her current focus in<br />

her role in the <strong>Novita</strong>Tech Support Team is to support children with<br />

physical disabilities to access and efficiently use assistive technology<br />

in their home, educational and community settings. She was involved<br />

in developing an accessible website for <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> and<br />

also in making recommendations for <strong>Novita</strong> regarding Australian<br />

Standards for equipment design and organisational requirements.<br />

Annabelle has presented workshops and papers on a range of topics<br />

at conferences both in Australia and the UK and has had a paper<br />

published in a professional journal.<br />

11<br />

Sandra Stewart B App Sc (Speech Pathology)<br />

Sandra graduated from the South Australian College of Advanced<br />

Education with a Bachelor of Applied Science (Speech Pathology) in<br />

1984. She has worked in the area of physical disability ever since.<br />

She worked initially for the Spastic Centres of South Australia and<br />

commenced at <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> in 1987. She also worked for<br />

a similar organisation in Canada in 1990. She completed training<br />

in the Neuro-development Treatment of Cerebral Palsy in 1993,<br />

being one of the few Speech Pathologists to do so. She has undertaken<br />

many roles including Augmentative Communication Specialist in<br />

Rehabilitation Engineering, member of the Technology Consultative<br />

Team (TeCT), Augmentative and Alternative Communication Clinical<br />

Senior Speech Pathologist, Regional Senior Speech Pathologist, Acting<br />

Quality Manager and is currently the <strong>Research</strong> Clinical Senior Speech<br />

Pathologist and maintains an active caseload. She has presented at<br />

international and national conferences and conducted numerous<br />

training forums nationally and locally.<br />

Ben Symonds B Sc / B Eng (Biomed) (Hons)<br />

Ben graduated from Flinders University with a double degree<br />

in Biomedical Engineering, with Honours, in 2002. During his<br />

studies Ben undertook two major projects, including his Honours<br />

project, focussing on the research and development of robotic<br />

systems. In March 2003 he began working at <strong>Novita</strong>Tech and is<br />

employed as a Rehabilitation Engineer, primarily in the <strong>Research</strong><br />

& Development Department. In this position Ben has undertaken<br />

Dr Lloyd Walker BE (Hons), PhD (Strath), MIEAust, CPEng, ATP<br />

Lloyd Walker completed his Mechanical Engineering degree at the<br />

University of Queensland with a rehabilitation-based honours project.<br />

He gained an international scholarship to study at the University<br />

of Strathclyde in the Bioengineering Unit and investigated the<br />

biomechanics of the foot and lower leg. On his return to Australia in<br />

1991, Lloyd established a rehabilitation engineering facility in North<br />

Queensland, taught at James Cook University and developed and<br />

coordinated the preparation of the world’s first multimedia-based<br />

postgraduate course in Assistive Technology. In 1998 he became the<br />

foundation deputy head of the Occupational Therapy program at<br />

James Cook University until he was appointed Director of Regency Park<br />

Rehabilitation Engineering in 2002.<br />

Lloyd has been a member of the National Committee on Rehabilitation<br />

Engineering since 1995 (chair from <strong>1999</strong>–2003), the National<br />

Technology Committee of ACROD (1996–2001), the Uniting Care<br />

Queensland Board (1996–2002), and the CONROD <strong>Research</strong> Advisory<br />

Group (1997–2001). He is currently Chair of the ME67 Committee of<br />

Standards Australia and is Australia’s nominee on the ISO TC173 SC1<br />

working group that covers wheelchair-related standards. As a person<br />

with a disability, Lloyd has a strong focus on worthwhile outcomes<br />

from the use of technology and this is a key focus of his research<br />

and presentations recently. He is also particularly interested in the<br />

application of accident investigation and prevention research to<br />

avoiding adverse outcomes in assistive technology delivery.<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


projects<br />

The following pages contain details of the projects undertaken over the past five years at <strong>Novita</strong> and <strong>Novita</strong>Tech.<br />

Early and external projects are listed below while detailed summaries are given for all other projects on subsequent pages.<br />

12<br />

<strong>1999</strong><br />

1a. Expectations and Early Experiences of Parents with The<br />

Crippled Children’s Association of SA Inc. – <strong>Report</strong> 1.<br />

Parimala Raghavendra, Julie Smith with Members of<br />

“Working Together” Working Party<br />

1b. Current Work Practices and Expectations of Therapists of<br />

The Crippled Children’s Association of SA Inc. – <strong>Report</strong> 2,<br />

Therapists’ Work Practices and Expectations. Parimala<br />

Raghavendra, Julie Smith with Members of “Working<br />

Together” Working Party<br />

2. Telephone interviews regarding name of the association:<br />

Feedback from parents of CCA, <strong>Report</strong> for CCA Board.<br />

Julie Smith & Parimala Raghavendra<br />

3. The Quality of life of children with disability in inclusive<br />

educational settings – Master’s project, Flinders University<br />

of South Australia<br />

2000<br />

1. Perception of Community Based and Family-Centred Practice<br />

for physiotherapists – Masters in Public Health, Flinders<br />

University of South Australia, Rachel Lichfield. Lichfield, R &<br />

MacDougall, C (2002). Professional issues for physiotherapists<br />

in family-centred and community-based settings. Australian<br />

Journal of Physiotherapy, 48: p. 105–112<br />

2. The Role of Social Support in Psychological Adjustment<br />

of Children with a Disabled Sibling. Kylie Barnes, Masters<br />

Student, Dept. of Psychology, Flinders University of<br />

South Australia<br />

3. What are the factors and how do they influence the decision to<br />

abandon day splints for three adolescents with cerebral palsy<br />

– Occupational Therapy Honours Project, University of<br />

South Australia. Biancha Gerlach<br />

2001<br />

1. Does an Intensive Fitness and Skills Training Program for<br />

Young Adolescents with Physical Disabilities Enhance their<br />

Independence with Mobility and A.D.L. Tasks – A parent<br />

initiated project, SWRO, CCA. Judith McPharlin, Jennifer<br />

Gutschi, Sue Gibson, Sonya Murchland<br />

2. Factors associated with the social development of children<br />

with disabilities at school. Kellie Bennett, PhD project,<br />

Curtin University<br />

3. What is a useful checklist for the prescription of a laptop<br />

based VOCA for children with a communication disorder<br />

– Third year Group project, School of Occupational<br />

Therapy, University of South Australia<br />

2002<br />

1. A retrospective case study of effectiveness of a<br />

child receiving multiple physiotherapy and medical<br />

interventions. Margarita Benias<br />

2. Technological Promise and Technology Abandonment:<br />

Understanding the Human Aspect of Technologies for<br />

people with disabilities. Dr Wendy Seymour, School of<br />

Social Work and Social Policy, University of South Australia<br />

2003<br />

1. Customer Valued Information Dissemination Strategy –<br />

A survey of consumers, professionals and carers/families<br />

regarding accessibility of telecommunication information.<br />

Dr Janet Owens, Deakin University/Communication Aid<br />

Users Society, Victoria<br />

2. Assessment of the monitoring of growth and nutrition<br />

in children with cerebral palsy accessing the Crippled<br />

Children’s Association. Karina Butcher, Dietician, CCA/WCH<br />

3. Audit of the assessment, management and treatment<br />

outcomes for spastic equinus ankle deformity in children<br />

with an inherited encephalopathy Dr Ray Russo,<br />

Dr David Baulderstone, Dr J Fletcher, Women’s and<br />

Children’s Hospital, Adelaide (ongoing)<br />

4. Botulinum Toxin and the neglected upper limb in children<br />

with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Dr Ray Russo, Prof.<br />

Maria Crotty, Flinders University of South Australia,<br />

Dr Eric Hahn, Dr Peter Flett, Women’s and Children’s<br />

Hospital, Sonya Murchland (ongoing)<br />

5. Cognitive Appraisal in Parents who have a young child<br />

with a physical disability. Melissa Zschorn, PhD project,<br />

Supervisor Assoc. Prof. Ros Shute, CCA supervisor<br />

Dr Tim Connell (ongoing)<br />

2004<br />

1. Duschenne Muscular Dystrophy Falls Project, CCA and<br />

Rocky Bay, WA<br />

2. Benchmarking seating prescription – Therapy Focus, WA<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Paediatric dysphagia and physical<br />

disability: the evidence base<br />

Kylie Opperman<br />

Senior <strong>Research</strong><br />

Speech Pathologist<br />

Jenny Faulks<br />

Senior Clinical Speech<br />

Pathologist<br />

Objective<br />

To summarise the current evidence base in relation to a range of challenging aspects of paediatric dysphagia<br />

assessment and management, including aspiration and nutritional status related issues, relevant to children with<br />

severe physical disabilities.<br />

Method<br />

The question “What characteristics are highly correlated with dysphagia and children with physical disabilities<br />

and, what management strategies contribute to the improvement of oral eating and drinking” was systematically<br />

searched. 38 articles were identified. Eight speech pathologists, with training in evidence based practice, read and<br />

critically reviewed the articles. Five articles were randomly chosen by an independent reviewer to re-critique them.<br />

Inter-judge reliability was satisfactory. Reviewers were asked to rank the relevance of the articles to the EBP question.<br />

Results<br />

It is difficult to generalise the results to clinical practice without additional evidence from other studies. Particularly<br />

pertinent points highlighted in the articles are as follows:<br />

• Aspiration is common among this population before, during and after swallowing;<br />

• Aspiration was significantly associated with specific food textures; and<br />

• Malnutrition and growth failure were common in the children with quadriplegic cerebral palsy.<br />

Management strategies highly correlated to dysphagia include nutritional supplements, enteral feeding, small and<br />

frequent kilojoule dense meals, oral motor treatment, kilojoule dense food/ fluid, positioning, texture modifications,<br />

rate of presentation.<br />

Implications<br />

Information has been disseminated to staff through training and development days. Guidelines have been<br />

developed regarding dysphagia assessment and management. Information has been disseminated to clients and<br />

their families. Management of dysphagia requires a multi-disciplinary approach. A research grant has successfully<br />

been obtained to further investigate the area.<br />

Project completed in 2004<br />

13<br />

Pilot study into the use of Botulinum-A Toxin in the management of spasticity<br />

in the upper limb of children who have spasticity of central origin<br />

Ray Russo 1<br />

Paediatric<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

Specialist<br />

Sonya Murchland<br />

Senior <strong>Research</strong><br />

Occupational Therapist<br />

Peter Flett 1<br />

Paediatric<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

Specialist<br />

Myriam Sandelance<br />

Senior Clinical<br />

Occupational Therapist<br />

Philip Brook 1<br />

Orthopaedic Surgeon<br />

1<br />

Women’s &<br />

Children’s Hospital<br />

Objective<br />

To examine the effects of injecting Botulinum-A toxin into the upper limb of children with spasticity of central origin,<br />

and monitor the responsiveness of a number of outcome measures to reflect change in hand skills and functional<br />

ability of the children.<br />

Method<br />

This pilot study was an open label study, where 14 children of ages from 2 – 17 years were injected with Botulinum-<br />

A toxin into their upper limb, and their progress was monitored at baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 6 months post injection.<br />

Injection of the toxin occurred under a general anaesthesia using muscle stimulation to locate site of injection.<br />

Assessments used varied dependant on the age of the child and included the Quality of Upper Extremity Skill<br />

Test, Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS), School Assessment of Motor and Process Skills, Canadian<br />

Occupational Performance Measure, Goal Attainment Scaling, Range of Motion, Modified Ashworth Scale, and<br />

classifications of hand posture and function.<br />

Results<br />

The final results are still being analysed. 10 children completed the follow-up assessments. All showed positive<br />

gains in function as measured on the GAS, and COPM. The AMPS appeared to be responsive to functional<br />

changes in the older participants.<br />

Implications<br />

Following the initial positive results that were attained, a larger randomised control study has been proposed, with<br />

the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills and the Goal Attainment Scale being the major outcome measures.<br />

Project ongoing<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Serial casting after Botulinum Toxin:<br />

A retrospective study of outcomes for dynamic equinus<br />

Susan Bostock<br />

Senior Clinical<br />

Physiotherapist<br />

Objective<br />

A preliminary retrospective study was undertaken at <strong>Novita</strong> to (i) review the use of outcome measures currently<br />

in use at <strong>Novita</strong>, and (ii) review <strong>Novita</strong>’s current practice of serial casting post Botulinum Toxin Type A (BoNT-A).<br />

This study was initiated in response to the increasing costs of casting materials and budgetary demands, and the<br />

perceived notion that, for optimal results, serial casting routinely follows BoNT-A injections for children with cerebral<br />

palsy who present with dynamic equinus.<br />

Method<br />

A retrospective review of case notes of 29 children who had received BoNT- A injections between May 1998 and<br />

May 2002 was undertaken. The data collected included passive range of movement (R2), dynamic range of<br />

movement (Modified Tardieu: R1), descriptions of gait and goals set. There was adequate data for only 24 children<br />

with cerebral palsy: 12 children with diplegia (D), 10 with hemiplegia (H) and 2 with triplegia (T). BoNT-A had been<br />

injected into gastrocnemius only in 24 legs, and to both gastrocnemius and hamstrings in 26 legs (total 50 legs).<br />

BoNT-A injections were followed by serial casting to the gastrocnemius muscle in 41 legs.<br />

Results<br />

R1 scores, PROM and casting protocols were available for 27 legs (D=20, H=5, T=2). For this group, Tardieu<br />

scores improved significantly (Wilcoxon Signed Rank test, z = -4.39, p< .01) from a median value of R1 = -15º<br />

(Range: -45º to 0º) before casting to R1 = 0º (Range: -25º to 25º) after casting. PROM improved in all subjects;<br />

from a median of 5 degrees (Range: -15º to 20º) to 20º (5º to 30º) (Wilcoxon, z = -4.5, p< .01). Overall, there<br />

were no significant differences in clinical and functional outcomes for children with diplegia or hemiplegia who<br />

underwent individualised spasticity management. Eighty three percent of children with diplegia who had BoNT-A<br />

to gastrocnemius alone, and 85% of those with BoNT-A to both hamstrings and gastrocnemius, underwent serial<br />

casting post BoNT-A. Seventy five percent of children with hemiplegia who had BoNT-A to gastrocnemius alone<br />

also had serial casting. There was a significant difference in dynamic (R1) and passive (R2) dorsiflexion pre serial<br />

casting and post serial casting for those children requiring serial casting post BoNT-A.<br />

14<br />

Implications<br />

The retrospective study will be useful in helping to formulate a prospective study as this study had several inherent<br />

limitations. The most significant finding was the lack of uniform data collection. Some measures were taken for<br />

some children, while other measures were used for other children. This made it difficult to compare measures,<br />

such as the Observational Gait Scale, as not all children routinely had video data taken. A controlled prospective<br />

study, with larger numbers of participants who have complete data sets, may provide further information on the<br />

effects of serial casting after BoNT-A injections.<br />

Project completed in 2003<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Can typically developing preschool children<br />

learn the meaning of graphic symbols through play<br />

Paul Manson<br />

Regional Senior<br />

Speech Pathologist<br />

Angela Guidera<br />

Senior Speech<br />

Pathologist, <strong>Novita</strong>Tech<br />

Support Team<br />

Sandra Stewart<br />

Senior <strong>Research</strong><br />

Speech Pathologist<br />

Kylie Opperman<br />

Senior <strong>Research</strong><br />

Speech Pathologist<br />

Parimala<br />

Raghavendra<br />

Manager ,<br />

Clinical <strong>Research</strong><br />

Objective<br />

To investigate whether typically developing preschool children can learn the meaning of graphic symbols without<br />

structured teaching. Children with complex communication needs (CCN) are increasingly being integrated into<br />

regular educational settings. Communication intervention with children who have CCN often involves the use of<br />

graphic symbols. If peers are not familiar with a child’s communication method, communication breakdowns are<br />

likely to occur.<br />

Method<br />

Participants were typically developing preschool children aged between 4 years, 3 months and 5 years old. In the<br />

pre-test the participants were asked to label 16 symbols. During intervention they were left to play with a speechgenerating<br />

device that had an overlay comprised of the 16 symbols. Each time they pressed a symbol a label was<br />

spoken. In the post-test the same procedure as the pre-test was used. 18 children completed the three phases of<br />

pre-test, intervention and post-test. 12 children completed a retention test 3 weeks after the post-test.<br />

Results<br />

The mean number of symbols correctly recognised at pre-test was 3.4 and this increased to 7.9 symbols at<br />

post-test. There was more gain from pre- to post-test for symbols pressed more frequently (4 words with most key<br />

presses – average gain was 7.12) and less gain for those pressed less frequently (4 words with least key presses<br />

gained 1.75).<br />

Implications<br />

The study shows that typically developing children can learn to recognise symbols through play. The findings<br />

have implications for the way opportunities can be provided for peers to become familiar with aspects of a<br />

child’s communication system. Peers could benefit from a combination of structured teaching and unstructured<br />

opportunities. More structured teaching may need to focus particularly on symbols that are less transparent.<br />

Project completed in 2000<br />

15<br />

Early Intervention: when is it too late<br />

A case study of a 6 year old boy with mild cerebral palsy<br />

Sue Durand 1<br />

Regional Senior<br />

Physiotherapist<br />

Sonya Murchland<br />

Senior <strong>Research</strong><br />

Occupational Therapist<br />

1<br />

Currently employed<br />

in private practice<br />

Objective<br />

Although Early intervention may refer to services for children aged 0 – 8 years it is generally considered to be for<br />

children in the 0 – 6 year age group prior to school entry. This case study reports on the outcomes of a consultative<br />

therapy programme for a 6 year old boy with mild cerebral palsy who lived in rural South Australia.<br />

Method<br />

Following parent consent, the participant was assessed by an occupational therapist and physiotherapist with<br />

the Peabody Motor Scales (PMS) to determine his current motor abilities. A home and school programme was<br />

provided by the therapists based on the results of the initial assessment, with activities that could be included in<br />

daily activities. Progress was re-assessed at 6 months using the PMS and the programme was updated to reflect<br />

changes in abilities and new priorities for development. The participant was then reassessed at 12 months.<br />

Results<br />

On initial assessment at age 6 years 10 months his gross motor performance scored an age equivalent of 25<br />

months, and fine motor age equivalent was 35 months, with gains over the year of approximately 18 months in<br />

all motor areas. Gross motor gains preceded fine motor development.<br />

Implications<br />

A consultative therapy approach was appropriate in providing the input to the participant suggesting that early<br />

intervention in the form of a targeted therapy programme, was not too late for this child over 6. He received his<br />

input within his regular environments, and with the co-operation of his family and carers. It is recognised that the<br />

motivation of these people to work with the participant in a positive manner that recognised his individuality, would<br />

have contributed to the success of this intervention.<br />

Project completed in 2002<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Evidence based practice review of occupational therapy interventions<br />

to assist pre-school children with physical disabilities to become spontaneous<br />

and independent players, and guidelines for clinical practice<br />

Sonya Murchland<br />

Senior <strong>Research</strong><br />

Occupational Therapist<br />

Occupational<br />

Therapy Staff<br />

Objective<br />

The emergence of occupational science over the past ten years within occupational therapy, has seen an<br />

emphasis being placed on play as an occupational behaviour and role of children, rather than a means to achieve<br />

other therapy goals. This review reflected this change in emphasis, and aimed to determine the interventions that<br />

occupational therapists use to promote the ability of children to be spontaneous and independent players.<br />

Method<br />

A systematic review was undertaken using Medline and CINAHL, with additional hand searching of the reference<br />

lists. Staff also forwarded any existing articles that they had located. Staff were then allocated two articles to<br />

appraise, following training in a consistent method of appraisal. A modified version of Crombie’s Appraisal Tool<br />

(adapted by the Clinical <strong>Research</strong> Department, <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong>), was used with the initial appraisals,<br />

and then the McMaster Clinical Appraisal Forms were used later. All studies and papers were included. The review<br />

period was limited to an 18 month period.<br />

Results<br />

Of the 60 articles distributed, only 39 were returned (65%). 26 were review articles. Of the remaining 13 studies, four<br />

were cross-sectional, three were case control studies, and the others were a cohort study, a quasi-experimental,<br />

and a qualitative study. There was a great variability in the quality of the papers, reflecting in appraisal scores that<br />

varied widely. Most of the studies were a low level of scientific exploration, and those of higher level only received<br />

moderate appraisal ratings.<br />

16<br />

Implications<br />

This was the first EBP review undertaken by the occupational therapy discipline and as such, was a learning<br />

process for all those involved.<br />

Critical appraisal of the literature found that the evidence for occupational interventions to promote play was<br />

inconclusive. Key themes for promoting play in children with physical disabilities were identified and guidelines<br />

for practice developed.<br />

Project completed in 2003<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Handwriting of children who have hemiplegia: a profile of abilities<br />

in children aged 8 – 13 years from a parent and teacher survey<br />

Louise DuBois<br />

Regional Senior<br />

Occupational Therapist<br />

Anna Klemm<br />

Regional Senior<br />

Occupational Therapist<br />

Sonya Murchland<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Senior<br />

Occupational Therapist<br />

Ann Ozols<br />

Regional Senior<br />

Occupational Therapist<br />

Objective<br />

Handwriting is a major occupational task for children attending mainstream schools in Australia, and children<br />

who have cerebral palsy (CP) with hemiplegia are expected to learn to write along side their peers. It had been<br />

the experience of occupational therapists at <strong>Novita</strong> that these children were often referred to their services due<br />

to difficulties with handwriting. However there was limited information on the specific nature of the handwriting<br />

difficulties in children with CP to guide therapists’ interventions. This study aimed to identify the prevalence of<br />

handwriting difficulties in a sample of school-aged children with hemiplegia, and gain an indication of the extent<br />

and nature of these difficulties.<br />

Method<br />

A descriptive, explorative study was undertaken using a survey design. Questionnaires were mailed firstly to<br />

parents and then to teachers with parent permission gained. The questionnaires were adapted from one designed<br />

by Duff and Goyeen, and used a 7 point ordinal scale to rate the child’s abilities related to speed, neatness, ability<br />

to copy and complete handwriting tasks. A convenience sample of 42 clients of <strong>Novita</strong> were identified as meeting<br />

the selection criteria of registration with the organisation, having a diagnosis of hemiplegia (congenital or acquired),<br />

aged 8 – 13 years, and attending mainstream school.<br />

Results<br />

31 of the 42 parents returned the questionnaires giving a 77.5% response rate, and 26 of the 30 teachers returned<br />

theirs giving a 86.7% response rate.<br />

The majority of children were indicated to have difficulties with one or more areas of handwriting (Parents report<br />

