Novita Research Report January 1999 - Novita Children's Services
Novita Research Report January 1999 - Novita Children's Services
Novita Research Report January 1999 - Novita Children's Services
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />
<strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
table of contents<br />
Foreword 1<br />
Summary of research reports 2<br />
Overview of research at <strong>Novita</strong> 4<br />
Our research partners 5<br />
Selecting research projects 6<br />
<strong>Research</strong> teams 8<br />
Projects 12<br />
Publications 64<br />
Conference presentations 65
foreword<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Inc (formerly The Crippled Children’s Association of South<br />
Australia Inc) has demonstrated a commitment to research for many years, as an<br />
essential part of providing quality services to people with disabilities. We are very<br />
pleased to endorse the first <strong>Novita</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, which showcases research activities<br />
undertaken during the past five years.<br />
<strong>Research</strong> at <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> (<strong>Novita</strong>) is conducted within two streams. The<br />
<strong>Research</strong> and Development Department of <strong>Novita</strong>Tech has a history of over 8 years of<br />
leading-edge research in the Rehabilitation Engineering field. The Clinical <strong>Research</strong><br />
Department was established five years ago, as the first clinical research department within<br />
a disability organisation in Australia. Both areas have achieved outstanding results in<br />
research and the dissemination of research findings.<br />
As a service delivery organisation, <strong>Novita</strong> is ideally placed to undertake research that makes<br />
a difference to clients and has direct benefits to service provision. A particularly important<br />
part of this report is the implications section which identifies the client and service delivery<br />
outcomes achieved from each research project.<br />
1<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> research activities are possible because of generous community support, effective<br />
fundraising by the Marketing and Public Relations Division and through specific research<br />
grant funding. <strong>Research</strong> activities are also supported by partnerships with many community<br />
agencies, including universities and other disability and health organisations.<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> is committed to the importance of research as an investment into the current and<br />
future quality of services in the disability sector.<br />
Jane Hyde<br />
President<br />
Glenn Rappensberg<br />
Chief Executive<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
summary of research reports<br />
The following pages contain the summaries of <strong>Research</strong> Projects undertaken by or in collaboration<br />
with <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Inc (formerly The Crippled Children’s Association of SA Inc). These Projects<br />
are reported in greater detail later in this <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong>. Projects are arranged alphabetically by the title<br />
of the project and with the primary investigator named.<br />
PRIMARY<br />
INVESTIGATOR PROJECT TITLE PG<br />
Children’s Physical Functioning<br />
Opperman K Paediatric dysphagia and physical disability: the evidence base 13<br />
Russo R<br />
Pilot study into the use of Botulinum-A Toxin in the management of spasticity<br />
in the upper limb of children who have spasticity of central origin<br />
13<br />
Bostock S Serial casting after Botulinum Toxin: A retrospective study of outcomes for dynamic equinus 14<br />
Children’s Activity and Participation<br />
Manson P Can typically developing preschool children learn the meaning of graphic symbols through play 15<br />
Durand S Early Intervention: when is it too late A case study of a 6 year old boy with mild cerebral palsy 15<br />
Murchland S<br />
DuBois L<br />
Evidence based practice review of occupational therapy interventions to assist pre-school children with physical<br />
disabilities to become spontaneous and independent players, and guidelines for clinical practice<br />
Handwriting of children who have hemiplegia: a profile of abilities in children aged 8 – 13 years from a parent<br />
and teacher survey<br />
16<br />
17<br />
2<br />
Bricher G ‘If you wanted to know about it just ask!’ Exploring disabled young people’s experiences of health and health care 18<br />
Ising M<br />
Now I can eat too: the impact of an intensive community based feeding program on a four year old with severe<br />
feeding difficulties<br />
19<br />
Guidera A Participation of Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) users in school settings: research evidence 19<br />
Leane J<br />
Reading and phonological awareness in children with complex communication needs:<br />
literacy outcomes of internet-based assessment and intervention<br />
20<br />
Grace E School vocabulary in typically developing 6 year old Australian children 21<br />
Centre for Allied<br />
Health Evidence<br />
Systematic review of strategies used by therapists to work effectively with teachers and aides to implement<br />
programs which address client goals<br />
22<br />
Murchland S<br />
Unravelling handwriting: an investigation into the factors that influence handwriting ability in primary school aged<br />
children with hemiplegia<br />
23<br />
Equipment<br />
Communication Equipment<br />
Raghavendra P Clinical pathway for voice output communication aid recommendation and training for adults with disabilities 24<br />
Symonds B Convergence of AAC and portable computers 25<br />
Symonds B Effective mounting solutions 26<br />
Bebb M Predictors of device abandonment: transitioning from school to the community 27<br />
Garrett R Vocabulary Organiser – development of the program 28<br />
Garrett R Vocabulary Organiser – enhancement and commercialisation 29<br />
Bradley M Vocabulary Organiser – marketing 30<br />
Hobbs D Vocabulary Organiser – the addition of the merge function 31<br />
Environmental Control Equipment<br />
Ingram R The design and development of a range of cordless switches 32<br />
Hobbs D Movement-to-music therapy 33<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
PRIMARY<br />
INVESTIGATOR PROJECT TITLE PG<br />
Mobility and Transferring Equipment<br />
Sanders D Computer aided customisation of walker designs 34<br />
Symonds B Integrated control of wheelchairs and communication devices 35<br />
Shepherd A<br />
Introduction of a hoist into the family home – a qualitative study into the perspectives of three mothers who care<br />
for a child who has a severe physical disability<br />
Svistounov A Remote monitoring of the testing laboratory 36<br />
Telecommunication Equipment<br />
Nguyen T Focus group to assess home and mobile phone needs 37<br />
Hobbs D Making the home phone accessible for people with a disability 38<br />
Nguyen T Mobile phone access via an augmentative and alternative communication device 39<br />
Nguyen T Survey of accessible mobile communication for people with disabilities 40<br />
Nguyen T Technological options for people with physical disabilities through use of telecommunications equipment 41<br />
Website Accessibility<br />
Ziersch T Development of accessible websites 42<br />
Garrett R Using product features to select appropriate AT products 43<br />
Spizzo M<br />
Assessment Tools<br />
Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the Tardieu Scale to quantify spasticity in biceps brachii<br />
in children with cerebral palsy<br />
Lyons T Use of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: therapists’ and parents’ views – a pilot study 45<br />
36<br />
44<br />
Gibson S<br />
What is the evidence for the use of the gross motor function measure (GMFM-88)<br />
as a functional outcome measure for children with cerebral palsy<br />
46<br />
Parent Support<br />
Ward N The prevalence of low back pain in parents of children with a physical disability aged 5 years or below 47<br />
Service Evaluation<br />
Raghavendra P Childhood therapy experiences of adults with cerebral palsy: implications for today’s children with cerebral palsy 48<br />
Morris R Comparison of feedback conditions in spelling instruction for a child using AAC 49<br />
Crettenden A Evaluation of behaviour management advice 50<br />
Bentley M Evaluation of family centred practice using the measure of process of care 51<br />
Jones J How occupational therapists at <strong>Novita</strong> train clients in the scanning access technique 51<br />
3<br />
Gibson S<br />
“Is more therapy better” A comparison of two models of intensive physiotherapy<br />
and “conventional” intensive physiotherapy for children with cerebral palsy<br />
52<br />
Durand S<br />
Motor and functional outcomes of children with physical and /or multiple disabilities living<br />
in rural and remote areas compared with their metropolitan counterparts – a pilot study<br />
Dryden L Single event multilevel surgery: a description of stakeholder experiences 54<br />
Service and Policy Development<br />
Walker L Australian representation on ISO TC173 SC1 55<br />
Hobbs D Churchill Fellowship research, experiences and outcomes 56<br />
Seeger B Development and delivery of an undergraduate subject in Rehabilitation Engineering at Flinders University 57<br />
Walker L Development of collaborative links with University of Pittsburgh 58<br />
Garrett R Disability Standards Working Group (DSWG) 59<br />
Svistounov A Enhancing innovation and development of new products in the Australian rehabilitation equipment sector 60<br />
Walker L Evaluation and scoping of a movement analysis facility in Adelaide 61<br />
Garrett R Phone accessibility information working committee 62<br />
Murchland S Resource allocation project 63<br />
53<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
overview of research at novita<br />
<strong>Research</strong>, development and evaluation have been a vital part of high quality services provided by <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong><br />
Inc, (formerly The Crippled Children’s Association of SA Inc). <strong>Novita</strong> provides therapy, equipment and family support services to<br />
over 1000 South Australian children and young people with physical and/or severe multiple disabilities. Children have cerebral<br />
palsy (approximately 65%), muscular dystrophy, spina bifida or other conditions that result in a permanent physical disability.<br />
4<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> employs occupational therapists, orthotists,<br />
physiotherapists, psychologists, rehabilitation engineers,<br />
speech pathologists, and social workers, totalling over<br />
150 staff. <strong>Services</strong> are delivered by multi-disciplinary teams<br />
of therapists in clients’ homes, kindergartens, and schools or<br />
other community settings. There are five regional offices in<br />
the Adelaide metropolitan area, with staff from each office also<br />
visiting one or more country areas to support country families<br />
and local service providers. In addition, <strong>Novita</strong> provides<br />
equipment services to children and adults through <strong>Novita</strong>Tech<br />
(formerly Regency Park Rehabilitation Engineering).<br />
Historically, research was undertaken by individuals or<br />
by key departments within <strong>Novita</strong>. A research culture was<br />
established by Dr Leon Stern, Medical Director, Dr Barry Seeger,<br />
Director of Regency Park Rehabilitation Engineering, and former<br />
Chief Executive, Dr David Caudrey. This was strengthened in<br />
1996 by the creation of a new <strong>Research</strong> and Development<br />
(R&D) Department within the Regency Park Rehabilitation<br />
Engineering division of <strong>Novita</strong>, now called <strong>Novita</strong>Tech, and<br />
then later in <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> with the establishment of the<br />
Clinical <strong>Research</strong> Department.<br />
<strong>Novita</strong>Tech’s new <strong>Research</strong> and Development<br />
Department was formed using staff from the Electronics<br />
Department, providing a much clearer focus for R&D efforts.<br />
The team aimed to maximise the usefulness and relevance<br />
of technology to the lives of people with disabilities by<br />
conducting meaningful research and product development.<br />
As a result of the history and experience of the team, there<br />
was a clear emphasis on projects and products related to<br />
electronics and computers.<br />
Since then, the R&D Department has continued to refine<br />
and improve its internal processes while making a significant<br />
contribution to research and development in the field of<br />
rehabilitation engineering. In recent years there has been a<br />
move to the employment of Rehabilitation Engineers as they<br />
graduate from the Flinders University School of Informatics<br />
and Engineering. Since its inception, the Department has<br />
seen an increase in the level of collaboration with academic<br />
institutions, an increase in the use of sub-contractors to<br />
ensure that professional standards are applied to all areas,<br />
and an increased requirement for marketing skills.<br />
The Clinical <strong>Research</strong> Department was established to enable<br />
a systematic research focus in the Therapy Division that ensured<br />
effective assessments, interventions and support were provided<br />
to clients and families. The Department aims to conduct<br />
research; facilitate a spirit of enquiry amongst therapists within<br />
<strong>Novita</strong>; and to reduce the research-practice gap with therapists.<br />
The Department encourages therapists to pose clinical questions<br />
and provides the support required to answer these questions in a<br />
systematic way. It also facilitates the implementation of outcomes,<br />
as well as evaluating the effectiveness.<br />
The Clinical <strong>Research</strong> Department manages research<br />
projects in a number of ways:<br />
1) Supporting and educating <strong>Novita</strong> therapists involved in<br />
providing direct services to clients who initiate research<br />
ideas and are often involved in doing the research;<br />
2) Conducting joint projects internally and with other agencies<br />
and academic institutions such as the Women’s and<br />
Children’s Hospital, the University of South Australia and<br />
Flinders University;<br />
3) Providing an interface and liaison between the external<br />
groups and students who initiate projects and the <strong>Novita</strong><br />
staff and families who may be involved in the study.<br />
<strong>Research</strong> projects are presented at bimonthly research<br />
seminars and biennial research days conducted by <strong>Novita</strong>; at<br />
state, national and international conferences; and published in<br />
newsletters and journals so that clients, their families, other staff<br />
and professional colleagues can benefit from the findings.<br />
Evaluating the evidence<br />
Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) is defined as “integrating<br />
best research evidence together with clinical knowledge and<br />
reasoning in providing assessments and interventions that<br />
are effective and efficient for particular clients”. To enhance<br />
evidence-based practice, <strong>Novita</strong> has focussed on:<br />
1) Staff Training in EBP • In July 2000, the Clinical<br />
<strong>Research</strong> Manager, the three research seniors and several<br />
physiotherapists from <strong>Novita</strong> attended a three-day course<br />
on EBP conducted by the School of Physiotherapy,<br />
University of SA. Over the subsequent four years, using a<br />
‘Train-the-Trainer’ model, most <strong>Novita</strong> therapists have been<br />
trained in EBP.<br />
2) Developing <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Appraisal<br />
Forms to critically appraise research • The <strong>Research</strong><br />
Department found that the hierarchy of evidence model<br />
used in Evidence-Based Medicine, and the tools used to<br />
evaluate research, were not suitable to appraise research<br />
in disability. Via a process of evaluating existing tools, the<br />
Clinical <strong>Research</strong> department used an adapted appraisal<br />
form and the McMaster forms for all allied health discipline<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
esearch evaluations (http://bluewirecs.tzo.com/canchild/<br />
patches/qualform.pdf and http://bluewirecs.tzo.com/<br />
canchild/patches/quantform).<br />
3) Gathering and synthesising evidence for clinically<br />
relevant questions • Between 2001–2003, each therapy<br />
discipline investigated the evidence relating to one question<br />
of clinical relevance. All therapy staff were involved in the<br />
process of reviewing and critically appraising the literature,<br />
coordinated by research seniors. The outcomes of these are<br />
summarised on pages 13, 16, 19 and 46.<br />
4) Collaborating with the Centre for Allied Health<br />
Evidence (CAHE) (University of South Australia) –<br />
A collaborating Centre of Joanna Briggs Institute<br />
for Evidence Based Nursing • This has included<br />
contracting the CAHE to undertake a systematic review of a<br />
multi-disciplinary intervention question (page 22).<br />
our research partners<br />
Clinical <strong>Research</strong> (CR) and <strong>Research</strong> and Development<br />
(R&D) have strong links with university departments, hospitals<br />
and other external agencies within South Australia, nationally and<br />
some internationally. Our collaborative partners have provided an<br />
enriching relationship that has been of mutual benefit.<br />
Our Partners<br />
• Better Software<br />
• Colsoft (Computer Systems Management<br />
and Support <strong>Services</strong>) Pty Ltd<br />
• Flinders University of South Australia<br />
– School of Medicine,<br />
Department of Speech Pathology<br />
• Dr Ingrid Scholten PhD<br />
– School of Medicine,<br />
Department of Rehabilitation and Aged Care<br />
– Psychology<br />
– School of Informatics and Engineering<br />
• Prof Trevor Hearne B Sc (Hons) PhD<br />
• Assoc Prof Karen Reynolds MA M Sc PhD<br />
• Independent Living Centre<br />
– Adult Therapy <strong>Services</strong><br />
• Michael Bebb, Speech Pathologist<br />
• South Australian Department of Education<br />
and Children’s <strong>Services</strong><br />
– Regency Park School<br />
• Telstra Disability <strong>Services</strong><br />
• The Defence Science and Technology Organisation<br />
• Therapy Focus, Western Australia<br />
• University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania USA<br />
– School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences<br />
• Prof Rory Cooper BS MEng PhD ATD<br />
• University of South Australia<br />
– School of Health Sciences<br />
• Prof Esther May PhD<br />
• Dr Paul Grimshaw PhD<br />
– Division of Physiotherapy<br />
• Assoc Prof Marie Williams PhD<br />
• Dr Susan Hillier PhD<br />
• Dr Andrea Warden Flood PhD<br />
– Division of Occupational Therapy<br />
• Hugh Stewart Cert Tech (Electronic Engineering)<br />
B App Sc (OT) M App Sc (OT)<br />
– Joanna Briggs Institute, Center for Allied Health Evidence<br />
• Assoc Prof Karen Grimmer PhD<br />
– Louis Laybourne-Smith School of Architecture and Design<br />
• Women’s and Children’s Hospital<br />
– Department of Orthopaedic Surgery<br />
• Mr Philip Brook MBBS FRACS (Orth)<br />
– Department of Paediatric Rehabilitation<br />
Partnerships with some individuals have also been extremely<br />
productive, resulting in joint grant submissions, conference<br />
presentations, book chapters, journal articles and improved<br />
research processes. These include:<br />
• Jeff Clayton<br />
Director of Clayton Management Pty Ltd,<br />
Management Consultants<br />
• Prof Philip Darbyshire PhD<br />
Head of Nursing & Midwifery <strong>Research</strong><br />
Women’s and Children’s Hospital, SA<br />
• Prof Andrew Downing<br />
Foundation Professor, Biomedical Endineering<br />
School of Informatics and Engineering<br />
Flinders University, Adelaide SA<br />
• Dr Peter Flett<br />
Director of Paediatric Rehabilitation,<br />
Women’s and Children’s Hospital, SA<br />
• Jeff Groves<br />
Director of Innovation,<br />
Centre for Innovation, Business and Manufacturing<br />
• Dr Teresa Iacono PhD<br />
Senior <strong>Research</strong> Fellow, Centre for Developmental<br />
Disability Health Victoria, Monash University,<br />
Communication Resource Centre, Scope Victoria.<br />
• Dr Ralf Schlosser PhD<br />
Associate Professor,<br />
Dept. of Speech Pathology, NE University, Boston, USA<br />
• Peter Wilkinson<br />
Software Programmer<br />
5<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
selecting research projects<br />
The Clinical <strong>Research</strong> and <strong>Research</strong> & Development<br />
Departments have different committees<br />
and criteria for the approval of research ideas.<br />
6<br />
<strong>Research</strong> & Development Project<br />
Selection Process<br />
The <strong>Research</strong> & Development (R&D) Department has<br />
refined its project selection process since the creation of<br />
the Department, to establish and maintain ISO9001 Quality<br />
Accreditation and as a result of annual reviews of the<br />
Department. The essential criteria for project selection have<br />
not changed significantly over the past few years, however the<br />
process of evaluation against the following criteria has been<br />
modified. The criteria for project approval are as follows:<br />
• The idea must have the potential to enhance the lives of,<br />
or provide benefit to more than one individual;<br />
• Ideas should promote a collaborative relationship between<br />
R&D research staff and clinical staff, caregivers and<br />
end users;<br />
• The idea must provide an opportunity for the <strong>Novita</strong>Tech<br />
R&D Department to create an innovative, technological<br />
solution that meets the needs of people with disabilities<br />
in South Australia;<br />
• Where possible, the need for the idea should have arisen<br />
due to a lack of other existing, suitable or alternative solutions<br />
in the market. The idea should contribute to developing and<br />
piloting of a new product or service alternative;<br />
• The idea or problem solution must be in keeping with<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong>’ Strategic Plan;<br />
• There must be a ‘project champion’ (ideally the person<br />
who submits the idea) who is willing to be involved with the<br />
project through to completion;<br />
• The idea should potentially demonstrate one or more of<br />
the following measurable benefits, to justify the allocation<br />
of <strong>Novita</strong> resources:<br />
− enhance the lives of <strong>Novita</strong> clients;<br />
− provide a marketable/profitable end product;<br />
− provide a significant time or cost saving outcome<br />
(this could be to staff, clients, carers, etc.);<br />
− strive to enhance client satisfaction with the services<br />
of <strong>Novita</strong>;<br />
− clinical-based ideas should strive to increase the<br />
efficiency of <strong>Novita</strong> staff, and in doing so, benefit<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> clients.<br />
In the first instance, all project ideas that are submitted to<br />
R&D are filtered against these criteria. If an idea passes this<br />
initial filtering process, the idea is further developed into a<br />
strong business case before it is undertaken as a project.<br />
The secondary process (referred to as ‘Phase Zero’)<br />
is a more exhaustive evaluation that aims to identify and<br />
investigate any weaknesses or ‘areas of concern’ surrounding<br />
the submitted idea, to ensure that the project is feasible and is<br />
likely to produce a significant benefit. These concerns typically<br />
involve work to evaluate items such as the technical feasibility;<br />
an estimate of the significance to the lives of the people with a<br />
disability; an estimate of the number of <strong>Novita</strong> and other clients<br />
impacted upon; similar work occurring elsewhere in the world;<br />
alternative existing products; resolution of legal and ethical<br />
issues; and consideration of marketing issues.<br />
The output of ‘Phase Zero’ is a business and project plan<br />
that is tabled before an R&D Project Review Panel. This panel<br />
has skills in the assessment and review of business cases<br />
and has the authority to approve or reject project proposals or<br />
recommend additional work on particular parts of the business<br />
case. The panel may also rank or prioritise projects.<br />
The successful business case forms the basis of a request<br />
for project funding which may be sought from internal budget<br />
resources, the <strong>Novita</strong> Executive Reference Group or external<br />
funding bodies. Proposals where the scope extends beyond<br />
children’s services alone may require external funding, and their<br />
commencement is dependant upon the success of applications<br />
for such funding.<br />
If a project is approved through the selection process it will<br />
then be entered into the R&D project database and project plan.<br />
All projects are then required to be clearly defined, with sign-off<br />
by appropriate personnel at the end of each of the following<br />
stages throughout the life of the project:<br />
• design documents and production;<br />
• design document verification;<br />
• prototype construction or project implementation;<br />
• project internal validation;<br />
• project external validation;<br />
• project completion.<br />
If any of the above stages cannot be met then the project<br />
objectives are revised and re-evaluated at one of the earlier<br />
stages, or the project is cancelled because it is not feasible.<br />
Up until 2004, a group known as the ‘R&D Reference Group’<br />
was used to assist the selection of projects and the allocation<br />
of resources. Members of the group came from the other<br />
Departments within <strong>Novita</strong>Tech, the former Communication and<br />
Therapy <strong>Services</strong> division, the occupational therapy and speech<br />
pathology departments of <strong>Novita</strong>, and also included the parents<br />
of two <strong>Novita</strong> clients.<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Clinical <strong>Research</strong><br />
Selection Process<br />
The Clinical <strong>Research</strong> Sub Committee (CRC) was established<br />
in June 2000 to ensure that <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> has<br />
a cohesive clinical research program that aligns to the<br />
Association’s strategic directions and results in best practice<br />
outcomes for clients and families. Specifically, the committee<br />
ensures that equitable, objective project selection/acceptance<br />
is undertaken and that proposals gain appropriate ethics<br />
approval from relevant agencies prior to commencement;<br />
monitors all projects on a regular basis; and contributes to<br />
future directions of <strong>Novita</strong>’s research program. Criteria for<br />
project approval:<br />
• the project idea should reflect <strong>Novita</strong>’s research direction,<br />
mission, strategic and/or business plan objectives;<br />
• projects should be of benefit to clients, families, therapists,<br />
and the community;<br />
• the same clients and families should not be requested to<br />
take part in more than one research project. (Consideration<br />
given to avoiding excessive use of same clients);<br />
• there should be a balance of projects from various<br />
disciplines;<br />
• scientific merit; and<br />
• ethics approval from the appropriate Human <strong>Research</strong><br />
Ethics Committee.<br />
In 2003 a process of identifying the priority directions for<br />
Clinical <strong>Research</strong> at <strong>Novita</strong> commenced and was ratified by<br />
the Board in 2004. The priority areas for Clinical <strong>Research</strong> in<br />
2004–2007 are:<br />
1. projects that examine ways to enhance participation of our<br />
children and families in the community and measuring the<br />
effectiveness of those intervention methods;<br />
2. life span issues – research that investigates issues acrosss<br />
0–18 years, promoting personal autonomy and client and<br />
family centredness; and<br />
3. evaluations of interventions and aspects of service delivery<br />
reflecting outcomes at client Impairment, Activity and<br />
Participation levels.<br />
The Clinical <strong>Research</strong> Committee members are:<br />
Greg de Cure B A (Int Studies) Hons<br />
Parent & Project Officer (Curriculum Design)<br />
Office of Planning & Quality, University of Adelaide<br />
2002 – current<br />
Dr Peter Flett M B, B S, FRACP, FRACM, FAFRM (RACP), MRACMA<br />
Director of Paediatric Rehabilitation<br />
Women’s and Children’s Hospital, SA<br />
2001 – current<br />
Dr Tim Connell B A, Dip Soc Sc (Psychology), PhD<br />
Chief Psychologist, <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Inc<br />
2000 – current<br />
Terry Lyons Dip Tech (Occupational Therapy)<br />
Chief Occupational Therapist, <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Inc<br />
2000 – current<br />
Louise McCarthy B App Sc (OT)<br />
Manager, North Western Regional Office<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Inc<br />
March 2004 – current<br />
Catherine Olsson B App Sc (Speech Pathology)<br />
Chief Speech Pathologist, <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Inc<br />
2000 – current<br />
Dr Parimala Raghavendra B Sc, M Sc, PhD<br />
Chairperson<br />
Manager, Clinical <strong>Research</strong>, <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Inc<br />
2000 – current<br />
Judy Sprod B App Sc (Physiotherapy)<br />
Chief Physiotherapist, <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Inc<br />
2000 – current<br />
Wendy Wake-Dyster Dip Tech (Physio) Grad Dip (Physio)<br />
Grad Dip (Mmt), AFAIM, CPMger<br />
Director, Client Programs, <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Inc<br />
2000 – current<br />
Past Members:<br />
Tori Wilckens B App Sc (Physiotherapy)<br />
Senior Physiotherapist, Communication & Therapy <strong>Services</strong><br />
2001 – 2002<br />
Pam Donnelly B Soc Sc (Community <strong>Services</strong>)<br />