75%, teachers report 69%). Difficulties were reported in all areas of functional handwriting, speed, neatness, and to<br />

a lesser extent, organisation of written work. Children with epilepsy, speech and language difficulties, and/or visual<br />

problems experienced more difficulties than those with no other coexisting conditions. Boys and children with right<br />

hemiplegia were also reported to have more difficulties with handwriting. The impact of fatigue on performance<br />

was suggested in responses to a child’s ability to perform consistently over long periods of time. The prevalence<br />

of handwriting difficulties was not consistent with spelling and reading difficulties as reported by parents and<br />

teachers.<br />

Implications<br />

This study showed a high prevalence of handwriting difficulties in children with hemiplegia. Further investigation<br />

is recommended to gain a more detailed understanding of the nature of abilities and specific areas of difficulty<br />

experienced, in this population of children.<br />

17<br />

Project completed in 2002<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


‘If you wanted to know about it just ask!’<br />

Exploring disabled young people’s experiences of health and health care<br />

Gillian Bricher 1<br />

Doctoral Candidate<br />

Supervisors<br />

Philip Darbyshire 1<br />

Chair of Nursing<br />

Peter Flett 2<br />

Director<br />

1<br />

School of Health Sciences<br />

– Nursing and Midwifery,<br />

University of South Australia<br />

2<br />

Dept of Rehabilitation<br />

and Child Development,<br />

Women’s and Children’s<br />

Hospital<br />

Objective<br />

This project undertook a qualitative study into the health and health care experiences of disabled children and<br />

young people, using a flexible and participatory approach to challenge the traditional relations of research<br />

production. This reflected new paradigms in childhood research and the social model of disability. This study<br />

aimed to give a voice to disabled children and young people, and to gain an understanding of their experiences,<br />

perceptions and feelings.<br />

Method<br />

Twenty young people aged 9 –18 years met with the researcher up to four times, with the choice after the initial<br />

meeting of an individual or group meetings. All had a physical disability, some also had communication or learning<br />

difficulties. Conversations with the young people covered a range of topics that included hospitals, appointments,<br />

splints, therapy, and what it is like to have a carer.<br />

Results<br />

The young people showed recognition of factors that contributed to their health and sense of well being. They<br />

spoke of experiences of empowerment and powerlessness within a triad of the parent: professional: young person.<br />

Concern was expressed that many treatments were an experiment and that outcomes were hard to balance with<br />

the pain and inconvenience. Common talk was about living in a world that considers them as different, and the<br />

effect that this has with little opportunity for contact with disabled adults or peers. School issues raised concerns<br />

such as equity in access, being different, having to prove oneself, limited school sport involvement and issues of<br />

friendship and teasing.<br />

18<br />

Implications<br />

This study raises a number of issues for the provision of services to children in a client centred service, where both<br />

the child and parent need to be considered as clients. How therapists communicate with children to make their<br />

interventions understood, and outcomes realistic for the child, needs to occur in a manner that is meaningful and<br />

understood by the child. How a child determines success may be different to that of the professional, and there<br />

is a need for the “success” of interventions to be discussed and set before undertaking the procedure. There is a<br />

need to link children with other children with disabilities for peer contact, and adults with disabilities for role models.<br />

Social isolation was a factor for young people who were the only one with a disability at their school.<br />

Project completed in 2002<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Now I can eat too: The impact of an intensive community based<br />

feeding program on a four year old with severe feeding difficulties<br />

Merrin Ising<br />

Regional Senior<br />

Speech Pathologist<br />

Melissa Zschorn 1<br />

B Sc (Hons)<br />

Psychologist<br />

Karen Sowton<br />

Speech Pathology<br />

Assistant<br />

Julie Grayston<br />

Psychology Assistant<br />

Marcelle Pappas 2<br />

Dietitian<br />

1<br />

currently a doctoral<br />

student, not on staff<br />

2<br />

Women’s and<br />

Children’s Hospital<br />

Objective<br />

A case study to describe the outcome of a community-based intensive feeding program for a four-year old child<br />

with Moebius Syndrome. This condition is characterised by muscle weakness that affects the face and some throat<br />

muscles that may impact on swallowing strength and coordination. The child had a history of gastro-esophageal<br />

reflux disease and poor oral intake. At the commencement of the study the child’s nutritional requirements were<br />

met primarily via nasogastric feeds with very limited oral intake.<br />

Method<br />

A reward-based, intensive feeding program, was implemented by a multi-disciplinary team over a 20-week period.<br />

During this period the speech pathology assistant provided one to one input and modelling at home, up to five<br />

days a week, for lunch and dinner.<br />

Results<br />

At the completion of the program the child was no longer receiving enteral feeding and was obtaining her energy<br />

and nutritional requirements orally, mostly via supplementary drinks and vitamin and mineral supplements.<br />

Improvements were noted in oro-motor function and swallowing of various food consistencies. Parents reported a<br />

reduction in their stress levels.<br />

Implications<br />

Home-based intensive feeding programs can be effective and behavioural approaches are appropriate for some<br />

feeding difficulties. However, the programs are highly resource intensive. In this situation a considerable amount of<br />

additional time was dedicated to documentation and professional consultation. In spite of this, the intensive home<br />

based program may be considered cost effective due to its success, generalisability and maintenance compared<br />

to the previous treatment provided or alternative options. The authors attribute the success of this program to the<br />

multi-disciplinary team approach.<br />

Project completed in 2001<br />

Participation of Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC)<br />

users in school settings: research evidence<br />

19<br />

Angela Guidera<br />

Senior Speech<br />

Pathologist<br />

<strong>Novita</strong>Tech<br />

Support Team<br />

Parimala<br />

Raghavendra<br />

Manager,<br />

Clinical <strong>Research</strong><br />

Cathy Olsson<br />

Chief Speech<br />

Pathologist<br />

Objective<br />

One key area for many Speech Pathologists working in the disability field is the provision of services for users<br />

of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) in school settings. A project investigating the research<br />

evidence relating to the participation of these students at school was conducted.<br />

Method<br />

The project was implemented by a group of Speech Pathologists. It involved collaboration between <strong>Novita</strong><br />

Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Speech Pathology Department and Clinical <strong>Research</strong> Department. <strong>Research</strong> articles relating<br />

to factors influencing AAC users’ participation at school were gathered. Each article was critically appraised by<br />

at least one Speech Pathologist using critical appraisal forms developed by the Clinical <strong>Research</strong> Department.<br />

The Manager of the Clinical <strong>Research</strong> Department completed reliability checking of the critical appraisals. The<br />

results of the appraisals were collated and synthesised and the implications identified. The appraisal results were<br />

converted to percentages. The strength of the evidence for each factor identified was determined based on the<br />

number of papers which achieved scores of 75% or higher.<br />

Results<br />

Forty-one articles were appraised in total. They included review papers, surveys, case studies, group and single<br />

subject experimental designs and qualitative studies. The findings indicated that a range of factors influenced AAC<br />

users’ participation in school settings. There was strong evidence to show that AAC users’ participation is affected<br />

by training of adult communication partners (e.g. teachers). The evidence was moderate with respect to the<br />

influences of communication partner attitudes, peer training and instruction of the AAC user. Limited evidence was<br />

found for communication partner behaviours.<br />

Implications<br />

This project demonstrates that the research evidence indicates that AAC users’ participation in school settings<br />

is influenced by a range of factors. <strong>Novita</strong> plans to use this evidence in the development of resources, training<br />

packages and clinical guidelines for AAC intervention with students in school settings.<br />

Project completed in 2002<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Reading and phonological awareness in children with complex communication needs:<br />

literacy outcomes of internet-based assessment and intervention<br />

Joanne Leane 1<br />

Honours Student<br />

Supervisors<br />

Parimala<br />

Raghavendra<br />

Manager,<br />

Clinical <strong>Research</strong><br />

and Adjunct Lecturer 1<br />

Ingrid Scholten 1<br />

Senior Lecturer<br />

1<br />

Department of Speech<br />

Pathology and Audiology,<br />

Flinders University of SA<br />

Objective<br />

A high proportion of people who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) have poor literacy skills.<br />

The aim of the study was:<br />

1) To use Assessment of Phonological Awareness and Reading (APAR) 1 to investigate each participant’s strength<br />

and weaknesses in phonological awareness and word reading skills;<br />

2) To compare results from APAR with two other standardised assessments in order to investigate the accuracy of<br />

results gained from the APAR; and<br />

3) To observe improvements in the participants’ abilities to read single words by way of word analysis using<br />

Accessible Word Reading Intervention (AWRI) 2 .<br />

Method<br />

APAR assesses three areas: reading, phonological awareness and listening comprehension and can be<br />

administered via computer, or, as was the case in this project, printed and presented in hard copy. AWRI also has<br />

three areas of focus: compound words, onset and rime, and word endings that are downloaded and presented on<br />

computer. In this project, only the onset-rime component was used.<br />

A single subject experimental design utilising a multiple baseline across three participants (age: 11, 14 and 15 years)<br />

was employed in this project. Each participant had cerebral palsy, complex communication needs and used a<br />

Pathfinder TM or Liberator TM communication device. Assessment and intervention sessions were conducted intensively<br />

over a 2 month period. The children were assessed with the APAR in daily sessions before commencing intervention<br />

with AWRI. Passive tasks were used to facilitate recognition of onset and rime in monosyllabic words. Active tasks<br />

were used to promote participants’ skills in selection of an appropriate onset or rime to complete monosyllabic<br />

words and picture to word matching. All three participants accessed AWRI via a switch-adapted mouse.<br />

Once each participant had responded correctly to 90% of the trained probes or had completed fifteen sessions<br />

with the AWRI, intervention ceased. Finally, APAR was re-administered.<br />

20<br />

Results<br />

Improvements were evident in word reading tasks of APAR’s reading section in all 3 participants. Analysis of results<br />

indicated that AWRI was highly effective in promoting word-reading skills for one participant, fairly effective for the<br />

second and of very little effect for the third.<br />

Implications<br />

Further research is required to evaluate the effectiveness of AWRI and further explore the reliability and validity of APAR.<br />

These preliminary results show that APAR and AWRI can be used with people with complex communication needs.<br />

1,2<br />

Iacono, T. & Cupples (n.d.) APAR & AWRI, www.med.monash.edu.au/access<br />

Project completed in 2002<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


School vocabulary in typically developing 6 year old Australian children<br />

Emma Grace 1<br />

Honours Student,<br />

currently working at<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s<br />

<strong>Services</strong><br />

Supervisors<br />

Parimala<br />

Raghavendra<br />

Manager,<br />

Clinical <strong>Research</strong><br />

and Adjunct Lecturer 1<br />

Ingrid Scholten 1<br />

Senior Lecturer<br />

1<br />

Department of Speech<br />

Pathology and Audiology,<br />

Flinders University of SA<br />

Objective<br />

Children who use Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) systems are increasingly participating in<br />

integrated settings. Access to individualized and functional vocabulary in different environments such as school,<br />

home and community, has long been recognized as an important and critical feature of an effective AAC system.<br />

One strategy that has been used is to observe typically developing individuals and record common vocabulary<br />

patterns.<br />

Method<br />

Fifteen typically developing children from six different schools participated. The children were all aged between<br />

6 – 7 years. The children’s speech was recorded using a small voice activated tape recorder and microphone<br />

that was fitted to them in a bag on their waist. Each child was recorded throughout one to two school days until<br />

two hours of continuous speech was collected. All of the words that the children said were transcribed onto the<br />

computer and the information was analysed using custom designed word counter software.<br />

Results<br />

Eighty four percent of the total 76,963 words analysed consisted of 500 most frequently occurring words.<br />

Participants in this study engaged in language play behaviours including rhyming slang, making up words and<br />

singing. These types of communication represented a significant proportion of the total communication (13%<br />

of total utterances). 25 topics were identified in the data. The most common topics in the data collected were<br />

academic language (e.g. counting/ spelling), current events (e.g. book week, royal show, footy finals) and<br />

judgements about behaviour or grooming. Lists of the most common words (i.e. words that were used by several<br />

of the children) and frequent words (i.e. words that occurred several times) were collated to inform vocabulary<br />

selection decisions for children who use AAC at school. Structure words (words used to connect other words) were<br />

listed separately from content words (words that provide meaning and give the communication a topic).<br />

Implications<br />

The study provided a valuable database of communication samples for six-year-old Australians in the school<br />

environment. This information can be used to develop vocabulary for children who use Augmentative and<br />

Alternative Communication at school.<br />

The flexibility to provide rhyming words, colloquial expressions, self talk, singing and non-words should be<br />

considered in the design of AAC systems for children as they provide important opportunities for literacy<br />

development and for engaging in socially appropriate and colloquial uses of language, enabling children to<br />

identify with their peers.<br />

21<br />

Child wearing a tape recorder.<br />

Project completed in 2002<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Systematic review of strategies used by therapists to work effectively<br />

with teachers and aides to implement programs which address client goals<br />

22<br />

Karen Grimmer 1<br />

Director<br />

Debashish Das 1<br />

Project Officer<br />

Saravana Kumar 1<br />

Project Officer<br />

<strong>Novita</strong><br />

Reference Group<br />

Bronwyn Timko<br />

Regional Senior<br />

Speech Pathologist<br />

Terry Lyons<br />

Chief Occupational<br />

Therapist<br />

Catherine Olsson<br />

Chief Speech<br />

Pathologist<br />

Parimala<br />

Raghavendra<br />

Manager,<br />

Clinical <strong>Research</strong><br />

Judy Sprod<br />

Chief Physiotherapist<br />

1<br />

Centre for<br />

Allied Health Evidence<br />

Objective<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> therapy staff work in kindergartens and schools with educational staff to achieve client goals, and enhance<br />

participation of children into their class environments. It has been recognised that therapists often struggle with<br />

how to effectively achieve client and family goals when the main intervention input is via support staff from other<br />

organisations. As there are no standard approaches or best practice guidelines, this study aimed to undertake a<br />

systematic review to identify evidence for strategies in use or different collaborative approaches.<br />

Method<br />

The Centre for Allied Health Evidence (CAHE) was contracted to undertake a systematic review that considered<br />

the evidence for effective training methods for therapists and education staff to work together with the purpose of<br />

supporting children with disabilities in the classroom. The <strong>Novita</strong> Reference group has been working with CAHE<br />

staff in refining the question, identifying the key databases and providing regular input into the appropriateness of<br />

the information retrieved.<br />

The parameters of the study were:<br />

• Population – Education staff (teachers/assistants/aides/para-professional);<br />

• Intervention – Strategies/methods that therapists (occupational therapists, physiotherapists, speech<br />

pathologists, psychologists) use in training and working with education staff (modelling, written information,<br />

verbal feedback, etc.);<br />

• Comparison – Effectiveness of two different strategies; and<br />

• Outcome – Before and after measures indicating positive change, maintenance of change in behaviour,<br />

attitude, etc.<br />

Results<br />

A synthesised report will be provided at the conclusion of the study.<br />

Implications<br />

The review may provide evidence to strategies already being used or may suggest different approaches in<br />

collaborating with education staff.<br />

Project commenced in 2004<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Unravelling handwriting: an investigation into the factors that influence<br />

handwriting ability in primary school aged children with hemiplegia<br />

Sonya Murchland<br />

Senior <strong>Research</strong><br />

Occupational Therapist<br />

Jocelyn Kernot<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Assistant<br />

Occupational Therapist<br />

Parimala<br />

Raghavendra<br />

Manager,<br />

Clinical <strong>Research</strong><br />

Funding<br />

Channel 7 Children’s<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Foundation<br />

$16 500<br />

Objective<br />

This study aimed to investigate the relationships between handwriting ability (speed and legibility), hand function,<br />

posture, and visual perceptual skills in children aged 8 – 13 years who have cerebral palsy with hemiplegia.<br />

Method<br />

A descriptive study was undertaken that examined the school performance, handwriting speed, legibility, hand<br />

function and visual perceptual skills. Children identified as having cerebral palsy with hemiplegia, aged between<br />

8 – 13 years, attending a mainstream class in metropolitan Adelaide and registered with <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong><br />

were selected as potential participants. Each child was assessed over two withdrawal sessions, and then they<br />

were observed during school completing handwriting activities. The following assessments were given:<br />

• Handwriting: Handwriting Speed Test, Evaluation Tool of Children’s Handwriting, Extended Handwriting Task;<br />

• School Performance: School AMPS;<br />

• Hand Function: Grip and pinch Strength, Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Hand Function, Bruininks-<br />

Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency Subtest 8 Upper Limb Speed and Dexterity, VMI Motor Co-ordination<br />

Subtest, Observations of grasp and movement;<br />

• Visual Perception: Beery Test of Visual Motor Integration (VMI) 4th Edition, VMI Visual Perception Subtest; and<br />

• Posture: Observations of sitting posture and movement control.<br />

Results<br />

24 Children participated in the study, with 21 consenting to be observed within their class environment. Over<br />

half (54%) had mild involvement in their hemiplegic hand. Handwriting difficulties with speed, legibility or school<br />

performance were identified in 17 of the 24 children (71%). Difficulties in motor control (posture, arm movement<br />

across the page, visual motor control) were identified as having an impact on handwriting legibility and speed.<br />

Visual perceptual difficulties were not more prevalent in this population. However, if these were compromised,<br />

the child did have impaired handwriting abilities. The severity of the hemiplegia had no correlation with functional<br />

abilities in the schoolroom as measured on the School AMPS.<br />

Implications<br />

Children with hemiplegia are working less efficiently than their peers in mainstream classes. They often have<br />

impairments of motor control that are influencing their ability to maintain stable sitting postures, complete smooth<br />

arm movements, work at speed, and have refined visual-motor control. A smaller percentage also had visual<br />

perceptual difficulties. Future studies will focus on the impact of interventions to improve motor functioning on<br />

handwriting ability.<br />

23<br />

Project completed in 2004<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Clinical pathway for voice output communication aid recommendation<br />

and training for adults with disabilities<br />

Parimala<br />

Raghavendra<br />

Manager,<br />

Clinical <strong>Research</strong><br />

Roslyn Ferris<br />

Senior Speech<br />

Pathologist<br />

Adriana Rapagna 1<br />

Speech Pathologist<br />

Michael Bebb 1<br />

Speech Pathologist<br />

Michelle Hardy 1<br />

Speech Pathology<br />

Assistant<br />

Fiona McDonald 1, 2<br />

Quality Assurance<br />

1<br />

Communication and<br />

Therapy <strong>Services</strong>, now part<br />

of Adult Therapy <strong>Services</strong><br />

at the Independent Living<br />

Centre<br />

2<br />

Currently Quality<br />

Coordinator, Ashford<br />

Hospital<br />

Objective<br />

Clinical pathway is a plan of care, that reflects best clinical practice and the expressed needs of customers.<br />

Because an enormous amount of time, effort, money and on-going support is needed in voice output<br />

communication aid (VOCA) prescription and use, it was decided to streamline the process and develop a pathway<br />

for consumers and external agencies involved in the process to ensure maximum efficiency and effectiveness.<br />

Method<br />

Information for the pathway was collected from adults with severe physical/multiple disabilities (consumers<br />

of Communication and Therapy <strong>Services</strong>- CTS), their families, support workers, CTS staff, staff of Assistive<br />

Technology unit of Regency Park Rehabilitation Engineering and an Options Co-ordinator (community case<br />

manager) through questionnaires, interviews, and focus groups. The central theme that was addressed was the<br />

current practices and expectations of VOCA prescription, training, support, use and follow-up. Two consumers of<br />

CTS who use VOCA and access workers from various accommodation and day activity centres were invited to be<br />

part of the project steering committee. Information from the above methods was used to develop a pathway at a<br />

macro level, which presented the various steps in the process of device prescription and training.<br />

Results<br />

A booklet containing simple text, pictures, Picture Communication Symbols, (Johnson, 1994) was used to<br />

illustrate each step in the process, the time frame and the agencies or individuals who can be involved. An initial<br />

evaluation of the booklet showed that the response to referrals were within the current set time of 10 working days<br />

and assessment was completed for the majority within a month. The period required for trialling varied amongst<br />

consumers. Several consumers were waiting for funding to be organised. Some comments regarding the pathway:<br />

“I was impressed with the booklet. It would have helped me with difficulties I had with obtaining a previous device”<br />

(Client), “excellent idea, It will help in keeping track of the process and to train other staff” (support worker 1),“some<br />

of the time frames are questionable” (support worker 2).<br />

24<br />

Implications<br />

With the use of the booklet,<br />

1) that the process for VOCA prescription and support is clear to VOCA users, their support workers,<br />

staff at CTS and all other stakeholders;<br />

2) that there is reduction in communication breakdowns; and<br />

3) that issues which interfere with VOCA prescription and support are identified and addressed.<br />

Project completed in 2000<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Convergence of AAC and portable computers<br />

Ben Symonds<br />

Rehabilitation Engineer<br />

Rob Garrett<br />

Group Leader, R&D,<br />

Engineering & Support<br />

Rebecca Gallio<br />

Rehabilitation Engineer<br />

Objective<br />

As computers become smaller, more powerful, compact, portable, and enjoy longer battery life, the desire to<br />

explore their use as a communication device with appropriate software has become a topic of interest. It has been<br />

suggested that the cost of setting up a custom system using an ordinary laptop and Augmentative & Alternative<br />