Manager, Northern Regional Office,<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Inc<br />
2001 – 2003<br />
7<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
esearch teams<br />
The two research teams within <strong>Novita</strong> are<br />
Clinical <strong>Research</strong>, Therapy Division and<br />
<strong>Research</strong> and Development, <strong>Novita</strong>Tech.<br />
8<br />
Clinical <strong>Research</strong> Team<br />
Manager, Clinical <strong>Research</strong><br />
Dr Parimala Raghavendra B Sc, M Sc, PhD<br />
<strong>1999</strong> – present<br />
Adjunct Lecturer, Department of Speech Pathology<br />
& Audiology, Flinders University of SA<br />
The Manager is responsible for the development and implementation<br />
of an innovative and meaningful research and evaluation<br />
program. This is achieved by developing and maintaining a strong<br />
multidisciplinary research focus across <strong>Novita</strong> therapy services;<br />
identifying, formulating and conducting relevant research projects<br />
within the context of <strong>Novita</strong>’s policies and priorities; and working<br />
with <strong>Novita</strong> therapy staff, university schools and external agencies.<br />
<strong>Research</strong> Seniors<br />
<strong>Research</strong> Senior Occupational Therapist<br />
Sonya Murchland B App Sc (OT), M H Sc (OT)<br />
<strong>1999</strong> – present<br />
<strong>Research</strong> Senior Physiotherapist<br />
Sue Gibson B App Sc (Physiotherapy),<br />
G Dip Physiotherapy (Paediatrics), M App Sc Physiotherapy (Paediatrics)<br />
<strong>1999</strong> – 2002, 2003 – present<br />
Dr Trish Bate B App Sc (Physiotherapy), M App Sc, PhD<br />
2002 – 2003<br />
<strong>Research</strong> Senior Speech Pathologist<br />
Sandra Stewart B App Sc (Speech Pathology)<br />
April 2004 – present<br />
Kylie Opperman B App Sc (Speech Pathology)<br />
2003 – April 2004<br />
Angela Guidera B App Sc (Speech Pathology)<br />
<strong>1999</strong> – 2002<br />
The <strong>Research</strong> Seniors are the key link between therapists and the <strong>Research</strong><br />
Department by providing clinical services to clients and also working in<br />
the <strong>Research</strong> Department. They contribute to the development of research<br />
direction of their discipline and client programs; undertake and facilitate<br />
research projects within their discipline and disseminate research<br />
outcomes at conferences; promote evidence-based activities; and liaise<br />
with university departments and other agencies to promote research.<br />
Other staff<br />
Project Officer<br />
Julie Smith B A (Adelaide)<br />
<strong>1999</strong> – 2002<br />
<strong>Research</strong> Assistant Occupational Therapist<br />
Jocelyn Kernot B App Sc (OT) Hons<br />
2002 – 2003<br />
<strong>Research</strong> and Development Team<br />
Manager<br />
Rob Garrett B Tech, Grad Dip Maths, C P Eng, ATP<br />
Group Leader, <strong>Research</strong> & Development,<br />
Engineering & Support<br />
1985 – present<br />
The Group Leader is responsible for the development and<br />
implementation of innovative technological solutions that will<br />
enhance the lives of people with a disability.<br />
This is achieved by actively soliciting new ideas and projects,<br />
appropriate analysis of the potential benefits and costs, the<br />
creation of a business plan, the involvement of key stakeholders<br />
and review of the project at the end of critical development stages.<br />
Senior Rehabilitation Engineer<br />
David Hobbs B Sc (Physics), B Sc / B Eng (Biomed) (Hons)<br />
May 2001 – present<br />
Marketing Specialist<br />
Melissa Bradley B Des (Int Des), B Mgt (Intl Mktg)<br />
April 2000 – present<br />
Rehabilitation Engineers<br />
Ben Symonds B Sc / B Eng (Biomed) (Hons)<br />
March 2003 – present<br />
Toan Nguyen B Sc / B Eng (Biomed) (Hons)<br />
Masters Candidate, 2001 – present;<br />
<strong>Research</strong> Assistant 2003<br />
Rebecca Gallio B Sc, B Eng (Biomed) (Hons)<br />
<strong>January</strong> 2002 – <strong>January</strong> 2003<br />
Electronics Engineers<br />
Paul Davies B Eng (Electronics) (Hons), Grad Dip (Disability Studies), ATP<br />
May 1997 – Aug 2000<br />
Duane Stapleton B Eng (Computer Systems) (Hons)<br />
December 1994 – April <strong>1999</strong><br />
The <strong>Research</strong> and Development staff are assigned to one or<br />
more projects as a project co-ordinator, responsible for ensuring<br />
the involvement of stakeholders, collaboration with partners,<br />
development of business cases, liaison with sub-contractors,<br />
reporting on progress, publishing results and disseminating<br />
outcomes at conferences. They also contribute to the strategic<br />
direction of the department.<br />
Other staff<br />
Undergraduate students gain work experience and contribute<br />
to projects from time to time.<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
<strong>Research</strong>er Profiles<br />
Susan Bostock B App Sc Physiotherapy<br />
Sue graduated from the Lincoln Institute of Health Sciences, Victoria<br />
in 1978 and has had over 20 years experience in paediatric<br />
disability and recent research experience. She is currently Senior<br />
Clinical Physiotherapist and is based in the Northern Regional Office<br />
of <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong>.<br />
Melissa Bradley B Des (Int Des), B Mgt (Intl Mktg)<br />
Melissa graduated from the University of South Australia with<br />
a design degree (majoring in Interior Design) in 1994 and a<br />
Management degree (majoring in International Marketing) in 1998.<br />
As part of her final year studies, Melissa travelled to Malaysia and<br />
the Philippines to investigate the business opportunities for Adelaidebased<br />
company, Sabco Australia. Since starting as Marketing<br />
Specialist with <strong>Novita</strong>Tech in April 2000, Melissa has worked with<br />
the <strong>Research</strong> and Development Department in investigating several<br />
market opportunities for various products in the small, unique and<br />
highly specialised disability field. A key element of her work has been<br />
the establishment of systems to project manage research and input<br />
from clients, families and staff. Melissa has also worked on<br />
the commercialisation of the Vocabulary Organiser program.<br />
She has been highly involved in the graphical representation of<br />
material produced by the Division, with a distinct goal to strengthen<br />
its profile. Melissa has also worked in a Marketing role for <strong>Novita</strong><br />
Children’s <strong>Services</strong>, <strong>Novita</strong>Tech’s parent organisation.<br />
Louise DuBois B App Sc (Occupational Therapy)<br />
Louise graduated from the University of South Australia in 1992 with a<br />
Bachelor of Applied Science in Occupational Therapy. Her first job was<br />
in Aged Care in Grafton, where she worked for one year before moving<br />
to Grafton Base Hospital where her case load included some paediatrics.<br />
After 2 years, Louise headed overseas and worked in a Children’s<br />
Development Centre in Basildon, Essex, UK. She returned to Adelaide<br />
and gained employment with <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> in 1997 and<br />
was appointed Senior Therapist later that year. Louise currently works<br />
as a Regional Senior in the Northern Regional Office of <strong>Novita</strong>.<br />
Sue Durand C Cert (Physiotherapy)<br />
Sue graduated from the Bristol School of Physiotherapy in 1971.<br />
She has many years of experience in paediatrics working, in<br />
England and different states of Australia. Sue began her employment<br />
in South Australia with the Spastic Centres of SA, Inc in 1989 and later<br />
transitioned to <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong>. Sue finished working with<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> in June 2004, at which time she held the position of Regional<br />
Senior Physiotherapist in the South Eastern Regional Office. For many<br />
years Sue was on the Australian Physiotherapy Association’s South<br />
Australian Paediatric Group Committee. Sue always had an interest in<br />
hydrotherapy and is now working in a private paediatric physiotherapy<br />
practice and is a consultant for specialised walking equipment.<br />
Dr Peter Flett MBBS, FRACP, FACRM, FAFRM (RACP), MRACMA<br />
Dr Peter Flett is a Consultant Physician in Paediatric Rehabilitation<br />
Medicine, and is currently the Director of Paediatric Rehabilitation,<br />
Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Adelaide, a strategic alliance<br />
position with <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong>. Following the conferring of<br />
his FRACP in 1981, he became the first paediatrician in Australia to<br />
become fully qualified as a specialist in rehabilitation medicine by<br />
examination and has been an examiner since 1986 for the Faculty<br />
of Rehabilitation Medicine. Dr Flett was also a member of the original<br />
<strong>Research</strong> and Development Sub-Committee of the Board of CCA,<br />
chaired by Dr Barry Seeger. Dr Flett has an interest in children with<br />
cerebral palsy, publishing widely in this area, and contributing to the<br />
establishment of the South Australian Cerebral Palsy Register.<br />
Rob Garrett B Tech (Electronics), Grad Dip Maths, MIEAust, CPEng, ATP<br />
Rob graduated from the University of Adelaide with a Bachelor<br />
Technology in Electronic Engineering in 1971 and completed a<br />
Graduate Diploma in Mathematics at the South Australian Institute<br />
of Technology in 1976.<br />
After working at the Defence Science and Technology Organisation at<br />
Salisbury South Australia for 22 years, in 1985 Rob became the first<br />
Electronics Engineer in Australia to work in the field of Rehabilitation<br />
Engineering at <strong>Novita</strong>Tech.<br />
Rob was awarded a Churchill Fellowship in 1990 to study the “Use<br />
of Computers to Enhance the Lives of People with Disabilities” for a<br />
period of 9 weeks in USA, Canada, UK and Sweden. Rob is also a<br />
certified Assistive Technology Practitioner.<br />
Rob has been a member of: the Australian Rehabilitation and<br />
Assistive Technology Association (ARATA) Board (<strong>1999</strong>–current);<br />
Modbury Hospital Board (2002 –2004); chair Modbury Hospital<br />
Community Consultative Committee; member Disability Advisory<br />
Body of the Australian Communications Industry Forum since<br />
inception in <strong>1999</strong>; Telstra Regional Consumer Council in SA (1996–<br />
2000); Telecommunications Consumer’s Group, SA since inception in<br />
2000; Technical Aid to the Disabled (past member of executive) and is<br />
a corresponding member of Engineers Australia’s National Committee<br />
on Rehabilitation Engineering.<br />
His interests include the application of Universal Design principles to<br />
the development of products and processes to enhance the lives of all<br />
people and especially those who have a disability with a particular<br />
interest in ensuring telecommunications products are accessible to all.<br />
Susan Gibson<br />
B App Sc (Physiotherapy), Grad Dip Physio (Paeds), M App Sc Physio (Paeds)<br />
Susan graduated from the South Australian Institute of Technology<br />
with a Bachelor of Applied Science (Physiotherapy) in 1978, a<br />
Graduate Diploma in Physiotherapy (Paediatrics) from the South<br />
Australian Institute of Technology in 1989, and completed a Masters<br />
of Applied Science in Physiotherapy (Paediatrics) at the University<br />
of South Australia in 1993. She has worked at several organisations,<br />
both in Australia and the UK, that provide therapy services for<br />
children and adults with disabilities. Susan commenced work at<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> in 1985. Her areas of interest include<br />
the promotion, and use of, research in clinical practice. Susan is<br />
currently employed as the Senior <strong>Research</strong> Physiotherapist, and<br />
has a clinical caseload in the Southern Regional Office of <strong>Novita</strong><br />
providing metropolitan and outreach services.<br />
Angela Guidera B App Sc (Speech Pathology), MSPAA, CPSP<br />
Angela graduated from the South Australian College of Advanced<br />
Education with a Bachelor of Applied Science (Speech Pathology)<br />
in 1989. She started working for <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> in 1993.<br />
She has worked in various roles, including providing communitybased<br />
therapy services, providing country outreach services and<br />
working in the organisation’s Clinical <strong>Research</strong> Department. Angela<br />
is currently a member of the <strong>Novita</strong>Tech Support Team. Her role<br />
provides a consultative service in the use of technology, primarily in<br />
relation to augmentative and alternative communication (AAC),<br />
for children with disabilities. She has presented at several national<br />
conferences. Angela has previously worked in rural areas in South<br />
Australia and Western Australia.<br />
9<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
10<br />
David Hobbs B Sc (Physics), B Sc / B Eng (Biomed) (Hons), Exec Dip Bus Plan<br />
David graduated from Flinders University with a Physics degree in<br />
1994 and a double degree in Biomedical Engineering, with Honours,<br />
in 2000. He also has an Executive Diploma in Business Planning<br />
(2001) through the South Australian Enterprise Workshop. David<br />
started working at <strong>Novita</strong>Tech in May 2001, and is employed as a<br />
Senior Rehabilitation Engineer within the <strong>Research</strong> & Development<br />
Department and the Engineering (Testing Laboratory) Group.<br />
David is a member of the National Committee on Rehabilitation<br />
Engineering, through Engineers Australia, a Board member of<br />
ARATA, and was awarded a Churchill Fellowship in 2002. The<br />
aim of David’s Churchill research was to investigate how leading<br />
rehabilitation engineering centres around the world are using<br />
research and development, Universal Design, and the application<br />
of technology to assist people with a disability. David has<br />
recently been appointed as a ‘Flinders Ambassador in the<br />
Community’ by the Vice-Chancellor of Flinders University, and is<br />
a member of ‘Engineers Without Borders Australia’ at a state and<br />
national level.<br />
Merrin Ising B App Sc (Speech Pathology)<br />
Merrin graduated from Flinders University in 1996 with a Bachelor<br />
of Applied Science in Speech Pathology. Merrin began her career<br />
working with adults with acquired brain injury at Julia Farr <strong>Services</strong>.<br />
In <strong>January</strong> 2000 she accepted a position at <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong><br />
and has enjoyed working with children ever since. Merrin has an<br />
interest in working with children with complex communication<br />
needs and giving them a voice within our community. She has also<br />
maintained a particular interest in acquired brain injury and would<br />
one day like to pursue this further with children and adolescents.<br />
Merrin is currently the Senior Speech Pathologist at the Southern<br />
Regional Office of <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong>.<br />
Sue van de Loo B App Sc (Occupational Therapy)<br />
Sue is currently a member of the <strong>Novita</strong>Tech Support Team. She<br />
graduated from the South Australian Institute of Technology in 1988<br />
and gained employment with the Crippled Children’s Association<br />
(now <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong>) in the same year. She has worked in<br />
a broad range of therapy areas including Early Childhood <strong>Services</strong><br />
Speech and Language units, country outreach and been a senior<br />
therapist in the North East Regional Office. During 1990–91, Sue<br />
worked in Paediatrics in the United Kingdom. In 1996, Sue played<br />
a key role in the establishment of an internal <strong>Novita</strong>Tech Assistive<br />
Technology Support Team. Technology for people with disabilities<br />
has always been an area of interest, and Sue has a special focus on<br />
alternative controls for powered mobility and access to alternative<br />
and augmentative communication systems. Sue has presented papers<br />
at a number of national and state conferences and has been involved<br />
in running technology workshops both intra and interstate.<br />
Terry Lyons Dip Tech (Occupational Therapy)<br />
Following a cadetship during her training, Terry began working for<br />
the then Crippled Children’s Association of South Australia, Inc., and<br />
completed her qualifications in occupational therapy in 1974. She<br />
has worked in the area of services for children and adolescents with<br />
physical and/or multiple disabilities throughout her career, with a<br />
short period of employment in country South Australia. In 1988–91<br />
she held a joint position with the University of South Australia and<br />
Spastic Centres of South Australia as Student Unit Supervisor. Terry<br />
has an interest in occupational performance in children, and<br />
intervention methods to support their independence. Since 1997,<br />
Terry has been the Chief Occupational Therapist at <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s<br />
<strong>Services</strong>, and is the OT Australia – SA representative for the Paediatric<br />
and Adolescent Action Group. Terry has worked in most regions of<br />
<strong>Novita</strong>, and is currently based in the Northern Regional Office.<br />
Paul Manson B Sp Thy<br />
Paul completed his Bachelor of Speech Therapy at the University of<br />
Queensland in 1983. He started his career working with children<br />
with a disability in 1984 at the Hartley St School for Physically<br />
Handicapped Children in Canberra. He moved from Canberra in<br />
1985, and joined <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong>. Paul has maintained<br />
his interest in communication for people with a disability ever<br />
since, and is interested in the ways we can improve the quality of<br />
life for children with disabilities. Naturally, this has focused on<br />
augmentative and alternative communication. Paul has performed<br />
different roles within the organisation, including within the Head<br />
Injury Program and Technology Access Service and 3 different<br />
Regional Offices. Paul is currently the Senior Speech Pathologist at<br />
<strong>Novita</strong>’s North Western Regional Office.<br />
Sonya Murchland B App Sc (Occupational Therapy), MH Sc (Occupational Therapy)<br />
Sonya gained her occupational therapy qualifications in 1982<br />
graduating from the South Australian Institute of Technology, and then<br />
in 1995 she gained her Masters in Health Science from the University<br />
of South Australia. She commenced working with children who have<br />
disabilities in 1982 at the Spastic Centres of South Australia, and has<br />
gone on to work in a variety of children’s health settings in Adelaide<br />
and in Scotland. Sonya commenced work at <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong><br />
in 1998, following a secondment from the Women’s and Children’s<br />
Hospital. Her interests include the development of hand function in<br />
children, measuring outcomes of therapy, models of service delivery and<br />
resource allocation. Sonya has a commitment to the provision of services<br />
to children in rural and remote areas. She has worked in most regions<br />
of Adelaide and is currently acting as Manager of Clinical <strong>Research</strong><br />
before returning to the position of Senior <strong>Research</strong> Occupational<br />
Therapist with a clinical load in one of the regions in early 2005.<br />
Toan Nguyen B Sc / B Eng (Biomed) (Hons), M Eng (<strong>Research</strong>) Candidate<br />
Toan graduated from Flinders University with a double degree in<br />
Biomedical Engineering, with Honours, in 2000. He is now completing<br />
his Master of Engineering (<strong>Research</strong>) thesis entitled, “Accessible Mobile<br />
Communication for People with Disabilities” at Flinders University,<br />
Adelaide. In 2003, Toan was employed as a <strong>Research</strong> Assistant at<br />
<strong>Novita</strong>Tech within the <strong>Research</strong> & Development Department to assist<br />
with a trial of “New Technological Options for people with physical<br />
disabilities, through the use of telecommunications equipment”. The<br />
objective of this research was to trial and evaluate new configurable<br />
“off-the-shelf” technological options that can improve the lifestyle,<br />
independence, security and social interaction of people with disabilities.<br />
At present, Toan is employed as a Rehabilitation Engineer to carry<br />
out further research into telecommunications options for people with<br />
disabilities, with a particular emphasis on mobile phone access for<br />
Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) device users.<br />
Kylie Opperman B App Sc (Speech Pathology)<br />
Kylie has been working as a Speech Pathologist in the area of<br />
paediatrics and disabilities for over 10 years. She has a particular<br />
interest in dysphagia in children, early communication development<br />
and the use of assistive and augmentative communication (AAC).<br />
Kylie has been a senior therapist since 1996, first as a Regional<br />
Senior Speech Pathologist, then Clinical Senior within specialist<br />
speech and language programmes, then in the area of dysphagia,<br />
before being appointed <strong>Research</strong> Senior in 2003.<br />
Dr Parimala Raghavendra B Sc, M Sc, PhD<br />
Dr Raghavendra has a PhD in speech pathology from Purdue<br />
University, USA. She has clinical, teaching and research experience<br />
in augmentative and alternative communication through her<br />
work in India, Singapore, USA, and Sweden. She has published in<br />
high quality journals and has over 60 national and international<br />
conference presentations. She has been a consultant editor for the<br />
Journal of Augmentative & Alternative Communication, since<br />
1990 and was the Vice-President without Portfolio, International<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (ISAAC),<br />
1995–1996. In 2002 she was on the selection panel for a statewide<br />
Therapy Service for people with a disability who have complex<br />
communication needs, Department of Human <strong>Services</strong>, Victoria.<br />
Currently, her work focuses on making research become an integral<br />
part of high quality services and on answering important clinical<br />
questions through research in paediatric disability.<br />
Dr Ray Russo MBBS FRACP FAFRM (RACP)<br />
Dr Russo is a Paediatric Rehabilitation Specialist working at the<br />
Women’s and Children’s Hospital, <strong>Novita</strong> Children <strong>Services</strong> and the<br />
Flinders Medical Centre. He is currently undertaking a PhD thesis in<br />
the area of upper limb function in children with spastic hemiplegia.<br />
His clinical work includes the rehabilitation care of children with<br />
chronic physical disabilities, and cognitive impairments associated<br />
with these conditions and in children with acquired brain injury.<br />
He is actively involved in the teaching programs for both adult<br />
rehabilitation physician and paediatric physician trainees and is<br />
an examiner in Paediatric Rehabilitation for the Australasian<br />
Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine. He is currently the Chairman<br />
of the SA Branch of the Australasian Faculty of Rehabilitation<br />
Medicine representing the local interests of both adult and<br />
paediatric rehabilitation at a state level.<br />
research investigating the use of mainstream laptop computers as<br />
communication devices and has investigated alternative controls<br />
for powered mobility. Most recently he has been working with the<br />
Mobility & Seating Department and has also developed an interest<br />
and involvement in wheelchair mounting systems for communication<br />
devices and alternative powered mobility controls. Ben’s other role at<br />
<strong>Novita</strong>Tech is in the Engineering Department (an independent N.A.T.A.<br />
Accredited mechanical testing facility) where he tests a range of<br />
rehabilitation engineering equipment.<br />
Alex Svistounov ME (Mech), MIE Aust<br />
Alex Svistounov graduated from the Bauman Moscow State Technical<br />
University in 1994 as an Electromechanical Engineer with specialisation<br />
in mechanical systems of underwater robotic complexes. After<br />
graduation he worked as a senior mechanical design engineer in one<br />
of the departments of the Russian Federal Marine <strong>Research</strong> and Project<br />
Centre. Alex migrated to Australia in 2000 and joined the <strong>Novita</strong>Tech<br />
team in 2002 as a senior testing engineer. Alex is currently undertaking<br />
his Masters studies by research with the Adelaide University. He is<br />
interested in advanced design, innovation, failure prediction and<br />
technical problem solving techniques and in the effects of legislation on<br />
innovation. Alex is a corresponding member of Engineers Australia’s<br />
National Committee on Rehabilitation Engineering and a member the<br />
ME67 Committee of Standards Australia.<br />
Dr Barry Seeger BE (Mech), PhD, FIE Aust, AM<br />
Dr Barry Seeger was Director of Rehabilitation Engineering for<br />
the Crippled Children’s Association of SA (now <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s<br />
<strong>Services</strong>) for 25 years until his retirement in 2002. He has a degree<br />
in Mechanical Engineering and a PhD in Biomedical Engineering<br />
from the University of NSW. He has obtained over 40 research grants<br />
and authored over 80 papers in scientific journals. He has been chair<br />
of Standards Australia’s Committees on wheelchairs, and access<br />
for children and adolescents with disabilities, and a member of<br />
international standards committees on wheelchairs. He is a Fellow of<br />
the Institution of Engineers, Australia. He is an advocate of Universal<br />
Design, and to that end continues to be a Board Member of the<br />
Coalition for Adaptable Housing SA, and is the SA representative to<br />
the Australian Network for Universal Housing Design. In 2002 he was<br />
made a Member of the Order of Australia for his work for people with<br />
a disability in the area of rehabilitation engineering and received the<br />
Cerebral Palsy Medal from the Australian Cerebral Palsy Association.<br />
Annabelle Tilbrook BA, B App Sc (Occupational Therapy) (Hons)<br />
Annabelle Tilbrook graduated from the University of Queensland<br />
in 1987 with a Bachelor of Arts (Economics, Modern History and<br />
Psychology) and in 1991 with a Bachelor of Occupational Therapy<br />
with Honours. Before joining <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> in 1998, she<br />
worked as a senior therapist in a range of children’s therapy services<br />
in both Australia and in the UK (Hobart 1992–93, 1996–97, Brisbane<br />
1993, London, 1994 and Inverness, 1995–96). Her current focus in<br />
her role in the <strong>Novita</strong>Tech Support Team is to support children with<br />
physical disabilities to access and efficiently use assistive technology<br />
in their home, educational and community settings. She was involved<br />
in developing an accessible website for <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> and<br />
also in making recommendations for <strong>Novita</strong> regarding Australian<br />
Standards for equipment design and organisational requirements.<br />
Annabelle has presented workshops and papers on a range of topics<br />
at conferences both in Australia and the UK and has had a paper<br />
published in a professional journal.<br />
11<br />
Sandra Stewart B App Sc (Speech Pathology)<br />
Sandra graduated from the South Australian College of Advanced<br />
Education with a Bachelor of Applied Science (Speech Pathology) in<br />
1984. She has worked in the area of physical disability ever since.<br />
She worked initially for the Spastic Centres of South Australia and<br />
commenced at <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> in 1987. She also worked for<br />
a similar organisation in Canada in 1990. She completed training<br />
in the Neuro-development Treatment of Cerebral Palsy in 1993,<br />
being one of the few Speech Pathologists to do so. She has undertaken<br />
many roles including Augmentative Communication Specialist in<br />
Rehabilitation Engineering, member of the Technology Consultative<br />
Team (TeCT), Augmentative and Alternative Communication Clinical<br />
Senior Speech Pathologist, Regional Senior Speech Pathologist, Acting<br />
Quality Manager and is currently the <strong>Research</strong> Clinical Senior Speech<br />
Pathologist and maintains an active caseload. She has presented at<br />
international and national conferences and conducted numerous<br />
training forums nationally and locally.<br />
Ben Symonds B Sc / B Eng (Biomed) (Hons)<br />
Ben graduated from Flinders University with a double degree<br />
in Biomedical Engineering, with Honours, in 2002. During his<br />
studies Ben undertook two major projects, including his Honours<br />
project, focussing on the research and development of robotic<br />
systems. In March 2003 he began working at <strong>Novita</strong>Tech and is<br />
employed as a Rehabilitation Engineer, primarily in the <strong>Research</strong><br />
& Development Department. In this position Ben has undertaken<br />
Dr Lloyd Walker BE (Hons), PhD (Strath), MIEAust, CPEng, ATP<br />
Lloyd Walker completed his Mechanical Engineering degree at the<br />
University of Queensland with a rehabilitation-based honours project.<br />
He gained an international scholarship to study at the University<br />
of Strathclyde in the Bioengineering Unit and investigated the<br />
biomechanics of the foot and lower leg. On his return to Australia in<br />
1991, Lloyd established a rehabilitation engineering facility in North<br />
Queensland, taught at James Cook University and developed and<br />
coordinated the preparation of the world’s first multimedia-based<br />
postgraduate course in Assistive Technology. In 1998 he became the<br />
foundation deputy head of the Occupational Therapy program at<br />
James Cook University until he was appointed Director of Regency Park<br />
Rehabilitation Engineering in 2002.<br />
Lloyd has been a member of the National Committee on Rehabilitation<br />
Engineering since 1995 (chair from <strong>1999</strong>–2003), the National<br />
Technology Committee of ACROD (1996–2001), the Uniting Care<br />
Queensland Board (1996–2002), and the CONROD <strong>Research</strong> Advisory<br />
Group (1997–2001). He is currently Chair of the ME67 Committee of<br />
Standards Australia and is Australia’s nominee on the ISO TC173 SC1<br />
working group that covers wheelchair-related standards. As a person<br />
with a disability, Lloyd has a strong focus on worthwhile outcomes<br />
from the use of technology and this is a key focus of his research<br />
and presentations recently. He is also particularly interested in the<br />
application of accident investigation and prevention research to<br />
avoiding adverse outcomes in assistive technology delivery.<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
projects<br />
The following pages contain details of the projects undertaken over the past five years at <strong>Novita</strong> and <strong>Novita</strong>Tech.<br />
Early and external projects are listed below while detailed summaries are given for all other projects on subsequent pages.<br />
12<br />
<strong>1999</strong><br />
1a. Expectations and Early Experiences of Parents with The<br />
Crippled Children’s Association of SA Inc. – <strong>Report</strong> 1.<br />
Parimala Raghavendra, Julie Smith with Members of<br />
“Working Together” Working Party<br />
1b. Current Work Practices and Expectations of Therapists of<br />
The Crippled Children’s Association of SA Inc. – <strong>Report</strong> 2,<br />
Therapists’ Work Practices and Expectations. Parimala<br />
Raghavendra, Julie Smith with Members of “Working<br />
Together” Working Party<br />
2. Telephone interviews regarding name of the association:<br />
Feedback from parents of CCA, <strong>Report</strong> for CCA Board.<br />
Julie Smith & Parimala Raghavendra<br />
3. The Quality of life of children with disability in inclusive<br />
educational settings – Master’s project, Flinders University<br />
of South Australia<br />
2000<br />
1. Perception of Community Based and Family-Centred Practice<br />
for physiotherapists – Masters in Public Health, Flinders<br />
University of South Australia, Rachel Lichfield. Lichfield, R &<br />
MacDougall, C (2002). Professional issues for physiotherapists<br />
in family-centred and community-based settings. Australian<br />
Journal of Physiotherapy, 48: p. 105–112<br />
2. The Role of Social Support in Psychological Adjustment<br />
of Children with a Disabled Sibling. Kylie Barnes, Masters<br />
Student, Dept. of Psychology, Flinders University of<br />
South Australia<br />
3. What are the factors and how do they influence the decision to<br />
abandon day splints for three adolescents with cerebral palsy<br />
– Occupational Therapy Honours Project, University of<br />
South Australia. Biancha Gerlach<br />
2001<br />
1. Does an Intensive Fitness and Skills Training Program for<br />
Young Adolescents with Physical Disabilities Enhance their<br />
Independence with Mobility and A.D.L. Tasks – A parent<br />
initiated project, SWRO, CCA. Judith McPharlin, Jennifer<br />
Gutschi, Sue Gibson, Sonya Murchland<br />
2. Factors associated with the social development of children<br />
with disabilities at school. Kellie Bennett, PhD project,<br />
Curtin University<br />
3. What is a useful checklist for the prescription of a laptop<br />
based VOCA for children with a communication disorder<br />
– Third year Group project, School of Occupational<br />
Therapy, University of South Australia<br />
2002<br />
1. A retrospective case study of effectiveness of a<br />
child receiving multiple physiotherapy and medical<br />
interventions. Margarita Benias<br />
2. Technological Promise and Technology Abandonment:<br />
Understanding the Human Aspect of Technologies for<br />
people with disabilities. Dr Wendy Seymour, School of<br />
Social Work and Social Policy, University of South Australia<br />
2003<br />
1. Customer Valued Information Dissemination Strategy –<br />
A survey of consumers, professionals and carers/families<br />
regarding accessibility of telecommunication information.<br />
Dr Janet Owens, Deakin University/Communication Aid<br />
Users Society, Victoria<br />
2. Assessment of the monitoring of growth and nutrition<br />
in children with cerebral palsy accessing the Crippled<br />
Children’s Association. Karina Butcher, Dietician, CCA/WCH<br />
3. Audit of the assessment, management and treatment<br />
outcomes for spastic equinus ankle deformity in children<br />
with an inherited encephalopathy Dr Ray Russo,<br />
Dr David Baulderstone, Dr J Fletcher, Women’s and<br />
Children’s Hospital, Adelaide (ongoing)<br />
4. Botulinum Toxin and the neglected upper limb in children<br />
with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Dr Ray Russo, Prof.<br />
Maria Crotty, Flinders University of South Australia,<br />
Dr Eric Hahn, Dr Peter Flett, Women’s and Children’s<br />
Hospital, Sonya Murchland (ongoing)<br />
5. Cognitive Appraisal in Parents who have a young child<br />
with a physical disability. Melissa Zschorn, PhD project,<br />
Supervisor Assoc. Prof. Ros Shute, CCA supervisor<br />
Dr Tim Connell (ongoing)<br />
2004<br />
1. Duschenne Muscular Dystrophy Falls Project, CCA and<br />
Rocky Bay, WA<br />
2. Benchmarking seating prescription – Therapy Focus, WA<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Paediatric dysphagia and physical<br />
disability: the evidence base<br />
Kylie Opperman<br />
Senior <strong>Research</strong><br />
Speech Pathologist<br />
Jenny Faulks<br />
Senior Clinical Speech<br />
Pathologist<br />
Objective<br />
To summarise the current evidence base in relation to a range of challenging aspects of paediatric dysphagia<br />
assessment and management, including aspiration and nutritional status related issues, relevant to children with<br />
severe physical disabilities.<br />
Method<br />
The question “What characteristics are highly correlated with dysphagia and children with physical disabilities<br />
and, what management strategies contribute to the improvement of oral eating and drinking” was systematically<br />
searched. 38 articles were identified. Eight speech pathologists, with training in evidence based practice, read and<br />
critically reviewed the articles. Five articles were randomly chosen by an independent reviewer to re-critique them.<br />
Inter-judge reliability was satisfactory. Reviewers were asked to rank the relevance of the articles to the EBP question.<br />
Results<br />
It is difficult to generalise the results to clinical practice without additional evidence from other studies. Particularly<br />
pertinent points highlighted in the articles are as follows:<br />
• Aspiration is common among this population before, during and after swallowing;<br />
• Aspiration was significantly associated with specific food textures; and<br />
• Malnutrition and growth failure were common in the children with quadriplegic cerebral palsy.<br />
Management strategies highly correlated to dysphagia include nutritional supplements, enteral feeding, small and<br />
frequent kilojoule dense meals, oral motor treatment, kilojoule dense food/ fluid, positioning, texture modifications,<br />
rate of presentation.<br />
Implications<br />
Information has been disseminated to staff through training and development days. Guidelines have been<br />
developed regarding dysphagia assessment and management. Information has been disseminated to clients and<br />
their families. Management of dysphagia requires a multi-disciplinary approach. A research grant has successfully<br />
been obtained to further investigate the area.<br />
Project completed in 2004<br />
13<br />
Pilot study into the use of Botulinum-A Toxin in the management of spasticity<br />
in the upper limb of children who have spasticity of central origin<br />
Ray Russo 1<br />
Paediatric<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
Specialist<br />
Sonya Murchland<br />
Senior <strong>Research</strong><br />
Occupational Therapist<br />
Peter Flett 1<br />
Paediatric<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
Specialist<br />
Myriam Sandelance<br />
Senior Clinical<br />
Occupational Therapist<br />
Philip Brook 1<br />
Orthopaedic Surgeon<br />
1<br />
Women’s &<br />
Children’s Hospital<br />
Objective<br />
To examine the effects of injecting Botulinum-A toxin into the upper limb of children with spasticity of central origin,<br />
and monitor the responsiveness of a number of outcome measures to reflect change in hand skills and functional<br />
ability of the children.<br />
Method<br />
This pilot study was an open label study, where 14 children of ages from 2 – 17 years were injected with Botulinum-<br />
A toxin into their upper limb, and their progress was monitored at baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 6 months post injection.<br />
Injection of the toxin occurred under a general anaesthesia using muscle stimulation to locate site of injection.<br />
Assessments used varied dependant on the age of the child and included the Quality of Upper Extremity Skill<br />
Test, Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS), School Assessment of Motor and Process Skills, Canadian<br />
Occupational Performance Measure, Goal Attainment Scaling, Range of Motion, Modified Ashworth Scale, and<br />
classifications of hand posture and function.<br />
Results<br />
The final results are still being analysed. 10 children completed the follow-up assessments. All showed positive<br />
gains in function as measured on the GAS, and COPM. The AMPS appeared to be responsive to functional<br />
changes in the older participants.<br />
Implications<br />
Following the initial positive results that were attained, a larger randomised control study has been proposed, with<br />
the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills and the Goal Attainment Scale being the major outcome measures.<br />
Project ongoing<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Serial casting after Botulinum Toxin:<br />
A retrospective study of outcomes for dynamic equinus<br />
Susan Bostock<br />
Senior Clinical<br />
Physiotherapist<br />
Objective<br />
A preliminary retrospective study was undertaken at <strong>Novita</strong> to (i) review the use of outcome measures currently<br />
in use at <strong>Novita</strong>, and (ii) review <strong>Novita</strong>’s current practice of serial casting post Botulinum Toxin Type A (BoNT-A).<br />
This study was initiated in response to the increasing costs of casting materials and budgetary demands, and the<br />
perceived notion that, for optimal results, serial casting routinely follows BoNT-A injections for children with cerebral<br />
palsy who present with dynamic equinus.<br />
Method<br />
A retrospective review of case notes of 29 children who had received BoNT- A injections between May 1998 and<br />
May 2002 was undertaken. The data collected included passive range of movement (R2), dynamic range of<br />
movement (Modified Tardieu: R1), descriptions of gait and goals set. There was adequate data for only 24 children<br />
with cerebral palsy: 12 children with diplegia (D), 10 with hemiplegia (H) and 2 with triplegia (T). BoNT-A had been<br />
injected into gastrocnemius only in 24 legs, and to both gastrocnemius and hamstrings in 26 legs (total 50 legs).<br />
BoNT-A injections were followed by serial casting to the gastrocnemius muscle in 41 legs.<br />
Results<br />
R1 scores, PROM and casting protocols were available for 27 legs (D=20, H=5, T=2). For this group, Tardieu<br />
scores improved significantly (Wilcoxon Signed Rank test, z = -4.39, p< .01) from a median value of R1 = -15º<br />
(Range: -45º to 0º) before casting to R1 = 0º (Range: -25º to 25º) after casting. PROM improved in all subjects;<br />
from a median of 5 degrees (Range: -15º to 20º) to 20º (5º to 30º) (Wilcoxon, z = -4.5, p< .01). Overall, there<br />
were no significant differences in clinical and functional outcomes for children with diplegia or hemiplegia who<br />
underwent individualised spasticity management. Eighty three percent of children with diplegia who had BoNT-A<br />
to gastrocnemius alone, and 85% of those with BoNT-A to both hamstrings and gastrocnemius, underwent serial<br />
casting post BoNT-A. Seventy five percent of children with hemiplegia who had BoNT-A to gastrocnemius alone<br />
also had serial casting. There was a significant difference in dynamic (R1) and passive (R2) dorsiflexion pre serial<br />
casting and post serial casting for those children requiring serial casting post BoNT-A.<br />
14<br />
Implications<br />
The retrospective study will be useful in helping to formulate a prospective study as this study had several inherent<br />
limitations. The most significant finding was the lack of uniform data collection. Some measures were taken for<br />
some children, while other measures were used for other children. This made it difficult to compare measures,<br />
such as the Observational Gait Scale, as not all children routinely had video data taken. A controlled prospective<br />
study, with larger numbers of participants who have complete data sets, may provide further information on the<br />
effects of serial casting after BoNT-A injections.<br />
Project completed in 2003<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Can typically developing preschool children<br />
learn the meaning of graphic symbols through play<br />
Paul Manson<br />
Regional Senior<br />
Speech Pathologist<br />
Angela Guidera<br />
Senior Speech<br />
Pathologist, <strong>Novita</strong>Tech<br />
Support Team<br />
Sandra Stewart<br />
Senior <strong>Research</strong><br />
Speech Pathologist<br />
Kylie Opperman<br />
Senior <strong>Research</strong><br />
Speech Pathologist<br />
Parimala<br />
Raghavendra<br />
Manager ,<br />
Clinical <strong>Research</strong><br />
Objective<br />
To investigate whether typically developing preschool children can learn the meaning of graphic symbols without<br />
structured teaching. Children with complex communication needs (CCN) are increasingly being integrated into<br />
regular educational settings. Communication intervention with children who have CCN often involves the use of<br />
graphic symbols. If peers are not familiar with a child’s communication method, communication breakdowns are<br />
likely to occur.<br />
Method<br />
Participants were typically developing preschool children aged between 4 years, 3 months and 5 years old. In the<br />
pre-test the participants were asked to label 16 symbols. During intervention they were left to play with a speechgenerating<br />
device that had an overlay comprised of the 16 symbols. Each time they pressed a symbol a label was<br />
spoken. In the post-test the same procedure as the pre-test was used. 18 children completed the three phases of<br />
pre-test, intervention and post-test. 12 children completed a retention test 3 weeks after the post-test.<br />
Results<br />
The mean number of symbols correctly recognised at pre-test was 3.4 and this increased to 7.9 symbols at<br />
post-test. There was more gain from pre- to post-test for symbols pressed more frequently (4 words with most key<br />
presses – average gain was 7.12) and less gain for those pressed less frequently (4 words with least key presses<br />
gained 1.75).<br />
Implications<br />
The study shows that typically developing children can learn to recognise symbols through play. The findings<br />
have implications for the way opportunities can be provided for peers to become familiar with aspects of a<br />
child’s communication system. Peers could benefit from a combination of structured teaching and unstructured<br />
opportunities. More structured teaching may need to focus particularly on symbols that are less transparent.<br />
Project completed in 2000<br />
15<br />
Early Intervention: when is it too late<br />
A case study of a 6 year old boy with mild cerebral palsy<br />
Sue Durand 1<br />
Regional Senior<br />
Physiotherapist<br />
Sonya Murchland<br />
Senior <strong>Research</strong><br />
Occupational Therapist<br />
1<br />
Currently employed<br />
in private practice<br />
Objective<br />
Although Early intervention may refer to services for children aged 0 – 8 years it is generally considered to be for<br />
children in the 0 – 6 year age group prior to school entry. This case study reports on the outcomes of a consultative<br />
therapy programme for a 6 year old boy with mild cerebral palsy who lived in rural South Australia.<br />
Method<br />
Following parent consent, the participant was assessed by an occupational therapist and physiotherapist with<br />
the Peabody Motor Scales (PMS) to determine his current motor abilities. A home and school programme was<br />
provided by the therapists based on the results of the initial assessment, with activities that could be included in<br />
daily activities. Progress was re-assessed at 6 months using the PMS and the programme was updated to reflect<br />
changes in abilities and new priorities for development. The participant was then reassessed at 12 months.<br />
Results<br />
On initial assessment at age 6 years 10 months his gross motor performance scored an age equivalent of 25<br />
months, and fine motor age equivalent was 35 months, with gains over the year of approximately 18 months in<br />
all motor areas. Gross motor gains preceded fine motor development.<br />
Implications<br />
A consultative therapy approach was appropriate in providing the input to the participant suggesting that early<br />
intervention in the form of a targeted therapy programme, was not too late for this child over 6. He received his<br />
input within his regular environments, and with the co-operation of his family and carers. It is recognised that the<br />
motivation of these people to work with the participant in a positive manner that recognised his individuality, would<br />
have contributed to the success of this intervention.<br />
Project completed in 2002<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Evidence based practice review of occupational therapy interventions<br />
to assist pre-school children with physical disabilities to become spontaneous<br />
and independent players, and guidelines for clinical practice<br />
Sonya Murchland<br />
Senior <strong>Research</strong><br />
Occupational Therapist<br />
Occupational<br />
Therapy Staff<br />
Objective<br />
The emergence of occupational science over the past ten years within occupational therapy, has seen an<br />
emphasis being placed on play as an occupational behaviour and role of children, rather than a means to achieve<br />
other therapy goals. This review reflected this change in emphasis, and aimed to determine the interventions that<br />
occupational therapists use to promote the ability of children to be spontaneous and independent players.<br />
Method<br />
A systematic review was undertaken using Medline and CINAHL, with additional hand searching of the reference<br />
lists. Staff also forwarded any existing articles that they had located. Staff were then allocated two articles to<br />
appraise, following training in a consistent method of appraisal. A modified version of Crombie’s Appraisal Tool<br />
(adapted by the Clinical <strong>Research</strong> Department, <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong>), was used with the initial appraisals,<br />
and then the McMaster Clinical Appraisal Forms were used later. All studies and papers were included. The review<br />
period was limited to an 18 month period.<br />
Results<br />
Of the 60 articles distributed, only 39 were returned (65%). 26 were review articles. Of the remaining 13 studies, four<br />
were cross-sectional, three were case control studies, and the others were a cohort study, a quasi-experimental,<br />
and a qualitative study. There was a great variability in the quality of the papers, reflecting in appraisal scores that<br />
varied widely. Most of the studies were a low level of scientific exploration, and those of higher level only received<br />
moderate appraisal ratings.<br />
16<br />
Implications<br />
This was the first EBP review undertaken by the occupational therapy discipline and as such, was a learning<br />
process for all those involved.<br />
Critical appraisal of the literature found that the evidence for occupational interventions to promote play was<br />
inconclusive. Key themes for promoting play in children with physical disabilities were identified and guidelines<br />
for practice developed.<br />
Project completed in 2003<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Handwriting of children who have hemiplegia: a profile of abilities<br />
in children aged 8 – 13 years from a parent and teacher survey<br />
Louise DuBois<br />
Regional Senior<br />
Occupational Therapist<br />
Anna Klemm<br />
Regional Senior<br />
Occupational Therapist<br />
Sonya Murchland<br />
<strong>Research</strong> Senior<br />
Occupational Therapist<br />
Ann Ozols<br />
Regional Senior<br />
Occupational Therapist<br />
Objective<br />
Handwriting is a major occupational task for children attending mainstream schools in Australia, and children<br />
who have cerebral palsy (CP) with hemiplegia are expected to learn to write along side their peers. It had been<br />
the experience of occupational therapists at <strong>Novita</strong> that these children were often referred to their services due<br />
to difficulties with handwriting. However there was limited information on the specific nature of the handwriting<br />
difficulties in children with CP to guide therapists’ interventions. This study aimed to identify the prevalence of<br />
handwriting difficulties in a sample of school-aged children with hemiplegia, and gain an indication of the extent<br />
and nature of these difficulties.<br />
Method<br />
A descriptive, explorative study was undertaken using a survey design. Questionnaires were mailed firstly to<br />
parents and then to teachers with parent permission gained. The questionnaires were adapted from one designed<br />
by Duff and Goyeen, and used a 7 point ordinal scale to rate the child’s abilities related to speed, neatness, ability<br />
to copy and complete handwriting tasks. A convenience sample of 42 clients of <strong>Novita</strong> were identified as meeting<br />
the selection criteria of registration with the organisation, having a diagnosis of hemiplegia (congenital or acquired),<br />
aged 8 – 13 years, and attending mainstream school.<br />
Results<br />
31 of the 42 parents returned the questionnaires giving a 77.5% response rate, and 26 of the 30 teachers returned<br />
theirs giving a 86.7% response rate.<br />
The majority of children were indicated to have difficulties with one or more areas of handwriting (Parents report<br />
75%, teachers report 69%). Difficulties were reported in all areas of functional handwriting, speed, neatness, and to<br />
a lesser extent, organisation of written work. Children with epilepsy, speech and language difficulties, and/or visual<br />
problems experienced more difficulties than those with no other coexisting conditions. Boys and children with right<br />
hemiplegia were also reported to have more difficulties with handwriting. The impact of fatigue on performance<br />
was suggested in responses to a child’s ability to perform consistently over long periods of time. The prevalence<br />
of handwriting difficulties was not consistent with spelling and reading difficulties as reported by parents and<br />
teachers.<br />
Implications<br />
This study showed a high prevalence of handwriting difficulties in children with hemiplegia. Further investigation<br />
is recommended to gain a more detailed understanding of the nature of abilities and specific areas of difficulty<br />
experienced, in this population of children.<br />
17<br />
Project completed in 2002<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
‘If you wanted to know about it just ask!’<br />
Exploring disabled young people’s experiences of health and health care<br />
Gillian Bricher 1<br />
Doctoral Candidate<br />
Supervisors<br />
Philip Darbyshire 1<br />
Chair of Nursing<br />
Peter Flett 2<br />
Director<br />
1<br />
School of Health Sciences<br />
– Nursing and Midwifery,<br />
University of South Australia<br />
2<br />
Dept of Rehabilitation<br />
and Child Development,<br />
Women’s and Children’s<br />
Hospital<br />
Objective<br />
This project undertook a qualitative study into the health and health care experiences of disabled children and<br />
young people, using a flexible and participatory approach to challenge the traditional relations of research<br />
production. This reflected new paradigms in childhood research and the social model of disability. This study<br />
aimed to give a voice to disabled children and young people, and to gain an understanding of their experiences,<br />
perceptions and feelings.<br />
Method<br />
Twenty young people aged 9 –18 years met with the researcher up to four times, with the choice after the initial<br />
meeting of an individual or group meetings. All had a physical disability, some also had communication or learning<br />
difficulties. Conversations with the young people covered a range of topics that included hospitals, appointments,<br />
splints, therapy, and what it is like to have a carer.<br />
Results<br />
The young people showed recognition of factors that contributed to their health and sense of well being. They<br />
spoke of experiences of empowerment and powerlessness within a triad of the parent: professional: young person.<br />
Concern was expressed that many treatments were an experiment and that outcomes were hard to balance with<br />
the pain and inconvenience. Common talk was about living in a world that considers them as different, and the<br />
effect that this has with little opportunity for contact with disabled adults or peers. School issues raised concerns<br />
such as equity in access, being different, having to prove oneself, limited school sport involvement and issues of<br />
friendship and teasing.<br />
18<br />
Implications<br />
This study raises a number of issues for the provision of services to children in a client centred service, where both<br />
the child and parent need to be considered as clients. How therapists communicate with children to make their<br />
interventions understood, and outcomes realistic for the child, needs to occur in a manner that is meaningful and<br />
understood by the child. How a child determines success may be different to that of the professional, and there<br />
is a need for the “success” of interventions to be discussed and set before undertaking the procedure. There is a<br />
need to link children with other children with disabilities for peer contact, and adults with disabilities for role models.<br />
Social isolation was a factor for young people who were the only one with a disability at their school.<br />
Project completed in 2002<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Now I can eat too: The impact of an intensive community based<br />
feeding program on a four year old with severe feeding difficulties<br />
Merrin Ising<br />
Regional Senior<br />
Speech Pathologist<br />
Melissa Zschorn 1<br />
B Sc (Hons)<br />
Psychologist<br />
Karen Sowton<br />
Speech Pathology<br />
Assistant<br />
Julie Grayston<br />
Psychology Assistant<br />
Marcelle Pappas 2<br />
Dietitian<br />
1<br />
currently a doctoral<br />
student, not on staff<br />
2<br />
Women’s and<br />
Children’s Hospital<br />
Objective<br />
A case study to describe the outcome of a community-based intensive feeding program for a four-year old child<br />
with Moebius Syndrome. This condition is characterised by muscle weakness that affects the face and some throat<br />
muscles that may impact on swallowing strength and coordination. The child had a history of gastro-esophageal<br />
reflux disease and poor oral intake. At the commencement of the study the child’s nutritional requirements were<br />
met primarily via nasogastric feeds with very limited oral intake.<br />
Method<br />
A reward-based, intensive feeding program, was implemented by a multi-disciplinary team over a 20-week period.<br />
During this period the speech pathology assistant provided one to one input and modelling at home, up to five<br />
days a week, for lunch and dinner.<br />
Results<br />
At the completion of the program the child was no longer receiving enteral feeding and was obtaining her energy<br />
and nutritional requirements orally, mostly via supplementary drinks and vitamin and mineral supplements.<br />
Improvements were noted in oro-motor function and swallowing of various food consistencies. Parents reported a<br />
reduction in their stress levels.<br />
Implications<br />
Home-based intensive feeding programs can be effective and behavioural approaches are appropriate for some<br />
feeding difficulties. However, the programs are highly resource intensive. In this situation a considerable amount of<br />
additional time was dedicated to documentation and professional consultation. In spite of this, the intensive home<br />
based program may be considered cost effective due to its success, generalisability and maintenance compared<br />
to the previous treatment provided or alternative options. The authors attribute the success of this program to the<br />
multi-disciplinary team approach.<br />
Project completed in 2001<br />
Participation of Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC)<br />
users in school settings: research evidence<br />
19<br />
Angela Guidera<br />
Senior Speech<br />
Pathologist<br />
<strong>Novita</strong>Tech<br />
Support Team<br />
Parimala<br />
Raghavendra<br />
Manager,<br />
Clinical <strong>Research</strong><br />
Cathy Olsson<br />
Chief Speech<br />
Pathologist<br />
Objective<br />
One key area for many Speech Pathologists working in the disability field is the provision of services for users<br />
of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) in school settings. A project investigating the research<br />
evidence relating to the participation of these students at school was conducted.<br />
Method<br />
The project was implemented by a group of Speech Pathologists. It involved collaboration between <strong>Novita</strong><br />
Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Speech Pathology Department and Clinical <strong>Research</strong> Department. <strong>Research</strong> articles relating<br />