Communication (AAC) software is cheaper then buying a specialised communication device. This project aimed<br />

to investigate the effectiveness of such a concept – can an ordinary laptop with specialised software substitute the<br />

need for a specialised communication device<br />

Method<br />

The research first identified existing AAC devices that are built on PC based systems. Therapists were then<br />

consulted to obtain their opinions of the critical features of a communication device and particularly those features<br />

that would be absent or insufficient in a standard laptop. It was then necessary to investigate the possibility<br />

of replicating these features with a standard laptop, identify suitable laptops and identify the required add-on<br />

hardware and software that would need to be added to a standard laptop to give features equivalent to those of<br />

the commercial devices. The laptop solutions were then compared with the specialised devices, discussing some<br />

of the critical features and the comparative costs of the different options.<br />

Results<br />

Commercial laptop based AAC devices were identified and the features and cost were summarised in a<br />

comparison table within the final report. Similar tables were created for a variety of laptop and tablet computers,<br />

however the standard laptop does not account for the needs of an AAC user. Features such as durability,<br />

speaker volume and the provision of alternative inputs (i.e. joystick, switch or touch-screen) were identified as key<br />

considerations along with the associated software. Laptops such as the Panasonic Toughbook were identified to<br />

meet extreme durability needs, however the high cost of these laptops makes them inappropriate for most cases.<br />

Another issue was that of compatibility and reliability of both software and hardware, which therapists highlighted as<br />

a point of concern and trouble in past experience. The implications and costs associated with any additions were<br />

also presented and a few example custom systems described. It was demonstrated that laptops could be used to<br />

build systems that are functionally equivalent to the dedicated systems at a significantly lower cost. However this<br />

apparent cost saving needs to be weighed carefully against the further time and cost involved with the set-up and<br />

on-going maintenance required to ensure the system is adequately durable, reliable and trouble-free.<br />

25<br />

Implications<br />

Ultimately the report intends to educate anyone who is considering using a standard laptop as an AAC device about<br />

the relevant complications and give recommendations to assist them in achieving a positive, cost effective, outcome.<br />

The final report is available from the “Downloads” section of the R&D website (http://www.novitatech.org.au/research).<br />

Project completed in 2004<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Effective mounting solutions<br />

Ben Symonds<br />

Rehabilitation Engineer<br />

Paul Manson<br />

Senior Speech<br />

Pathologist<br />

Sandra Stewart<br />

Senior Speech<br />

Pathologist<br />

Rob Garrett<br />

Group Leader, R&D,<br />

Engineering & Support<br />

Objective<br />

Therapists spend a significant amount of time attempting to set up effective wheelchair mounting systems for<br />

communication devices, switches and computers, and would like to improve the efficiency and effectiveness<br />

of the process. Many are also not familiar with the relevant safety standards or legal implications associated<br />

with the addition of mounting systems to wheelchairs. This project aimed to provide information and some<br />

recommendations that would assist and enhance the process of setting up mounting systems.<br />

Method<br />

<strong>Novita</strong>Tech <strong>Research</strong> & Development committed to investigating how other centres, both nationally and<br />

internationally, are dealing with mounting systems, and also collating some information on the relevant standards.<br />

The research investigated all relevant standards, the usefulness of these standards and how they might be<br />

applied to improve safe outcomes. The implications of the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) legislation<br />

were investigated to clarify the legislation’s impact on the development, prescription and installation of mounting<br />

systems. Finally, other centres were approached, asking about the approaches they have adopted when tackling<br />

mounting systems and to gain their perspective regarding the effect, relevance and importance of standards<br />

and legislation.<br />

26<br />

Results<br />

In terms of the new TGA Medical Devices Regulations 2002, standards testing is not compulsory. However, having<br />

a product successfully tested to a recognised, published, peer reviewed Standard will prove conformity with the<br />

relevant 14 Essential Principles, and will greatly assist with the ‘Declaration of Conformity’. Many centres seem to<br />

use the approach of over engineering to ensure the implementation of safe and reliable solutions. The relevant<br />

standards present important design and performance considerations that should certainly be understood and at<br />

least considered in the design process and/or theoretically assessed to some measure, if not tested. The test for<br />

anchorage of additional devices is one case that whilst providing meaningful information, just isn’t feasible. In this<br />

case a theoretical risk analysis or simulated test would be most appropriate. Non-destructive stability testing (both<br />

static and dynamic) however can give very important results that probably should not be dismissed if the resources<br />

are available. The addition of a mounting system and device could alter a wheelchair’s stability, making it unstable<br />

in environments where the user has previously had no problems, which is clearly a potential risk. Thus the decision<br />

regarding the necessity for such testing may benefit from the input of a technician or engineer who is familiar<br />

with the standards’ requirements. Similarly the actual design or choice of an appropriate mounting system would<br />

benefit greatly from a broader multidisciplinary input.<br />

Most centres suggest that a multidisciplinary approach is adopted when tackling the issue of developing or<br />

implementing effective mounting solutions. It appears that some centres have dedicated teams for this purpose,<br />

whilst others draw on the expertise of various disciplines in a less formal manner. Either way the collaborative<br />

involvement of therapists, clients, technicians and engineers is certainly advocated throughout the process. This<br />

is believed to enhance the process for everyone involved, ensuring positive and safe outcomes for the end user.<br />

Implications<br />

A further implication was that this work has contributed towards the establishment of an “on call” team that<br />

would be available to assist with the prescription of solutions for individuals with complex technological needs.<br />

The concept is to gather a team of key players who have relevant expertise with respect to the development of<br />

mounting solutions.<br />

Project commenced in 2004<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Predictors of device abandonment: transitioning from school to the community<br />

Michael Bebb 1<br />

Speech Pathologist<br />

Parimala<br />

Raghavendra<br />

Manager,<br />

Clinical <strong>Research</strong><br />

1<br />

Adult Therapy <strong>Services</strong>,<br />

Independent Living Centre<br />

Objective<br />

Abandonment of voice output technology is an ongoing concern for people who use augmentative and alternative<br />

communication (AAC), their families, clinicians and support workers. This study examined what factors influenced<br />

the discarding of devices during the transition from school to the community.<br />

Method<br />

The participants were five individuals who used AAC, five of their parents and two of their teachers. A structured<br />

interview was conducted. The questions addressed the opinions of the individuals who use AAC with regard<br />

to attitude toward their AAC device, length of time and frequency of use of the device, their perception of their<br />

peers’ attitudes to the device and factors that would increase device usage. Parents of AAC users were asked<br />

their opinions with regard to level of knowledge/familiarity with the AAC device, factors influencing reduced<br />

use/abandonment of the AAC device and personal experience during the AAC prescription and training process.<br />

Teachers of AAC users were asked their opinions with regard to appropriateness of prescription of the AAC device,<br />

users’ level of proficiency with the AAC device, communicative efficiency of AAC users (high technology vs low<br />

technology) and services provided by educators and clinicians during the prescription and training process.<br />

Questionnaires were completed during the interview and utilised for data analysis.<br />

Results<br />

Users of AAC decided to discontinue device use after leaving the school environment and the reasons related to<br />

aesthetic and functional aspects of the device. Parents felt their child had benefited communicatively from using<br />

the device, but most felt that despite many years of having access to the device, their personal knowledge of its<br />

function was limited. Teachers suggested that the high tech device was appropriate, that semantic compaction<br />

was easily incorporated into the curriculum whilst still catering to individual needs, and that whilst support for AAC<br />

in secondary schools was minimal initially, it developed over time.<br />

Implications<br />

The information will provide clinicians/carers with an insight into reasons for device dissatisfaction, thus providing<br />

opportunities for preventative action. Ongoing training and education for families, leading to increased support<br />

for in-home device use is an essential part of the transition planning process These findings also have important<br />

implications for device manufacturers, professionals and others who support clients in transition.<br />

27<br />

Project completed in 2000<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Vocabulary Organiser – development of the program<br />

Rob Garrett<br />

Group Leader, R&D,<br />

Engineering & Support<br />

Melissa Bradley<br />

Marketing Specialist<br />

Angela Guidera<br />

Senior Speech<br />

Pathologist<br />

Bob Collinson 1<br />

Software programmer<br />

1<br />

Colsoft Pty. Ltd.<br />

Objective<br />

Vocabulary Organiser is an innovative software tool for designing, producing and storing vocabulary dictionaries<br />

and worksheets. The software was developed by the <strong>Research</strong> and Development Department in collaboration with<br />

the <strong>Novita</strong> Speech Pathology Department (in particular, Jenny Faulks, who was the idea originator), in response to<br />

a demand for vocabulary management and teaching resources. It was developed for anyone who is involved in<br />

supporting users of augmentative and alternative communication systems. The objective was to validate that the<br />

software met the needs of the users within the organisation.<br />

Method<br />

The original version of the software was trialed by key stakeholders. Extensive feedback was sought, collated and<br />

used to specify software changes needed.<br />

Results<br />

Version 2.3 of the Vocabulary Organiser software was created with the following new features included:<br />

• Support for multiple vocabulary files;<br />

• Enhanced backup facilities;<br />

• User authentication and data security. Specification and modification of the vocabulary stored in the dictionary<br />

can be protected by password;<br />

• Numerous enhancements to speed up the entry and editing of vocabulary dictionaries;<br />

• Enhancements to the options available in printed output mode to create more useable teaching and<br />

learning aids;<br />

• Increased flexibility in graphic size with the addition of “Very Large” graphics option;<br />

• Ability to specify and save page margins to a specific report; and<br />

• Ability to create printed headings relevant to the contents of the dictionary file.<br />

The Users Guide and Help screens were also updated. A final positive validation of the software was achieved in<br />

October 2000.<br />

28<br />

Implications<br />

All of the regional offices now have an effective and usable copy of this powerful tool to efficiently support the<br />

clients of the organisation who use communication devices.<br />

Project completed in 2000<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Vocabulary Organiser – enhancement and commercialisation<br />

Rob Garrett<br />

Group Leader, R&D,<br />

Engineering & Support<br />

Melissa Bradley<br />

Marketing Specialist<br />

David Hobbs<br />

Senior Rehabilitation<br />

Engineer<br />

Peter Wilkinson 1<br />

Software programmer<br />

Sorin Buzilla 2<br />

1<br />

Contract<br />

2<br />

Better Software Pty. Ltd.<br />

Objective<br />

The move to MSAccess 2000 from the older MSAccess 2.0 software version will provide many tangible benefits,<br />

which would directly translate into a better Vocabulary Organiser (VO) product. Reasons for the move include the<br />

fact that Microsoft was no longer supporting the older version, as well as version 2.0’s inability to work correctly on<br />

the later 32-bit operating systems, such as Windows 2000 and XP. Upgrading to Access 2000, will allow for longer<br />

file name conventions compared with the older system that had the old DOS limit of 8 characters. Another reason<br />

for the upgrade is that the newer version of MSAccess was known to be more reliable.<br />

Method<br />

For much of its history, two programmers developed VO. As it moved from internal use to external customers, it<br />

became critical to ensure the software was maintainable by other programmers and had adequate error reporting<br />

capability. To assess this risk, Sorin Buzila from Better Software Pty Ltd was commissioned to perform a software<br />

audit. Sorin spent 3 days reviewing the code and identified 25 actions that were prioritised as “Immediate”, “High”,<br />

“Medium”, or “Low” actions to improve the software. The R&D Department identified all “Immediate” and “High”<br />

recommendations as priority actions.<br />

Industrial programming standards were documented by Sorin Buzila and used to specify the software<br />

programming requirements. In addition, all software changes were independently reviewed to ensure compliance<br />

with the documented standard.<br />

Results<br />

The newer version of Vocabulary Organiser (3.2) is compatible with Windows 2000/XP and the <strong>Novita</strong> standard<br />

computer operating system. Software coding Standards have been established for all software written in<br />

Visual Basic and Visual Basic for Applications. All changes to the software are now independently reviewed<br />

for compliance. A central website to record feedback and report problems can be accessed directly from the<br />

Vocabulary Organiser program. This website is universally available to all users who have access to the web. There<br />

is now one central list of issues enabling easier monitoring of the state of the program such as reliability statistics<br />

and requests for product enhancements. The new version of software now has extensive error reporting capability<br />

that can be simultaneously logged on the user’s computer in a simple text file. The website supports upload of files<br />

that will enable the log file to accompany any errors logged on the web site. The submission of an issue at this web<br />

site results in an immediate notification to key staff.<br />

29<br />

Implications<br />

The software conforms to industrial standards, is easily maintained, has increased reliability, now has error logging<br />

and can be effectively and efficiently supported independent of the location of the user.<br />

Project completed in 2003<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


30<br />

Melissa Bradley<br />

Marketing Specialist<br />

Rob Garrett<br />

Group Leader, R&D,<br />

Engineering & Support<br />

Greg Mathews 1<br />

Mark English 1<br />

1<br />

Vanilla Interactive<br />

Objective<br />

Vocabulary Organiser – marketing<br />

In <strong>1999</strong>, the <strong>Research</strong> and Development Department were commended on the Vocabulary Organiser (VO)<br />

program by its Annual Review panel, and asked to investigate the possibility of selling the software in order to<br />

recoup some of the money spent on its development.<br />

Method<br />

In 2000, the VO program was externally reviewed with a view to fixing known bugs and increasing the reliability of<br />

the software. Activities included:<br />

• Design of CD cover, CD label and User Manual Cover;<br />

• Development of first promotional flyer;<br />

• Establishment of copyright requirements; and<br />

• Generation of mail out database.<br />

During 2001, VO progressed from a resource tool within <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> to a viable, packaged product<br />

to be sold around Australia. Activities included:<br />

• Updating of User Manual, CD cover and brochure;<br />

• Pricing strategy and Kit Lists for VO packages created;<br />

• Development of posters for promotion at conferences;<br />

• A VO brochure was sent to those who had registered an interest in VO and other identified potential customers;<br />

• Creation of a ‘Unity’ vocabulary file;<br />

• Creation of resource/example folders for use at workshops;<br />

• 1 hour Workshop at AGOSCI 1 Conference in Adelaide; and<br />

• 2 hour Workshop at ARATA 2 Conference in Brisbane.<br />

2002 saw changes to the marketing approach for VO. These changes were driven by the completion of the Key<br />

Word Signing vocabulary file, which opened possibilities to target a broader audience. Activities included:<br />

• Development of Demonstration CD in conjunction with Vanilla Interactive;<br />

• Development of a new brochure to support the demo CD;<br />

• Development of a Key Word Signing vocabulary file and specific promotional resources to support it;<br />

• Collection of photographs for VO marketing activities;<br />

• The demonstration CD promoting the Key Word Signing, Unity and AusUnity files was mailed to identified<br />

potential customers;<br />

• 1 hour Presentation at Speech Pathology Conference in Alice Springs; and<br />

• 1 hour presentation at ISAAC 3 Conference in Denmark.<br />

Marketing activities for 2003 focused on increasing awareness for VO in the community. Activities included:<br />

• Key Wording Signing User Manual written and distributed;<br />

• Visit by Bruce Baker from Semantic Compaction Systems (author/creator of the icon-based language, Unity);<br />

• Signed agreement for the use of ‘AusUnity’ and Australian ‘Unity’;<br />

• Windows XP manuals written; and<br />

• Presentation at AGOSCI 1 Conference in Sydney.<br />

Results<br />

The VO program is now in the mature stage of development, and is well entrenched with the <strong>Novita</strong> Speech<br />

Pathology Department. There has been a significant increase in sales. The effectiveness and efficiency of<br />

Vocabulary Organiser has been promoted.<br />

Implications<br />

Vocabulary Organiser is available for sale throughout Australia and a free demonstration CD is available as an<br />

educational tool.<br />

1<br />

AGOSCI: Australian Group on Severe Communication Impairments<br />

2<br />

ARATA: Australian Rehabilitation & Assistive Technology Association<br />

3<br />

ISAAC: International Society for Augmentative & Alternative Communication<br />

Project commenced in 2000<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Vocabulary Organiser – the addition of the merge function<br />

David Hobbs<br />

Senior Rehabilitation<br />

Engineer<br />

Rob Garrett<br />

Group Leader, R&D,<br />

Engineering & Support<br />

Angela Guidera<br />

Senior Speech<br />

Pathologist<br />

Ben Symonds<br />

Rehabilitation Engineer<br />

Peter Wilkinson 1<br />

Software programmer<br />

Sorin Buzila 2<br />

1<br />

Contract<br />

2<br />

Better Software Pty. Ltd.<br />

Objective<br />

There are now multiple copies of the master vocabulary files being used by support staff dealing with individual<br />

clients. As changes and additions to the master vocabulary are created, the changes need to be copied to<br />

other computers.<br />

To facilitate this process, the Merge function has been added to the Vocabulary Organiser software.<br />

Method<br />

Merge allows two unique vocabulary files to be integrated (in essence, one file is merged into the other). The<br />

resultant file contains all the original messages plus any new messages from the merging file that weren’t<br />

contained in the original.<br />

If “clashes” are detected (ie: two elements have the same message name or same symbol sequence) the user<br />

is prompted to take the appropriate action. This could be either adding the new message to the dictionary,<br />

overwriting the original message with the incoming entry, or rejecting the new message. Figure 1 shows a screen<br />

shot for this process.<br />

Results<br />

The Merge function has undergone, and passed, a lengthy internal testing and validation process.<br />

Merge is currently in the hands of the Speech Pathology Department for external validation.<br />

Implications<br />

The Merge function will now make it possible to distribute vocabulary file updates and additions easily via email or<br />

as downloads from a web page. It also enables a user’s vocabulary to follow a person to an alternate location or<br />

therapy support area.<br />

31<br />

Figure 1 – A screen shot showing when a clash of messages is detected during the Merge process.<br />

Project commenced in 2002<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


The design and development of a range of cordless switches<br />

Roger Ingram<br />

Electronics Technician<br />

Jeff Price<br />

Electronics Technician<br />

David Hobbs<br />

Senior Rehabilitation<br />

Engineer<br />

Objective<br />

Several switches with big buttons exist for people with physical impairments. A major disadvantage of these<br />

switches is the cord – it can be cumbersome and sometimes dangerous for people in wheelchairs to use a device<br />

with a cord. The cord not only limits the distance over which the switch can be operated, but the cord itself poses<br />

a risk of tangling or being ‘snagged’. A cordless switch eliminates these issues.<br />

Method<br />

The <strong>Research</strong> & Development Department was involved in the management, validation and user documentation<br />

of the range of cordless switches that the Assistive Technology Department developed. The range includes the<br />

Cordless BIG Switch, the Cordless ANY Switch, and the Cordless Jelly Bean Booster Switch.<br />

Results<br />

A range of radio frequency (RF) cordless switches have been designed for non-critical applications, i.e.<br />

applications not involving the control of medical or safety related issues. Useful applications include the remote<br />

control of battery-operated toys, communication devices, environmental control units, computer access switch<br />

interfaces, and others.<br />

In 2002, the transmitter-receiver chips for these switches were changed for component availability reasons. The<br />

new chips operate on the same 433 MHz frequency but have an improved range of operation – in excess of 50m.<br />

Another benefit of the new switch transmitter-receiver system is the decreased delay (or lag) between switch press<br />

and switch activation.<br />

Implications<br />

The range of cordless switches has now become a regular item in the Assistive Technology catalogue. Loan<br />

switches have also been placed in the <strong>Novita</strong> Toy and Resource Centre so parents and therapists can trial them.<br />

32<br />

Figure 1 – The Cordless Jelly Bean Booster Switch<br />

Project completed in 2002<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Movement-to-m usic therapy<br />

David Hobbs<br />

Senior Rehabilitation<br />

Engineer<br />

Tom Chau 1<br />

Canada <strong>Research</strong><br />

Chair in Paediatric<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

Engineering,<br />

1<br />

Bloorview MacMillan<br />

Children’s Centre, Toronto,<br />

Ontario, Canada<br />

Objective<br />

The “Movement-to-Music” (MTM) therapy system, or Virtual Music Instrument (VMI), is an innovative software<br />

program that allows simple movements to be translated into music. The MTM system provides an interface for<br />

children with a disability to be able to play music without having to hold or manipulate an instrument. One simply<br />

positions themselves in view of a webcam and moves to interact with pre-defined coloured shapes they can see<br />

on the screen, as shown in Figure 1. The system generates musical sounds from very small movements, such as<br />

finger movements, to very large ones, such as waving your arms around.<br />

Method<br />

The MTM system was identified by the investigator as the best use of technology within the field of rehabilitation<br />

engineering and assistive technology after completing his Churchill Fellowship research in 2003. The system is<br />

simple to use and only requires the specific MTM software, a computer (preferably a laptop), a webcam, and a<br />

means of interacting with the webcam (a large TV or data projector).<br />

Results<br />

The group that developed the system at Bloorview MacMillan Children’s Centre in Toronto, Canada, completed<br />

usability testing of a prototype version with 6 children with cerebral palsy or spinal muscular atrophy in May 2002.<br />

The group has also begun conducting Suzuki music lessons using the VMI with 6 children with cerebral palsy or<br />

spinal muscular atrophy, and the system has been installed on the home computers of participating families to<br />

provide an opportunity for the children to practice at home.<br />

MTM can be used in a number of ways: as a virtual musical instrument, as a tool for physical, occupational or<br />

music therapy, as a leisure activity, or to encourage exploration and emotional expression. Some ways that children<br />

can play with the system include games like “Simon Says” and “Memory”, or they can learn to play songs on their<br />

own, in a group, or with family members. <strong>Research</strong> has shown that MTM can help improve children’s reach, range<br />

of motion, endurance, motivation, sense of satisfaction, confidence and ability to explore and create<br />

music independently.<br />

Implications<br />

A copy of the MTM software was donated to <strong>Novita</strong>Tech to trial with <strong>Novita</strong> clients and the system was<br />

demonstrated to <strong>Novita</strong>’s Speech Pathology and Occupational Therapy staff during their July 2004 in-service.<br />

Both disciplines were excited about the possibility of incorporating music therapy into their existing programs,<br />

and were interested in conducting similar research to what was being done in Canada.<br />

33<br />

Figure 1 – Dr Tom Chau, MTM therapy program developer, demonstrates the system. By making movements in<br />

front of the TV he can produce music each time he interacts with the coloured squares.<br />

Project commenced in July 2004<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Computer aided customisation of walker designs<br />

David Sanders 1<br />

4th Year Biomedical<br />

Engineering Student<br />

Alex Svistounov<br />

Senior Testing Engineer<br />

Kevin Clements<br />

Manager, Mobility &<br />

Seating Department<br />

1<br />

School of Informatics<br />

and Engineering, Flinders<br />

University, Adelaide,<br />

Australia<br />

Objective<br />

The aim of this project was to automate the current manual process of designing a walker for an individual client by<br />

developing a system that automatically produced the necessary design plans for a given client’s measurements.<br />

Method<br />

Initial attempts were made to complete this project using a software package called Pro/DESKTOP by P.T.C.<br />

Although the models were completed successfully, the user interface (which was used to simplify the use of the<br />

software and drawing creation) failed due to limitations in the software package.<br />

Given this limitation, another drawing package called Solid Edge V9 by Unigraphics Solutions was investigated. An<br />

academic version of the software was obtained and the models were recreated in this package. Visual Basic was<br />

the language used to program the user interface and it provided a solid, easy to use platform for the job.<br />

Results<br />

The project again encountered problems when it was discovered that the version of Solid Edge being used had<br />

functional limitations, e.g. the Visual Basic interfacing libraries were disabled. This halted any further progress with<br />

this project, however the concept was adequately demonstrated.<br />

Implications<br />

An automated drawing or modelling package would allow for quick and easy designs to be created without the<br />

need for time-intensive hand drawings. It would also allow for quick adjustments or modifications to be made to<br />

the drawings, and would provide a way of storing and documenting future designs. Current fully functioning retail<br />

packages are being investigated to further the work of this project.<br />

Project commenced in 2003<br />

34<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Integrated control of wheelchairs & communication devices<br />

Ben Symonds<br />

Rehabilitation Engineer<br />

Sue van de Loo<br />

Senior Occupational<br />

Therapist<br />

David Hobbs<br />

Senior Rehabilitation<br />

Engineer<br />

Rob Garrett<br />

Group Leader, R&D,<br />

Engineering & Support<br />

Rebecca Gallio<br />

Rehabilitation Engineer<br />

Colin Clayton 1<br />

1<br />

Great Ormond Street<br />

Hospital for Children, The<br />

Wolfson Centre<br />

Objective<br />

Individuals with limited movement may only have one functional ‘access site’ which they must use to drive a<br />

wheelchair, control their communication aid or control the environment around them (eg: TV’s, personal computer,<br />

radio, etc.). The aim of this project was to enhance an individual’s independence by enabling them to incorporate<br />

driving a powered wheelchair and their ability to interact with their environment through the same control<br />

mechanism and site. Ideally it was also hoped that the solution would remove an individual’s reliance upon others<br />

when alternating between driving and control of other technology.<br />

Method<br />

Preliminary research was undertaken to identify or develop a solution that would enable someone to access both<br />

their computer and wheelchair using the same controls – be it a joystick, switch or other alternative control. A<br />

comparison document of identified devices was collated. This document compared three major systems to each<br />

other in a comparison table format, enabling a feature-based comparison to be made.<br />

When a particular system was selected for trial a referral form was completed providing background information<br />

about each client. Using this information and video footage of the current access methods of the clients, the<br />

system was then configured to the clients’ specific abilities. Each client then spent a day trialing the system.<br />

Results<br />

Early research identified three potential integrated systems – the Dynamics IRIS, the wiseDX and the SRS100<br />

system. After assessing all three, the wiseDX system was chosen for a trial with two <strong>Novita</strong> clients in 2003. The<br />

wiseDX was preferred for its flexibility to meet the needs of different users and for the relative ease of use, set-up<br />

and configuration of the system. Investigators from engineering and therapy worked together to achieve extremely<br />

significant results for both these clients. The wiseDX system enabled the first client, a single switch user, to<br />

independently drive her wheelchair and switch to controlling her Pathfinder communication device. The second client<br />

was a joystick user, who was able to control his wheelchair and several other devices with his joystick, including a<br />

television, infrared phone, and the mouse on a laptop computer (wirelessly) with complete independence.<br />

Implications<br />

The project identified an effective, easy to use and versatile integrated system that was demonstrated to meet<br />

the initial project aims. Engineering, technical and therapy staff were accredited by the inventor of the wiseDX<br />

system and gained valuable experience setting up the system for clients. This expertise and experience has given<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> the confidence and credentials to prescribe and support this system, thus providing an exciting solution for<br />

individuals who require such technology.<br />

35<br />

Project completed in 2004<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Introduction of a hoist into the family home – a qualitative study into the perspectives<br />

of three mothers who care for a child who has a severe physical disability<br />

Angela Shepherd 1<br />

Honours Student<br />

Supervisor<br />

Hugh Stewart 1<br />

Lecturer<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Supervisor<br />

Sonya Murchland<br />

Senior <strong>Research</strong><br />

Occupational Therapist<br />

1<br />

School of Health Sciences<br />

– Occupational Therapy,<br />

University of South Australia<br />

Objective<br />

To identify the perspectives of three mothers who use a hoist to assist in the care of a child with a severe physical disability<br />

in the home. It sought to identify the effects of hoist introduction on the family as well as factors that influence hoist use.<br />

Method<br />

A descriptive qualitative methodology was used for naturalistic inquiry. Purposeful sampling was used to select<br />

three participants who were the primary caregivers of a child with a severe physical disability that limited their<br />

capacity to transfer independently. Mothers were interviewed individually in their own homes using in-depth, semistructured<br />

interviews. Analysis of the data used an inductive process of thematic analysis.<br />

Results<br />

Four major themes emerged: ‘get it ahead of time’; ‘represents loss of function’; ‘meeting family’s needs’,<br />

‘improves quality of life’. The findings highlight the overall positive impact of hoist introduction on the parent and<br />

child’s quality of life as a result of improved management of care, increased options for the child, and increased<br />

respite options for the parent.<br />

Implications<br />

These positive outcomes of hoist use were very important in terms of hoist acceptance and eventual use. A number<br />

of influences such as the consultation on acquisition of the hoist, early introduction of the hoist, appropriate fit in the<br />

home, sensitivity to grief and loss, and negotiations with parents about changes in care provision were all seen as<br />

important in the introduction of the hoist. The study also served to remind occupational therapists of the complexity<br />

of the introduction process, and the compromises associated with ongoing hoist use in the family home.<br />

Project completed in 2002<br />

36<br />

Alex Svistounov<br />

Senior Testing Engineer<br />

Janitha Jayaweera 1<br />

4th Year Computer<br />

Systems Engineering<br />

Student<br />

David Sanders 2<br />

4th Year Biomedical<br />

Engineering Student<br />

1<br />

The University of Adelaide<br />

2<br />

School of Informatics<br />

and Engineering,<br />

Flinders University,<br />

Adelaide, Australia<br />

Objective<br />

Remote monitoring of the testing laboratory<br />

The aim of this research was to develop, build and launch a hardware/software based data acquisition (DAQ)<br />

system for the Rehabilitation Equipment Testing Laboratory (Test Lab) that would allow remote (preferably real-time)<br />

monitoring of cyclic tests, remote (PC based) control, and monitoring of environmental conditions.<br />

Method<br />

Preliminary research was undertaken to explore possible solutions, by looking at the systems employed locally by<br />

similar organisations and contacting suppliers of DAQ systems. Additionally the pros and cons of custom versus<br />

‘off the shelf’ systems and stand-alone versus PC based systems were investigated. The research was then<br />

combined with the specific requirements of the test lab to develop a detailed specification for the DAQ system.<br />

Results<br />

Several options were identified including turnkey solutions, the use of commercial DAQ and signal conditioning<br />

cards combined with some basic programming, or the in-house development of hardware and software. Due<br />

to the cost of the commercial solutions the student developed an in-house hardware and software solution for<br />

PC based monitoring of basic cyclic tests. This resulted in a functional prototype that can be employed for basic<br />

logging and also provided a solid validation of the concept.<br />

Implications<br />

A complete DAQ system would allow tests to be remotely monitored and thus remove the need for staff to come<br />

and check on test progress over weekends and holidays. It would also enable more detailed failure analysis<br />

through revision of test conditions leading up to any failures. Currently the student solution is being utilised for<br />

basic cyclic testing and the test lab is evaluating the identified commercial DAQ systems to enable comprehensive<br />

monitoring and control of all tests.<br />

Project commenced in 2003<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Toan Nguyen 1<br />

Master of Engineering<br />

(<strong>Research</strong>) candidate<br />

Andrew Downing 1<br />

Foundation<br />

Professor, Biomedical<br />

Engineering<br />

Barry Seeger 2<br />

Director, <strong>Novita</strong>Tech<br />

Rob Garrett<br />

Group Leader, R&D,<br />

Engineering & Support<br />

Ruth Davy 3<br />

1<br />

School of Informatics<br />

and Engineering, Flinders<br />

University, Adelaide.<br />

2<br />

Retired<br />

3<br />

Co-ordinator, Quality<br />

Assurance and Evaluation,<br />

Barkuma Inc.<br />

Funding:<br />

A Strategic<br />

Partnerships with<br />

Industry <strong>Research</strong><br />

and Training (SPIRT)<br />

scheme funded by the<br />

Australian <strong>Research</strong><br />

Council/ Department of<br />

Education, Training and<br />

Youth Affairs (DETYA).<br />

Funding amount of<br />

$42,160.<br />

Objective<br />

Focus group to assess home and mobile phone needs<br />

To assist in the understanding of both the mobile and fixed telecommunication needs of <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s<br />

<strong>Services</strong> clients and from the identified needs, develop and pilot new service alternatives and product concepts in<br />

telecommunications to the wider <strong>Novita</strong> community.<br />

Method<br />

A focus group discussion was held at <strong>Novita</strong>, with four clients consenting to take part. An informal discussion ran<br />

for approximately 90 minutes to find answers to questions such as:<br />

• How are people currently using mobile and home phones<br />

• What difficulties or barriers are people having when using phones<br />

• What needs to be changed or improved<br />

Participants were also asked to respond to a list of mobile phone solutions and features that could provide better<br />

mobile phone access and whether or not they were of significant importance for these participants.<br />

Results<br />

All members participating in the focus group were current users of mobile phones. The purposes for which the<br />

phone were used by the participants included:<br />

• a method of keeping in contact with friends and family;<br />

• a means of ringing for a taxi and checking on the taxi’s location;<br />

• a safety device to enable them to telephone for an ambulance, or the police; and<br />

• the use of the phone to type and display a key word or idea to assist in a conversation.<br />

There were many problems associated with mobile phone use, features and design. These included lifting the<br />

phone from waist level to ear level during mobile phone use. For many people with severe weakness and reduced<br />

strength in their arms and hands, a dilemma was noted when choosing between smaller mobile phone models that<br />

are lighter to lift but harder to use in contrast to larger models which easier to use but harder to lift to the shoulder.<br />

Some participants found that calls were terminated before they were able to retrieve the phone from its storage<br />

position, answer the call and then raise the phone to ear level.<br />

The type of disability that the participants have often limits the way they can use the mobile phone. Some have<br />

adapted ways to overcome their shortcomings when using their mobile phone, while others preferred advanced<br />

technologies to solve their problems (although there are some trade-offs, such as privacy). All participants<br />

expressed an interest in hands-free operation of the phone through the use of the speakerphone function and/or<br />

voice recognition, since all the participants had reduced strength in their arms and hands. There were also<br />

participants who have no knowledge of current mobile phone technologies available (hardware and software) that<br />

can be used in conjunction with their mobile phone or AAC device to help improve their use and accessibility.<br />

Implications<br />

The outcomes of this research suggest that accessible mobile phones will become a necessity for people with<br />

a disability. Indeed, many existing solutions may solve the many problems faced by people with disabilities.<br />

Education and trials of these solutions will play a vital role in determining their appropriateness to individuals.<br />

37<br />

Project completed in 2002<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Making the home phone accessible for people with a disability<br />

David Hobbs<br />

Senior Rehabilitation<br />

Engineer<br />

Rob Garrett<br />

Group Leader, R&D,<br />

Engineering & Support<br />

Objective<br />

As part of the review process of the MiPhone project, new research was conducted to identify the common<br />

obstacles that prevent people with a disability from using the home phone.<br />

The steps involved with getting to and using the home phone were identified and divided into 6 separate tasks.<br />

These included getting to the phone in time to answer an in-coming call, holding the phone to your ear for the<br />

duration of the call, dialling a number using the key pad, and replacing the phone handset after a call is finished.<br />

A document titled “The Home Phone Solutions Guide” was then produced, where the Guide identified existing<br />

commercial solutions for each of the 6 tasks.<br />

Method<br />

Common problems and obstacles were identified through focus group sessions and questionnaires sent to both<br />

child and adult clients of <strong>Novita</strong> (run in conjunction with the mobile phone research, see ‘Focus Group to Assess<br />

Home and Mobile Phone Needs’, page 37 and ‘Survey of Accessible Mobile Communication for People with<br />

Disabilities, page 40). The Guide was then developed to provide hints, tips, and suggested solutions to each of the<br />

obstacles the questionnaires and focus group sessions identified.<br />

Solutions and recommendations for overcoming these obstacles were collected from the SA Independent Living<br />

Centre (ILC), <strong>Novita</strong>Tech’s Environmental Control Specialist (Annabel Gregory), and Telstra, through their Disability<br />

Equipment Program (DEP). An online version of Telstra’s Disability Equipment Program can be found at the<br />

following location: http://www.telstra.com.au/disability/catalogue/.<br />

Having identified a host of existing solutions, it became apparent that this information was not widely known within<br />

the disability community. Few people were aware of Telstra’s Disability Equipment Program, and less knew how it<br />

functioned, what it provided, and how one could be registered.<br />

For example, existing Telstra customers who are eligible for the DEP may be entitled to a “Holdaphone” (see<br />

Figure 1) or a speakerphone (for hands-free operation) for the cost of a standard telephone handset rental.<br />

38<br />

Results<br />

The <strong>Research</strong> & Development Department has concentrated on disseminating the information within the Guide.<br />

Presentations have been given to <strong>Novita</strong>’s OT’s, and feature articles explaining some of the solutions and<br />

highlighting the DEP have been published in <strong>Novita</strong>’s Nexus Newsletter and the Australian Rehabilitation and<br />

Assistive Technology Association (ARATA) newsletter.<br />

Implications<br />

R&D plans to continue to promote Telstra’s DEP, which directly benefits <strong>Novita</strong>’s clients and their families, and the<br />

solutions provided within the Guide. On-going discussions are being held with the Manager of Disability <strong>Services</strong><br />

within Telstra about extending the scope of the DEP to encompass infrared controlled phones. At present, these<br />

are not part of the Program.<br />

Figure 1 – The Holdaphone, an assistive device for using the home phone.<br />

Project completed in 2002<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Mobile phone access via an augmentative and alternative communication device<br />

Toan Nguyen<br />

Rehabilitation Engineer<br />

Andrew Downing 1<br />

Foundation<br />

Professor, Biomedical<br />

Engineering<br />

Rob Garrett<br />

Group Leader, R&D,<br />

Engineering & Support<br />

1<br />

School of Informatics<br />

and Engineering, Flinders<br />

University, Adelaide.<br />

Funding:<br />

A Strategic<br />

Partnerships with<br />

Industry <strong>Research</strong><br />

and Training (SPIRT)<br />

scheme funded by the<br />

Australian <strong>Research</strong><br />

Council/ Department of<br />

Education, Training and<br />

Youth Affairs (DETYA).<br />

Funding amount of<br />

$42,160.<br />

Objective<br />

People with severe disabilities are both functionally and socially disadvantaged and often require an Augmentative<br />

and Alternative Communication (AAC) device, with expensive customised hardware and software interfaces,<br />

to support their educational, vocational, social and recreational activities. For many of these people, the lack<br />

of a mobile phone interface is a significant impediment. This research aims to generate economical, effective<br />

communication solutions, for people with disabilities who need or want to be mobile, by developing and integrating<br />

mobile technology to suit their needs. For example, the development of an interfacing system to enable a person<br />

with a disability who uses an AAC device such as the “Pathfinder” to independently answer, initiate and terminate a<br />

mobile phone voice and to create and send text.<br />

Method<br />

Most Global Systems for Mobile Communication (GSM 1 ) mobile phones include an internal hardware modem.<br />

This modem allows data, fax, text messaging (such as the “Short Messaging Service”, or SMS) and voice calls<br />

to be controlled by standardised GSM AT 2 commands. Most AAC devices such as the Pathfinder have a serial<br />

and/or infrared (IrDA 3 ) port, which readily outputs strings of ASCII 4 characters. Consequently, a Pathfinder can<br />

be programmed to send the required sequences of GSM AT commands to control the mobile phone to initiate<br />

a voice call, answer incoming calls, terminate calls and send and receive text messages. With the integration of<br />

a compatible mobile phone car kit, a complete system can be created which would allow an AAC device user to<br />

independently control a mobile phone for voice and text communications.<br />

Results<br />

A prototype interfacing system for mobile phone access via an AAC device has been developed through this<br />

research to enable people with disabilities who currently utilize electronic communication aids to use a mobile<br />

phone for voice calls and text messaging. A working model was successfully demonstrated at the Australian<br />

Rehabilitation & Assistive Technology Association (ARATA) 2004 Conference held in Melbourne 1–4 June 2004<br />

pre-conference workshop and through a paper presentation. Further refinement is required to develop the system<br />

into a solution readily useable by AAC users.<br />

Implications<br />

A fully developed and packaged system to connect a mobile phone and an AAC device will provide mobile phone<br />

access for many users of AAC devices that otherwise has not been possible. Trials and evaluation of the fully<br />

developed system with end users will be the next phase of the project.<br />

39<br />

1<br />

A standard for digital cellular phone service in over 85 countries, which operates at 900/1800/1900 MHz.<br />

2<br />

AT stands for ATtention and is the two-character abbreviation that is always used to start communication between two devices.<br />

3<br />

Infrared Data Association - which sets standards for using infrared transmission to transfer data between electronic devices (e.g. computers and<br />

other peripherals and devices) through the air, with no cables or wires.<br />

4<br />

American Standard Code for Information Exchange – world-wide standard for the code numbers used by computers to represent all the upper and<br />

lower-case Latin letters, numbers, punctuation, etc<br />

Project commenced in 2003<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


40<br />

Toan Nguyen 1<br />

Master of Engineering<br />

(<strong>Research</strong>) candidate<br />

Andrew Downing 1<br />

Foundation<br />

Professor, Biomedical<br />

Engineering<br />

Barry Seeger 2<br />

Director, <strong>Novita</strong>Tech<br />

Rob Garrett<br />

Group Leader, R&D,<br />

Engineering & Support<br />

David Hobbs<br />

Senior Rehabilitation<br />

Engineer<br />

1<br />

School of Informatics<br />

and Engineering, Flinders<br />

University, Adelaide.<br />

2<br />

Retired.<br />

Funding:<br />

A Strategic<br />

Partnerships with<br />

Industry <strong>Research</strong><br />

and Training (SPIRT)<br />

scheme funded by the<br />

Australian <strong>Research</strong><br />

Council/ Department of<br />

Education, Training and<br />

Youth Affairs (DETYA).<br />

Funding amount of<br />

$42,160.<br />

Survey of accessible mobile communication for people with disabilities<br />

Objective<br />

Different people have different needs when it comes to using mobile and home phones. For people with<br />

disabilities, these needs become increasingly important, as accessing standard phones can become an issue.<br />

More often, specialised or modified phones are needed to deal with these special circumstances.<br />

The purpose of this research was to identify issues relating to current and future mobile phone technology use, and<br />

the difficulties or barriers that people with disabilities face when using a mobile or standard home phone. In addition,<br />

establishing what needs to be developed to enhance/improve accessibility to phones is still an on-going challenge.<br />

Method<br />

A Mobile and Home Phone Needs Analysis survey questionnaire was created and distributed via mail to 342 clients<br />

receiving services from <strong>Novita</strong>.<br />

The survey was divided in two sections:<br />

1. The Mobile Phone Needs Analysis section that dealt with issues relating to mobile phone use; and<br />

2. The Home Phone Needs Analysis that dealt with accessibility issues relating to home phone use.<br />

The information obtained from each section of the survey was then used to:<br />

• develop practical solutions to overcome the difficulties or barriers that users are having when using a mobile or<br />

home phone;<br />

• develop alternative methods or approaches to using a mobile or home phone; and<br />

• model an integrated system that would provide easier access to both the mobile and home phones.<br />

Results<br />

The results of the survey questionnaires indicated that people with disabilities within the community are able to<br />

use, and want to have access to, mobile phone technology. It also highlighted that, apart from general difficulties in<br />

performing essential tasks on current phones efficiently, most people with a disability are not aware of the available<br />

technology, and if they are, do not use it to the fullest extent. There was a need to make access to mobile phones<br />

easier through the development of an interfacing system as well as to look more closely at existing solutions as<br />

alternative options.<br />

Implications<br />

The findings from this research prompted the consideration of trials to investigate and evaluate viable and<br />

alternative solutions to improve awareness and telecommunications experience for people with disabilities. This<br />

work was carried out in 2003 through a government-funded project entitled “New technological options for people<br />

with disabilities through the use of telecommunications equipment” described on p41.<br />

Project completed in 2002<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Technological options for people with physical disabilities<br />

through the use of telecommunications equipment<br />

Toan Nguyen<br />

Rehabilitation Engineer<br />

Andrew Downing 1<br />

Foundation<br />

Professor, Biomedical<br />

Engineering<br />

Rob Garrett<br />

Group Leader, R&D,<br />

Engineering & Support<br />

David Hobbs<br />

Senior Rehabilitation<br />

Engineer<br />

Lloyd Walker<br />

Director, <strong>Novita</strong>Tech.<br />

1<br />

School of Informatics<br />

and Engineering, Flinders<br />

University, Adelaide.<br />

Funding:<br />

Telecommunications<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Grant<br />