to factors influencing AAC users’ participation at school were gathered. Each article was critically appraised by<br />
at least one Speech Pathologist using critical appraisal forms developed by the Clinical <strong>Research</strong> Department.<br />
The Manager of the Clinical <strong>Research</strong> Department completed reliability checking of the critical appraisals. The<br />
results of the appraisals were collated and synthesised and the implications identified. The appraisal results were<br />
converted to percentages. The strength of the evidence for each factor identified was determined based on the<br />
number of papers which achieved scores of 75% or higher.<br />
Results<br />
Forty-one articles were appraised in total. They included review papers, surveys, case studies, group and single<br />
subject experimental designs and qualitative studies. The findings indicated that a range of factors influenced AAC<br />
users’ participation in school settings. There was strong evidence to show that AAC users’ participation is affected<br />
by training of adult communication partners (e.g. teachers). The evidence was moderate with respect to the<br />
influences of communication partner attitudes, peer training and instruction of the AAC user. Limited evidence was<br />
found for communication partner behaviours.<br />
Implications<br />
This project demonstrates that the research evidence indicates that AAC users’ participation in school settings<br />
is influenced by a range of factors. <strong>Novita</strong> plans to use this evidence in the development of resources, training<br />
packages and clinical guidelines for AAC intervention with students in school settings.<br />
Project completed in 2002<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Reading and phonological awareness in children with complex communication needs:<br />
literacy outcomes of internet-based assessment and intervention<br />
Joanne Leane 1<br />
Honours Student<br />
Supervisors<br />
Parimala<br />
Raghavendra<br />
Manager,<br />
Clinical <strong>Research</strong><br />
and Adjunct Lecturer 1<br />
Ingrid Scholten 1<br />
Senior Lecturer<br />
1<br />
Department of Speech<br />
Pathology and Audiology,<br />
Flinders University of SA<br />
Objective<br />
A high proportion of people who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) have poor literacy skills.<br />
The aim of the study was:<br />
1) To use Assessment of Phonological Awareness and Reading (APAR) 1 to investigate each participant’s strength<br />
and weaknesses in phonological awareness and word reading skills;<br />
2) To compare results from APAR with two other standardised assessments in order to investigate the accuracy of<br />
results gained from the APAR; and<br />
3) To observe improvements in the participants’ abilities to read single words by way of word analysis using<br />
Accessible Word Reading Intervention (AWRI) 2 .<br />
Method<br />
APAR assesses three areas: reading, phonological awareness and listening comprehension and can be<br />
administered via computer, or, as was the case in this project, printed and presented in hard copy. AWRI also has<br />
three areas of focus: compound words, onset and rime, and word endings that are downloaded and presented on<br />
computer. In this project, only the onset-rime component was used.<br />
A single subject experimental design utilising a multiple baseline across three participants (age: 11, 14 and 15 years)<br />
was employed in this project. Each participant had cerebral palsy, complex communication needs and used a<br />
Pathfinder TM or Liberator TM communication device. Assessment and intervention sessions were conducted intensively<br />
over a 2 month period. The children were assessed with the APAR in daily sessions before commencing intervention<br />
with AWRI. Passive tasks were used to facilitate recognition of onset and rime in monosyllabic words. Active tasks<br />
were used to promote participants’ skills in selection of an appropriate onset or rime to complete monosyllabic<br />
words and picture to word matching. All three participants accessed AWRI via a switch-adapted mouse.<br />
Once each participant had responded correctly to 90% of the trained probes or had completed fifteen sessions<br />
with the AWRI, intervention ceased. Finally, APAR was re-administered.<br />
20<br />
Results<br />
Improvements were evident in word reading tasks of APAR’s reading section in all 3 participants. Analysis of results<br />
indicated that AWRI was highly effective in promoting word-reading skills for one participant, fairly effective for the<br />
second and of very little effect for the third.<br />
Implications<br />
Further research is required to evaluate the effectiveness of AWRI and further explore the reliability and validity of APAR.<br />
These preliminary results show that APAR and AWRI can be used with people with complex communication needs.<br />
1,2<br />
Iacono, T. & Cupples (n.d.) APAR & AWRI, www.med.monash.edu.au/access<br />
Project completed in 2002<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
School vocabulary in typically developing 6 year old Australian children<br />
Emma Grace 1<br />
Honours Student,<br />
currently working at<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s<br />
<strong>Services</strong><br />
Supervisors<br />
Parimala<br />
Raghavendra<br />
Manager,<br />
Clinical <strong>Research</strong><br />
and Adjunct Lecturer 1<br />
Ingrid Scholten 1<br />
Senior Lecturer<br />
1<br />
Department of Speech<br />
Pathology and Audiology,<br />
Flinders University of SA<br />
Objective<br />
Children who use Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) systems are increasingly participating in<br />
integrated settings. Access to individualized and functional vocabulary in different environments such as school,<br />
home and community, has long been recognized as an important and critical feature of an effective AAC system.<br />
One strategy that has been used is to observe typically developing individuals and record common vocabulary<br />
patterns.<br />
Method<br />
Fifteen typically developing children from six different schools participated. The children were all aged between<br />
6 – 7 years. The children’s speech was recorded using a small voice activated tape recorder and microphone<br />
that was fitted to them in a bag on their waist. Each child was recorded throughout one to two school days until<br />
two hours of continuous speech was collected. All of the words that the children said were transcribed onto the<br />
computer and the information was analysed using custom designed word counter software.<br />
Results<br />
Eighty four percent of the total 76,963 words analysed consisted of 500 most frequently occurring words.<br />
Participants in this study engaged in language play behaviours including rhyming slang, making up words and<br />
singing. These types of communication represented a significant proportion of the total communication (13%<br />
of total utterances). 25 topics were identified in the data. The most common topics in the data collected were<br />
academic language (e.g. counting/ spelling), current events (e.g. book week, royal show, footy finals) and<br />
judgements about behaviour or grooming. Lists of the most common words (i.e. words that were used by several<br />
of the children) and frequent words (i.e. words that occurred several times) were collated to inform vocabulary<br />
selection decisions for children who use AAC at school. Structure words (words used to connect other words) were<br />
listed separately from content words (words that provide meaning and give the communication a topic).<br />
Implications<br />
The study provided a valuable database of communication samples for six-year-old Australians in the school<br />
environment. This information can be used to develop vocabulary for children who use Augmentative and<br />
Alternative Communication at school.<br />
The flexibility to provide rhyming words, colloquial expressions, self talk, singing and non-words should be<br />
considered in the design of AAC systems for children as they provide important opportunities for literacy<br />
development and for engaging in socially appropriate and colloquial uses of language, enabling children to<br />
identify with their peers.<br />
21<br />
Child wearing a tape recorder.<br />
Project completed in 2002<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Systematic review of strategies used by therapists to work effectively<br />
with teachers and aides to implement programs which address client goals<br />
22<br />
Karen Grimmer 1<br />
Director<br />
Debashish Das 1<br />
Project Officer<br />
Saravana Kumar 1<br />
Project Officer<br />
<strong>Novita</strong><br />
Reference Group<br />
Bronwyn Timko<br />
Regional Senior<br />
Speech Pathologist<br />
Terry Lyons<br />
Chief Occupational<br />
Therapist<br />
Catherine Olsson<br />
Chief Speech<br />
Pathologist<br />
Parimala<br />
Raghavendra<br />
Manager,<br />
Clinical <strong>Research</strong><br />
Judy Sprod<br />
Chief Physiotherapist<br />
1<br />
Centre for<br />
Allied Health Evidence<br />
Objective<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> therapy staff work in kindergartens and schools with educational staff to achieve client goals, and enhance<br />
participation of children into their class environments. It has been recognised that therapists often struggle with<br />
how to effectively achieve client and family goals when the main intervention input is via support staff from other<br />
organisations. As there are no standard approaches or best practice guidelines, this study aimed to undertake a<br />
systematic review to identify evidence for strategies in use or different collaborative approaches.<br />
Method<br />
The Centre for Allied Health Evidence (CAHE) was contracted to undertake a systematic review that considered<br />
the evidence for effective training methods for therapists and education staff to work together with the purpose of<br />
supporting children with disabilities in the classroom. The <strong>Novita</strong> Reference group has been working with CAHE<br />
staff in refining the question, identifying the key databases and providing regular input into the appropriateness of<br />
the information retrieved.<br />
The parameters of the study were:<br />
• Population – Education staff (teachers/assistants/aides/para-professional);<br />
• Intervention – Strategies/methods that therapists (occupational therapists, physiotherapists, speech<br />
pathologists, psychologists) use in training and working with education staff (modelling, written information,<br />
verbal feedback, etc.);<br />
• Comparison – Effectiveness of two different strategies; and<br />
• Outcome – Before and after measures indicating positive change, maintenance of change in behaviour,<br />
attitude, etc.<br />
Results<br />
A synthesised report will be provided at the conclusion of the study.<br />
Implications<br />
The review may provide evidence to strategies already being used or may suggest different approaches in<br />
collaborating with education staff.<br />
Project commenced in 2004<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Unravelling handwriting: an investigation into the factors that influence<br />
handwriting ability in primary school aged children with hemiplegia<br />
Sonya Murchland<br />
Senior <strong>Research</strong><br />
Occupational Therapist<br />
Jocelyn Kernot<br />
<strong>Research</strong> Assistant<br />
Occupational Therapist<br />
Parimala<br />
Raghavendra<br />
Manager,<br />
Clinical <strong>Research</strong><br />
Funding<br />
Channel 7 Children’s<br />
<strong>Research</strong> Foundation<br />
$16 500<br />
Objective<br />
This study aimed to investigate the relationships between handwriting ability (speed and legibility), hand function,<br />
posture, and visual perceptual skills in children aged 8 – 13 years who have cerebral palsy with hemiplegia.<br />
Method<br />
A descriptive study was undertaken that examined the school performance, handwriting speed, legibility, hand<br />
function and visual perceptual skills. Children identified as having cerebral palsy with hemiplegia, aged between<br />
8 – 13 years, attending a mainstream class in metropolitan Adelaide and registered with <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong><br />
were selected as potential participants. Each child was assessed over two withdrawal sessions, and then they<br />
were observed during school completing handwriting activities. The following assessments were given:<br />
• Handwriting: Handwriting Speed Test, Evaluation Tool of Children’s Handwriting, Extended Handwriting Task;<br />
• School Performance: School AMPS;<br />
• Hand Function: Grip and pinch Strength, Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Hand Function, Bruininks-<br />
Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency Subtest 8 Upper Limb Speed and Dexterity, VMI Motor Co-ordination<br />
Subtest, Observations of grasp and movement;<br />
• Visual Perception: Beery Test of Visual Motor Integration (VMI) 4th Edition, VMI Visual Perception Subtest; and<br />
• Posture: Observations of sitting posture and movement control.<br />
Results<br />
24 Children participated in the study, with 21 consenting to be observed within their class environment. Over<br />
half (54%) had mild involvement in their hemiplegic hand. Handwriting difficulties with speed, legibility or school<br />
performance were identified in 17 of the 24 children (71%). Difficulties in motor control (posture, arm movement<br />
across the page, visual motor control) were identified as having an impact on handwriting legibility and speed.<br />
Visual perceptual difficulties were not more prevalent in this population. However, if these were compromised,<br />
the child did have impaired handwriting abilities. The severity of the hemiplegia had no correlation with functional<br />
abilities in the schoolroom as measured on the School AMPS.<br />
Implications<br />
Children with hemiplegia are working less efficiently than their peers in mainstream classes. They often have<br />
impairments of motor control that are influencing their ability to maintain stable sitting postures, complete smooth<br />
arm movements, work at speed, and have refined visual-motor control. A smaller percentage also had visual<br />
perceptual difficulties. Future studies will focus on the impact of interventions to improve motor functioning on<br />
handwriting ability.<br />
23<br />
Project completed in 2004<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Clinical pathway for voice output communication aid recommendation<br />
and training for adults with disabilities<br />
Parimala<br />
Raghavendra<br />
Manager,<br />
Clinical <strong>Research</strong><br />
Roslyn Ferris<br />
Senior Speech<br />
Pathologist<br />
Adriana Rapagna 1<br />
Speech Pathologist<br />
Michael Bebb 1<br />
Speech Pathologist<br />
Michelle Hardy 1<br />
Speech Pathology<br />
Assistant<br />
Fiona McDonald 1, 2<br />
Quality Assurance<br />
1<br />
Communication and<br />
Therapy <strong>Services</strong>, now part<br />
of Adult Therapy <strong>Services</strong><br />
at the Independent Living<br />
Centre<br />
2<br />
Currently Quality<br />
Coordinator, Ashford<br />
Hospital<br />
Objective<br />
Clinical pathway is a plan of care, that reflects best clinical practice and the expressed needs of customers.<br />
Because an enormous amount of time, effort, money and on-going support is needed in voice output<br />
communication aid (VOCA) prescription and use, it was decided to streamline the process and develop a pathway<br />
for consumers and external agencies involved in the process to ensure maximum efficiency and effectiveness.<br />
Method<br />
Information for the pathway was collected from adults with severe physical/multiple disabilities (consumers<br />
of Communication and Therapy <strong>Services</strong>- CTS), their families, support workers, CTS staff, staff of Assistive<br />
Technology unit of Regency Park Rehabilitation Engineering and an Options Co-ordinator (community case<br />
manager) through questionnaires, interviews, and focus groups. The central theme that was addressed was the<br />
current practices and expectations of VOCA prescription, training, support, use and follow-up. Two consumers of<br />
CTS who use VOCA and access workers from various accommodation and day activity centres were invited to be<br />
part of the project steering committee. Information from the above methods was used to develop a pathway at a<br />
macro level, which presented the various steps in the process of device prescription and training.<br />
Results<br />
A booklet containing simple text, pictures, Picture Communication Symbols, (Johnson, 1994) was used to<br />
illustrate each step in the process, the time frame and the agencies or individuals who can be involved. An initial<br />
evaluation of the booklet showed that the response to referrals were within the current set time of 10 working days<br />
and assessment was completed for the majority within a month. The period required for trialling varied amongst<br />
consumers. Several consumers were waiting for funding to be organised. Some comments regarding the pathway:<br />
“I was impressed with the booklet. It would have helped me with difficulties I had with obtaining a previous device”<br />
(Client), “excellent idea, It will help in keeping track of the process and to train other staff” (support worker 1),“some<br />
of the time frames are questionable” (support worker 2).<br />
24<br />
Implications<br />
With the use of the booklet,<br />
1) that the process for VOCA prescription and support is clear to VOCA users, their support workers,<br />
staff at CTS and all other stakeholders;<br />
2) that there is reduction in communication breakdowns; and<br />
3) that issues which interfere with VOCA prescription and support are identified and addressed.<br />
Project completed in 2000<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Convergence of AAC and portable computers<br />
Ben Symonds<br />
Rehabilitation Engineer<br />
Rob Garrett<br />
Group Leader, R&D,<br />
Engineering & Support<br />
Rebecca Gallio<br />
Rehabilitation Engineer<br />
Objective<br />
As computers become smaller, more powerful, compact, portable, and enjoy longer battery life, the desire to<br />
explore their use as a communication device with appropriate software has become a topic of interest. It has been<br />
suggested that the cost of setting up a custom system using an ordinary laptop and Augmentative & Alternative<br />
Communication (AAC) software is cheaper then buying a specialised communication device. This project aimed<br />
to investigate the effectiveness of such a concept – can an ordinary laptop with specialised software substitute the<br />
need for a specialised communication device<br />
Method<br />
The research first identified existing AAC devices that are built on PC based systems. Therapists were then<br />
consulted to obtain their opinions of the critical features of a communication device and particularly those features<br />
that would be absent or insufficient in a standard laptop. It was then necessary to investigate the possibility<br />
of replicating these features with a standard laptop, identify suitable laptops and identify the required add-on<br />
hardware and software that would need to be added to a standard laptop to give features equivalent to those of<br />
the commercial devices. The laptop solutions were then compared with the specialised devices, discussing some<br />
of the critical features and the comparative costs of the different options.<br />
Results<br />
Commercial laptop based AAC devices were identified and the features and cost were summarised in a<br />
comparison table within the final report. Similar tables were created for a variety of laptop and tablet computers,<br />
however the standard laptop does not account for the needs of an AAC user. Features such as durability,<br />
speaker volume and the provision of alternative inputs (i.e. joystick, switch or touch-screen) were identified as key<br />
considerations along with the associated software. Laptops such as the Panasonic Toughbook were identified to<br />
meet extreme durability needs, however the high cost of these laptops makes them inappropriate for most cases.<br />
Another issue was that of compatibility and reliability of both software and hardware, which therapists highlighted as<br />
a point of concern and trouble in past experience. The implications and costs associated with any additions were<br />
also presented and a few example custom systems described. It was demonstrated that laptops could be used to<br />
build systems that are functionally equivalent to the dedicated systems at a significantly lower cost. However this<br />
apparent cost saving needs to be weighed carefully against the further time and cost involved with the set-up and<br />
on-going maintenance required to ensure the system is adequately durable, reliable and trouble-free.<br />
25<br />
Implications<br />
Ultimately the report intends to educate anyone who is considering using a standard laptop as an AAC device about<br />
the relevant complications and give recommendations to assist them in achieving a positive, cost effective, outcome.<br />
The final report is available from the “Downloads” section of the R&D website (http://www.novitatech.org.au/research).<br />
Project completed in 2004<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Effective mounting solutions<br />
Ben Symonds<br />
Rehabilitation Engineer<br />
Paul Manson<br />
Senior Speech<br />
Pathologist<br />
Sandra Stewart<br />
Senior Speech<br />
Pathologist<br />
Rob Garrett<br />
Group Leader, R&D,<br />
Engineering & Support<br />
Objective<br />
Therapists spend a significant amount of time attempting to set up effective wheelchair mounting systems for<br />
communication devices, switches and computers, and would like to improve the efficiency and effectiveness<br />
of the process. Many are also not familiar with the relevant safety standards or legal implications associated<br />
with the addition of mounting systems to wheelchairs. This project aimed to provide information and some<br />
recommendations that would assist and enhance the process of setting up mounting systems.<br />
Method<br />
<strong>Novita</strong>Tech <strong>Research</strong> & Development committed to investigating how other centres, both nationally and<br />
internationally, are dealing with mounting systems, and also collating some information on the relevant standards.<br />
The research investigated all relevant standards, the usefulness of these standards and how they might be<br />
applied to improve safe outcomes. The implications of the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) legislation<br />
were investigated to clarify the legislation’s impact on the development, prescription and installation of mounting<br />
systems. Finally, other centres were approached, asking about the approaches they have adopted when tackling<br />
mounting systems and to gain their perspective regarding the effect, relevance and importance of standards<br />
and legislation.<br />
26<br />
Results<br />
In terms of the new TGA Medical Devices Regulations 2002, standards testing is not compulsory. However, having<br />
a product successfully tested to a recognised, published, peer reviewed Standard will prove conformity with the<br />
relevant 14 Essential Principles, and will greatly assist with the ‘Declaration of Conformity’. Many centres seem to<br />
use the approach of over engineering to ensure the implementation of safe and reliable solutions. The relevant<br />
standards present important design and performance considerations that should certainly be understood and at<br />
least considered in the design process and/or theoretically assessed to some measure, if not tested. The test for<br />
anchorage of additional devices is one case that whilst providing meaningful information, just isn’t feasible. In this<br />
case a theoretical risk analysis or simulated test would be most appropriate. Non-destructive stability testing (both<br />
static and dynamic) however can give very important results that probably should not be dismissed if the resources<br />
are available. The addition of a mounting system and device could alter a wheelchair’s stability, making it unstable<br />
in environments where the user has previously had no problems, which is clearly a potential risk. Thus the decision<br />
regarding the necessity for such testing may benefit from the input of a technician or engineer who is familiar<br />
with the standards’ requirements. Similarly the actual design or choice of an appropriate mounting system would<br />
benefit greatly from a broader multidisciplinary input.<br />
Most centres suggest that a multidisciplinary approach is adopted when tackling the issue of developing or<br />
implementing effective mounting solutions. It appears that some centres have dedicated teams for this purpose,<br />
whilst others draw on the expertise of various disciplines in a less formal manner. Either way the collaborative<br />
involvement of therapists, clients, technicians and engineers is certainly advocated throughout the process. This<br />
is believed to enhance the process for everyone involved, ensuring positive and safe outcomes for the end user.<br />
Implications<br />
A further implication was that this work has contributed towards the establishment of an “on call” team that<br />
would be available to assist with the prescription of solutions for individuals with complex technological needs.<br />
The concept is to gather a team of key players who have relevant expertise with respect to the development of<br />
mounting solutions.<br />
Project commenced in 2004<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Predictors of device abandonment: transitioning from school to the community<br />
Michael Bebb 1<br />
Speech Pathologist<br />
Parimala<br />
Raghavendra<br />
Manager,<br />
Clinical <strong>Research</strong><br />
1<br />
Adult Therapy <strong>Services</strong>,<br />
Independent Living Centre<br />
Objective<br />
Abandonment of voice output technology is an ongoing concern for people who use augmentative and alternative<br />
communication (AAC), their families, clinicians and support workers. This study examined what factors influenced<br />
the discarding of devices during the transition from school to the community.<br />
Method<br />
The participants were five individuals who used AAC, five of their parents and two of their teachers. A structured<br />
interview was conducted. The questions addressed the opinions of the individuals who use AAC with regard<br />
to attitude toward their AAC device, length of time and frequency of use of the device, their perception of their<br />
peers’ attitudes to the device and factors that would increase device usage. Parents of AAC users were asked<br />
their opinions with regard to level of knowledge/familiarity with the AAC device, factors influencing reduced<br />
use/abandonment of the AAC device and personal experience during the AAC prescription and training process.<br />
Teachers of AAC users were asked their opinions with regard to appropriateness of prescription of the AAC device,<br />
users’ level of proficiency with the AAC device, communicative efficiency of AAC users (high technology vs low<br />
technology) and services provided by educators and clinicians during the prescription and training process.<br />
Questionnaires were completed during the interview and utilised for data analysis.<br />
Results<br />
Users of AAC decided to discontinue device use after leaving the school environment and the reasons related to<br />
aesthetic and functional aspects of the device. Parents felt their child had benefited communicatively from using<br />
the device, but most felt that despite many years of having access to the device, their personal knowledge of its<br />
function was limited. Teachers suggested that the high tech device was appropriate, that semantic compaction<br />
was easily incorporated into the curriculum whilst still catering to individual needs, and that whilst support for AAC<br />
in secondary schools was minimal initially, it developed over time.<br />
Implications<br />
The information will provide clinicians/carers with an insight into reasons for device dissatisfaction, thus providing<br />
opportunities for preventative action. Ongoing training and education for families, leading to increased support<br />
for in-home device use is an essential part of the transition planning process These findings also have important<br />
implications for device manufacturers, professionals and others who support clients in transition.<br />
27<br />
Project completed in 2000<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Vocabulary Organiser – development of the program<br />
Rob Garrett<br />
Group Leader, R&D,<br />
Engineering & Support<br />
Melissa Bradley<br />
Marketing Specialist<br />
Angela Guidera<br />
Senior Speech<br />
Pathologist<br />
Bob Collinson 1<br />
Software programmer<br />
1<br />
Colsoft Pty. Ltd.<br />
Objective<br />
Vocabulary Organiser is an innovative software tool for designing, producing and storing vocabulary dictionaries<br />
and worksheets. The software was developed by the <strong>Research</strong> and Development Department in collaboration with<br />
the <strong>Novita</strong> Speech Pathology Department (in particular, Jenny Faulks, who was the idea originator), in response to<br />
a demand for vocabulary management and teaching resources. It was developed for anyone who is involved in<br />
supporting users of augmentative and alternative communication systems. The objective was to validate that the<br />
software met the needs of the users within the organisation.<br />
Method<br />
The original version of the software was trialed by key stakeholders. Extensive feedback was sought, collated and<br />
used to specify software changes needed.<br />
Results<br />
Version 2.3 of the Vocabulary Organiser software was created with the following new features included:<br />
• Support for multiple vocabulary files;<br />
• Enhanced backup facilities;<br />
• User authentication and data security. Specification and modification of the vocabulary stored in the dictionary<br />
can be protected by password;<br />
• Numerous enhancements to speed up the entry and editing of vocabulary dictionaries;<br />
• Enhancements to the options available in printed output mode to create more useable teaching and<br />
learning aids;<br />