Program, Department<br />

of Communications,<br />

Information Technology<br />

and the Arts. Funding<br />

amount of $24,705.<br />

Telstra’s Disability<br />

<strong>Services</strong>. Funding<br />

amount of $8,000.<br />

Objective<br />

Accessing telecommunication technology and the broad range of services behind it has been an ongoing<br />

challenge for people with disabilities. With technology continually changing and mobile phones shrinking in<br />

size, the gap between people with disabilities and telecommunication technology has grown. The results of the<br />

focus group (see page 37) and survey (see page 40) indicated that new mobile phone features and accessories<br />

could be significant in overcoming this gap. The aim of this research was to trial and evaluate new configurable<br />

‘off-the-shelf’ telecommunication options such as car kits, voice recognition and hands-free technology (e.g.<br />

speakerphone), and network features such as voice mail that can improve the lifestyle, independence, security<br />

and social interaction of people with physical disabilities.<br />

Method<br />

The trials involved ten participants, drawn from the 1300 children and adults receiving services from <strong>Novita</strong>. The<br />

trial group included people with mild, moderate and severe physical disabilities affecting movement and speech.<br />

The trials tested the ability of the participants to make and receive calls using a mobile phone, and for those<br />

participants that can use the Short Message Service (SMS), to create and send text messages efficiently. Various<br />

assessment methods including the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) tool were used to<br />

measure the performance, frustration, and satisfaction as well as the time responses of participants when carrying<br />

out these activities:<br />

• before intervention – with the participant using their existing technology (prior to the trial);<br />

• during intervention – with the telecommunications equipment provided for approximately 3 weeks (end the trial); and<br />

• after intervention – when the trial equipment was withdrawn from the participant for approximately 2 weeks.<br />

Results<br />

Based on the outcomes of the trials it was found that:<br />

• there is no insurmountable barrier to the use of phone technology by people with a physical disability. Features of<br />

the existing technologies offer affordable solutions to problems of accessibility previously considered unsolvable;<br />

• nine out of ten participants showed high to very high results in terms of their overall performance and<br />

satisfaction with the use of the telecommunication equipment provided. (A technical difficulty prevented an<br />

effective evaluation for one of the participants);<br />

• participants who had an inadequate solution, now can have an adequate solution (or alternative solution) to<br />

access telecommunication equipment and services; and<br />

• participants who had no independent access to telecommunication equipment can now independently access<br />

the network successfully.<br />

Implications<br />

Through this research it was found that people with a range of physical disabilities can use and should have equal<br />

access to telecommunications equipment and services. With the right policies, processes and support (equipment<br />

matching, education, training and delivery) in place, current off-the-shelf solutions can help alleviate problems and<br />

improve the lifestyle, social interaction, security and independence of many people with physical disabilities.<br />

Acknowledgements:<br />

This research was supported by the Commonwealth Telecommunications <strong>Research</strong> Grant Program of the Department of<br />

Communications, Information, Technology and the Arts. This project proudly supported by Telstra.<br />

41<br />

Project completed in 2003<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Development of accessible websites<br />

Tim Ziersch<br />

Manager, Special<br />

Projects<br />

Annabel Gregory<br />

Assistive Technology,<br />

Computer Access<br />

Specialist<br />

Rob Garrett<br />

Group Leader, R&D,<br />

Engineering & Support<br />

Annabelle Tilbrook<br />

Senior Occupational<br />

Therapist<br />

Christian Russell 1<br />

David Morell 2<br />

1<br />

Fusion Design<br />

Consultants<br />

2<br />

Disability Action<br />

Objective<br />

To build a suite of four websites for <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> having the highest possible level of accessibility for<br />

people with a range of disabilities.<br />

Results<br />

A comprehensive range of accessibility features were incorporated into the 4 planned websites to meet the highest<br />

level of compliance for all 14 W3C Web Content Guidelines. The sites were built and tested with a high level of<br />

satisfaction being reported by testers using a range of assistive technology. Some minor enhancements were<br />

undertaken based on tester feedback. The sites achieved the AAA W3C compliance rating of the W3C and were<br />

also awarded the silver medal in the HESTA Web Awards Competition (2004), for which one of the criteria was<br />

accessibility for people with disability.<br />

The web sites can be found at:<br />

http://www.novita.org.au/<br />

http://kids.novita.org.au/<br />

http://teens.novita.org.au/<br />

http://www.novitatech.org.au/<br />

Implications<br />

This work is important in reinforcing the need for all websites to be built so that all people, regardless of whether<br />

they have a disability or not, can easily and fully access them.<br />

42<br />

Project completed in 2003<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Using product features to select appropriate AT products<br />

Rob Garrett<br />

Group Leader, R&D,<br />

Engineering & Support<br />

Annabel Gregory<br />

Assistive Technology,<br />

Computer Access<br />

Specialist<br />

Libby Price<br />

Assistive Technology,<br />

Augmentative<br />

Communication<br />

Specialist<br />

Rebecca Gallio<br />

Rehabilitation Engineer<br />

Objective<br />

When assistive technology products are categorised by the desirable features required by the end users, it is<br />

possible to filter all the products for features required by a particular user. For example, a user who can only use<br />

1 switch and requires a device to produce speech can specify these features and then see a list of devices that<br />

have just these attributes.<br />

Earlier pioneering feature based selection work resulted in the stand-alone software “VOCAselect” 1 and “Computer<br />

Access Selector” 2 . With the addition of web pages containing product information, these innovative computer<br />

programs required product information to be entered into two different locations. With limited resources, it was<br />

difficult to maintain the software programs.<br />

The objective was to integrate the feature-based product selection system into the Assistive Technology product<br />

web pages on the new web site.<br />

Method<br />

A comprehensive comparison of feature-based selection systems was conducted and a specification included in<br />

the web site contract.<br />

The addition of a product to the online catalogue now requires the features to be identified and tagged within the<br />

web database system.<br />

Results<br />

The Product Selector system has been implemented for the Communication Devices, Computer Access and<br />

Environmental Control sections of <strong>Novita</strong>Tech’s online catalogue. The software items will also be included in<br />

the future.<br />

The Product Selection Web page can be found at:<br />

http://www.novitatech.org.au/selector.aspp=249<br />

Implications<br />

This new product selector enables people searching for assistive technology products to specify the feature or<br />

features needed and to quickly isolate a range of products most closely matched to the end user’s requirements.<br />

Purchasers are more likely to consider the full range of products that match the required features, resulting in a<br />

final purchase that is a better match to the user’s needs.<br />

43<br />

1 Stapleton D, Garrett RE. VOCAselect Version 1.0: An AAC Device Selection Tool. Proceedings of 2nd Australian Conference on Technology for<br />

People with Disabilities, Adelaide, 1995, p 114–116.<br />

2 Garrett RE, Stapleton D and Seeger BR. Computer Access Selector: A Windows-based Tool for Choosing Keyboard & Mouse Alternatives.<br />

Proceedings of EPSM 95, Queenstown NZ, 1995, p 148.<br />

Project completed in 2003<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the Tardieu Scale to quantify spasticity<br />

in biceps brachii in children with cerebral palsy.<br />

Marianne Spizzo 1<br />

Honours student<br />

Supervisors<br />

Andrea<br />

Warden Flood 1<br />

Senior Lecturer<br />

Paula Harris 2<br />

Chief Physiotherapist<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Supervisor<br />

Susan Gibson<br />

Senior <strong>Research</strong><br />

Physiotherapist<br />

1<br />

School of Health Sciences<br />

– Physiotherapy, University<br />

of South Australia<br />

2<br />

Lyell McEwin Hospital,<br />

Adelaide, South Australia<br />

Objective<br />

The Tardieu scale is a commonly used test of spasticity that involves determining the difference between full<br />

passive range of motion at slow speed and then the angle of catch at fast speed in single joints such as the elbow.<br />

The aim of this study was to establish both intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the Tardieu scale in biceps brachii<br />

of children with cerebral palsy.<br />

Method<br />

In this randomised single-blind design study, five participants with cerebral palsy (aged 4 – 16 years) were<br />

randomly assigned to one of two groups. Both right and left arms were tested on one subject, resulting in a sample<br />

of six limbs. Each subject was tested in supine on two consecutive days and at the same time of day. On each day,<br />

the Tardieu scale was assessed twice with a 5-minute inter-test interval during which the participant moved into<br />

sitting and was repositioned in supine prior to the second test. On day 1, one Rater (A) performed both tests. On<br />

day 2, Rater A was followed by Rater B for Group 1, and Rater B was followed by Rater A for Group 2. To blind the<br />

raters, an independent investigator measured all angles with a goniometer and recorded the results.<br />

Results<br />

Intra-rater reliability was acceptable (ICC(1,1) = 0.80) whereas inter-rater reliability was low (ICC(1,1) = 0.51)<br />

suggesting that the Tardieu score is not reproducible between the raters and that one rater may be required to<br />

conduct all tests to ensure agreement between repeated measures. These findings were supported by standard<br />

errors of measurement (intra-rater SEM = 6.65º and inter-rater SEM = 12.28º). Further, the minimal detectable<br />

change needed to demonstrate treatment effectiveness was 19º for one therapist and 35º for two therapists when<br />

using the Tardieu score as the outcome measure.<br />

44<br />

Implications<br />

The findings of this study suggest that the use of the Tardieu scale is justified when used by only one therapist for<br />

the measurement of biceps brachii spasticity in a child with cerebral palsy. If different therapists use the Tardieu<br />

scale, a change in score may be due to a difference in measurement technique and not a treatment effect. Further<br />

studies are needed to determine the intra- and inter- rater reliability of this scale with a larger sample and in other<br />

muscle groups and starting positions.<br />

Project completed in 2001<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Use of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure:<br />

therapists’ and parents’ views – a pilot study<br />

Terry Lyons<br />

Chief Occupational<br />

Therapist<br />

Parimala<br />

Raghavendra<br />

Manager,<br />

Clinical <strong>Research</strong><br />

Objective<br />

Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) (Law, et al., 1998) is designed to measure changes in<br />

self-perception of occupational performance among clients with a variety of disabilities, across all developmental<br />

stages and by individual disciplines. However it is not known whether a multi-disciplinary team working with the<br />

same group of clients can use COPM.<br />

Method<br />

A pilot project was undertaken to investigate, whether COPM would inform the goal setting process for an early<br />

intervention (EI) group run by a multi-disciplinary team, the training needs of therapists, and their and parents’<br />

views on the usability of the tool. Four children between the ages of 3 years 11 months and 5 years with physical<br />

disabilities including Leigh’s Disease, muscular dystrophy and cerebral palsy and their 4 family members formed<br />

the EI group.; An occupational therapist, physiotherapist, speech pathologist and psychologist were trained in the<br />

use of COPM. Each therapist was allocated a client and completed the COPM with the parent/carer of that client.<br />

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the therapists after goal setting with parents, and at the end of the<br />

intervention period. The COPM was re-administrated approximately three months after the first. Parents were asked<br />

to share their experiences in identifying problem areas and their perception of change for their child.<br />

Results<br />

The COPM informed the goal-setting process for the EI group. The team was able to work on areas identified by<br />

parents that were common across the group. The team found COPM to be a simple tool to use but thought that<br />

more practice was necessary in documenting behavioural issues. Parents were positive about the goal setting<br />

process and the opportunity it provided to look back on changes in their child. COPM had provided an opportunity<br />

for them to reflect on their child’s progress and to discuss future goals.<br />

Implications<br />

The pilot project with a multi-disciplinary team working with an EI team showed that COPM could be used across<br />

different therapy areas. Parents observed progress in their children. COPM facilitates client-centred practice and<br />

may be more useful in using it with older clients and in describing occupation-related goals.<br />

45<br />

References: Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, McColl M, Polatajko H, Pollock N (1998). Canadian Occupational Performance Measures. CAOT<br />

publications: Canada.<br />

Project completed in 2002<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


What is the evidence for the use of the gross motor function measure (GMFM-88)<br />

as a functional outcome measure for children with cerebral palsy<br />

Susan Gibson<br />

Senior <strong>Research</strong><br />

Physiotherapist<br />

Physiotherapy<br />

Staff<br />

Objective<br />

The purpose of this critical appraisal of the literature was to (1) establish whether the GMFM-88 a reliable and valid<br />

tool to detect change in the gross motor skills of children with CP, and (2) establish its clinical usefulness and its<br />

sensitivity to detect change<br />

Method<br />

A systematic search was conducted using multiple databases through South Australian Health <strong>Services</strong> Libraries<br />

Consortium database (SALUS). Databases searched: Medline, CINAHL, AMED, Current Contents, IDEAL, Science<br />

Direct, Cochrane Library and Sports Discus. Key words: cerebral palsy, Gross Motor Function Measure, GMFM,<br />

GMFM-88, Gross Motor Performance Measure, GMPM, Gross Motor Functional Classification Scale, GMFCS,<br />

GMFM-66. Crombie Appraisal Tools, modified by the Clinical <strong>Research</strong> Department at <strong>Novita</strong>, were used to<br />

critically appraise the literature. All studies and articles located were acceptable evidence.<br />

Results<br />

A total of 50 studies were included. 12 articles pertaining to Question 1 (reliability and validity) were appraised:<br />

3 reviews, 7 observational studied and 2 experimental studies. For Question 2 (clinical usefulness) 38 articles were<br />

appraised: 4 reviews, 4 case studies, 15 observational studies and 15 experimental studies. The outcomes of the<br />

critical appraisal of the literature was that:<br />

• The GMFM-88 is a reliable and valid measure used to evaluate change in motor function in children with CP, it is<br />

not a very sensitive tool for the higher functioning child with a mild motor impairment, and a ceiling effect can be<br />

reached making it difficult to measure improvements in these children;<br />

• The GMFM-88 has been validated for use with children with Downs Syndrome and Osteogenesis Imperfecta; and<br />

• The GMFM-88 has been used to establish baseline profiles and detect change in gross motor function after<br />

interventions such as Selective Dorsal Rhizotomies, Botulinum Toxin Type A injections, Hyperbaric Oxygen<br />

Therapy and to demonstrate a treatment effect in the research into efficacy of intensive physiotherapy<br />

intervention and muscle strengthening programs for children with CP.<br />

46<br />

Implications<br />

This critical appraisal of the literature supports the use of the GMFM-88 as a Functional Outcomes Measurement<br />

tool for children with cerebral palsy. The physiotherapy staff at <strong>Novita</strong> continues to use the GMFM-88 as a clinical<br />

outcome measurement. The Physiotherapy Department also now uses the Gross Motor Functional Classification<br />

System, and have recently embarked on a training program for all physiotherapists at <strong>Novita</strong> in the use of the<br />

GMFM-66 and the Gross Motor Ability Estimator.<br />

Project completed in 2001<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


The prevalence of low back pain in parents of children<br />

with a physical disability aged 5 years or below<br />

Nathan Ward 1<br />

Honours Student<br />

Supervisor<br />

Marie Williams 1<br />

Associate Professor<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Supervisor<br />

Trish Bate<br />

Senior <strong>Research</strong><br />

Physiotherapist<br />

1<br />

School of Health Sciences<br />

– Physiotherapy, University<br />

of South Australia<br />

Objective<br />

Low back pain (LBP) is a significant issue within the general population. Numerous risk factors have been linked to<br />

the development of LBP, with many of these presumed to be present in parents of young children. To date, there is<br />

little information concerning the prevalence of LBP in adults caring for young physically disabled children. The aim<br />

of this study was to conduct a survey to investigate the incidence of LBP in parents of children aged five years or<br />

below that have a physical disability.<br />

Method<br />

This study used a survey design where a postal questionnaire was undertaken to determine the prevalence of<br />

LBP in the study population. The questionnaire was administered to parents who had a child who was registered<br />

with <strong>Novita</strong> and was 5 years of age or younger. The Nordic Low Back Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability<br />

Questionnaire were used in the study. A purpose-designed questionnaire to provide demographics was also<br />

mailed to each subject. Two hundred and seventy five packages were mailed out.<br />

Results<br />

This study achieved a final response rate of 36.7% (n=101). For this sample, there was a lifetime prevalence of<br />

90.1%, 12-month prevalence of 87.1% and a seven-day prevalence of 54.5%. On the day they completed the<br />

survey, 59% of parents said they had low back pain. Most parents reported only a small amount of inconvenience<br />

caused by the low back pain. There was no link between the time spent caring, washing/dressing, feeding, playing<br />

with and lifting/carrying the child and the level of disability. In the past year, 37% of the parents had sought help<br />

from a doctor, physiotherapist, chiropractor or another person due to low back pain. Low back pain had affected<br />

the normal work activities of 36% of the parents, with 41% having to limit their leisure activity due to low back pain<br />

in the last year. There also appeared to be no link between receiving assistance from a paid carer and having<br />

low back pain in either the last 7 days or 12 months. This means that having a paid carer did not help reduce or<br />

increase the incidence of low back pain in our study group.<br />

Implications<br />

The findings of the study suggest that LBP may be a significant issue for some parents with a young disabled<br />

child. However, due to the low response rate, prevalence figures cannot be considered significant of the entire<br />

population group. The Physiotherapy Discipline at <strong>Novita</strong> is considering whether back care information sessions<br />

and classes for parents should be offered on an ongoing basis.<br />

47<br />

Project completed in 2003<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


48<br />

Parimala<br />

Raghavendra<br />

Manager<br />

Clinical <strong>Research</strong><br />

Julie Smith<br />

Senior Psychologist<br />

Trevor Harrison 1<br />

Pam Donnelly<br />

Regional Manager<br />

Glenda Noble 2<br />

Senior Occupational<br />

Therapist<br />

Heather Slattery 3<br />

Actress<br />

1<br />

Harrison Consultants<br />

2<br />

Communication and<br />

Therapy <strong>Services</strong>, now part<br />

of Adult Therapy <strong>Services</strong><br />

at the Independent Living<br />

Centre<br />

3<br />

Deceased<br />

Childhood therapy experiences of adults with cerebral palsy:<br />

implications for today’s children with cerebral palsy<br />

Objective<br />

The aim of the project was to investigate how an agency providing long term support for children with cerebral<br />

palsy can best prepare them for adulthood. Adults who had received services from <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong><br />

(formerly Crippled Children’s Association of SA Inc.) as children, were asked how physiotherapy, occupational<br />

therapy, speech pathology and social work/psychology services had assisted them during their years at <strong>Novita</strong>.<br />

They were also asked what they thought of the services they had received, what else they might have needed,<br />

and what suggestions they would like to make regarding <strong>Novita</strong>’s services for the future.<br />

Method<br />

A qualitative research methodology involving focus groups and individual interviews was employed with a<br />

participatory research paradigm in which people with disabilities and researchers worked together at each stage<br />

of the project.<br />

Fifteen people with cerebral palsy between the ages of 20 and 35 years who had received services from <strong>Novita</strong><br />

as children, participated in the study. Ten of them were individually interviewed and 5 participated in focus groups.<br />

All data was transcribed verbatim and cross-checked with the participants. Inductive analysis of the data included<br />

displaying the data in tables, developing codes, and identifying patterns, themes, and categories of responses.<br />

The report was provided to the participants in written and audio format and their feedback obtained and<br />

incorporated in the final report.<br />

Results<br />

Of all the services, participants remembered physiotherapy in greatest detail and depth. They spoke very highly of<br />

the quality of physiotherapy service they had received, in particular the amount of therapy. Of the nine participants<br />

who had received speech pathology services, most were satisfied. In looking back at occupational therapy<br />

services, they identified a need to have more input on practical living issues, e.g. getting about in the community,<br />

finding employment, managing a team of attendants. The majority of participants were satisfied with friendship<br />

experiences, but reported dissatisfaction with aspects of their school experiences.<br />

Some of the recommendations made by the participants:<br />

• Ensure mobility is presented as a range of options;<br />

• Provide more independence training;<br />

• Provide more training across a range of communication skills: directing personal attendants & conversing<br />

with peers;<br />

• Give greater emphasis to teaching literacy skills, especially the ability to read; and<br />

• Advocate more for disability awareness in the community, better access, better understanding and support.<br />

Implications<br />

A retrospective evaluation of its services provides <strong>Novita</strong> with some clear recommendations for future service<br />

delivery. A “<strong>Research</strong> into <strong>Services</strong>“ sub-committee studied the report and proposed two distinct areas of<br />

recommendations:<br />

1. Philosophical basis for <strong>Novita</strong> to reflect a focus on the development of autonomy in the young person; and<br />

2. Content and focus of services particularly for adolescents.<br />

For more information visit www.novita.org.au<br />

Project completed in 2002<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Comparison of feedback conditions in spelling instruction for a child using AAC<br />

Rebecca Morris 1<br />

Speech Pathologist<br />

Parimala<br />

Raghavendra<br />

Manager<br />

Clinical <strong>Research</strong><br />

1<br />

Currently R Oaten at<br />

Intellectual Disability<br />

<strong>Services</strong> Council, Inc.<br />

Objective<br />

To investigate the effectiveness of three feedback conditions (PRINT – looking at the spelt word on the Liquid<br />

Crystal display only, SPEECH – listening to the synthesised word only, SPEECH-PRINT – listening and looking) on<br />

learning to spell 24 words for an 11-year-old boy with cerebral palsy and complex communication needs (CCN)<br />

who used a speech generating device (SGD) The child had a mild intellectual impairment and normal<br />

hearing and vision.<br />

Method<br />

A pre-assessment phase determined words that the child comprehended but could not spell. In study 1 an<br />

adapted alternating treatments design was used to evaluate the effects of the above 3 feedback conditions on<br />

spelling acquisition of 12 x 3 letter words. The sessions were conducted weekly. The spelling instruction employed<br />

the copy-write-compare method under the three different feedback conditions. The order of the feedback<br />

conditions within each session was counterbalanced to avoid any condition being favoured. In study 2 an intrasubject<br />

direct replication of study 1 was conducted with a different set of 12 x 3 letter words. These sessions were<br />

daily rather than weekly and generalisation and maintenance phases were added.<br />

Results<br />

The child learnt to spell all 24 words under the three feedback conditions. However, the PRINT condition<br />

consistently reached criterion (all words spelt correctly on two consecutive sessions) before the other two<br />

conditions. The intra-subject replication strengthened this finding. The sequence of criterion attainment was PRINT<br />

(session 21) followed by SPEECH and SPEECH-PRINT conditions simultaneously (session 33) in Study 1 and<br />

PRINT (session 10), SPEECH (session 18) and SPEECH-PRINT (session 29) in Study 2.<br />

Implications<br />

Children with CCN using SGD may learn to spell using visual feedback and may have the potential to develop<br />

some literacy skills if training is provided over a lengthy period.<br />

Project completed in 2001<br />

49<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Evaluation of behaviour management advice<br />

Angela<br />

Crettenden 1<br />

Clinical Psychologist<br />

Tim Connell<br />

Chief Clinical<br />

Psychologist<br />

1<br />

Currently a Doctoral<br />

Student at The University<br />

of Adelaide<br />

Objective<br />

Children with physical disabilities and their families experience significant psychological issues which are several<br />

fold. Significant numbers of parents experience stress due to grief and having to deal with diverse child needs.<br />

Some children experience difficulties learning basic skills, coping with school, getting on with others and living with<br />

limitations and others’ reactions.<br />

Analysis of the 270 referrals received by the <strong>Novita</strong> psychologists from June to December, 2000 found the most<br />

frequent referral (36% of the total) was for behaviour management. To evaluate the effectiveness of services<br />

provided for these referrals, and explore how our service could be improved, parents of children meeting specific<br />

criteria were invited to participate in an evaluation study.<br />

Method<br />

Parents of children referred to <strong>Novita</strong> psychologists were invited to participate in the study if the children presented<br />

with overt, acting-out behavioural issues (e.g. aggression and noncompliance), were between 2 and 10 years of<br />

age and did not attend a special school. This resulted in 17 families participating. The children included 12 boys,<br />

5 girls, average age of 6 years, 0 months (SD: 3 years, 4 months). The ages ranged between 18 months and<br />

13 years, 5 months. As part of study participation, parents completed the Parenting Scale (O’Leary et al, 1993),<br />

Child Behaviour Questionnaire (Eyberg & Pincus, <strong>1999</strong>) before and after two terms (Average pre-post interval:<br />

18.1 weeks; SD: 8 weeks). At the post-test they were also asked to complete the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire<br />

(Larsen et al, 1979), and the treating psychologist completed the Therapist Satisfaction Questionnaire<br />

(Crettenden, 2001).<br />

Results<br />

After intervention, 70% of families reported that problems were now less severe and 67% reported a fewer number<br />

of behaviour problems. 75% reported an improvement in their overall parenting style (p


Evaluation of family centred practice using the measure of process of care<br />

South Australian<br />

Community Health<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Unit (SACHRU)<br />

Michael Bentley<br />

Senior <strong>Research</strong><br />

Officer<br />

<strong>Novita</strong><br />

Reference Group<br />

Sarah Anderson<br />

Orthotist, <strong>Novita</strong>Tech<br />

Jane Loveday<br />

Senior Options<br />

Coordinator, Family<br />

Support <strong>Services</strong><br />

Terry Lyons<br />

Chief Occupational<br />

Therapist<br />

Pauline McGregor<br />

Regional Manager<br />

Parimala<br />

Raghavendra<br />

Manager,<br />

Clinical <strong>Research</strong><br />

Sonya Murchland<br />

Acting Manager,<br />

Clinical <strong>Research</strong><br />

Objective<br />

The aim of the project is to evaluate “how family-centred” is <strong>Novita</strong> in providing therapy, rehabilitation engineering,<br />

and family support services to clients and families of <strong>Novita</strong>. The South Australian Community Health <strong>Research</strong><br />

Unit (SACHRU) has been contracted to conduct the evaluation as part of <strong>Novita</strong>’s ongoing commitment to service<br />

quality. SACHRU will work closely with the <strong>Novita</strong> Reference Group.<br />

Method<br />

The evaluation will use two survey instruments developed by CanChild, Canada.<br />

The Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC) is a self-administered questionnaire that measures parents’/caregivers’<br />

perceptions of the extent to which specific behaviours of <strong>Novita</strong> staff occur. A sample of 285 families stratified by<br />

three age groups of clients (> 6 years, 6 – 12 and 13 – 18 years) and metropolitan/country places of residence will<br />

be sent the MPOC–20 questionnaire.<br />

The Measure of Processes of Care for Service Providers (MPOC-SP) is a 27 item self-assessment questionnaire for<br />

staff working in paediatrics, designed to measure their reported implementation of family-centred practice. All staff<br />

of <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> who have direct contact with clients and their families (approximately 170 staff) will be<br />

sent the MPOC-SP questionnaire.<br />

Implications<br />

The outcomes will inform <strong>Novita</strong> of parents’ perception of <strong>Novita</strong>’s family centred practice behaviours and also<br />

staff’s perception of their behaviours towards families. It may highlight strengths and needs in implementation of<br />

family centred practice. The results from MPOC-SP may also be useful in professional development activities.<br />

Project commenced in 2004<br />

51<br />

How occupational therapists at <strong>Novita</strong> train clients in the scanning access technique<br />

Jennifer Jones 1<br />

Honours Student<br />

Supervisor<br />

Hugh Stewart 1<br />

Lecturer<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Supervisors:<br />

Sue van der Loo<br />

Senior Occupational<br />

Therapist, <strong>Novita</strong>Tech<br />

Support Team<br />

Angela Guidera<br />

Senior Speech<br />

Pathologist, <strong>Novita</strong>Tech<br />

Support Team<br />

1<br />

School of Health Sciences<br />

– Occupational Therapy,<br />

University of South Australia<br />

Objective<br />

This study explored the role of occupational therapists at <strong>Novita</strong> in training children in scanning access techniques.<br />

It then went on to investigate how this role was carried out by three experienced occupational therapists.<br />

Method<br />

The first part of the study employed a survey methodology where all <strong>Novita</strong> occupational therapists, speech<br />

pathologists, and their assistants completed a questionnaire. The second part involved qualitative methodology<br />

using in-depth, semi-structured interviews with three experienced occupational therapists.<br />

Results<br />

The survey found that the most common clinical diagnoses of clients who were taught scanning were cerebral<br />

palsy (CP) with spastic quadriplegia, and athetoid CP. Scanning was most commonly introduced between<br />

3–5 years of age. Occupational therapists were heavily involved in training in all phases, and speech pathologists<br />

were more involved in the middle to later phases. The training process was identified as consisting of a sequence<br />

of steps. From the in-depth interviews, four themes relating to the scanning process were found. These were that<br />

the process of scanning training is progressive and parallel; clients must be considered on an individual basis;<br />

scanning training is very closely linked with functional goals; and a collaborative approach in teaching the child<br />

and primary caregivers is important.<br />

Implications<br />

There is a significant role for occupational therapists in teaching a child to scan, despite the relatively small<br />

population of scanning users. The training of scanning is a dynamic process that uses a number of different<br />

approaches and is collaborative with the family and health professionals. Successful scanning enables enhanced<br />

quality of life.<br />

Project completed in November 2001<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


“Is more therapy better” A comparison of two models of intensive physiotherapy<br />

and “conventional” intensive physiotherapy for children with cerebral palsy<br />

Susan Gibson<br />

Senior <strong>Research</strong><br />

Physiotherapist<br />

Parimala<br />

Raghavendra<br />

Manager,<br />

Clinical <strong>Research</strong><br />

Philip Darbyshire 1<br />

Chair of Nursing<br />

1<br />

Midwifery and <strong>Research</strong><br />

and Practice Development,<br />

Women’s and Children’s<br />

Hospital, Adelaide<br />

Funding<br />

Channel 7<br />

Children’s <strong>Research</strong><br />

Foundation ($35,000):<br />

2000 – 2002.<br />

Objective<br />

The aim of the study was to investigate if the rate of motor skill achievement and muscle strength increased<br />

following intensive physiotherapy intervention for children with cerebral palsy (CP). The models of intensive<br />

physiotherapy investigated were: Model 1: Conventional Intensive Physiotherapy Intervention (10 hours over 10<br />

weeks); Model 2: Intensive Holiday Physiotherapy Program (21 hours over 2 weeks); and Model 3: Intensive After<br />

School Block of Physiotherapy (21 hours over 4 weeks). The children, their parents, and physiotherapists were also<br />

asked their opinions and perceptions of the models of intensive intervention.<br />

Method<br />

Sixteen children with CP, classified at Level II or III on the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS),<br />

and aged between 4 and 7 years, were matched on GMFCS levels and then randomly assigned to two groups:<br />

Group A received Model 1 and Model 3 and a 6-week period of “no intervention”. Group B received Model 1 and<br />

Model 2 and an 8-week period of “no intervention”. Each group had a 2-week washout period between models.<br />

Muscle strength (Hand Held Myometer) and gross motor function (Gross Motor Function Measure) were recorded<br />

on 6 occasions. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) was administered to parents on 5 of<br />

these occasions. Views and opinions were gathered from parents, children and physiotherapists through focus<br />

groups and individual interviews.<br />

Results<br />

There was no significant difference in rate of motor skill acquisition or muscle strength between Model 1 and Model<br />

2 for Group B, and Model 1 and Model 3 for Group A. Although changes in muscle strength and gross motor<br />

function were unremarkable, parents perceived positive changes in their child’s functional skills as measured by<br />

COPM scores. Results from the interviews suggested that Group A children preferred weekly physiotherapy to after<br />

school intensive. Group B children preferred the school holiday intensive block to weekly physiotherapy. Parents<br />

were positive about both intensive models of intervention, but had specific issues and concerns relating to the<br />

models. The physiotherapists’ responses to the intensive models were variable.<br />

52<br />

Implications<br />

The lack of significant difference between intensive models of intervention may indicate issues regarding lack of<br />

sensitivity to change of tools used, and the use of small groups of children with high variability. The study highlights<br />

the importance of goal setting with parents as changes in gross motor function were related to the goals set,<br />

rather than the intensity of intervention. In addition to measuring functional changes using measurement tools, it is<br />

important to gather the views and perceptions of the people involved in studies as it assists in building meaningful<br />

partnerships resulting in a better family-centred service.<br />

Project completed in 2003<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Motor and functional outcomes of children with physical and /or multiple disabilities<br />

living in rural and remote areas compared with their metropolitan counterparts – a pilot study<br />

Sue Durand 1<br />

Senior Physiotherapist<br />

Pauline McGregor<br />

Regional Manager<br />

Sonya Murchland<br />

Senior <strong>Research</strong><br />

Occupational Therapist<br />

1<br />

Currently employed<br />

in private practice<br />

Objective<br />

In early <strong>1999</strong> an evaluation of the rural outreach service was carried out by means of a parent, caregiver and other<br />

local personnel questionnaire. The results indicated that there was a great deal of satisfaction with the service but<br />

the question remained as to whether the motor and functional gains of the children in remote and rural areas were<br />

equivalent to their metropolitan contemporaries. This study attempted to determine whether there were differences<br />

in the motor and functional outcomes of children with physical and/or multiple disabilities living in rural and remote<br />

areas compared with their metropolitan counterparts.<br />

Method<br />

A convenience sample of four matched pairs of children, who were clients of <strong>Novita</strong> was selected for this study,<br />

with parental permission gained for their inclusion. All of the children were aged under 6 at the end of the study.<br />

Each pair was matched as near as possible for age (ideally within 6 months), gender and disability. Pre and<br />

Post testing by the same Occupational Therapist and Physiotherapist occurred 12 months apart. No blinding of<br />

assessors occurred. The matched pairs were to be assessed within one month interval of each other. The children<br />

were assessed with the Peabody Motor Scales, Wee FIM, and parent survey of satisfaction.<br />

Results<br />

All children made fine and / or gross motor progress over the 12-month period. However, all children progressed at<br />

a slower rate, making developmental gains that were equivalent to less than 12 months.<br />

The developmental ratio of mean motor age/chronological age was consistent for all clients on pre and post<br />

testing. The Wee-FIM results appeared to be related to the parent’s understanding of their child’s abilities and how<br />

this understanding changed over time.<br />

Implications<br />

This pilot study suggested that children who lived in the country and have access to specialist paediatric therapy<br />

input quarterly made comparable progress to their city peers. They have an expectation of participation by family<br />

and local services to provide regular input that is guided by the specialist services. Parents residing in the country<br />

may be reassured that their children are not disadvantaged due to the location of their home.<br />

53<br />

Project completed in 2002<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Single event multilevel surgery: a description of stakeholder experiences<br />

Lauren Dryden 1<br />

Honours Student<br />

Supervisor<br />

Karen Grimmer 2<br />

Director<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Supervisor<br />

Susan Bostock<br />

Senior Clinical<br />

Physiotherapist<br />

1<br />

School of Health Sciences<br />

– Physiotherapy University<br />

of South Australia<br />

2<br />

Centre for Allied Health<br />

<strong>Research</strong>, University of<br />

South Australia<br />

Objective<br />

Single event multilevel surgery is performed on a small number of children with cerebral palsy each year. It consists<br />

of multiple procedures being undertaken in one operation and occurs when conservative management success<br />

is decreasing. Following orthopaedic surgery, research has shown children with cerebral palsy experience a<br />

regression in motor function and a temporary loss of functional activities.<br />

An effective physiotherapy/ rehabilitation program is considered crucial to the success of multilevel interventions.<br />

The program must be intensive, and requires compliance and motivation from all stakeholders. <strong>Research</strong> states<br />

the need for parents to set expectations and desires around which a multidisciplinary team can create goals which<br />

are individualised, explicit and prudent; and treatment must take into account the family’s support and available<br />

resources. Despite this acknowledgement, information about what parents and children hope to achieve by<br />

undergoing surgery, the preparation of children and their parents for the operation, and the families’ perceptions<br />

of the outcomes of surgery are limited.<br />

The aim of this study was to report, from the perspective of all stakeholders, their experience from pre-operative<br />

planning to postoperative rehabilitation to identify barriers and facilitators for successful rehabilitation and to<br />

enhance preparation of future children and their families for surgery.<br />

Method<br />

This study used a qualitative approach and consisted of interviews with six physiotherapists, four families, one<br />

paediatric rehabilitation specialist and an orthopaedic surgeon. Transcripts were analysed and coded to extract<br />

key themes.<br />

54<br />

Results<br />

Themes which emerged from the data included recommendations for surgery, outcomes from surgery, information<br />

to families, complications, emotional factors and areas to improve from all stakeholder groups; as well as<br />

postoperative services from the family and medical personnel interviews; rehabilitation experience from the family<br />

interviews; and role of the physiotherapist and rehabilitation from the physiotherapist interviews. The findings<br />

suggested there is potential to improve service delivery in the areas of preoperative preparation, postoperative pain<br />

management, and postoperative family assistance.<br />

Implications<br />

It is anticipated this research will facilitate the development of a more comprehensive education tool aiming to<br />

improve management of children having SEMLS in areas including formalised pre-surgery goal setting, preparing<br />

the house and family members for when the child requires increased assistance, and rehabilitation requirements.<br />

Project completed in 2004<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Australian representation on ISO TC173 SC1<br />

Lloyd Walker<br />

Director, <strong>Novita</strong>Tech<br />

Funding:<br />

Attendance allowance<br />

from Standards<br />

Australia<br />

2003 – NZ – $2,400<br />

2004 – USA – $3,500<br />

Objective<br />

Ensure that Australian needs and expertise are recognised in the development of new international standards that<br />

relate to wheeled mobility devices.<br />

Method<br />

<strong>Novita</strong>Tech staff have participated in Standards development over the years, but this involvement almost<br />

completely ceased around 2000. Dr Walker joined all five relevant ISO working groups listed below in mid 2003.<br />

Since that time he has monitored discussions on the various electronic lists that the groups have used and<br />

also participated in voting on Australia’s behalf through the ISO Server. He (or if available a suitable nominee)<br />

will be attending a face-to-face meeting (usually 5 days) of the five Working Groups at least once per year, and<br />

maintaining contact at other times through email.<br />

Results<br />

The group responsible for international standards relating to wheelchairs is Technical Committee 173 (TC173).<br />

TC173 has a Standing Committee 1 that oversees the activities of five Working Groups (WG):<br />

WG1 – Test Methods<br />

WG6 – Transportation Safety<br />

WG8 – Electronic and power systems<br />

WG10 – Stair climbing wheelchairs<br />

WG11 – Seating and related systems<br />

In November 2003 (Christchurch, NZ) and May 2004 (Estes Park, USA) Dr Walker participated in the face-toface<br />

meetings of the Working Groups over a full working week. In <strong>January</strong> 2004, Dr Walker participated by<br />

teleconference in discussions of WG6 as it met in Pittsburgh, and a delegate with relevant experience (Kevin<br />

Clements – Manager Mobility & Seating) attended the WG11 meeting in March 2004 in Vancouver, Canada.<br />

Implications<br />

There are currently a number of International Standards under review or being developed. Our contribution has<br />

been highly valued by our international colleagues, and this work has facilitated an approach that will make it<br />

simpler for Australia to adopt ISO standards rather than create our own requirements. Input into the development<br />

of these key documents has also helped to ensure that pragmatic testing and user requirements are being<br />

considered early, and that our personnel, and the Australian sector generally, are aware of changes being planned<br />

at an International level.<br />

55<br />

Project recommenced in 2003<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Churchill Fellowship research, experiences and outcomes<br />

David Hobbs<br />

Senior Rehabilitation<br />

Engineer<br />

Funding:<br />

The Winston Churchill<br />

Memorial Trust, 2003,<br />

$16,600<br />

Objective<br />

The purpose of this Churchill Fellowship research was to investigate how leading Rehabilitation<br />

Engineering (RE) Centres around the world are using research and development and the application<br />

of technology to assist people with a disability. Inherent to this research was understanding the<br />

structure and set-up of each facility in an effort to determine how their research was conducted, how it<br />

was funded, how research priorities were determined, to what extent each centre collaborated with industry or<br />

other centres, and the range of current project work. A secondary focus was to investigate how the concept and<br />

process of “Universal Design” was being taught and implemented within the field of RE.<br />

Method<br />

This research was conducted over a period of 8 weeks with 12 centres in England, Toronto, and the United States<br />

being visited and researched. A variety of centres and settings were chosen, including specialist Rehabilitation<br />

Centres, departments within hospitals, and tertiary research facilities. Initial contact was made with key<br />

stakeholders at each of the centres after the scholarship was awarded, and an individual program was developed<br />

that allowed the investigator to conduct his research and meet with key staff. At each centre the investigator was<br />

given an opportunity to give a presentation to interested staff about <strong>Novita</strong> and <strong>Novita</strong>Tech and the range of work<br />

that is conducted. The Fellowship concluded with the annual Rehabilitation Engineering Society of North America<br />

(RESNA) Conference in Atlanta, Georgia, the USA – one of the largest conferences focussing on technology<br />

and disability.<br />

56<br />

Results<br />

A number of novel, user-driven, innovative products and programs were investigated and researched at the<br />

different centres. These came from areas such as seating, mobility, home health care, telecommunications, and<br />

the general area of ‘assistive technology’. Many of these products, particularly those from Canada and the United<br />

States, are commercially available but have not reached Australian shores or are unknown to Australian healthcare<br />

professionals. Examples of such novel products include a talking mobile phone, the Movement-to-Music therapy<br />

system, a novel seating system called the Flip2sit booster seat, and Solesensor (an innovative shoe insole that<br />

improves balance in the elderly).<br />

Common themes that were identified were an emphasis on – technology transfer; information dissemination; end<br />

user involvement; research into ageing, falls, and balance; and a focus on developing collaborative links with<br />

industry and other institutions. Notably, every centre was either fully affiliated with a tertiary institution or operated<br />

as a department within a tertiary institution. This link strengthened their research program and was a common<br />

successful trait.<br />

Two successful research and development models were identified and investigated: namely the Canadian<br />

provincial Ontario Rehabilitation Technology Consortium (ORTC) model and the United States federal National<br />

Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation <strong>Research</strong> (NIDRR) model. A critical ingredient of both of these models was<br />

that of government support. Without government initiation and support, neither model would exist.<br />

Implications<br />

A number of benefits have resulted from this research. The investigator identified a centre in Atlanta (Georgia,<br />

USA) that is conducting similar mobile phone technology research and initial collaborative links have since been<br />

established. The investigator has also been successful in introducing the concept of music therapy at <strong>Novita</strong>, by<br />

bringing the Movement-to-Music therapy program to Australia. Formal links have also since been established with<br />

a major distributor of assistive technology equipment in Canada. Future plans include hosting a forum on how<br />

rehabilitation engineering and assistive technology centres can work closer with industry and academia to replicate<br />

the ORTC model of product innovation and development.<br />

Project completed in 2003<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Development and delivery of an undergraduate subject in<br />

rehabilitation engineering at Flinders University<br />

Barry Seeger 1<br />

Director, <strong>Novita</strong>Tech<br />

Lloyd Walker<br />

Director, <strong>Novita</strong>Tech<br />

Rob Garrett<br />

Group Leader, R&D,<br />

Engineering & Support.<br />

David Hobbs<br />

<strong>Research</strong> &<br />

Development Dept.<br />

Kevin Clements<br />

Mobility & Seating<br />

Dept.<br />

Annabel Gregory<br />

Assistive Technology<br />

Dept.<br />

Libby Price<br />

Assistive Technology<br />

Dept.<br />

Leigh Taylor<br />

Group Leader, Mobility,<br />

Orthotics and Seating<br />

1<br />

Retired<br />

Objective<br />

In 1997 the Division, in conjunction with the School of Engineering (now the School of Informatics and Engineering)<br />

at Flinders University, initiated and began teaching an elective subject in Rehabilitation Engineering (course code<br />