• Increased flexibility in graphic size with the addition of “Very Large” graphics option;<br />
• Ability to specify and save page margins to a specific report; and<br />
• Ability to create printed headings relevant to the contents of the dictionary file.<br />
The Users Guide and Help screens were also updated. A final positive validation of the software was achieved in<br />
October 2000.<br />
28<br />
Implications<br />
All of the regional offices now have an effective and usable copy of this powerful tool to efficiently support the<br />
clients of the organisation who use communication devices.<br />
Project completed in 2000<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Vocabulary Organiser – enhancement and commercialisation<br />
Rob Garrett<br />
Group Leader, R&D,<br />
Engineering & Support<br />
Melissa Bradley<br />
Marketing Specialist<br />
David Hobbs<br />
Senior Rehabilitation<br />
Engineer<br />
Peter Wilkinson 1<br />
Software programmer<br />
Sorin Buzilla 2<br />
1<br />
Contract<br />
2<br />
Better Software Pty. Ltd.<br />
Objective<br />
The move to MSAccess 2000 from the older MSAccess 2.0 software version will provide many tangible benefits,<br />
which would directly translate into a better Vocabulary Organiser (VO) product. Reasons for the move include the<br />
fact that Microsoft was no longer supporting the older version, as well as version 2.0’s inability to work correctly on<br />
the later 32-bit operating systems, such as Windows 2000 and XP. Upgrading to Access 2000, will allow for longer<br />
file name conventions compared with the older system that had the old DOS limit of 8 characters. Another reason<br />
for the upgrade is that the newer version of MSAccess was known to be more reliable.<br />
Method<br />
For much of its history, two programmers developed VO. As it moved from internal use to external customers, it<br />
became critical to ensure the software was maintainable by other programmers and had adequate error reporting<br />
capability. To assess this risk, Sorin Buzila from Better Software Pty Ltd was commissioned to perform a software<br />
audit. Sorin spent 3 days reviewing the code and identified 25 actions that were prioritised as “Immediate”, “High”,<br />
“Medium”, or “Low” actions to improve the software. The R&D Department identified all “Immediate” and “High”<br />
recommendations as priority actions.<br />
Industrial programming standards were documented by Sorin Buzila and used to specify the software<br />
programming requirements. In addition, all software changes were independently reviewed to ensure compliance<br />
with the documented standard.<br />
Results<br />
The newer version of Vocabulary Organiser (3.2) is compatible with Windows 2000/XP and the <strong>Novita</strong> standard<br />
computer operating system. Software coding Standards have been established for all software written in<br />
Visual Basic and Visual Basic for Applications. All changes to the software are now independently reviewed<br />
for compliance. A central website to record feedback and report problems can be accessed directly from the<br />
Vocabulary Organiser program. This website is universally available to all users who have access to the web. There<br />
is now one central list of issues enabling easier monitoring of the state of the program such as reliability statistics<br />
and requests for product enhancements. The new version of software now has extensive error reporting capability<br />
that can be simultaneously logged on the user’s computer in a simple text file. The website supports upload of files<br />
that will enable the log file to accompany any errors logged on the web site. The submission of an issue at this web<br />
site results in an immediate notification to key staff.<br />
29<br />
Implications<br />
The software conforms to industrial standards, is easily maintained, has increased reliability, now has error logging<br />
and can be effectively and efficiently supported independent of the location of the user.<br />
Project completed in 2003<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
30<br />
Melissa Bradley<br />
Marketing Specialist<br />
Rob Garrett<br />
Group Leader, R&D,<br />
Engineering & Support<br />
Greg Mathews 1<br />
Mark English 1<br />
1<br />
Vanilla Interactive<br />
Objective<br />
Vocabulary Organiser – marketing<br />
In <strong>1999</strong>, the <strong>Research</strong> and Development Department were commended on the Vocabulary Organiser (VO)<br />
program by its Annual Review panel, and asked to investigate the possibility of selling the software in order to<br />
recoup some of the money spent on its development.<br />
Method<br />
In 2000, the VO program was externally reviewed with a view to fixing known bugs and increasing the reliability of<br />
the software. Activities included:<br />
• Design of CD cover, CD label and User Manual Cover;<br />
• Development of first promotional flyer;<br />
• Establishment of copyright requirements; and<br />
• Generation of mail out database.<br />
During 2001, VO progressed from a resource tool within <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> to a viable, packaged product<br />
to be sold around Australia. Activities included:<br />
• Updating of User Manual, CD cover and brochure;<br />
• Pricing strategy and Kit Lists for VO packages created;<br />
• Development of posters for promotion at conferences;<br />
• A VO brochure was sent to those who had registered an interest in VO and other identified potential customers;<br />
• Creation of a ‘Unity’ vocabulary file;<br />
• Creation of resource/example folders for use at workshops;<br />
• 1 hour Workshop at AGOSCI 1 Conference in Adelaide; and<br />
• 2 hour Workshop at ARATA 2 Conference in Brisbane.<br />
2002 saw changes to the marketing approach for VO. These changes were driven by the completion of the Key<br />
Word Signing vocabulary file, which opened possibilities to target a broader audience. Activities included:<br />
• Development of Demonstration CD in conjunction with Vanilla Interactive;<br />
• Development of a new brochure to support the demo CD;<br />
• Development of a Key Word Signing vocabulary file and specific promotional resources to support it;<br />
• Collection of photographs for VO marketing activities;<br />
• The demonstration CD promoting the Key Word Signing, Unity and AusUnity files was mailed to identified<br />
potential customers;<br />
• 1 hour Presentation at Speech Pathology Conference in Alice Springs; and<br />
• 1 hour presentation at ISAAC 3 Conference in Denmark.<br />
Marketing activities for 2003 focused on increasing awareness for VO in the community. Activities included:<br />
• Key Wording Signing User Manual written and distributed;<br />
• Visit by Bruce Baker from Semantic Compaction Systems (author/creator of the icon-based language, Unity);<br />
• Signed agreement for the use of ‘AusUnity’ and Australian ‘Unity’;<br />
• Windows XP manuals written; and<br />
• Presentation at AGOSCI 1 Conference in Sydney.<br />
Results<br />
The VO program is now in the mature stage of development, and is well entrenched with the <strong>Novita</strong> Speech<br />
Pathology Department. There has been a significant increase in sales. The effectiveness and efficiency of<br />
Vocabulary Organiser has been promoted.<br />
Implications<br />
Vocabulary Organiser is available for sale throughout Australia and a free demonstration CD is available as an<br />
educational tool.<br />
1<br />
AGOSCI: Australian Group on Severe Communication Impairments<br />
2<br />
ARATA: Australian Rehabilitation & Assistive Technology Association<br />
3<br />
ISAAC: International Society for Augmentative & Alternative Communication<br />
Project commenced in 2000<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Vocabulary Organiser – the addition of the merge function<br />
David Hobbs<br />
Senior Rehabilitation<br />
Engineer<br />
Rob Garrett<br />
Group Leader, R&D,<br />
Engineering & Support<br />
Angela Guidera<br />
Senior Speech<br />
Pathologist<br />
Ben Symonds<br />
Rehabilitation Engineer<br />
Peter Wilkinson 1<br />
Software programmer<br />
Sorin Buzila 2<br />
1<br />
Contract<br />
2<br />
Better Software Pty. Ltd.<br />
Objective<br />
There are now multiple copies of the master vocabulary files being used by support staff dealing with individual<br />
clients. As changes and additions to the master vocabulary are created, the changes need to be copied to<br />
other computers.<br />
To facilitate this process, the Merge function has been added to the Vocabulary Organiser software.<br />
Method<br />
Merge allows two unique vocabulary files to be integrated (in essence, one file is merged into the other). The<br />
resultant file contains all the original messages plus any new messages from the merging file that weren’t<br />
contained in the original.<br />
If “clashes” are detected (ie: two elements have the same message name or same symbol sequence) the user<br />
is prompted to take the appropriate action. This could be either adding the new message to the dictionary,<br />
overwriting the original message with the incoming entry, or rejecting the new message. Figure 1 shows a screen<br />
shot for this process.<br />
Results<br />
The Merge function has undergone, and passed, a lengthy internal testing and validation process.<br />
Merge is currently in the hands of the Speech Pathology Department for external validation.<br />
Implications<br />
The Merge function will now make it possible to distribute vocabulary file updates and additions easily via email or<br />
as downloads from a web page. It also enables a user’s vocabulary to follow a person to an alternate location or<br />
therapy support area.<br />
31<br />
Figure 1 – A screen shot showing when a clash of messages is detected during the Merge process.<br />
Project commenced in 2002<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
The design and development of a range of cordless switches<br />
Roger Ingram<br />
Electronics Technician<br />
Jeff Price<br />
Electronics Technician<br />
David Hobbs<br />
Senior Rehabilitation<br />
Engineer<br />
Objective<br />
Several switches with big buttons exist for people with physical impairments. A major disadvantage of these<br />
switches is the cord – it can be cumbersome and sometimes dangerous for people in wheelchairs to use a device<br />
with a cord. The cord not only limits the distance over which the switch can be operated, but the cord itself poses<br />
a risk of tangling or being ‘snagged’. A cordless switch eliminates these issues.<br />
Method<br />
The <strong>Research</strong> & Development Department was involved in the management, validation and user documentation<br />
of the range of cordless switches that the Assistive Technology Department developed. The range includes the<br />
Cordless BIG Switch, the Cordless ANY Switch, and the Cordless Jelly Bean Booster Switch.<br />
Results<br />
A range of radio frequency (RF) cordless switches have been designed for non-critical applications, i.e.<br />
applications not involving the control of medical or safety related issues. Useful applications include the remote<br />
control of battery-operated toys, communication devices, environmental control units, computer access switch<br />
interfaces, and others.<br />
In 2002, the transmitter-receiver chips for these switches were changed for component availability reasons. The<br />
new chips operate on the same 433 MHz frequency but have an improved range of operation – in excess of 50m.<br />
Another benefit of the new switch transmitter-receiver system is the decreased delay (or lag) between switch press<br />
and switch activation.<br />
Implications<br />
The range of cordless switches has now become a regular item in the Assistive Technology catalogue. Loan<br />
switches have also been placed in the <strong>Novita</strong> Toy and Resource Centre so parents and therapists can trial them.<br />
32<br />
Figure 1 – The Cordless Jelly Bean Booster Switch<br />
Project completed in 2002<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Movement-to-m usic therapy<br />
David Hobbs<br />
Senior Rehabilitation<br />
Engineer<br />
Tom Chau 1<br />
Canada <strong>Research</strong><br />
Chair in Paediatric<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
Engineering,<br />
1<br />
Bloorview MacMillan<br />
Children’s Centre, Toronto,<br />
Ontario, Canada<br />
Objective<br />
The “Movement-to-Music” (MTM) therapy system, or Virtual Music Instrument (VMI), is an innovative software<br />
program that allows simple movements to be translated into music. The MTM system provides an interface for<br />
children with a disability to be able to play music without having to hold or manipulate an instrument. One simply<br />
positions themselves in view of a webcam and moves to interact with pre-defined coloured shapes they can see<br />
on the screen, as shown in Figure 1. The system generates musical sounds from very small movements, such as<br />
finger movements, to very large ones, such as waving your arms around.<br />
Method<br />
The MTM system was identified by the investigator as the best use of technology within the field of rehabilitation<br />
engineering and assistive technology after completing his Churchill Fellowship research in 2003. The system is<br />
simple to use and only requires the specific MTM software, a computer (preferably a laptop), a webcam, and a<br />
means of interacting with the webcam (a large TV or data projector).<br />
Results<br />
The group that developed the system at Bloorview MacMillan Children’s Centre in Toronto, Canada, completed<br />
usability testing of a prototype version with 6 children with cerebral palsy or spinal muscular atrophy in May 2002.<br />
The group has also begun conducting Suzuki music lessons using the VMI with 6 children with cerebral palsy or<br />
spinal muscular atrophy, and the system has been installed on the home computers of participating families to<br />
provide an opportunity for the children to practice at home.<br />
MTM can be used in a number of ways: as a virtual musical instrument, as a tool for physical, occupational or<br />
music therapy, as a leisure activity, or to encourage exploration and emotional expression. Some ways that children<br />
can play with the system include games like “Simon Says” and “Memory”, or they can learn to play songs on their<br />
own, in a group, or with family members. <strong>Research</strong> has shown that MTM can help improve children’s reach, range<br />
of motion, endurance, motivation, sense of satisfaction, confidence and ability to explore and create<br />
music independently.<br />
Implications<br />
A copy of the MTM software was donated to <strong>Novita</strong>Tech to trial with <strong>Novita</strong> clients and the system was<br />
demonstrated to <strong>Novita</strong>’s Speech Pathology and Occupational Therapy staff during their July 2004 in-service.<br />
Both disciplines were excited about the possibility of incorporating music therapy into their existing programs,<br />
and were interested in conducting similar research to what was being done in Canada.<br />
33<br />
Figure 1 – Dr Tom Chau, MTM therapy program developer, demonstrates the system. By making movements in<br />
front of the TV he can produce music each time he interacts with the coloured squares.<br />
Project commenced in July 2004<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Computer aided customisation of walker designs<br />
David Sanders 1<br />
4th Year Biomedical<br />
Engineering Student<br />
Alex Svistounov<br />
Senior Testing Engineer<br />
Kevin Clements<br />
Manager, Mobility &<br />
Seating Department<br />
1<br />
School of Informatics<br />
and Engineering, Flinders<br />
University, Adelaide,<br />
Australia<br />
Objective<br />
The aim of this project was to automate the current manual process of designing a walker for an individual client by<br />
developing a system that automatically produced the necessary design plans for a given client’s measurements.<br />
Method<br />
Initial attempts were made to complete this project using a software package called Pro/DESKTOP by P.T.C.<br />
Although the models were completed successfully, the user interface (which was used to simplify the use of the<br />
software and drawing creation) failed due to limitations in the software package.<br />
Given this limitation, another drawing package called Solid Edge V9 by Unigraphics Solutions was investigated. An<br />
academic version of the software was obtained and the models were recreated in this package. Visual Basic was<br />
the language used to program the user interface and it provided a solid, easy to use platform for the job.<br />
Results<br />
The project again encountered problems when it was discovered that the version of Solid Edge being used had<br />
functional limitations, e.g. the Visual Basic interfacing libraries were disabled. This halted any further progress with<br />
this project, however the concept was adequately demonstrated.<br />
Implications<br />
An automated drawing or modelling package would allow for quick and easy designs to be created without the<br />
need for time-intensive hand drawings. It would also allow for quick adjustments or modifications to be made to<br />
the drawings, and would provide a way of storing and documenting future designs. Current fully functioning retail<br />
packages are being investigated to further the work of this project.<br />
Project commenced in 2003<br />
34<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Integrated control of wheelchairs & communication devices<br />
Ben Symonds<br />
Rehabilitation Engineer<br />
Sue van de Loo<br />
Senior Occupational<br />
Therapist<br />
David Hobbs<br />
Senior Rehabilitation<br />
Engineer<br />
Rob Garrett<br />
Group Leader, R&D,<br />
Engineering & Support<br />
Rebecca Gallio<br />
Rehabilitation Engineer<br />
Colin Clayton 1<br />
1<br />
Great Ormond Street<br />
Hospital for Children, The<br />
Wolfson Centre<br />
Objective<br />
Individuals with limited movement may only have one functional ‘access site’ which they must use to drive a<br />
wheelchair, control their communication aid or control the environment around them (eg: TV’s, personal computer,<br />
radio, etc.). The aim of this project was to enhance an individual’s independence by enabling them to incorporate<br />
driving a powered wheelchair and their ability to interact with their environment through the same control<br />
mechanism and site. Ideally it was also hoped that the solution would remove an individual’s reliance upon others<br />
when alternating between driving and control of other technology.<br />
Method<br />
Preliminary research was undertaken to identify or develop a solution that would enable someone to access both<br />
their computer and wheelchair using the same controls – be it a joystick, switch or other alternative control. A<br />
comparison document of identified devices was collated. This document compared three major systems to each<br />
other in a comparison table format, enabling a feature-based comparison to be made.<br />
When a particular system was selected for trial a referral form was completed providing background information<br />
about each client. Using this information and video footage of the current access methods of the clients, the<br />
system was then configured to the clients’ specific abilities. Each client then spent a day trialing the system.<br />
Results<br />
Early research identified three potential integrated systems – the Dynamics IRIS, the wiseDX and the SRS100<br />
system. After assessing all three, the wiseDX system was chosen for a trial with two <strong>Novita</strong> clients in 2003. The<br />
wiseDX was preferred for its flexibility to meet the needs of different users and for the relative ease of use, set-up<br />
and configuration of the system. Investigators from engineering and therapy worked together to achieve extremely<br />
significant results for both these clients. The wiseDX system enabled the first client, a single switch user, to<br />
independently drive her wheelchair and switch to controlling her Pathfinder communication device. The second client<br />
was a joystick user, who was able to control his wheelchair and several other devices with his joystick, including a<br />
television, infrared phone, and the mouse on a laptop computer (wirelessly) with complete independence.<br />
Implications<br />
The project identified an effective, easy to use and versatile integrated system that was demonstrated to meet<br />
the initial project aims. Engineering, technical and therapy staff were accredited by the inventor of the wiseDX<br />
system and gained valuable experience setting up the system for clients. This expertise and experience has given<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> the confidence and credentials to prescribe and support this system, thus providing an exciting solution for<br />
individuals who require such technology.<br />
35<br />
Project completed in 2004<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Introduction of a hoist into the family home – a qualitative study into the perspectives<br />
of three mothers who care for a child who has a severe physical disability<br />
Angela Shepherd 1<br />
Honours Student<br />
Supervisor<br />
Hugh Stewart 1<br />
Lecturer<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Supervisor<br />
Sonya Murchland<br />
Senior <strong>Research</strong><br />
Occupational Therapist<br />
1<br />
School of Health Sciences<br />
– Occupational Therapy,<br />
University of South Australia<br />
Objective<br />
To identify the perspectives of three mothers who use a hoist to assist in the care of a child with a severe physical disability<br />
in the home. It sought to identify the effects of hoist introduction on the family as well as factors that influence hoist use.<br />
Method<br />
A descriptive qualitative methodology was used for naturalistic inquiry. Purposeful sampling was used to select<br />
three participants who were the primary caregivers of a child with a severe physical disability that limited their<br />
capacity to transfer independently. Mothers were interviewed individually in their own homes using in-depth, semistructured<br />
interviews. Analysis of the data used an inductive process of thematic analysis.<br />
Results<br />
Four major themes emerged: ‘get it ahead of time’; ‘represents loss of function’; ‘meeting family’s needs’,<br />
‘improves quality of life’. The findings highlight the overall positive impact of hoist introduction on the parent and<br />
child’s quality of life as a result of improved management of care, increased options for the child, and increased<br />
respite options for the parent.<br />
Implications<br />
These positive outcomes of hoist use were very important in terms of hoist acceptance and eventual use. A number<br />
of influences such as the consultation on acquisition of the hoist, early introduction of the hoist, appropriate fit in the<br />
home, sensitivity to grief and loss, and negotiations with parents about changes in care provision were all seen as<br />
important in the introduction of the hoist. The study also served to remind occupational therapists of the complexity<br />
of the introduction process, and the compromises associated with ongoing hoist use in the family home.<br />
Project completed in 2002<br />
36<br />
Alex Svistounov<br />
Senior Testing Engineer<br />
Janitha Jayaweera 1<br />
4th Year Computer<br />
Systems Engineering<br />
Student<br />
David Sanders 2<br />
4th Year Biomedical<br />
Engineering Student<br />
1<br />
The University of Adelaide<br />
2<br />
School of Informatics<br />
and Engineering,<br />
Flinders University,<br />
Adelaide, Australia<br />
Objective<br />
Remote monitoring of the testing laboratory<br />
The aim of this research was to develop, build and launch a hardware/software based data acquisition (DAQ)<br />
system for the Rehabilitation Equipment Testing Laboratory (Test Lab) that would allow remote (preferably real-time)<br />
monitoring of cyclic tests, remote (PC based) control, and monitoring of environmental conditions.<br />
Method<br />
Preliminary research was undertaken to explore possible solutions, by looking at the systems employed locally by<br />
similar organisations and contacting suppliers of DAQ systems. Additionally the pros and cons of custom versus<br />
‘off the shelf’ systems and stand-alone versus PC based systems were investigated. The research was then<br />
combined with the specific requirements of the test lab to develop a detailed specification for the DAQ system.<br />
Results<br />
Several options were identified including turnkey solutions, the use of commercial DAQ and signal conditioning<br />
cards combined with some basic programming, or the in-house development of hardware and software. Due<br />
to the cost of the commercial solutions the student developed an in-house hardware and software solution for<br />
PC based monitoring of basic cyclic tests. This resulted in a functional prototype that can be employed for basic<br />
logging and also provided a solid validation of the concept.<br />
Implications<br />
A complete DAQ system would allow tests to be remotely monitored and thus remove the need for staff to come<br />
and check on test progress over weekends and holidays. It would also enable more detailed failure analysis<br />
through revision of test conditions leading up to any failures. Currently the student solution is being utilised for<br />
basic cyclic testing and the test lab is evaluating the identified commercial DAQ systems to enable comprehensive<br />
monitoring and control of all tests.<br />
Project commenced in 2003<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Toan Nguyen 1<br />
Master of Engineering<br />
(<strong>Research</strong>) candidate<br />
Andrew Downing 1<br />
Foundation<br />
Professor, Biomedical<br />
Engineering<br />
Barry Seeger 2<br />
Director, <strong>Novita</strong>Tech<br />
Rob Garrett<br />
Group Leader, R&D,<br />
Engineering & Support<br />
Ruth Davy 3<br />
1<br />
School of Informatics<br />
and Engineering, Flinders<br />
University, Adelaide.<br />
2<br />
Retired<br />
3<br />
Co-ordinator, Quality<br />
Assurance and Evaluation,<br />
Barkuma Inc.<br />
Funding:<br />
A Strategic<br />
Partnerships with<br />
Industry <strong>Research</strong><br />
and Training (SPIRT)<br />
scheme funded by the<br />
Australian <strong>Research</strong><br />
Council/ Department of<br />
Education, Training and<br />
Youth Affairs (DETYA).<br />
Funding amount of<br />
$42,160.<br />
Objective<br />
Focus group to assess home and mobile phone needs<br />
To assist in the understanding of both the mobile and fixed telecommunication needs of <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s<br />
<strong>Services</strong> clients and from the identified needs, develop and pilot new service alternatives and product concepts in<br />
telecommunications to the wider <strong>Novita</strong> community.<br />
Method<br />
A focus group discussion was held at <strong>Novita</strong>, with four clients consenting to take part. An informal discussion ran<br />
for approximately 90 minutes to find answers to questions such as:<br />
• How are people currently using mobile and home phones<br />
• What difficulties or barriers are people having when using phones<br />
• What needs to be changed or improved<br />
Participants were also asked to respond to a list of mobile phone solutions and features that could provide better<br />
mobile phone access and whether or not they were of significant importance for these participants.<br />
Results<br />
All members participating in the focus group were current users of mobile phones. The purposes for which the<br />
phone were used by the participants included:<br />
• a method of keeping in contact with friends and family;<br />
• a means of ringing for a taxi and checking on the taxi’s location;<br />
• a safety device to enable them to telephone for an ambulance, or the police; and<br />
• the use of the phone to type and display a key word or idea to assist in a conversation.<br />
There were many problems associated with mobile phone use, features and design. These included lifting the<br />
phone from waist level to ear level during mobile phone use. For many people with severe weakness and reduced<br />
strength in their arms and hands, a dilemma was noted when choosing between smaller mobile phone models that<br />
are lighter to lift but harder to use in contrast to larger models which easier to use but harder to lift to the shoulder.<br />
Some participants found that calls were terminated before they were able to retrieve the phone from its storage<br />
position, answer the call and then raise the phone to ear level.<br />
The type of disability that the participants have often limits the way they can use the mobile phone. Some have<br />
adapted ways to overcome their shortcomings when using their mobile phone, while others preferred advanced<br />
technologies to solve their problems (although there are some trade-offs, such as privacy). All participants<br />
expressed an interest in hands-free operation of the phone through the use of the speakerphone function and/or<br />
voice recognition, since all the participants had reduced strength in their arms and hands. There were also<br />
participants who have no knowledge of current mobile phone technologies available (hardware and software) that<br />
can be used in conjunction with their mobile phone or AAC device to help improve their use and accessibility.<br />
Implications<br />
The outcomes of this research suggest that accessible mobile phones will become a necessity for people with<br />
a disability. Indeed, many existing solutions may solve the many problems faced by people with disabilities.<br />
Education and trials of these solutions will play a vital role in determining their appropriateness to individuals.<br />
37<br />
Project completed in 2002<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Making the home phone accessible for people with a disability<br />
David Hobbs<br />
Senior Rehabilitation<br />
Engineer<br />
Rob Garrett<br />
Group Leader, R&D,<br />
Engineering & Support<br />
Objective<br />
As part of the review process of the MiPhone project, new research was conducted to identify the common<br />
obstacles that prevent people with a disability from using the home phone.<br />
The steps involved with getting to and using the home phone were identified and divided into 6 separate tasks.<br />
These included getting to the phone in time to answer an in-coming call, holding the phone to your ear for the<br />