ENGR 5122). The aim was to expose undergraduate Biomedical Engineering students to the career path and<br />

challenges of the field of Rehabilitation Engineering.<br />

Method<br />

The semester long 13-week course is typically taught to 5th (final) year Biomedical Engineering students at the<br />

university. It is structured so that each 3-hour lecture focuses on a different topic and the students are exposed to<br />

a number of different environments outside of the classroom. Approximately a third of the classes are taught on<br />

the university campus, the remainder involve site visits to <strong>Novita</strong>Tech, the Independent Living Centre, the Disability<br />

Information Resource Centre, and the Royal Society for the Blind.<br />

The topics that are addressed over the 13 weeks are:<br />

• An introduction and overview of assistive technology;<br />

• Universal Design;<br />

• Delivering assistive technology services to the customer;<br />

• Assessing access to the built environment;<br />

• Computer interfaces and computers as extrinsic enablers;<br />

• Augmentative and Alternative Communication systems;<br />

• Mobility and seating;<br />

• Environmental control;<br />

• Prosthetics and orthotics; and<br />

• Sensory aids for visual and auditory impairments.<br />

As well as the lecturers listed alongside, a number of guest lecturers assist with the course, providing<br />

specialist input.<br />

Results<br />

Students taking the course submit 3 problem-based assignments throughout the semester and sit a 2-hour exam<br />

during the normal exam period. Recently the exam format has shifted from being a 100% multiple-choice exam to<br />

including a number of short answer questions. Three of <strong>Novita</strong>Tech’s current engineers are graduates of the course.<br />

57<br />

Implications<br />

The course has been instrumental in terms of exposing undergraduate Biomedical Engineering students to the<br />

field of Rehabilitation Engineering. It continues to be a popular elective course for final year students. Interest<br />

in the topics and style of delivery is now being shown by other universities in Adelaide. This will potentially lead<br />

to a multidisciplinary class group who are interested in being exposed to the field of Assistive Technology and<br />

Rehabilitation Engineering.<br />

Project commenced in 1997<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Development of collaborative links with University of Pittsburgh<br />

Lloyd Walker<br />

Director, <strong>Novita</strong>Tech<br />

Rory Cooper 1<br />

1<br />

School of Rehabilitation<br />

and Health Sciences,<br />

University of Pittsburgh,<br />

Pittsburgh, USA<br />

Funding:<br />

Undertaken as<br />

part of other visits.<br />

Joint funding being<br />

explored.<br />

Objective<br />

This work seeks to establish a link into related research that will offer the opportunity of multi-centred research and<br />

collaborative funding proposals between <strong>Novita</strong>Tech and United States and European colleagues.<br />

Method<br />

The University of Pittsburgh is a world-leading centre in rehabilitation engineering research. It has hosted the<br />

Rehabilitation Engineering <strong>Research</strong> Centres in Wheeled Mobility and Wheelchair Transportation Safety. It is also<br />

a Veteran’s Administration (VA) specialist research centre – the Human Engineering <strong>Research</strong> Laboratories.<br />

It is expected that following the agreement between the two groups on joint research proposals, competitive<br />

funding submissions will be developed to support both the site based research and the collaboration. An aim<br />

of this work is to also permit the exchange of personnel between the centres as a means of strengthening the<br />

research and expertise exchange.<br />

Results<br />

There have been loose links between individuals at both centres over a number of years, but following various<br />

meetings during 2003 and 2004, the two groups are now negotiating on two potential collaborative research<br />

proposals: Real use characteristics of wheelchairs; and upper limb function and overuse biomechanics. Both of<br />

these projects have developed from established research programs in Pittsburgh and Australia’s contribution<br />

would be to extend the research to include children with disabilities. There is very little empirical evidence in this<br />

area. Currently project proposals are being reviewed for use in the Australian context including the ethical needs<br />

and changes that may be required for the different subject group.<br />

58<br />

Implications<br />

Potentially significant insight into how young people use and are affected by their wheeled mobility. This work<br />

would also permit strong international links that strengthen the power of research techniques by increasing the<br />

population base under study. As a result more definitive conclusions can be drawn on improving the health,<br />

wellbeing and social inclusion of people with disabilities.<br />

Project commenced in 2004<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Rob Garrett<br />

Group Leader, R&D,<br />

Engineering & Support<br />

Rob Burns 1<br />

(chair)<br />

Fiona Kieni-Judd 1<br />

(Telecommunications.<br />

Standards)<br />

Mike Johns 2<br />

Hank Wylie 3<br />

Teresa Corbin 4<br />

Bryan Porter 4<br />

Andrew Stewart 5<br />

Paul Robinson 6<br />

Rolf Regel 7<br />

Gunela Astbrink 8<br />

Merv Sewell 9<br />

1<br />

Australian<br />

Communications Authority<br />

2<br />

Australian<br />

Communications Industry<br />

Forum<br />

3<br />

Communications Aid<br />

Users Society<br />

4<br />

Consumers’<br />

Telecommunications<br />

Network<br />

5<br />

Deafness Forum<br />

6<br />

IBM<br />

7<br />

Siemens<br />

8<br />

TEDICORE<br />

9<br />

Telstra<br />

Objective<br />

Disability Standards Working Group (DSWG)<br />

The Disability Standards Working Group (DSWG) was convened at the Australian Communications Authority’s<br />

(ACA) Communications Technical Regulation Advisory Committee (CTRAC) meeting on 23 May 2002. The<br />

Working Group was established as a result of the ACA’s dissatisfaction with the limited content of the current<br />

telecommunications disability standard.<br />

The DSWG was required to provide advice and make recommendations on what needs to be included in any<br />

future disability standards and appropriate compliance arrangements.<br />

The disability standard does not cover specialist equipment for people with disabilities, but does specify the<br />

requirements for features on the regular phone that will facilitate access to the standard telephone service for<br />

those with a disability.<br />

Method<br />

Representatives from the disability sector, telecommunications industry and Australian Communications Authority<br />

were sought.<br />

A total of 5 one-day meetings were held in Melbourne in 2002 to develop the required document.<br />

Results<br />

The final recommendations contain a list of features in two categories. The “A List” is a proposed list of features<br />

that are generally considered to be of benefit to all members of our community, and are to be considered as<br />

mandatory. This list includes features such as a standard key layout, adjustable ringer volume, a non-slip base,<br />

etc. The “B List” contains desirable features that can be phased in over time. A home phone will need to comply<br />

with at least 6 of the features on the “B List”. This approach will open the way for future standards to “raise the bar”<br />

and specify more than 6 features. These features include items such as enlarged keys, key feedback, high contrast<br />

display, microphone amplification, etc.<br />

The final report “Communications Technical Regulation Advisory Committee – <strong>Report</strong> on features for inclusion in<br />

future disability standards, 24 February 2003”, is now available from the Australian Communications Authority.<br />

Implications<br />

The final report has been submitted to the CTRAC meeting, and as a result, the ACA has requested that the<br />

Australian Communications Industry Forum develop:<br />

a) an Industry Code to specify obligations on customer equipment importers and manufacturers to provide<br />

product information on the functional characteristics of phones that would be beneficial to people with a<br />

disability; and<br />

b) an Industry Guideline to provide guidance for phone equipment importers and manufacturers on features<br />

of customer equipment used for telecommunication that will assist consumers with disabilities.<br />

See also page 62 (Phone Accessibility Information Working Committee).<br />

59<br />

Project completed in 2003<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Enhancing innovation and development of new products in the<br />

Australian rehabilitation equipment sector<br />

Alex Svistounov<br />

Senior Testing Engineer<br />

Objective<br />

To develop methods and strategies to maintain and enhance the process of innovation and the design of new products<br />

and technologies in the Australian Medical Devices Industry with specific reference to the Rehabilitation Equipment sector.<br />

Method<br />

This research is a part of a Masters of Engineering Degree through The University of Adelaide. The research will<br />

involve the evaluation of the suitability and the adaptation of advanced innovation, design and failure prediction<br />

methods and their combinations for the Rehabilitation Equipment sector.<br />

The research will also include an analysis of the effect of the new Therapeutic Goods Medical Device legislation on<br />

the Australian Rehabilitation Equipment sector, with respect to innovation.<br />

The design and innovation processes in the Australian Medical Device Industry and effects of the TGA regulations<br />

will be compared with analogous processes, regulations and effects in Europe.<br />

Implications<br />

This research will evaluate the effects of the new Therapeutic Goods (Medical Device) legislation on the Australian<br />

Rehabilitation Equipment sector with respect to the development of new products and harmonisation with<br />

international best practice. The quality systems used by manufacturers and the quality and safety of equipment will<br />

also be investigated. Instrumental techniques and tools for maintaining and enhancing innovation and the design<br />

of new quality products and technologies in the Rehabilitation Sector will be developed and verified.<br />

Project commenced in September 2004<br />

60<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Evaluation and scoping of a movement analysis facility in Adelaide<br />

Lloyd Walker<br />

Director, <strong>Novita</strong>Tech<br />

David Hobbs<br />

Senior Rehabilitation<br />

Engineer<br />

Judy Sprod<br />

Chief Physiotherapist<br />

Susan Gibson<br />

Senior <strong>Research</strong><br />

Physiotherapist<br />

Trish Bate<br />

Senior <strong>Research</strong><br />

Physiotherapist<br />

Esther May 1<br />

Susan Hillier 1<br />

Paul Grimshaw 1<br />

Karen Reynolds 2<br />

Trevor Hearn 2<br />

1<br />

School of Health<br />

Sciences, University of<br />

South Australia<br />

2<br />

School of Informatics<br />

and Engineering, Flinders<br />

University, Adelaide,<br />

Australia<br />

Objective<br />

To offer the people of Adelaide a world-class movement analysis facility that will permit research, teaching but most<br />

importantly, a clinical evaluation tool.<br />

Method<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> has been utilising gait analysis in a two dimensional context for several years. A number<br />

of children have also been funded by the Variety Club to attend the Hugh Williamson Gait Laboratory at the Royal<br />

Children’s Hospital in Melbourne for more detailed 3D examinations as a precursor to surgical intervention.<br />

A visit by Prof Kit Vaughan drew together a number of potential partners to explore what further options could be<br />

introduced into Adelaide that would both maximise the usefulness of a full 3D facility but also provide access for<br />

the clinical cases currently being referred to Melbourne for assessment.<br />

Results<br />

To date discussions have been held with the University of South Australia, Flinders University, the Gerontology<br />

group at the Repatriation General Hospital and key individuals within <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong>. As a result of<br />

negotiations, a proposal has been developed for a joint Post Doctoral position to be based at the University of<br />

South Australia to establish collaborative research projects, evaluate the potential systems and build the case<br />

for a dedicated facility (potentially with a satellite facility at Regency Park Centre) to serve a number of needs in<br />

South Australia.<br />

Implications<br />

This project, if approved in final form, may herald a range of joint research initiatives between clinical and university<br />

based researchers. It will also establish a facility that can offer the same level of movement analysis that is available<br />

in Melbourne and permit our involvement in several international biomechanics studies of direct relevance to<br />

wheelchair users.<br />

Project commenced in 2002<br />

61<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


62<br />

Rob Garrett<br />

Group Leader, R&D,<br />

Engineering & Support<br />

Teresa Corbin 1<br />

Chair<br />

Gunela Astbrink 2<br />

Bert Ciavarra 3<br />

Deborah<br />

Goodman 4<br />

Malcolm Garnham 5<br />

Kim Yan 6<br />

Richard Robbins 7<br />

Cecily Yan 8<br />

Stacey Joyce 9<br />

1<br />

Consumers’<br />

Telecommunications<br />

Network<br />

2<br />

TEDICORE<br />

3<br />

Telstra<br />

4<br />

Vodafone<br />

5<br />

Trillium Communications<br />

5<br />

Cisco systems<br />

7<br />

NEC Business Solutions<br />

8<br />

Australian Electrical &<br />

Electronic Manufacturers’<br />

Association Ltd<br />

9<br />

Australian<br />

Communications Authority<br />

Objective<br />

Phone accessibility information working committee<br />

At the direction of the Australian Communications Authority, an Accessibility Information Working Committee has<br />

been established under the auspices of the Customer Equipment and Cable Reference Panel (CECRP) of the<br />

Australian Communications Industry Forum (ACIF). This Committee is to develop:<br />

a) An Industry Code to specify obligations on customer equipment importers and manufacturers to<br />

provide product information on the functional characteristics of home and mobile phones that would be<br />

beneficial to people with a disability. This information is to be provided to phone companies that provide<br />

telecommunication services. Consideration will also be given to the provision of information to other parts of the<br />

telecommunications market.<br />

b) An Industry Guideline to provide guidance for phone equipment importers and manufacturers on features of<br />

customer equipment used for telecommunications that will assist consumers with disabilities.<br />

Method<br />

In developing both the Code and Guideline, the Working Committee is to:<br />

• take account of international work and align the documents with relevant standards and guidelines developed<br />

by recognised international bodies;<br />

• recognise that both the Code and Guideline be developed in relation to the standard telephone service, and<br />

consider if the scope of the work should be further confined, for example, by confining the Code to consumer<br />

equipment for use primarily by the residential/small business market; and<br />

• consider whether there should be a phase in period required to fully implement the Code.<br />

The Working Committee has been established with three consumer representatives, six industry representatives<br />

and a non-voting representative from the Australian Communications Authority. The Committee has been meeting<br />

approximately once every three weeks since April 2004.<br />

Results<br />

A comprehensive list of 61 features have been named within the categories: Mobility/Dexterity, Vision, Hearing and<br />

Speech. The Committee is close to completing a checklist to be completed by the industry that will specify the<br />

features on each phone made available to Australians. A genuine attempt has been made to make this checklist as<br />

simple as possible.<br />

Implications<br />

This work is an important first step to ensure that people with disabilities can select phones suitable to meet their<br />

needs. It will name the features that are important to those with a disability. This process will raise manufacturer and<br />

importer awareness of these needs and promote the application of Universal Design principles.<br />

Project commenced in 2004<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Resource allocation project<br />

Sonya Murchland<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Officer<br />

Wendy<br />

Wake-Dyster<br />

Director,<br />

Client Programs<br />

Objective<br />

This study has aimed to develop, implement and evaluate a model that identifies priorities for therapy resources in<br />

accordance with <strong>Novita</strong>’s principles of family centred, community based therapy service delivery that allows:<br />

• equity and planning in resource distribution;<br />

• prediction of resource usage; and<br />

• advocacy for new resources rather than the constant stretching of those available.<br />

It has recognised that initially the model needs to address existing resources, while enabling a model for future<br />

changes in resources to be accommodated.<br />

Method<br />

An action research methodology was employed, with the following data collected through the process of the study<br />

and contributed to the model formation:<br />

• Discipline and Regional Profiles of <strong>Services</strong> (Feb-March 2002);<br />

• Qualitative data from regional and discipline management teams on factors influencing service delivery<br />

(March – June 2002);<br />

• Client Numbers – from regions for seasonal board reports (October 2002) and Annual <strong>Report</strong>s (1996–2003);<br />

• Caseload Numbers – from therapists as a part of survey of Client Profiles (December 2002);<br />

• Client Profile – from therapists indicating intensity of service provision, and features indicating need for services<br />

(December 2002); and<br />

• Travel Time – snapshot data of two weeks (October–December 2002).<br />

Results<br />

A model for allocating resources across the organisation was developed and is now being trialled. As client<br />

numbers change on a daily basis throughout the organisation, percentages of clients in the different service types<br />

are reported upon and used for comparison and model development. The WHO International Classification of<br />

Functioning was used to describe the range and type of therapy services provided by <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong>.<br />

Implications<br />

Trial and review of this method of resource allocation needs to occur as calculations were based on estimations<br />

rather than actual recording of therapists activities. This has commenced with a review of support activities that aim<br />

to develop the social environment of individuals with disabilities.<br />

63<br />

Ongoing implementation and review<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


publications<br />

All journal articles, book chapters, research symposium papers,<br />

conference papers published in proceedings or accepted for<br />

publication between <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004 are listed below.<br />

64<br />

Journal Articles (peer reviewed)<br />

Croser R, Garrett R, Seeger B, Davies P (2001) Effectiveness of<br />

electronic aids to daily living: Increased independence and decreased<br />

frustration. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 48: p. 35–44.<br />

DuBois L, Klemm A, Murchland S & Ozols A (2004) Handwriting<br />

of children who have hemiplegia: A profile of abilities in children<br />

aged 8–3 years from a parent and teacher survey. Australian<br />

Occupational Therapy Journal, 51: p. 89–98.<br />

Flett P, Stern LM, Waddy H, Connell T & Gibson S (<strong>1999</strong>)<br />

Botulinum toxin A versus fixed cast stretching for dynamic calf<br />

tightness in cerebral palsy. J Paediatric Child Health, 35: p. 71–77.<br />

Raghavendra P, Murchland S, Gibson S & Guidera A (2004)<br />

Producing and evaluating research evidence in a multi-disciplinary<br />

community setting: An organisational approach. Australian<br />

Epidemiologist, 11.2: p. 33–35.<br />

Raghavendra P, Rosengren E & Hunnicutt S (2001) An<br />

investigation of different degrees of dysarthric speech as input to<br />

speaker-adaptive and speaker-dependent recognition systems.<br />

Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17: p. 265–275.<br />

Schlosser R & Raghavendra P (2004) Evidence based-practice in<br />

AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20: p. 1–21.<br />

Journal Correspondence<br />

Flett P, Gibson S & Murchland S (2004) Lycra Pressure Orthoses.<br />

International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 11(7): p. 340.<br />

Book Chapters<br />

Balandin S & Raghavendra P (<strong>1999</strong>) Challenging Oppression:<br />

Augmentative Communicators’ Involvement in AAC <strong>Research</strong>. In<br />

Loncker F, Clibbens J, Arvidson H & Lloyd LL (Eds) Augmentative<br />

and Alternative Communication: new directions in research and<br />

practice: p. 262–277, Whurr Publishing Ltd, London, UK.<br />

Schlosser R, & Raghavendra P (2003) Using evidence to guide<br />

clinical/educational decision-making. In Schlosser RW (ed). The<br />

Efficacy of Augmentative Communication: Towards evidencebased<br />

practice: p. 259–297. Academic Press, New York, USA.<br />

Other Publications<br />

Chip Karmatz et. al. (2001) “Willing and able” Assistive<br />

Technology, Accessibility for people with disabilities: p. 36–40,<br />

Microsoft Communiqué, December 2001 (R Garrett and A Gregory<br />

were quoted and contributed to this article).<br />

Garrett R (<strong>1999</strong>) “Exciting Award Winning Phone Improves Quality of<br />

Life for Children with Disabilities.” CCA Newsletter, December <strong>1999</strong>.<br />

Garrett R (2003) Telecommunications and Physical Disability: A Journey.<br />

ARATA News, No 29, Autumn 2003: p. 1–2, also in Accord SCI, The<br />

Journal of Spinal Cord Injuries Australia, No 2, Spring 2003: p. 14–15.<br />

Hobbs D (2002). “Home Phone Solutions Guide: Making the Home<br />

Phone more Accessible“. ARATA News, No 28, Summer 2002: p. 3.<br />

Hobbs D (2002) A <strong>Report</strong> on my Trip to the UK. ARATA Newsletter,<br />

April 2002<br />

Hobbs D (2004) Churchill Fellowship Experiences – <strong>Research</strong>ing<br />

Rehabilitation Engineering Overseas. Accord SCI, the Journal of<br />

Spinal Cord Injuries Australia, No 4, Autumn 2004: p. 17–18.<br />

Nguyen T (2002) Accessible Mobile Phone Project. ARATA News,<br />

No 28, Summer 2002: p. 1–2.<br />

Nguyen T (2002) Accessible Mobile and Home Phone Project. CCA<br />

Nexus Newsletter, September 2002 and also the CAUS Newsletter,<br />

Winter 2002: p. 6, 7, 9.<br />

Nguyen T & Garrett R (2003) New technological options for people<br />

with physical disabilities, through the use of telecommunications<br />

equipment. Final <strong>Report</strong> submitted to the Department of Information<br />

Technology, Communications and the Arts, December 2003.<br />

Nguyen T & Garrett R (2004) New technological options for people<br />

with physical disabilities, through the use of telecommunications<br />

equipment trials’ results. ARATA news, No 33, Autumn 2004.<br />

Nguyen T, Garrett R, Downing A, Walker L & Hobbs D (2004)<br />

“<strong>Research</strong> into Telecommunications Options for People with Physical<br />

Disabilities” in Zhang D & Mokhtari M (Eds) Towards a Human Friendly<br />

Assistive Environment: p57-64. IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.<br />

Olsson C (2003) The EBP experiences of an AAC Service Provider:<br />

Diving in Deep. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative<br />

Communication, Newsletter of Division 12 Special Interest Group of<br />

the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association: p. 15–19.<br />

Olsson C (in press) Experiences with EBP: Perspectives from the<br />

Clinical Coalface. Proceedings of Seventh Biennial ISAAC <strong>Research</strong><br />

Symposium, Odense, Denmark.<br />

Raghavendra P (in press) New Mandate for AAC: How do we move<br />

towards evidence-based practice Proceedings of Seventh Biennial<br />

ISAAC <strong>Research</strong> Symposium, Odense, Denmark.<br />

Raghavendra P, Olsson C, Iacono T, & Schlosser R (in press)<br />

New mandate in AAC: How do we move towards EBP Summary<br />

and Recommendations. Proceedings of Seventh Biennial ISAAC<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Symposium, Odense, Denmark.<br />

Seeger BR & Garrett RE (2001) Universal access needs to<br />

encompass private as well as public buildings. Engineers Australia,<br />

July 2001, vol 73, No 7: p. 28–32.<br />

Timko B, Guidera A, Hutchinson R & Stewart S “Vocabulary<br />

Organiser” Software to Support Signing Users. Proceedings of the 2002<br />

Speech Pathology Australia National Conference.<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


conference presentations<br />

<strong>Novita</strong>’s research profile continues to grow with increasing number of high quality presentations made at state,<br />

national and international conferences. We would like to congratulate and thank all the therapy staff for their hard work and<br />

enthusiasm in preparing and making the presentations. Unless stated otherwise, the presentations listed are free papers.<br />