duration of the call, dialling a number using the key pad, and replacing the phone handset after a call is finished.<br />
A document titled “The Home Phone Solutions Guide” was then produced, where the Guide identified existing<br />
commercial solutions for each of the 6 tasks.<br />
Method<br />
Common problems and obstacles were identified through focus group sessions and questionnaires sent to both<br />
child and adult clients of <strong>Novita</strong> (run in conjunction with the mobile phone research, see ‘Focus Group to Assess<br />
Home and Mobile Phone Needs’, page 37 and ‘Survey of Accessible Mobile Communication for People with<br />
Disabilities, page 40). The Guide was then developed to provide hints, tips, and suggested solutions to each of the<br />
obstacles the questionnaires and focus group sessions identified.<br />
Solutions and recommendations for overcoming these obstacles were collected from the SA Independent Living<br />
Centre (ILC), <strong>Novita</strong>Tech’s Environmental Control Specialist (Annabel Gregory), and Telstra, through their Disability<br />
Equipment Program (DEP). An online version of Telstra’s Disability Equipment Program can be found at the<br />
following location: http://www.telstra.com.au/disability/catalogue/.<br />
Having identified a host of existing solutions, it became apparent that this information was not widely known within<br />
the disability community. Few people were aware of Telstra’s Disability Equipment Program, and less knew how it<br />
functioned, what it provided, and how one could be registered.<br />
For example, existing Telstra customers who are eligible for the DEP may be entitled to a “Holdaphone” (see<br />
Figure 1) or a speakerphone (for hands-free operation) for the cost of a standard telephone handset rental.<br />
38<br />
Results<br />
The <strong>Research</strong> & Development Department has concentrated on disseminating the information within the Guide.<br />
Presentations have been given to <strong>Novita</strong>’s OT’s, and feature articles explaining some of the solutions and<br />
highlighting the DEP have been published in <strong>Novita</strong>’s Nexus Newsletter and the Australian Rehabilitation and<br />
Assistive Technology Association (ARATA) newsletter.<br />
Implications<br />
R&D plans to continue to promote Telstra’s DEP, which directly benefits <strong>Novita</strong>’s clients and their families, and the<br />
solutions provided within the Guide. On-going discussions are being held with the Manager of Disability <strong>Services</strong><br />
within Telstra about extending the scope of the DEP to encompass infrared controlled phones. At present, these<br />
are not part of the Program.<br />
Figure 1 – The Holdaphone, an assistive device for using the home phone.<br />
Project completed in 2002<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Mobile phone access via an augmentative and alternative communication device<br />
Toan Nguyen<br />
Rehabilitation Engineer<br />
Andrew Downing 1<br />
Foundation<br />
Professor, Biomedical<br />
Engineering<br />
Rob Garrett<br />
Group Leader, R&D,<br />
Engineering & Support<br />
1<br />
School of Informatics<br />
and Engineering, Flinders<br />
University, Adelaide.<br />
Funding:<br />
A Strategic<br />
Partnerships with<br />
Industry <strong>Research</strong><br />
and Training (SPIRT)<br />
scheme funded by the<br />
Australian <strong>Research</strong><br />
Council/ Department of<br />
Education, Training and<br />
Youth Affairs (DETYA).<br />
Funding amount of<br />
$42,160.<br />
Objective<br />
People with severe disabilities are both functionally and socially disadvantaged and often require an Augmentative<br />
and Alternative Communication (AAC) device, with expensive customised hardware and software interfaces,<br />
to support their educational, vocational, social and recreational activities. For many of these people, the lack<br />
of a mobile phone interface is a significant impediment. This research aims to generate economical, effective<br />
communication solutions, for people with disabilities who need or want to be mobile, by developing and integrating<br />
mobile technology to suit their needs. For example, the development of an interfacing system to enable a person<br />
with a disability who uses an AAC device such as the “Pathfinder” to independently answer, initiate and terminate a<br />
mobile phone voice and to create and send text.<br />
Method<br />
Most Global Systems for Mobile Communication (GSM 1 ) mobile phones include an internal hardware modem.<br />
This modem allows data, fax, text messaging (such as the “Short Messaging Service”, or SMS) and voice calls<br />
to be controlled by standardised GSM AT 2 commands. Most AAC devices such as the Pathfinder have a serial<br />
and/or infrared (IrDA 3 ) port, which readily outputs strings of ASCII 4 characters. Consequently, a Pathfinder can<br />
be programmed to send the required sequences of GSM AT commands to control the mobile phone to initiate<br />
a voice call, answer incoming calls, terminate calls and send and receive text messages. With the integration of<br />
a compatible mobile phone car kit, a complete system can be created which would allow an AAC device user to<br />
independently control a mobile phone for voice and text communications.<br />
Results<br />
A prototype interfacing system for mobile phone access via an AAC device has been developed through this<br />
research to enable people with disabilities who currently utilize electronic communication aids to use a mobile<br />
phone for voice calls and text messaging. A working model was successfully demonstrated at the Australian<br />
Rehabilitation & Assistive Technology Association (ARATA) 2004 Conference held in Melbourne 1–4 June 2004<br />
pre-conference workshop and through a paper presentation. Further refinement is required to develop the system<br />
into a solution readily useable by AAC users.<br />
Implications<br />
A fully developed and packaged system to connect a mobile phone and an AAC device will provide mobile phone<br />
access for many users of AAC devices that otherwise has not been possible. Trials and evaluation of the fully<br />
developed system with end users will be the next phase of the project.<br />
39<br />
1<br />
A standard for digital cellular phone service in over 85 countries, which operates at 900/1800/1900 MHz.<br />
2<br />
AT stands for ATtention and is the two-character abbreviation that is always used to start communication between two devices.<br />
3<br />
Infrared Data Association - which sets standards for using infrared transmission to transfer data between electronic devices (e.g. computers and<br />
other peripherals and devices) through the air, with no cables or wires.<br />
4<br />
American Standard Code for Information Exchange – world-wide standard for the code numbers used by computers to represent all the upper and<br />
lower-case Latin letters, numbers, punctuation, etc<br />
Project commenced in 2003<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
40<br />
Toan Nguyen 1<br />
Master of Engineering<br />
(<strong>Research</strong>) candidate<br />
Andrew Downing 1<br />
Foundation<br />
Professor, Biomedical<br />
Engineering<br />
Barry Seeger 2<br />
Director, <strong>Novita</strong>Tech<br />
Rob Garrett<br />
Group Leader, R&D,<br />
Engineering & Support<br />
David Hobbs<br />
Senior Rehabilitation<br />
Engineer<br />
1<br />
School of Informatics<br />
and Engineering, Flinders<br />
University, Adelaide.<br />
2<br />
Retired.<br />
Funding:<br />
A Strategic<br />
Partnerships with<br />
Industry <strong>Research</strong><br />
and Training (SPIRT)<br />
scheme funded by the<br />
Australian <strong>Research</strong><br />
Council/ Department of<br />
Education, Training and<br />
Youth Affairs (DETYA).<br />
Funding amount of<br />
$42,160.<br />
Survey of accessible mobile communication for people with disabilities<br />
Objective<br />
Different people have different needs when it comes to using mobile and home phones. For people with<br />
disabilities, these needs become increasingly important, as accessing standard phones can become an issue.<br />
More often, specialised or modified phones are needed to deal with these special circumstances.<br />
The purpose of this research was to identify issues relating to current and future mobile phone technology use, and<br />
the difficulties or barriers that people with disabilities face when using a mobile or standard home phone. In addition,<br />
establishing what needs to be developed to enhance/improve accessibility to phones is still an on-going challenge.<br />
Method<br />
A Mobile and Home Phone Needs Analysis survey questionnaire was created and distributed via mail to 342 clients<br />
receiving services from <strong>Novita</strong>.<br />
The survey was divided in two sections:<br />
1. The Mobile Phone Needs Analysis section that dealt with issues relating to mobile phone use; and<br />
2. The Home Phone Needs Analysis that dealt with accessibility issues relating to home phone use.<br />
The information obtained from each section of the survey was then used to:<br />
• develop practical solutions to overcome the difficulties or barriers that users are having when using a mobile or<br />
home phone;<br />
• develop alternative methods or approaches to using a mobile or home phone; and<br />
• model an integrated system that would provide easier access to both the mobile and home phones.<br />
Results<br />
The results of the survey questionnaires indicated that people with disabilities within the community are able to<br />
use, and want to have access to, mobile phone technology. It also highlighted that, apart from general difficulties in<br />
performing essential tasks on current phones efficiently, most people with a disability are not aware of the available<br />
technology, and if they are, do not use it to the fullest extent. There was a need to make access to mobile phones<br />
easier through the development of an interfacing system as well as to look more closely at existing solutions as<br />
alternative options.<br />
Implications<br />
The findings from this research prompted the consideration of trials to investigate and evaluate viable and<br />
alternative solutions to improve awareness and telecommunications experience for people with disabilities. This<br />
work was carried out in 2003 through a government-funded project entitled “New technological options for people<br />
with disabilities through the use of telecommunications equipment” described on p41.<br />
Project completed in 2002<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Technological options for people with physical disabilities<br />
through the use of telecommunications equipment<br />
Toan Nguyen<br />
Rehabilitation Engineer<br />
Andrew Downing 1<br />
Foundation<br />
Professor, Biomedical<br />
Engineering<br />
Rob Garrett<br />
Group Leader, R&D,<br />
Engineering & Support<br />
David Hobbs<br />
Senior Rehabilitation<br />
Engineer<br />
Lloyd Walker<br />
Director, <strong>Novita</strong>Tech.<br />
1<br />
School of Informatics<br />
and Engineering, Flinders<br />
University, Adelaide.<br />
Funding:<br />
Telecommunications<br />
<strong>Research</strong> Grant<br />
Program, Department<br />
of Communications,<br />
Information Technology<br />
and the Arts. Funding<br />
amount of $24,705.<br />
Telstra’s Disability<br />
<strong>Services</strong>. Funding<br />
amount of $8,000.<br />
Objective<br />
Accessing telecommunication technology and the broad range of services behind it has been an ongoing<br />
challenge for people with disabilities. With technology continually changing and mobile phones shrinking in<br />
size, the gap between people with disabilities and telecommunication technology has grown. The results of the<br />
focus group (see page 37) and survey (see page 40) indicated that new mobile phone features and accessories<br />
could be significant in overcoming this gap. The aim of this research was to trial and evaluate new configurable<br />
‘off-the-shelf’ telecommunication options such as car kits, voice recognition and hands-free technology (e.g.<br />
speakerphone), and network features such as voice mail that can improve the lifestyle, independence, security<br />
and social interaction of people with physical disabilities.<br />
Method<br />
The trials involved ten participants, drawn from the 1300 children and adults receiving services from <strong>Novita</strong>. The<br />
trial group included people with mild, moderate and severe physical disabilities affecting movement and speech.<br />
The trials tested the ability of the participants to make and receive calls using a mobile phone, and for those<br />
participants that can use the Short Message Service (SMS), to create and send text messages efficiently. Various<br />
assessment methods including the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) tool were used to<br />
measure the performance, frustration, and satisfaction as well as the time responses of participants when carrying<br />
out these activities:<br />
• before intervention – with the participant using their existing technology (prior to the trial);<br />
• during intervention – with the telecommunications equipment provided for approximately 3 weeks (end the trial); and<br />
• after intervention – when the trial equipment was withdrawn from the participant for approximately 2 weeks.<br />
Results<br />
Based on the outcomes of the trials it was found that:<br />
• there is no insurmountable barrier to the use of phone technology by people with a physical disability. Features of<br />
the existing technologies offer affordable solutions to problems of accessibility previously considered unsolvable;<br />
• nine out of ten participants showed high to very high results in terms of their overall performance and<br />
satisfaction with the use of the telecommunication equipment provided. (A technical difficulty prevented an<br />
effective evaluation for one of the participants);<br />
• participants who had an inadequate solution, now can have an adequate solution (or alternative solution) to<br />
access telecommunication equipment and services; and<br />
• participants who had no independent access to telecommunication equipment can now independently access<br />
the network successfully.<br />
Implications<br />
Through this research it was found that people with a range of physical disabilities can use and should have equal<br />
access to telecommunications equipment and services. With the right policies, processes and support (equipment<br />
matching, education, training and delivery) in place, current off-the-shelf solutions can help alleviate problems and<br />
improve the lifestyle, social interaction, security and independence of many people with physical disabilities.<br />
Acknowledgements:<br />
This research was supported by the Commonwealth Telecommunications <strong>Research</strong> Grant Program of the Department of<br />
Communications, Information, Technology and the Arts. This project proudly supported by Telstra.<br />
41<br />
Project completed in 2003<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Development of accessible websites<br />
Tim Ziersch<br />
Manager, Special<br />
Projects<br />
Annabel Gregory<br />
Assistive Technology,<br />
Computer Access<br />
Specialist<br />
Rob Garrett<br />
Group Leader, R&D,<br />
Engineering & Support<br />
Annabelle Tilbrook<br />
Senior Occupational<br />
Therapist<br />
Christian Russell 1<br />
David Morell 2<br />
1<br />
Fusion Design<br />
Consultants<br />
2<br />
Disability Action<br />
Objective<br />
To build a suite of four websites for <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> having the highest possible level of accessibility for<br />
people with a range of disabilities.<br />
Results<br />
A comprehensive range of accessibility features were incorporated into the 4 planned websites to meet the highest<br />
level of compliance for all 14 W3C Web Content Guidelines. The sites were built and tested with a high level of<br />
satisfaction being reported by testers using a range of assistive technology. Some minor enhancements were<br />
undertaken based on tester feedback. The sites achieved the AAA W3C compliance rating of the W3C and were<br />
also awarded the silver medal in the HESTA Web Awards Competition (2004), for which one of the criteria was<br />
accessibility for people with disability.<br />
The web sites can be found at:<br />
http://www.novita.org.au/<br />
http://kids.novita.org.au/<br />
http://teens.novita.org.au/<br />
http://www.novitatech.org.au/<br />
Implications<br />
This work is important in reinforcing the need for all websites to be built so that all people, regardless of whether<br />
they have a disability or not, can easily and fully access them.<br />
42<br />
Project completed in 2003<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Using product features to select appropriate AT products<br />
Rob Garrett<br />
Group Leader, R&D,<br />
Engineering & Support<br />
Annabel Gregory<br />
Assistive Technology,<br />
Computer Access<br />
Specialist<br />
Libby Price<br />
Assistive Technology,<br />
Augmentative<br />
Communication<br />
Specialist<br />
Rebecca Gallio<br />
Rehabilitation Engineer<br />
Objective<br />
When assistive technology products are categorised by the desirable features required by the end users, it is<br />
possible to filter all the products for features required by a particular user. For example, a user who can only use<br />
1 switch and requires a device to produce speech can specify these features and then see a list of devices that<br />
have just these attributes.<br />
Earlier pioneering feature based selection work resulted in the stand-alone software “VOCAselect” 1 and “Computer<br />
Access Selector” 2 . With the addition of web pages containing product information, these innovative computer<br />
programs required product information to be entered into two different locations. With limited resources, it was<br />
difficult to maintain the software programs.<br />
The objective was to integrate the feature-based product selection system into the Assistive Technology product<br />
web pages on the new web site.<br />
Method<br />
A comprehensive comparison of feature-based selection systems was conducted and a specification included in<br />
the web site contract.<br />
The addition of a product to the online catalogue now requires the features to be identified and tagged within the<br />
web database system.<br />
Results<br />
The Product Selector system has been implemented for the Communication Devices, Computer Access and<br />
Environmental Control sections of <strong>Novita</strong>Tech’s online catalogue. The software items will also be included in<br />
the future.<br />
The Product Selection Web page can be found at:<br />
http://www.novitatech.org.au/selector.aspp=249<br />
Implications<br />
This new product selector enables people searching for assistive technology products to specify the feature or<br />
features needed and to quickly isolate a range of products most closely matched to the end user’s requirements.<br />
Purchasers are more likely to consider the full range of products that match the required features, resulting in a<br />
final purchase that is a better match to the user’s needs.<br />
43<br />
1 Stapleton D, Garrett RE. VOCAselect Version 1.0: An AAC Device Selection Tool. Proceedings of 2nd Australian Conference on Technology for<br />
People with Disabilities, Adelaide, 1995, p 114–116.<br />
2 Garrett RE, Stapleton D and Seeger BR. Computer Access Selector: A Windows-based Tool for Choosing Keyboard & Mouse Alternatives.<br />
Proceedings of EPSM 95, Queenstown NZ, 1995, p 148.<br />
Project completed in 2003<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the Tardieu Scale to quantify spasticity<br />
in biceps brachii in children with cerebral palsy.<br />
Marianne Spizzo 1<br />
Honours student<br />
Supervisors<br />
Andrea<br />
Warden Flood 1<br />
Senior Lecturer<br />
Paula Harris 2<br />
Chief Physiotherapist<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Supervisor<br />
Susan Gibson<br />
Senior <strong>Research</strong><br />
Physiotherapist<br />
1<br />
School of Health Sciences<br />
– Physiotherapy, University<br />
of South Australia<br />
2<br />
Lyell McEwin Hospital,<br />
Adelaide, South Australia<br />
Objective<br />
The Tardieu scale is a commonly used test of spasticity that involves determining the difference between full<br />
passive range of motion at slow speed and then the angle of catch at fast speed in single joints such as the elbow.<br />
The aim of this study was to establish both intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the Tardieu scale in biceps brachii<br />
of children with cerebral palsy.<br />
Method<br />
In this randomised single-blind design study, five participants with cerebral palsy (aged 4 – 16 years) were<br />
randomly assigned to one of two groups. Both right and left arms were tested on one subject, resulting in a sample<br />
of six limbs. Each subject was tested in supine on two consecutive days and at the same time of day. On each day,<br />
the Tardieu scale was assessed twice with a 5-minute inter-test interval during which the participant moved into<br />
sitting and was repositioned in supine prior to the second test. On day 1, one Rater (A) performed both tests. On<br />
day 2, Rater A was followed by Rater B for Group 1, and Rater B was followed by Rater A for Group 2. To blind the<br />
raters, an independent investigator measured all angles with a goniometer and recorded the results.<br />
Results<br />
Intra-rater reliability was acceptable (ICC(1,1) = 0.80) whereas inter-rater reliability was low (ICC(1,1) = 0.51)<br />
suggesting that the Tardieu score is not reproducible between the raters and that one rater may be required to<br />
conduct all tests to ensure agreement between repeated measures. These findings were supported by standard<br />
errors of measurement (intra-rater SEM = 6.65º and inter-rater SEM = 12.28º). Further, the minimal detectable<br />
change needed to demonstrate treatment effectiveness was 19º for one therapist and 35º for two therapists when<br />
using the Tardieu score as the outcome measure.<br />
44<br />
Implications<br />
The findings of this study suggest that the use of the Tardieu scale is justified when used by only one therapist for<br />
the measurement of biceps brachii spasticity in a child with cerebral palsy. If different therapists use the Tardieu<br />
scale, a change in score may be due to a difference in measurement technique and not a treatment effect. Further<br />
studies are needed to determine the intra- and inter- rater reliability of this scale with a larger sample and in other<br />
muscle groups and starting positions.<br />
Project completed in 2001<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Use of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure:<br />
therapists’ and parents’ views – a pilot study<br />
Terry Lyons<br />
Chief Occupational<br />
Therapist<br />
Parimala<br />
Raghavendra<br />
Manager,<br />
Clinical <strong>Research</strong><br />
Objective<br />
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) (Law, et al., 1998) is designed to measure changes in<br />
self-perception of occupational performance among clients with a variety of disabilities, across all developmental<br />
stages and by individual disciplines. However it is not known whether a multi-disciplinary team working with the<br />
same group of clients can use COPM.<br />
Method<br />
A pilot project was undertaken to investigate, whether COPM would inform the goal setting process for an early<br />
intervention (EI) group run by a multi-disciplinary team, the training needs of therapists, and their and parents’<br />
views on the usability of the tool. Four children between the ages of 3 years 11 months and 5 years with physical<br />
disabilities including Leigh’s Disease, muscular dystrophy and cerebral palsy and their 4 family members formed<br />
the EI group.; An occupational therapist, physiotherapist, speech pathologist and psychologist were trained in the<br />
use of COPM. Each therapist was allocated a client and completed the COPM with the parent/carer of that client.<br />
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the therapists after goal setting with parents, and at the end of the<br />
intervention period. The COPM was re-administrated approximately three months after the first. Parents were asked<br />
to share their experiences in identifying problem areas and their perception of change for their child.<br />
Results<br />
The COPM informed the goal-setting process for the EI group. The team was able to work on areas identified by<br />
parents that were common across the group. The team found COPM to be a simple tool to use but thought that<br />
more practice was necessary in documenting behavioural issues. Parents were positive about the goal setting<br />
process and the opportunity it provided to look back on changes in their child. COPM had provided an opportunity<br />
for them to reflect on their child’s progress and to discuss future goals.<br />
Implications<br />
The pilot project with a multi-disciplinary team working with an EI team showed that COPM could be used across<br />
different therapy areas. Parents observed progress in their children. COPM facilitates client-centred practice and<br />
may be more useful in using it with older clients and in describing occupation-related goals.<br />
45<br />
References: Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, McColl M, Polatajko H, Pollock N (1998). Canadian Occupational Performance Measures. CAOT<br />
publications: Canada.<br />
Project completed in 2002<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
What is the evidence for the use of the gross motor function measure (GMFM-88)<br />
as a functional outcome measure for children with cerebral palsy<br />
Susan Gibson<br />
Senior <strong>Research</strong><br />
Physiotherapist<br />
Physiotherapy<br />
Staff<br />
Objective<br />
The purpose of this critical appraisal of the literature was to (1) establish whether the GMFM-88 a reliable and valid<br />
tool to detect change in the gross motor skills of children with CP, and (2) establish its clinical usefulness and its<br />
sensitivity to detect change<br />
Method<br />
A systematic search was conducted using multiple databases through South Australian Health <strong>Services</strong> Libraries<br />
Consortium database (SALUS). Databases searched: Medline, CINAHL, AMED, Current Contents, IDEAL, Science<br />
Direct, Cochrane Library and Sports Discus. Key words: cerebral palsy, Gross Motor Function Measure, GMFM,<br />
GMFM-88, Gross Motor Performance Measure, GMPM, Gross Motor Functional Classification Scale, GMFCS,<br />
GMFM-66. Crombie Appraisal Tools, modified by the Clinical <strong>Research</strong> Department at <strong>Novita</strong>, were used to<br />
critically appraise the literature. All studies and articles located were acceptable evidence.<br />
Results<br />
A total of 50 studies were included. 12 articles pertaining to Question 1 (reliability and validity) were appraised:<br />
3 reviews, 7 observational studied and 2 experimental studies. For Question 2 (clinical usefulness) 38 articles were<br />
appraised: 4 reviews, 4 case studies, 15 observational studies and 15 experimental studies. The outcomes of the<br />
critical appraisal of the literature was that:<br />
• The GMFM-88 is a reliable and valid measure used to evaluate change in motor function in children with CP, it is<br />
not a very sensitive tool for the higher functioning child with a mild motor impairment, and a ceiling effect can be<br />
reached making it difficult to measure improvements in these children;<br />
• The GMFM-88 has been validated for use with children with Downs Syndrome and Osteogenesis Imperfecta; and<br />
• The GMFM-88 has been used to establish baseline profiles and detect change in gross motor function after<br />
interventions such as Selective Dorsal Rhizotomies, Botulinum Toxin Type A injections, Hyperbaric Oxygen<br />
Therapy and to demonstrate a treatment effect in the research into efficacy of intensive physiotherapy<br />
intervention and muscle strengthening programs for children with CP.<br />
46<br />
Implications<br />
This critical appraisal of the literature supports the use of the GMFM-88 as a Functional Outcomes Measurement<br />
tool for children with cerebral palsy. The physiotherapy staff at <strong>Novita</strong> continues to use the GMFM-88 as a clinical<br />
outcome measurement. The Physiotherapy Department also now uses the Gross Motor Functional Classification<br />
System, and have recently embarked on a training program for all physiotherapists at <strong>Novita</strong> in the use of the<br />
GMFM-66 and the Gross Motor Ability Estimator.<br />
Project completed in 2001<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
The prevalence of low back pain in parents of children<br />
with a physical disability aged 5 years or below<br />
Nathan Ward 1<br />
Honours Student<br />
Supervisor<br />
Marie Williams 1<br />
Associate Professor<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Supervisor<br />
Trish Bate<br />
Senior <strong>Research</strong><br />
Physiotherapist<br />
1<br />
School of Health Sciences<br />
– Physiotherapy, University<br />
of South Australia<br />
Objective<br />
Low back pain (LBP) is a significant issue within the general population. Numerous risk factors have been linked to<br />
the development of LBP, with many of these presumed to be present in parents of young children. To date, there is<br />
little information concerning the prevalence of LBP in adults caring for young physically disabled children. The aim<br />
of this study was to conduct a survey to investigate the incidence of LBP in parents of children aged five years or<br />
below that have a physical disability.<br />
Method<br />
This study used a survey design where a postal questionnaire was undertaken to determine the prevalence of<br />
LBP in the study population. The questionnaire was administered to parents who had a child who was registered<br />
with <strong>Novita</strong> and was 5 years of age or younger. The Nordic Low Back Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability<br />
Questionnaire were used in the study. A purpose-designed questionnaire to provide demographics was also<br />
mailed to each subject. Two hundred and seventy five packages were mailed out.<br />
Results<br />