<strong>1999</strong><br />

Health Outcomes:<br />

Integrating the Elements (Canberra)<br />

Raghavendra P, Ferris R, Rapagna A, Hardy M & McDonald F<br />

A critical pathway for communication device prescription and use by<br />

adults with disabilities in the community: An instrument for<br />

outcome measurement.<br />

Australian Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology<br />

Association (Sydney)<br />

Davies P & Garrett R Environmental control client trials and<br />

demonstration site.<br />

Davies P, Garrett, R & Stapleton, D MiPhone: Accessible<br />

telephone solution for Australia.<br />

Garrett R & Stewart H Vocabulary Organiser 2.0 and the Internal<br />

Symbol Prediction Software. Pre-conference Workshop<br />

Garrett R, Davies P & Seeger B New on-line research needs register.<br />

Garrett R, Seeger B, Enders, A & Rowe, R. Telephones in<br />

Australia: How close to universal access Forum<br />

Raghavendra P, Stewart H, duCaine A, Collins M, Garrett R &<br />

Seeger B Technology for Work: Evaluation of Telecommuting for<br />

people with disabilities<br />

Raghavendra P, Ferris R, Rapagna A, Hardy M & McDonald F<br />

Critical pathway for VOCA prescription and training for adults with<br />

multiple disabilities: results from development and evaluation<br />

Stewart S, Symon J & Tilbrook A Using a Liberator with Dragon<br />

Naturally Speaking for Internet access.<br />

Australian Physiotherapy Association<br />

Paediatric Group (Sydney)<br />

Gibson S & Sprod J Use of Standing Frames in the Maintenance of<br />

Hamstring Muscle Length in Non-mobile Children with Cerebral Palsy<br />

Spasticity Conference (Adelaide)<br />

Frogley M & Gibson S Physiotherapy in children with spasticity<br />

Steer V & Murchland S Assessment and therapy of the upper limb<br />

International Society for Alternative and<br />

Augmentative Communication (Dublin, Eire)<br />

Stewart, S & Olssen C Comparison of Minspeak Teaching Methods<br />

OT Australia – National (Canberra)<br />

Ziersch, T & Murchland S Linking the country and the city:<br />

outreach services provided by CCA.<br />

2000<br />

International Society for Augmentative and<br />

Alternative Communication (Washington DC, USA)<br />

Raghavendra P Evidence-Based Practice: Where are we in AAC<br />

Raghavendra P, Ferris R, Rapagna A, Bebb, M & McDonald,<br />

F Clinical Pathway for VOCA Recommendation and Training for<br />

Adults with Disabilities.<br />

Balandin S, McNaughton D, Morgan J, Raghavendra P &<br />

Williams M Developing Inclusive <strong>Research</strong> Communities: Issues<br />

in promoting AAC user Participation.<br />

Speech Pathology Australia (Adelaide)<br />

Cootes C, & Hughes A The Rocky road to achieving inclusion at<br />

school for a child who is blind and has no speech: p. 73.<br />

Ferris R Progressive Neurological conditions – AAC intervention<br />

and functional outcomes: p. 72.<br />

Morris, R & Raghavendra P Comparison of feedback conditions<br />

in spelling instruction for a child using AAC: p. 73.<br />

Raghavendra P & Balandin S Augmented Communicators<br />

involvement in AAC: Facilitating inclusion and practical<br />

implications: p. 72.<br />

State OT Australia – SA (Adelaide)<br />

Brayley A Use of a dynamic triceps driven orthosis to assist<br />

feeding for a child with Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita.<br />

DuBois L, Klemm A, Ozols, A & Murchland S The handwriting<br />

of children who have hemiplegia – a profile in children aged<br />

8–13 years.<br />

Durand S, & Murchland S Early Intervention – When is it too late<br />

Durand S, McGregor, P & Murchland S Country <strong>Services</strong><br />

Evaluated: a pilot study comparing the motor and functional<br />

progress of city and country clients of CCA.<br />

Farrall A Expanding horizons: Developing a Youth Group for<br />

teenagers with physical disabilities.<br />

Lian P & Lietzau R Paediatric OT equipment prescription<br />

within CCA.<br />

McPharlin J & Gutschi J Unlocking Imagination to build<br />

cognitive and physical skills – an exploratory study. Poster.<br />

Murchland S More than a Hunch. Keynote presentation.<br />

65<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


66<br />

Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive<br />

Technology Society of North America (RESNA)<br />

Conference (Orlando, USA)<br />

Garrett R, Davies P, Stapleton D Miphone: The Multiple Input<br />

Speaker Telephone.<br />

Cerebral Palsy Support National Network<br />

(Melbourne)<br />

Gibson S A A Comparison of three models of Intensive<br />

Physiotherapy for Children with Cerebral Palsy.<br />

Raghavendra P Evidence Based Practice: Where are we in<br />

Paediatric disability<br />

Australian Cerebral Palsy Association (Melbourne)<br />

Balandin S, Grant G, & Raghavendra P Working Together:<br />

A new dimension to research with people with disabilities.<br />

Bebb M & Raghavendra P Predictors of device<br />

abandonment: Transitioning from school to the community.<br />

Durand S & Murchland S Country outreach services evaluated.<br />

Manson P, Guidera A & Raghavendra P Can preschool<br />

children learn the meaning of picture symbols without<br />

structured teaching<br />

McPharlin J & Gutschi J Unlocking Imagination to build<br />

cognitive and physical skills – an exploratory study. Poster.<br />

Other Presentations<br />

Frogley M Rehabilitation Equipment Interest Group<br />

Seating Seminar<br />

Frogley M Manual Wheelchair prescription and Use Australian<br />

Physiotherapy Association Paediatric Special Interest Group Seminar.<br />

2001<br />

Australian Group on Severe Communication<br />

Impairments (Adelaide)<br />

Bebb M & Raghavendra P Predictors of device abandonment:<br />

Transitioning from school to the community.<br />

Iacono T & Raghavendra P What is the evidence base in AAC<br />

Manson P, Guidera, A & Raghavendra P Symbol Learning:<br />

Examining a technique for assisting typically developing preschool<br />

children to learn picture communication symbols.<br />

Morris, R & Raghavendra P Comparison of feedback conditions<br />

in spelling instruction for a child using AAC.<br />

Tilbrook A & Timko B Integrating education, communication and<br />

literacy: Inclusion of a 5 year old AAC user in the classroom.<br />

Australian Physiotherapy Association National<br />

Paediatric Group (Melbourne)<br />

Durand S, McGregor, P & Murchland S Country <strong>Services</strong><br />

Evaluated: a pilot study comparing the motor and functional<br />

progress of city and country clients of CCA.<br />

Durand S & Murchland S Early Intervention: When is it too late<br />

Gibson S Can we deliver better Therapy A Comparison of Three<br />

Models of Intensive Physiotherapy Intervention for Children with<br />

Cerebral Palsy. Old issues: New Focus.<br />

Paediatric Occupational Therapy (Sydney)<br />

DuBois L, Klemm A, Ozols A & Murchland S The handwriting<br />

of children who have hemiplegia – a profile in children aged<br />

8–13 years.<br />

Durand S, McGregor, P & Murchland S Country <strong>Services</strong><br />

Evaluated: a pilot study comparing the motor and functional<br />

progress of city and country clients of CCA.<br />

Durand S & Murchland S Early Intervention: When is it too late<br />

Engineers Australia’s Inaugural Rehabilitation<br />

Engineering Workshop (Brisbane)<br />

Hobbs D How to build a better wheelchair – workshop<br />

presentation.<br />

Australian Rehabilitation and Assistive<br />

Technology Association (Brisbane)<br />

Garrett R, Gregory A, Tilbrook A & Ziersch T Magic For<br />

Everyone: Accessible Website Design.<br />

Hobbs D Hey Presto – are we really getting bums on the right<br />

seats in Australia Interactive seating forum.<br />

Hobbs D Pulling the Bilby out of the Hat – a show and tell<br />

of seating systems designed for the client with complex<br />

multiplanar fixed deformity.<br />

Nguyen T, Garrett R & Downing A Accessible Mobile Phones.<br />

Frogley M Powered Wheelchair Trialling. Poster.<br />

Stewart S Vocabulary Organiser. Workshop.<br />

2002<br />

Speech Pathology Australia (Alice Springs)<br />

Timko B, Guidera A, Hutchinson R & Stewart S Strategies for<br />

Supporting Signing Users.<br />

International Society for Augmentative and<br />

Alternative Communication (Odense, Denmark)<br />

Morris R & Raghavendra P Comparison of feedback conditions<br />

for spelling instruction in AAC.<br />

Guidera A, Raghavendra P & Olsson C Participation of AAC<br />

users in school settings: <strong>Research</strong> Evidence.<br />

Olsson C, Guidera A, Stewart S & Garrett R Easily Managing &<br />

Producing Materials from Customised Vocabulary Sets.<br />

Olsson C, Stewart S Guidera A & Garrett R A tool for managing<br />

vocabulary and producing customised therapy materials.<br />

ISAAC <strong>Research</strong> Symposium (Odense, Denmark)<br />

Raghavendra P, Schlosser R, Iacono, T & Olsson C New Mandate<br />

in AAC: How do we move towards Evidence-based Practice<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


Australian Cerebral Palsy Association Conference<br />

(Sydney)<br />

Bebb M & Hardy M A multipurpose board. Poster.<br />

Slack J & Opperman K Alice in Computerland: The<br />

challenges in integrated System. Poster.<br />

Gibson S, Guidera A, Murchland S & Raghavendra P<br />

Application of evidence based practice in a multi-disciplinary<br />

setting. Poster.<br />

Guidera A, Raghavendra P & Olsson C Participation of AAC<br />

users in school settings: <strong>Research</strong> Evidence.<br />

Raghavendra P, Smith J, Harrison T, Donnelly P, Noble, G<br />

& Slattery H CCA Evaluates its services: What are our former<br />

clients with cerebral palsy telling us about services that they<br />

received and what are their ideas for future services<br />

Sprod J & Olsson C CCA involvement in the personal care<br />

support planning in schools and pre-schools in SA.<br />

Australasian Academy of Cerebral Palsy and<br />

Developmental Medicine (Sydney)<br />

Gibson S & Raghavendra R Intensive physiotherapy<br />

intervention for children with cerebral palsy: parents ’<br />

perceptions of outcomes using the Canadian Occupational<br />

Performance Measure.<br />

Raghavendra P, Smith J, Harrison T, Donnelly P,<br />

Noble G, & Slattery H The childhood therapy experiences<br />

of adults with cerebral palsy: What long term impact did it have<br />

and what does it mean for today’s children with cerebral palsy<br />

Gibson S, Guidera A, Murchland S & Raghavendra P<br />

Application of evidence based practice in a multi-disciplinary<br />

setting. Evidence into Practice. Poster.<br />

State OT Australia – SA (Adelaide)<br />

Jones, J & Stewart H How Occupational Therapists teach the<br />

scanning technique<br />

Lyons. T & Foley S School AMPS: An assessment tool that<br />

informs classroom strategies.<br />

Murchland S Evidence Based Practice and Play.<br />

Sandelance M Zooming in: Video education for staff & families.<br />

Slack J & Opperman K Alice in Computerland: The challenges<br />

in integrated System. Poster.<br />

Other Presentations<br />

Hobbs D “Rehabilitation Switches”, aired on the Channel 10<br />

children’s television program “Totally Wild” on Tuesday 19th<br />

November.<br />

Hobbs D “Universal Design (for Earthlings) – What’s it all about”,<br />

31st Annual CCA Auxiliaries Conference, (prior to the 2002 CCA<br />

AGM), 12th November.<br />

Frogley M Wheelchair and Seating Workshop, <strong>Novita</strong>/Independent<br />

Living Centre Workshop.<br />

2003<br />

National Allied Health (Adelaide)<br />

Gibson S, Guidera A, Murchland S & Raghavendra P<br />

(equal authorship) Application of evidence based practice in<br />

a multi-disciplinary setting. Poster.<br />

Lyons T & Raghavendra P The use of Canadian<br />

Occupational Performance Measure by a multi-disciplinary<br />

team: therapists; and parents’ views from a pilot study. Poster.<br />

Murchland S What to count and what to cost: a resource<br />

allocation model for therapy services.<br />

Australian Group on Severe Communication<br />

Impairment (Sydney)<br />

Faulks J, Olsson C & Opperman K Paediatric Dysphagia<br />

and Physical Disability: A review of the literature... and then<br />

some. Workshop.<br />

Grace E, Raghavendra P & Scholten I Vocabulary Use at<br />

School: What do Six Year Olds Say<br />

Guidera A, Raghavendra P & Olsson C Participation of users<br />

in school setting <strong>Research</strong> Evidence. Poster.<br />

Leane J, Raghavendra P & Scholten I Reading Outcomes of<br />

Internet-based Assessment and Intervention.<br />

Raghavendra P, Iacono T, Guidera A, Olsson C Evidence<br />

Based Practice: What does it mean for AAC 1⁄2 day Workshop.<br />

International Conference on Cerebral Palsy<br />

(Quebec City, Canada)<br />

Gibson S, Guidera A, Murchland S & Raghavendra P<br />

Application of evidence based practice in a multi-disciplinary<br />

setting. Poster.<br />

Murchland S How far will the elastic stretch: Resource<br />

Allocation for Community Based Therapy <strong>Services</strong>. Poster.<br />

World Congress on Medical Physics and<br />

Biomedical Engineering (Sydney)<br />

Hobbs D An International Perspective on Rehabilitation Engineering<br />

<strong>Research</strong> & Development – Results from a Churchill Fellowship.<br />

Walker L Regulation versus Information in Australia’s Assistive<br />

Technology Sector.<br />

Australian Physiotherapy Association National<br />

Paediatric Group (Perth)<br />

Bostock S Serial casting after Botulinum toxin: A review of<br />

outcomes for dynamic equinus.<br />

Gibson S & Raghavendra P Intensive physiotherapy intervention<br />

for children with cerebral palsy: Functional outcomes and parents’<br />

perceptions of outcomes.<br />

Raghavendra P, Darbyshire P & Gibson S Physiotherapists’,<br />

parents’ and children’s views on intensive physiotherapy<br />

intervention for children with cerebral palsy.<br />

67<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


68<br />

Raghavendra P, Smith J, Harrison T, Donnelly, P & Noble G<br />

Childhood physiotherapy experiences of adults with Cerebral<br />

palsy: Implications for today’s children with cerebral palsy<br />

Awarded Best Paper under “Quality.”<br />

Ward N, Williams M & Bate T The prevalence of low back<br />

pain in parents of children with a physical disability aged 5<br />

years or below.<br />

Sprod J, Frogley, M, & Murchland S Changing paediatric<br />

practice increasing demands on the role of the community<br />

physiotherapist.<br />

Pediatric Occupational Therapy (Brisbane)<br />

Murchland S Evidence based practice and play.<br />

Murchland S & Kernot J Unravelling Handwriting: An<br />

investigation into the factors that influence handwriting ability<br />

in primary school children with hemiplegia.<br />

Smith J, Raghavendra P, Harrison T, Donnelly, P & Noble G<br />

Childhood Occupational Therapy experiences of adults with<br />

cerebral palsy: Implications for today’s children with<br />

cerebral palsy.<br />

Speech Pathology Australia (Sydney)<br />

Faulks J, Olsson C & Oppermann K A training package for<br />

staff assisting children with eating and drinking difficulties<br />

Other Presentations<br />

Hobbs D During his Churchill Fellowship (6th May – 24th<br />

June), David made 11 presentations about <strong>Novita</strong>, <strong>Novita</strong>Tech<br />

and rehabilitation engineering at different Centres in England,<br />

Toronto, and the United States. Two of these were specifically<br />

about Vocabulary Organiser to special groups.<br />

Lyons, T & Occupational Therapy Staff Play for All, SA<br />

Department of Education and Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Early<br />

Childhood Conference Workshop.<br />

2004<br />

Australasian Academy of Cerebral Palsy and<br />

Developmental Medicine (Melbourne)<br />

Crettenden A & Connell T Changing problem behaviour in<br />

children with physical disabilities.<br />

Gibson S, & Raghavendra R Intensive physiotherapy<br />

intervention for children with cerebral palsy: Functional<br />

outcomes and parents’ perceptions of outcomes.<br />

Murchland S & Kernot J Hand function, visual perception and<br />

handwriting in children with hemiplegia.<br />

Opperman K & Faulks J Paediatric dysphagia and physical<br />

disability: a review of the literature. Poster.<br />

Raghavendra P, Darbyshire P, & Gibson S Physiotherapists’<br />

parents’ and children’s views on intensive physiotherapy<br />

intervention for children with cerebral palsy.<br />

Australian Rehabilitation and Assistive<br />

Technology Association (Melbourne)<br />

Gregory A New Software from Regency Park.<br />

Pre-conference workshop.<br />

Guidera A & Olsson C Why are speech generating<br />

devices returned<br />

Guidera A & Garrett R ‘Does your vocabulary need organising’<br />

Guidera A & Garrett R The ‘Vocabulary Organiser’ Software.<br />

Pre-conference workshop.<br />

Hobbs D An International Perspective on Rehabilitation<br />

Engineering – Results from a Churchill Fellowship.<br />

Hobbs D, Nguyen, T & Ward T The Development and<br />

Teaching of a Biomechanics Module in Cambodia.<br />

van de Loo S & Symonds B One Control Everywhere<br />

for Everything.<br />

Nguyen T, Garrett R, Downing A Mobile Phone Access Via<br />

an Augmentative and Alternative Communication Device.<br />

Nguyen T, Garrett R, Downing A, Walker L & Hobbs D<br />

<strong>Research</strong> into Telecommunications Options for People<br />

with Disabilities.<br />

Nguyen T, Gregory, A & Garrett R Telephone Options for<br />

People with Physical Disabilities. Pre-conference workshop.<br />

Svistounov A & Hobbs D Introduction to Standards Testing<br />

of Rehabilitation Equipment.<br />

Walker L Wheeled Mobility – Today, Tomorrow, Everywhere.<br />

Invited plenary speaker.<br />

Walker L & Hobbs D Good Practice or Best Practice –<br />

Where Do Professional Standards Come In<br />

Walker L, Svistounov, A & Hobbs D NCRE/ARATA TGA<br />

Workshop (a workshop and open forum on the affect the new<br />

TGA regulations will have within the RE/AT industry).<br />

Pre-conference workshop.<br />

Ziersch T and Gregory A Building Accessible Websites<br />

for Everyone.<br />

Other Presentations<br />

The results of our “New technological options for people with<br />

physical disabilities, through the use of telecommunications<br />

equipment trials’ results” research has been presented by:<br />

Garrett R to Australian Communications Industry Forum,<br />

Disability Advisory Body, Sydney, 13 February 2004.<br />

Garrett R to a combined meeting of the Australian<br />

Communications Industry Forum, Disability Advisory Body and<br />

Working Committee 19 “Accessibility Information”, Sydney,<br />

18 May 2004.<br />

Garrett R & Nguyen T to Telstra <strong>Research</strong> Laboratories,<br />

Melbourne, 3 June 2004.<br />

Hobbs D to the funding body – Department of Information<br />

Technology, Communications and the Arts staff, Canberra, 3<br />

March 2004.<br />

<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004


DESIGN AND PRODUCTION CORPORATE PROFILE PTY LTD


Head Office<br />

Regency Park Centre<br />

171 Days Road<br />

Regency Park SA 5010<br />

PO Box 2438, Regency Park SA 5942<br />

Telephone (08) 8243 8243<br />

Facsimile (08) 8243 8238<br />

Email research@novita.org.au<br />

r&d@novita.org.au<br />

www.novita.org.au<br />

<strong>Novita</strong>Tech (formerly Regency Park<br />

Rehabilitation Engineering)<br />

171 Days Road<br />

Regency Park SA 5010<br />

PO Box 2438, Regency Park SA 5942<br />

Telephone 1300 855 585<br />

Facsimile (08) 8243 8208<br />

Email info@novitatech.org.au<br />

www.novitatech.org.au<br />

Family Support <strong>Services</strong> (formerly<br />

CCA Options Coordination)<br />

171 Days Road<br />

Regency Park SA 5010<br />

PO Box 2438, Regency Park SA 5942<br />

Telephone (08) 8243 8266<br />

Facsimile (08) 8243 8269<br />

Email family.support@novita.org.au<br />

www.novita.org.au/familysupport<br />

Northern Regional Office<br />

422 Salisbury Highway<br />

Parafield Gardens SA 5107<br />

Telephone (08) 8182 1000<br />

Facsimile (08) 8182 1010<br />

Email nro@novita.org.au<br />

www.novita.org.au/north<br />

Southern Regional Office<br />

111 Beach Road<br />

Christies Beach SA 5165<br />

Telephone (08) 8329 5600<br />

Facsimile (08) 8329 5607<br />

Email sro@novita.org.au<br />

www.novita.org.au/south<br />

North Eastern Regional Office<br />

5 Darley Road<br />

Paradise SA 5075<br />

Telephone (08) 8207 8940<br />

Facsimile (08) 8207 8941<br />

Email nero@novita.org.au<br />

www.novita.org.au/northeast<br />

South Eastern Regional Office<br />

151 Greenhill Road<br />

Parkside SA 5063<br />

Telephone (08) 8172 9200<br />

Facsimile (08) 8172 9201<br />

Email sero@novita.org.au<br />

www.novita.org.au/southeast<br />

Northern Western Regional Office<br />

171 Days Road<br />

Regency Park SA 5010<br />

Telephone (08) 8243 8311<br />

Facsimile (08) 8243 8377<br />

Email nwro@novita.org.au<br />

www.novita.org.au/northwest

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!