This study achieved a final response rate of 36.7% (n=101). For this sample, there was a lifetime prevalence of<br />
90.1%, 12-month prevalence of 87.1% and a seven-day prevalence of 54.5%. On the day they completed the<br />
survey, 59% of parents said they had low back pain. Most parents reported only a small amount of inconvenience<br />
caused by the low back pain. There was no link between the time spent caring, washing/dressing, feeding, playing<br />
with and lifting/carrying the child and the level of disability. In the past year, 37% of the parents had sought help<br />
from a doctor, physiotherapist, chiropractor or another person due to low back pain. Low back pain had affected<br />
the normal work activities of 36% of the parents, with 41% having to limit their leisure activity due to low back pain<br />
in the last year. There also appeared to be no link between receiving assistance from a paid carer and having<br />
low back pain in either the last 7 days or 12 months. This means that having a paid carer did not help reduce or<br />
increase the incidence of low back pain in our study group.<br />
Implications<br />
The findings of the study suggest that LBP may be a significant issue for some parents with a young disabled<br />
child. However, due to the low response rate, prevalence figures cannot be considered significant of the entire<br />
population group. The Physiotherapy Discipline at <strong>Novita</strong> is considering whether back care information sessions<br />
and classes for parents should be offered on an ongoing basis.<br />
47<br />
Project completed in 2003<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
48<br />
Parimala<br />
Raghavendra<br />
Manager<br />
Clinical <strong>Research</strong><br />
Julie Smith<br />
Senior Psychologist<br />
Trevor Harrison 1<br />
Pam Donnelly<br />
Regional Manager<br />
Glenda Noble 2<br />
Senior Occupational<br />
Therapist<br />
Heather Slattery 3<br />
Actress<br />
1<br />
Harrison Consultants<br />
2<br />
Communication and<br />
Therapy <strong>Services</strong>, now part<br />
of Adult Therapy <strong>Services</strong><br />
at the Independent Living<br />
Centre<br />
3<br />
Deceased<br />
Childhood therapy experiences of adults with cerebral palsy:<br />
implications for today’s children with cerebral palsy<br />
Objective<br />
The aim of the project was to investigate how an agency providing long term support for children with cerebral<br />
palsy can best prepare them for adulthood. Adults who had received services from <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong><br />
(formerly Crippled Children’s Association of SA Inc.) as children, were asked how physiotherapy, occupational<br />
therapy, speech pathology and social work/psychology services had assisted them during their years at <strong>Novita</strong>.<br />
They were also asked what they thought of the services they had received, what else they might have needed,<br />
and what suggestions they would like to make regarding <strong>Novita</strong>’s services for the future.<br />
Method<br />
A qualitative research methodology involving focus groups and individual interviews was employed with a<br />
participatory research paradigm in which people with disabilities and researchers worked together at each stage<br />
of the project.<br />
Fifteen people with cerebral palsy between the ages of 20 and 35 years who had received services from <strong>Novita</strong><br />
as children, participated in the study. Ten of them were individually interviewed and 5 participated in focus groups.<br />
All data was transcribed verbatim and cross-checked with the participants. Inductive analysis of the data included<br />
displaying the data in tables, developing codes, and identifying patterns, themes, and categories of responses.<br />
The report was provided to the participants in written and audio format and their feedback obtained and<br />
incorporated in the final report.<br />
Results<br />
Of all the services, participants remembered physiotherapy in greatest detail and depth. They spoke very highly of<br />
the quality of physiotherapy service they had received, in particular the amount of therapy. Of the nine participants<br />
who had received speech pathology services, most were satisfied. In looking back at occupational therapy<br />
services, they identified a need to have more input on practical living issues, e.g. getting about in the community,<br />
finding employment, managing a team of attendants. The majority of participants were satisfied with friendship<br />
experiences, but reported dissatisfaction with aspects of their school experiences.<br />
Some of the recommendations made by the participants:<br />
• Ensure mobility is presented as a range of options;<br />
• Provide more independence training;<br />
• Provide more training across a range of communication skills: directing personal attendants & conversing<br />
with peers;<br />
• Give greater emphasis to teaching literacy skills, especially the ability to read; and<br />
• Advocate more for disability awareness in the community, better access, better understanding and support.<br />
Implications<br />
A retrospective evaluation of its services provides <strong>Novita</strong> with some clear recommendations for future service<br />
delivery. A “<strong>Research</strong> into <strong>Services</strong>“ sub-committee studied the report and proposed two distinct areas of<br />
recommendations:<br />
1. Philosophical basis for <strong>Novita</strong> to reflect a focus on the development of autonomy in the young person; and<br />
2. Content and focus of services particularly for adolescents.<br />
For more information visit www.novita.org.au<br />
Project completed in 2002<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Comparison of feedback conditions in spelling instruction for a child using AAC<br />
Rebecca Morris 1<br />
Speech Pathologist<br />
Parimala<br />
Raghavendra<br />
Manager<br />
Clinical <strong>Research</strong><br />
1<br />
Currently R Oaten at<br />
Intellectual Disability<br />
<strong>Services</strong> Council, Inc.<br />
Objective<br />
To investigate the effectiveness of three feedback conditions (PRINT – looking at the spelt word on the Liquid<br />
Crystal display only, SPEECH – listening to the synthesised word only, SPEECH-PRINT – listening and looking) on<br />
learning to spell 24 words for an 11-year-old boy with cerebral palsy and complex communication needs (CCN)<br />
who used a speech generating device (SGD) The child had a mild intellectual impairment and normal<br />
hearing and vision.<br />
Method<br />
A pre-assessment phase determined words that the child comprehended but could not spell. In study 1 an<br />
adapted alternating treatments design was used to evaluate the effects of the above 3 feedback conditions on<br />
spelling acquisition of 12 x 3 letter words. The sessions were conducted weekly. The spelling instruction employed<br />
the copy-write-compare method under the three different feedback conditions. The order of the feedback<br />
conditions within each session was counterbalanced to avoid any condition being favoured. In study 2 an intrasubject<br />
direct replication of study 1 was conducted with a different set of 12 x 3 letter words. These sessions were<br />
daily rather than weekly and generalisation and maintenance phases were added.<br />
Results<br />
The child learnt to spell all 24 words under the three feedback conditions. However, the PRINT condition<br />
consistently reached criterion (all words spelt correctly on two consecutive sessions) before the other two<br />
conditions. The intra-subject replication strengthened this finding. The sequence of criterion attainment was PRINT<br />
(session 21) followed by SPEECH and SPEECH-PRINT conditions simultaneously (session 33) in Study 1 and<br />
PRINT (session 10), SPEECH (session 18) and SPEECH-PRINT (session 29) in Study 2.<br />
Implications<br />
Children with CCN using SGD may learn to spell using visual feedback and may have the potential to develop<br />
some literacy skills if training is provided over a lengthy period.<br />
Project completed in 2001<br />
49<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Evaluation of behaviour management advice<br />
Angela<br />
Crettenden 1<br />
Clinical Psychologist<br />
Tim Connell<br />
Chief Clinical<br />
Psychologist<br />
1<br />
Currently a Doctoral<br />
Student at The University<br />
of Adelaide<br />
Objective<br />
Children with physical disabilities and their families experience significant psychological issues which are several<br />
fold. Significant numbers of parents experience stress due to grief and having to deal with diverse child needs.<br />
Some children experience difficulties learning basic skills, coping with school, getting on with others and living with<br />
limitations and others’ reactions.<br />
Analysis of the 270 referrals received by the <strong>Novita</strong> psychologists from June to December, 2000 found the most<br />
frequent referral (36% of the total) was for behaviour management. To evaluate the effectiveness of services<br />
provided for these referrals, and explore how our service could be improved, parents of children meeting specific<br />
criteria were invited to participate in an evaluation study.<br />
Method<br />
Parents of children referred to <strong>Novita</strong> psychologists were invited to participate in the study if the children presented<br />
with overt, acting-out behavioural issues (e.g. aggression and noncompliance), were between 2 and 10 years of<br />
age and did not attend a special school. This resulted in 17 families participating. The children included 12 boys,<br />
5 girls, average age of 6 years, 0 months (SD: 3 years, 4 months). The ages ranged between 18 months and<br />
13 years, 5 months. As part of study participation, parents completed the Parenting Scale (O’Leary et al, 1993),<br />
Child Behaviour Questionnaire (Eyberg & Pincus, <strong>1999</strong>) before and after two terms (Average pre-post interval:<br />
18.1 weeks; SD: 8 weeks). At the post-test they were also asked to complete the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire<br />
(Larsen et al, 1979), and the treating psychologist completed the Therapist Satisfaction Questionnaire<br />
(Crettenden, 2001).<br />
Results<br />
After intervention, 70% of families reported that problems were now less severe and 67% reported a fewer number<br />
of behaviour problems. 75% reported an improvement in their overall parenting style (p
Evaluation of family centred practice using the measure of process of care<br />
South Australian<br />
Community Health<br />
<strong>Research</strong> Unit (SACHRU)<br />
Michael Bentley<br />
Senior <strong>Research</strong><br />
Officer<br />
<strong>Novita</strong><br />
Reference Group<br />
Sarah Anderson<br />
Orthotist, <strong>Novita</strong>Tech<br />
Jane Loveday<br />
Senior Options<br />
Coordinator, Family<br />
Support <strong>Services</strong><br />
Terry Lyons<br />
Chief Occupational<br />
Therapist<br />
Pauline McGregor<br />
Regional Manager<br />
Parimala<br />
Raghavendra<br />
Manager,<br />
Clinical <strong>Research</strong><br />
Sonya Murchland<br />
Acting Manager,<br />
Clinical <strong>Research</strong><br />
Objective<br />
The aim of the project is to evaluate “how family-centred” is <strong>Novita</strong> in providing therapy, rehabilitation engineering,<br />
and family support services to clients and families of <strong>Novita</strong>. The South Australian Community Health <strong>Research</strong><br />
Unit (SACHRU) has been contracted to conduct the evaluation as part of <strong>Novita</strong>’s ongoing commitment to service<br />
quality. SACHRU will work closely with the <strong>Novita</strong> Reference Group.<br />
Method<br />
The evaluation will use two survey instruments developed by CanChild, Canada.<br />
The Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC) is a self-administered questionnaire that measures parents’/caregivers’<br />
perceptions of the extent to which specific behaviours of <strong>Novita</strong> staff occur. A sample of 285 families stratified by<br />
three age groups of clients (> 6 years, 6 – 12 and 13 – 18 years) and metropolitan/country places of residence will<br />
be sent the MPOC–20 questionnaire.<br />
The Measure of Processes of Care for Service Providers (MPOC-SP) is a 27 item self-assessment questionnaire for<br />
staff working in paediatrics, designed to measure their reported implementation of family-centred practice. All staff<br />
of <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> who have direct contact with clients and their families (approximately 170 staff) will be<br />
sent the MPOC-SP questionnaire.<br />
Implications<br />
The outcomes will inform <strong>Novita</strong> of parents’ perception of <strong>Novita</strong>’s family centred practice behaviours and also<br />
staff’s perception of their behaviours towards families. It may highlight strengths and needs in implementation of<br />
family centred practice. The results from MPOC-SP may also be useful in professional development activities.<br />
Project commenced in 2004<br />
51<br />
How occupational therapists at <strong>Novita</strong> train clients in the scanning access technique<br />
Jennifer Jones 1<br />
Honours Student<br />
Supervisor<br />
Hugh Stewart 1<br />
Lecturer<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Supervisors:<br />
Sue van der Loo<br />
Senior Occupational<br />
Therapist, <strong>Novita</strong>Tech<br />
Support Team<br />
Angela Guidera<br />
Senior Speech<br />
Pathologist, <strong>Novita</strong>Tech<br />
Support Team<br />
1<br />
School of Health Sciences<br />
– Occupational Therapy,<br />
University of South Australia<br />
Objective<br />
This study explored the role of occupational therapists at <strong>Novita</strong> in training children in scanning access techniques.<br />
It then went on to investigate how this role was carried out by three experienced occupational therapists.<br />
Method<br />
The first part of the study employed a survey methodology where all <strong>Novita</strong> occupational therapists, speech<br />
pathologists, and their assistants completed a questionnaire. The second part involved qualitative methodology<br />
using in-depth, semi-structured interviews with three experienced occupational therapists.<br />
Results<br />
The survey found that the most common clinical diagnoses of clients who were taught scanning were cerebral<br />
palsy (CP) with spastic quadriplegia, and athetoid CP. Scanning was most commonly introduced between<br />
3–5 years of age. Occupational therapists were heavily involved in training in all phases, and speech pathologists<br />
were more involved in the middle to later phases. The training process was identified as consisting of a sequence<br />
of steps. From the in-depth interviews, four themes relating to the scanning process were found. These were that<br />
the process of scanning training is progressive and parallel; clients must be considered on an individual basis;<br />
scanning training is very closely linked with functional goals; and a collaborative approach in teaching the child<br />
and primary caregivers is important.<br />
Implications<br />
There is a significant role for occupational therapists in teaching a child to scan, despite the relatively small<br />
population of scanning users. The training of scanning is a dynamic process that uses a number of different<br />
approaches and is collaborative with the family and health professionals. Successful scanning enables enhanced<br />
quality of life.<br />
Project completed in November 2001<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
“Is more therapy better” A comparison of two models of intensive physiotherapy<br />
and “conventional” intensive physiotherapy for children with cerebral palsy<br />
Susan Gibson<br />
Senior <strong>Research</strong><br />
Physiotherapist<br />
Parimala<br />
Raghavendra<br />
Manager,<br />
Clinical <strong>Research</strong><br />
Philip Darbyshire 1<br />
Chair of Nursing<br />
1<br />
Midwifery and <strong>Research</strong><br />
and Practice Development,<br />
Women’s and Children’s<br />
Hospital, Adelaide<br />
Funding<br />
Channel 7<br />
Children’s <strong>Research</strong><br />
Foundation ($35,000):<br />
2000 – 2002.<br />
Objective<br />
The aim of the study was to investigate if the rate of motor skill achievement and muscle strength increased<br />
following intensive physiotherapy intervention for children with cerebral palsy (CP). The models of intensive<br />
physiotherapy investigated were: Model 1: Conventional Intensive Physiotherapy Intervention (10 hours over 10<br />
weeks); Model 2: Intensive Holiday Physiotherapy Program (21 hours over 2 weeks); and Model 3: Intensive After<br />
School Block of Physiotherapy (21 hours over 4 weeks). The children, their parents, and physiotherapists were also<br />
asked their opinions and perceptions of the models of intensive intervention.<br />
Method<br />
Sixteen children with CP, classified at Level II or III on the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS),<br />
and aged between 4 and 7 years, were matched on GMFCS levels and then randomly assigned to two groups:<br />
Group A received Model 1 and Model 3 and a 6-week period of “no intervention”. Group B received Model 1 and<br />
Model 2 and an 8-week period of “no intervention”. Each group had a 2-week washout period between models.<br />
Muscle strength (Hand Held Myometer) and gross motor function (Gross Motor Function Measure) were recorded<br />
on 6 occasions. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) was administered to parents on 5 of<br />
these occasions. Views and opinions were gathered from parents, children and physiotherapists through focus<br />
groups and individual interviews.<br />
Results<br />
There was no significant difference in rate of motor skill acquisition or muscle strength between Model 1 and Model<br />
2 for Group B, and Model 1 and Model 3 for Group A. Although changes in muscle strength and gross motor<br />
function were unremarkable, parents perceived positive changes in their child’s functional skills as measured by<br />
COPM scores. Results from the interviews suggested that Group A children preferred weekly physiotherapy to after<br />
school intensive. Group B children preferred the school holiday intensive block to weekly physiotherapy. Parents<br />
were positive about both intensive models of intervention, but had specific issues and concerns relating to the<br />
models. The physiotherapists’ responses to the intensive models were variable.<br />
52<br />
Implications<br />
The lack of significant difference between intensive models of intervention may indicate issues regarding lack of<br />
sensitivity to change of tools used, and the use of small groups of children with high variability. The study highlights<br />
the importance of goal setting with parents as changes in gross motor function were related to the goals set,<br />
rather than the intensity of intervention. In addition to measuring functional changes using measurement tools, it is<br />
important to gather the views and perceptions of the people involved in studies as it assists in building meaningful<br />
partnerships resulting in a better family-centred service.<br />
Project completed in 2003<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Motor and functional outcomes of children with physical and /or multiple disabilities<br />
living in rural and remote areas compared with their metropolitan counterparts – a pilot study<br />
Sue Durand 1<br />
Senior Physiotherapist<br />
Pauline McGregor<br />
Regional Manager<br />
Sonya Murchland<br />
Senior <strong>Research</strong><br />
Occupational Therapist<br />
1<br />
Currently employed<br />
in private practice<br />
Objective<br />
In early <strong>1999</strong> an evaluation of the rural outreach service was carried out by means of a parent, caregiver and other<br />
local personnel questionnaire. The results indicated that there was a great deal of satisfaction with the service but<br />
the question remained as to whether the motor and functional gains of the children in remote and rural areas were<br />
equivalent to their metropolitan contemporaries. This study attempted to determine whether there were differences<br />
in the motor and functional outcomes of children with physical and/or multiple disabilities living in rural and remote<br />
areas compared with their metropolitan counterparts.<br />
Method<br />
A convenience sample of four matched pairs of children, who were clients of <strong>Novita</strong> was selected for this study,<br />
with parental permission gained for their inclusion. All of the children were aged under 6 at the end of the study.<br />
Each pair was matched as near as possible for age (ideally within 6 months), gender and disability. Pre and<br />
Post testing by the same Occupational Therapist and Physiotherapist occurred 12 months apart. No blinding of<br />
assessors occurred. The matched pairs were to be assessed within one month interval of each other. The children<br />
were assessed with the Peabody Motor Scales, Wee FIM, and parent survey of satisfaction.<br />
Results<br />
All children made fine and / or gross motor progress over the 12-month period. However, all children progressed at<br />
a slower rate, making developmental gains that were equivalent to less than 12 months.<br />
The developmental ratio of mean motor age/chronological age was consistent for all clients on pre and post<br />
testing. The Wee-FIM results appeared to be related to the parent’s understanding of their child’s abilities and how<br />
this understanding changed over time.<br />
Implications<br />
This pilot study suggested that children who lived in the country and have access to specialist paediatric therapy<br />
input quarterly made comparable progress to their city peers. They have an expectation of participation by family<br />
and local services to provide regular input that is guided by the specialist services. Parents residing in the country<br />
may be reassured that their children are not disadvantaged due to the location of their home.<br />
53<br />
Project completed in 2002<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Single event multilevel surgery: a description of stakeholder experiences<br />
Lauren Dryden 1<br />
Honours Student<br />
Supervisor<br />
Karen Grimmer 2<br />
Director<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Supervisor<br />
Susan Bostock<br />
Senior Clinical<br />
Physiotherapist<br />
1<br />
School of Health Sciences<br />
– Physiotherapy University<br />
of South Australia<br />
2<br />
Centre for Allied Health<br />
<strong>Research</strong>, University of<br />
South Australia<br />
Objective<br />
Single event multilevel surgery is performed on a small number of children with cerebral palsy each year. It consists<br />
of multiple procedures being undertaken in one operation and occurs when conservative management success<br />
is decreasing. Following orthopaedic surgery, research has shown children with cerebral palsy experience a<br />
regression in motor function and a temporary loss of functional activities.<br />
An effective physiotherapy/ rehabilitation program is considered crucial to the success of multilevel interventions.<br />
The program must be intensive, and requires compliance and motivation from all stakeholders. <strong>Research</strong> states<br />
the need for parents to set expectations and desires around which a multidisciplinary team can create goals which<br />
are individualised, explicit and prudent; and treatment must take into account the family’s support and available<br />
resources. Despite this acknowledgement, information about what parents and children hope to achieve by<br />
undergoing surgery, the preparation of children and their parents for the operation, and the families’ perceptions<br />
of the outcomes of surgery are limited.<br />
The aim of this study was to report, from the perspective of all stakeholders, their experience from pre-operative<br />
planning to postoperative rehabilitation to identify barriers and facilitators for successful rehabilitation and to<br />
enhance preparation of future children and their families for surgery.<br />
Method<br />
This study used a qualitative approach and consisted of interviews with six physiotherapists, four families, one<br />
paediatric rehabilitation specialist and an orthopaedic surgeon. Transcripts were analysed and coded to extract<br />
key themes.<br />
54<br />
Results<br />
Themes which emerged from the data included recommendations for surgery, outcomes from surgery, information<br />
to families, complications, emotional factors and areas to improve from all stakeholder groups; as well as<br />
postoperative services from the family and medical personnel interviews; rehabilitation experience from the family<br />
interviews; and role of the physiotherapist and rehabilitation from the physiotherapist interviews. The findings<br />
suggested there is potential to improve service delivery in the areas of preoperative preparation, postoperative pain<br />
management, and postoperative family assistance.<br />
Implications<br />
It is anticipated this research will facilitate the development of a more comprehensive education tool aiming to<br />
improve management of children having SEMLS in areas including formalised pre-surgery goal setting, preparing<br />
the house and family members for when the child requires increased assistance, and rehabilitation requirements.<br />
Project completed in 2004<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Australian representation on ISO TC173 SC1<br />
Lloyd Walker<br />
Director, <strong>Novita</strong>Tech<br />
Funding:<br />
Attendance allowance<br />
from Standards<br />
Australia<br />
2003 – NZ – $2,400<br />
2004 – USA – $3,500<br />
Objective<br />
Ensure that Australian needs and expertise are recognised in the development of new international standards that<br />
relate to wheeled mobility devices.<br />
Method<br />
<strong>Novita</strong>Tech staff have participated in Standards development over the years, but this involvement almost<br />
completely ceased around 2000. Dr Walker joined all five relevant ISO working groups listed below in mid 2003.<br />
Since that time he has monitored discussions on the various electronic lists that the groups have used and<br />
also participated in voting on Australia’s behalf through the ISO Server. He (or if available a suitable nominee)<br />
will be attending a face-to-face meeting (usually 5 days) of the five Working Groups at least once per year, and<br />
maintaining contact at other times through email.<br />
Results<br />
The group responsible for international standards relating to wheelchairs is Technical Committee 173 (TC173).<br />
TC173 has a Standing Committee 1 that oversees the activities of five Working Groups (WG):<br />
WG1 – Test Methods<br />
WG6 – Transportation Safety<br />
WG8 – Electronic and power systems<br />
WG10 – Stair climbing wheelchairs<br />
WG11 – Seating and related systems<br />
In November 2003 (Christchurch, NZ) and May 2004 (Estes Park, USA) Dr Walker participated in the face-toface<br />
meetings of the Working Groups over a full working week. In <strong>January</strong> 2004, Dr Walker participated by<br />
teleconference in discussions of WG6 as it met in Pittsburgh, and a delegate with relevant experience (Kevin<br />
Clements – Manager Mobility & Seating) attended the WG11 meeting in March 2004 in Vancouver, Canada.<br />
Implications<br />
There are currently a number of International Standards under review or being developed. Our contribution has<br />
been highly valued by our international colleagues, and this work has facilitated an approach that will make it<br />
simpler for Australia to adopt ISO standards rather than create our own requirements. Input into the development<br />
of these key documents has also helped to ensure that pragmatic testing and user requirements are being<br />
considered early, and that our personnel, and the Australian sector generally, are aware of changes being planned<br />
at an International level.<br />
55<br />
Project recommenced in 2003<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Churchill Fellowship research, experiences and outcomes<br />
David Hobbs<br />
Senior Rehabilitation<br />
Engineer<br />
Funding:<br />
The Winston Churchill<br />
Memorial Trust, 2003,<br />
$16,600<br />
Objective<br />
The purpose of this Churchill Fellowship research was to investigate how leading Rehabilitation<br />
Engineering (RE) Centres around the world are using research and development and the application<br />
of technology to assist people with a disability. Inherent to this research was understanding the<br />
structure and set-up of each facility in an effort to determine how their research was conducted, how it<br />
was funded, how research priorities were determined, to what extent each centre collaborated with industry or<br />
other centres, and the range of current project work. A secondary focus was to investigate how the concept and<br />
process of “Universal Design” was being taught and implemented within the field of RE.<br />
Method<br />
This research was conducted over a period of 8 weeks with 12 centres in England, Toronto, and the United States<br />
being visited and researched. A variety of centres and settings were chosen, including specialist Rehabilitation<br />
Centres, departments within hospitals, and tertiary research facilities. Initial contact was made with key<br />
stakeholders at each of the centres after the scholarship was awarded, and an individual program was developed<br />
that allowed the investigator to conduct his research and meet with key staff. At each centre the investigator was<br />
given an opportunity to give a presentation to interested staff about <strong>Novita</strong> and <strong>Novita</strong>Tech and the range of work<br />
that is conducted. The Fellowship concluded with the annual Rehabilitation Engineering Society of North America<br />
(RESNA) Conference in Atlanta, Georgia, the USA – one of the largest conferences focussing on technology<br />
and disability.<br />
56<br />
Results<br />
A number of novel, user-driven, innovative products and programs were investigated and researched at the<br />
different centres. These came from areas such as seating, mobility, home health care, telecommunications, and<br />
the general area of ‘assistive technology’. Many of these products, particularly those from Canada and the United<br />
States, are commercially available but have not reached Australian shores or are unknown to Australian healthcare<br />
professionals. Examples of such novel products include a talking mobile phone, the Movement-to-Music therapy<br />
system, a novel seating system called the Flip2sit booster seat, and Solesensor (an innovative shoe insole that<br />
improves balance in the elderly).<br />
Common themes that were identified were an emphasis on – technology transfer; information dissemination; end<br />
user involvement; research into ageing, falls, and balance; and a focus on developing collaborative links with<br />
industry and other institutions. Notably, every centre was either fully affiliated with a tertiary institution or operated<br />
as a department within a tertiary institution. This link strengthened their research program and was a common<br />
successful trait.<br />
Two successful research and development models were identified and investigated: namely the Canadian<br />
provincial Ontario Rehabilitation Technology Consortium (ORTC) model and the United States federal National<br />
Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation <strong>Research</strong> (NIDRR) model. A critical ingredient of both of these models was<br />
that of government support. Without government initiation and support, neither model would exist.<br />
Implications<br />
A number of benefits have resulted from this research. The investigator identified a centre in Atlanta (Georgia,<br />
USA) that is conducting similar mobile phone technology research and initial collaborative links have since been<br />
established. The investigator has also been successful in introducing the concept of music therapy at <strong>Novita</strong>, by<br />
bringing the Movement-to-Music therapy program to Australia. Formal links have also since been established with<br />
a major distributor of assistive technology equipment in Canada. Future plans include hosting a forum on how<br />
rehabilitation engineering and assistive technology centres can work closer with industry and academia to replicate<br />
the ORTC model of product innovation and development.<br />
Project completed in 2003<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Development and delivery of an undergraduate subject in<br />
rehabilitation engineering at Flinders University<br />
Barry Seeger 1<br />
Director, <strong>Novita</strong>Tech<br />
Lloyd Walker<br />
Director, <strong>Novita</strong>Tech<br />
Rob Garrett<br />
Group Leader, R&D,<br />
Engineering & Support.<br />
David Hobbs<br />
<strong>Research</strong> &<br />
Development Dept.<br />
Kevin Clements<br />
Mobility & Seating<br />
Dept.<br />
Annabel Gregory<br />
Assistive Technology<br />
Dept.<br />
Libby Price<br />
Assistive Technology<br />
Dept.<br />
Leigh Taylor<br />
Group Leader, Mobility,<br />
Orthotics and Seating<br />
1<br />
Retired<br />
Objective<br />
In 1997 the Division, in conjunction with the School of Engineering (now the School of Informatics and Engineering)<br />
at Flinders University, initiated and began teaching an elective subject in Rehabilitation Engineering (course code<br />
ENGR 5122). The aim was to expose undergraduate Biomedical Engineering students to the career path and<br />
challenges of the field of Rehabilitation Engineering.<br />
Method<br />
The semester long 13-week course is typically taught to 5th (final) year Biomedical Engineering students at the<br />
university. It is structured so that each 3-hour lecture focuses on a different topic and the students are exposed to<br />
a number of different environments outside of the classroom. Approximately a third of the classes are taught on<br />
the university campus, the remainder involve site visits to <strong>Novita</strong>Tech, the Independent Living Centre, the Disability<br />
Information Resource Centre, and the Royal Society for the Blind.<br />
The topics that are addressed over the 13 weeks are:<br />
• An introduction and overview of assistive technology;<br />
• Universal Design;<br />
• Delivering assistive technology services to the customer;<br />
• Assessing access to the built environment;<br />
• Computer interfaces and computers as extrinsic enablers;<br />
• Augmentative and Alternative Communication systems;<br />
• Mobility and seating;<br />
• Environmental control;<br />
• Prosthetics and orthotics; and<br />
• Sensory aids for visual and auditory impairments.<br />
As well as the lecturers listed alongside, a number of guest lecturers assist with the course, providing<br />
specialist input.<br />
Results<br />
Students taking the course submit 3 problem-based assignments throughout the semester and sit a 2-hour exam<br />
during the normal exam period. Recently the exam format has shifted from being a 100% multiple-choice exam to<br />
including a number of short answer questions. Three of <strong>Novita</strong>Tech’s current engineers are graduates of the course.<br />
57<br />
Implications<br />
The course has been instrumental in terms of exposing undergraduate Biomedical Engineering students to the<br />
field of Rehabilitation Engineering. It continues to be a popular elective course for final year students. Interest<br />
in the topics and style of delivery is now being shown by other universities in Adelaide. This will potentially lead<br />
to a multidisciplinary class group who are interested in being exposed to the field of Assistive Technology and<br />
Rehabilitation Engineering.<br />
Project commenced in 1997<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Development of collaborative links with University of Pittsburgh<br />
Lloyd Walker<br />
Director, <strong>Novita</strong>Tech<br />
Rory Cooper 1<br />
1<br />
School of Rehabilitation<br />
and Health Sciences,<br />
University of Pittsburgh,<br />
Pittsburgh, USA<br />
Funding:<br />
Undertaken as<br />
part of other visits.<br />
Joint funding being<br />
explored.<br />
Objective<br />
This work seeks to establish a link into related research that will offer the opportunity of multi-centred research and<br />
collaborative funding proposals between <strong>Novita</strong>Tech and United States and European colleagues.<br />
Method<br />
The University of Pittsburgh is a world-leading centre in rehabilitation engineering research. It has hosted the<br />
Rehabilitation Engineering <strong>Research</strong> Centres in Wheeled Mobility and Wheelchair Transportation Safety. It is also<br />
a Veteran’s Administration (VA) specialist research centre – the Human Engineering <strong>Research</strong> Laboratories.<br />
It is expected that following the agreement between the two groups on joint research proposals, competitive<br />
funding submissions will be developed to support both the site based research and the collaboration. An aim<br />
of this work is to also permit the exchange of personnel between the centres as a means of strengthening the<br />
research and expertise exchange.<br />
Results<br />
There have been loose links between individuals at both centres over a number of years, but following various<br />
meetings during 2003 and 2004, the two groups are now negotiating on two potential collaborative research<br />
proposals: Real use characteristics of wheelchairs; and upper limb function and overuse biomechanics. Both of<br />
these projects have developed from established research programs in Pittsburgh and Australia’s contribution<br />
would be to extend the research to include children with disabilities. There is very little empirical evidence in this<br />
area. Currently project proposals are being reviewed for use in the Australian context including the ethical needs<br />
and changes that may be required for the different subject group.<br />
58<br />
Implications<br />
Potentially significant insight into how young people use and are affected by their wheeled mobility. This work<br />
would also permit strong international links that strengthen the power of research techniques by increasing the<br />
population base under study. As a result more definitive conclusions can be drawn on improving the health,<br />
wellbeing and social inclusion of people with disabilities.<br />
Project commenced in 2004<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Rob Garrett<br />
Group Leader, R&D,<br />
Engineering & Support<br />
Rob Burns 1<br />
(chair)<br />
Fiona Kieni-Judd 1<br />
(Telecommunications.<br />
Standards)<br />
Mike Johns 2<br />
Hank Wylie 3<br />
Teresa Corbin 4<br />
Bryan Porter 4<br />
Andrew Stewart 5<br />
Paul Robinson 6<br />
Rolf Regel 7<br />
Gunela Astbrink 8<br />
Merv Sewell 9<br />
1<br />
Australian<br />
Communications Authority<br />
2<br />
Australian<br />
Communications Industry<br />
Forum<br />
3<br />
Communications Aid<br />
Users Society<br />
4<br />
Consumers’<br />
Telecommunications<br />
Network<br />
5<br />
Deafness Forum<br />
6<br />
IBM<br />
7<br />
Siemens<br />
8<br />
TEDICORE<br />
9<br />
Telstra<br />
Objective<br />
Disability Standards Working Group (DSWG)<br />
The Disability Standards Working Group (DSWG) was convened at the Australian Communications Authority’s<br />
(ACA) Communications Technical Regulation Advisory Committee (CTRAC) meeting on 23 May 2002. The<br />
Working Group was established as a result of the ACA’s dissatisfaction with the limited content of the current<br />
telecommunications disability standard.<br />
The DSWG was required to provide advice and make recommendations on what needs to be included in any<br />
future disability standards and appropriate compliance arrangements.<br />
The disability standard does not cover specialist equipment for people with disabilities, but does specify the<br />
requirements for features on the regular phone that will facilitate access to the standard telephone service for<br />
those with a disability.<br />
Method<br />
Representatives from the disability sector, telecommunications industry and Australian Communications Authority<br />
were sought.<br />
A total of 5 one-day meetings were held in Melbourne in 2002 to develop the required document.<br />
Results<br />
The final recommendations contain a list of features in two categories. The “A List” is a proposed list of features<br />
that are generally considered to be of benefit to all members of our community, and are to be considered as<br />
mandatory. This list includes features such as a standard key layout, adjustable ringer volume, a non-slip base,<br />
etc. The “B List” contains desirable features that can be phased in over time. A home phone will need to comply<br />
with at least 6 of the features on the “B List”. This approach will open the way for future standards to “raise the bar”<br />
and specify more than 6 features. These features include items such as enlarged keys, key feedback, high contrast<br />
display, microphone amplification, etc.<br />
The final report “Communications Technical Regulation Advisory Committee – <strong>Report</strong> on features for inclusion in<br />
future disability standards, 24 February 2003”, is now available from the Australian Communications Authority.<br />
Implications<br />
The final report has been submitted to the CTRAC meeting, and as a result, the ACA has requested that the<br />
Australian Communications Industry Forum develop:<br />
a) an Industry Code to specify obligations on customer equipment importers and manufacturers to provide<br />
product information on the functional characteristics of phones that would be beneficial to people with a<br />
disability; and<br />
b) an Industry Guideline to provide guidance for phone equipment importers and manufacturers on features<br />
of customer equipment used for telecommunication that will assist consumers with disabilities.<br />
See also page 62 (Phone Accessibility Information Working Committee).<br />
59<br />
Project completed in 2003<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Enhancing innovation and development of new products in the<br />
Australian rehabilitation equipment sector<br />
Alex Svistounov<br />
Senior Testing Engineer<br />
Objective<br />
To develop methods and strategies to maintain and enhance the process of innovation and the design of new products<br />
and technologies in the Australian Medical Devices Industry with specific reference to the Rehabilitation Equipment sector.<br />
Method<br />
This research is a part of a Masters of Engineering Degree through The University of Adelaide. The research will<br />
involve the evaluation of the suitability and the adaptation of advanced innovation, design and failure prediction<br />
methods and their combinations for the Rehabilitation Equipment sector.<br />
The research will also include an analysis of the effect of the new Therapeutic Goods Medical Device legislation on<br />
the Australian Rehabilitation Equipment sector, with respect to innovation.<br />
The design and innovation processes in the Australian Medical Device Industry and effects of the TGA regulations<br />
will be compared with analogous processes, regulations and effects in Europe.<br />
Implications<br />
This research will evaluate the effects of the new Therapeutic Goods (Medical Device) legislation on the Australian<br />
Rehabilitation Equipment sector with respect to the development of new products and harmonisation with<br />
international best practice. The quality systems used by manufacturers and the quality and safety of equipment will<br />
also be investigated. Instrumental techniques and tools for maintaining and enhancing innovation and the design<br />
of new quality products and technologies in the Rehabilitation Sector will be developed and verified.<br />
Project commenced in September 2004<br />
60<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Evaluation and scoping of a movement analysis facility in Adelaide<br />
Lloyd Walker<br />
Director, <strong>Novita</strong>Tech<br />
David Hobbs<br />
Senior Rehabilitation<br />
Engineer<br />
Judy Sprod<br />
Chief Physiotherapist<br />
Susan Gibson<br />
Senior <strong>Research</strong><br />
Physiotherapist<br />
Trish Bate<br />
Senior <strong>Research</strong><br />
Physiotherapist<br />
Esther May 1<br />
Susan Hillier 1<br />
Paul Grimshaw 1<br />
Karen Reynolds 2<br />
Trevor Hearn 2<br />
1<br />
School of Health<br />
Sciences, University of<br />
South Australia<br />
2<br />
School of Informatics<br />
and Engineering, Flinders<br />
University, Adelaide,<br />
Australia<br />
Objective<br />
To offer the people of Adelaide a world-class movement analysis facility that will permit research, teaching but most<br />
importantly, a clinical evaluation tool.<br />
Method<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> has been utilising gait analysis in a two dimensional context for several years. A number<br />
of children have also been funded by the Variety Club to attend the Hugh Williamson Gait Laboratory at the Royal<br />
Children’s Hospital in Melbourne for more detailed 3D examinations as a precursor to surgical intervention.<br />
A visit by Prof Kit Vaughan drew together a number of potential partners to explore what further options could be<br />
introduced into Adelaide that would both maximise the usefulness of a full 3D facility but also provide access for<br />
the clinical cases currently being referred to Melbourne for assessment.<br />
Results<br />
To date discussions have been held with the University of South Australia, Flinders University, the Gerontology<br />
group at the Repatriation General Hospital and key individuals within <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong>. As a result of<br />
negotiations, a proposal has been developed for a joint Post Doctoral position to be based at the University of<br />
South Australia to establish collaborative research projects, evaluate the potential systems and build the case<br />
for a dedicated facility (potentially with a satellite facility at Regency Park Centre) to serve a number of needs in<br />
South Australia.<br />
Implications<br />
This project, if approved in final form, may herald a range of joint research initiatives between clinical and university<br />
based researchers. It will also establish a facility that can offer the same level of movement analysis that is available<br />
in Melbourne and permit our involvement in several international biomechanics studies of direct relevance to<br />
wheelchair users.<br />
Project commenced in 2002<br />
61<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
62<br />
Rob Garrett<br />
Group Leader, R&D,<br />
Engineering & Support<br />
Teresa Corbin 1<br />
Chair<br />
Gunela Astbrink 2<br />
Bert Ciavarra 3<br />
Deborah<br />
Goodman 4<br />
Malcolm Garnham 5<br />
Kim Yan 6<br />
Richard Robbins 7<br />
Cecily Yan 8<br />
Stacey Joyce 9<br />
1<br />
Consumers’<br />
Telecommunications<br />
Network<br />
2<br />
TEDICORE<br />
3<br />
Telstra<br />
4<br />
Vodafone<br />
5<br />
Trillium Communications<br />
5<br />
Cisco systems<br />
7<br />
NEC Business Solutions<br />
8<br />
Australian Electrical &<br />
Electronic Manufacturers’<br />
Association Ltd<br />
9<br />
Australian<br />
Communications Authority<br />
Objective<br />
Phone accessibility information working committee<br />
At the direction of the Australian Communications Authority, an Accessibility Information Working Committee has<br />
been established under the auspices of the Customer Equipment and Cable Reference Panel (CECRP) of the<br />
Australian Communications Industry Forum (ACIF). This Committee is to develop:<br />
a) An Industry Code to specify obligations on customer equipment importers and manufacturers to<br />
provide product information on the functional characteristics of home and mobile phones that would be<br />
beneficial to people with a disability. This information is to be provided to phone companies that provide<br />
telecommunication services. Consideration will also be given to the provision of information to other parts of the<br />
telecommunications market.<br />
b) An Industry Guideline to provide guidance for phone equipment importers and manufacturers on features of<br />
customer equipment used for telecommunications that will assist consumers with disabilities.<br />
Method<br />
In developing both the Code and Guideline, the Working Committee is to:<br />
• take account of international work and align the documents with relevant standards and guidelines developed<br />
by recognised international bodies;<br />
• recognise that both the Code and Guideline be developed in relation to the standard telephone service, and<br />
consider if the scope of the work should be further confined, for example, by confining the Code to consumer<br />
equipment for use primarily by the residential/small business market; and<br />
• consider whether there should be a phase in period required to fully implement the Code.<br />
The Working Committee has been established with three consumer representatives, six industry representatives<br />
and a non-voting representative from the Australian Communications Authority. The Committee has been meeting<br />
approximately once every three weeks since April 2004.<br />
Results<br />
A comprehensive list of 61 features have been named within the categories: Mobility/Dexterity, Vision, Hearing and<br />
Speech. The Committee is close to completing a checklist to be completed by the industry that will specify the<br />
features on each phone made available to Australians. A genuine attempt has been made to make this checklist as<br />
simple as possible.<br />
Implications<br />
This work is an important first step to ensure that people with disabilities can select phones suitable to meet their<br />
needs. It will name the features that are important to those with a disability. This process will raise manufacturer and<br />
importer awareness of these needs and promote the application of Universal Design principles.<br />
Project commenced in 2004<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Resource allocation project<br />
Sonya Murchland<br />
<strong>Research</strong> Officer<br />
Wendy<br />
Wake-Dyster<br />
Director,<br />
Client Programs<br />
Objective<br />
This study has aimed to develop, implement and evaluate a model that identifies priorities for therapy resources in<br />
accordance with <strong>Novita</strong>’s principles of family centred, community based therapy service delivery that allows:<br />
• equity and planning in resource distribution;<br />
• prediction of resource usage; and<br />
• advocacy for new resources rather than the constant stretching of those available.<br />
It has recognised that initially the model needs to address existing resources, while enabling a model for future<br />
changes in resources to be accommodated.<br />
Method<br />
An action research methodology was employed, with the following data collected through the process of the study<br />
and contributed to the model formation:<br />
• Discipline and Regional Profiles of <strong>Services</strong> (Feb-March 2002);<br />
• Qualitative data from regional and discipline management teams on factors influencing service delivery<br />
(March – June 2002);<br />
• Client Numbers – from regions for seasonal board reports (October 2002) and Annual <strong>Report</strong>s (1996–2003);<br />
• Caseload Numbers – from therapists as a part of survey of Client Profiles (December 2002);<br />
• Client Profile – from therapists indicating intensity of service provision, and features indicating need for services<br />
(December 2002); and<br />
• Travel Time – snapshot data of two weeks (October–December 2002).<br />
Results<br />
A model for allocating resources across the organisation was developed and is now being trialled. As client<br />
numbers change on a daily basis throughout the organisation, percentages of clients in the different service types<br />
are reported upon and used for comparison and model development. The WHO International Classification of<br />
Functioning was used to describe the range and type of therapy services provided by <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong>.<br />
Implications<br />
Trial and review of this method of resource allocation needs to occur as calculations were based on estimations<br />
rather than actual recording of therapists activities. This has commenced with a review of support activities that aim<br />
to develop the social environment of individuals with disabilities.<br />
63<br />
Ongoing implementation and review<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
publications<br />
All journal articles, book chapters, research symposium papers,<br />
conference papers published in proceedings or accepted for<br />
publication between <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004 are listed below.<br />
64<br />
Journal Articles (peer reviewed)<br />
Croser R, Garrett R, Seeger B, Davies P (2001) Effectiveness of<br />
electronic aids to daily living: Increased independence and decreased<br />
frustration. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 48: p. 35–44.<br />
DuBois L, Klemm A, Murchland S & Ozols A (2004) Handwriting<br />
of children who have hemiplegia: A profile of abilities in children<br />
aged 8–3 years from a parent and teacher survey. Australian<br />
Occupational Therapy Journal, 51: p. 89–98.<br />
Flett P, Stern LM, Waddy H, Connell T & Gibson S (<strong>1999</strong>)<br />
Botulinum toxin A versus fixed cast stretching for dynamic calf<br />
tightness in cerebral palsy. J Paediatric Child Health, 35: p. 71–77.<br />
Raghavendra P, Murchland S, Gibson S & Guidera A (2004)<br />
Producing and evaluating research evidence in a multi-disciplinary<br />
community setting: An organisational approach. Australian<br />
Epidemiologist, 11.2: p. 33–35.<br />
Raghavendra P, Rosengren E & Hunnicutt S (2001) An<br />
investigation of different degrees of dysarthric speech as input to<br />
speaker-adaptive and speaker-dependent recognition systems.<br />
Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17: p. 265–275.<br />
Schlosser R & Raghavendra P (2004) Evidence based-practice in<br />
AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20: p. 1–21.<br />
Journal Correspondence<br />
Flett P, Gibson S & Murchland S (2004) Lycra Pressure Orthoses.<br />
International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 11(7): p. 340.<br />
Book Chapters<br />
Balandin S & Raghavendra P (<strong>1999</strong>) Challenging Oppression:<br />
Augmentative Communicators’ Involvement in AAC <strong>Research</strong>. In<br />
Loncker F, Clibbens J, Arvidson H & Lloyd LL (Eds) Augmentative<br />
and Alternative Communication: new directions in research and<br />
practice: p. 262–277, Whurr Publishing Ltd, London, UK.<br />
Schlosser R, & Raghavendra P (2003) Using evidence to guide<br />
clinical/educational decision-making. In Schlosser RW (ed). The<br />
Efficacy of Augmentative Communication: Towards evidencebased<br />
practice: p. 259–297. Academic Press, New York, USA.<br />
Other Publications<br />
Chip Karmatz et. al. (2001) “Willing and able” Assistive<br />
Technology, Accessibility for people with disabilities: p. 36–40,<br />
Microsoft Communiqué, December 2001 (R Garrett and A Gregory<br />
were quoted and contributed to this article).<br />
Garrett R (<strong>1999</strong>) “Exciting Award Winning Phone Improves Quality of<br />
Life for Children with Disabilities.” CCA Newsletter, December <strong>1999</strong>.<br />
Garrett R (2003) Telecommunications and Physical Disability: A Journey.<br />
ARATA News, No 29, Autumn 2003: p. 1–2, also in Accord SCI, The<br />
Journal of Spinal Cord Injuries Australia, No 2, Spring 2003: p. 14–15.<br />
Hobbs D (2002). “Home Phone Solutions Guide: Making the Home<br />
Phone more Accessible“. ARATA News, No 28, Summer 2002: p. 3.<br />
Hobbs D (2002) A <strong>Report</strong> on my Trip to the UK. ARATA Newsletter,<br />
April 2002<br />
Hobbs D (2004) Churchill Fellowship Experiences – <strong>Research</strong>ing<br />
Rehabilitation Engineering Overseas. Accord SCI, the Journal of<br />
Spinal Cord Injuries Australia, No 4, Autumn 2004: p. 17–18.<br />
Nguyen T (2002) Accessible Mobile Phone Project. ARATA News,<br />
No 28, Summer 2002: p. 1–2.<br />
Nguyen T (2002) Accessible Mobile and Home Phone Project. CCA<br />
Nexus Newsletter, September 2002 and also the CAUS Newsletter,<br />
Winter 2002: p. 6, 7, 9.<br />
Nguyen T & Garrett R (2003) New technological options for people<br />
with physical disabilities, through the use of telecommunications<br />
equipment. Final <strong>Report</strong> submitted to the Department of Information<br />
Technology, Communications and the Arts, December 2003.<br />
Nguyen T & Garrett R (2004) New technological options for people<br />
with physical disabilities, through the use of telecommunications<br />
equipment trials’ results. ARATA news, No 33, Autumn 2004.<br />
Nguyen T, Garrett R, Downing A, Walker L & Hobbs D (2004)<br />
“<strong>Research</strong> into Telecommunications Options for People with Physical<br />
Disabilities” in Zhang D & Mokhtari M (Eds) Towards a Human Friendly<br />
Assistive Environment: p57-64. IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.<br />
Olsson C (2003) The EBP experiences of an AAC Service Provider:<br />
Diving in Deep. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative<br />
Communication, Newsletter of Division 12 Special Interest Group of<br />
the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association: p. 15–19.<br />
Olsson C (in press) Experiences with EBP: Perspectives from the<br />
Clinical Coalface. Proceedings of Seventh Biennial ISAAC <strong>Research</strong><br />
Symposium, Odense, Denmark.<br />
Raghavendra P (in press) New Mandate for AAC: How do we move<br />
towards evidence-based practice Proceedings of Seventh Biennial<br />
ISAAC <strong>Research</strong> Symposium, Odense, Denmark.<br />
Raghavendra P, Olsson C, Iacono T, & Schlosser R (in press)<br />
New mandate in AAC: How do we move towards EBP Summary<br />
and Recommendations. Proceedings of Seventh Biennial ISAAC<br />
<strong>Research</strong> Symposium, Odense, Denmark.<br />
Seeger BR & Garrett RE (2001) Universal access needs to<br />
encompass private as well as public buildings. Engineers Australia,<br />
July 2001, vol 73, No 7: p. 28–32.<br />
Timko B, Guidera A, Hutchinson R & Stewart S “Vocabulary<br />
Organiser” Software to Support Signing Users. Proceedings of the 2002<br />
Speech Pathology Australia National Conference.<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
conference presentations<br />
<strong>Novita</strong>’s research profile continues to grow with increasing number of high quality presentations made at state,<br />
national and international conferences. We would like to congratulate and thank all the therapy staff for their hard work and<br />
enthusiasm in preparing and making the presentations. Unless stated otherwise, the presentations listed are free papers.<br />
<strong>1999</strong><br />
Health Outcomes:<br />
Integrating the Elements (Canberra)<br />
Raghavendra P, Ferris R, Rapagna A, Hardy M & McDonald F<br />
A critical pathway for communication device prescription and use by<br />
adults with disabilities in the community: An instrument for<br />
outcome measurement.<br />
Australian Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology<br />
Association (Sydney)<br />
Davies P & Garrett R Environmental control client trials and<br />
demonstration site.<br />
Davies P, Garrett, R & Stapleton, D MiPhone: Accessible<br />
telephone solution for Australia.<br />
Garrett R & Stewart H Vocabulary Organiser 2.0 and the Internal<br />
Symbol Prediction Software. Pre-conference Workshop<br />
Garrett R, Davies P & Seeger B New on-line research needs register.<br />
Garrett R, Seeger B, Enders, A & Rowe, R. Telephones in<br />
Australia: How close to universal access Forum<br />
Raghavendra P, Stewart H, duCaine A, Collins M, Garrett R &<br />
Seeger B Technology for Work: Evaluation of Telecommuting for<br />
people with disabilities<br />
Raghavendra P, Ferris R, Rapagna A, Hardy M & McDonald F<br />
Critical pathway for VOCA prescription and training for adults with<br />
multiple disabilities: results from development and evaluation<br />
Stewart S, Symon J & Tilbrook A Using a Liberator with Dragon<br />
Naturally Speaking for Internet access.<br />
Australian Physiotherapy Association<br />
Paediatric Group (Sydney)<br />
Gibson S & Sprod J Use of Standing Frames in the Maintenance of<br />
Hamstring Muscle Length in Non-mobile Children with Cerebral Palsy<br />
Spasticity Conference (Adelaide)<br />
Frogley M & Gibson S Physiotherapy in children with spasticity<br />
Steer V & Murchland S Assessment and therapy of the upper limb<br />
International Society for Alternative and<br />
Augmentative Communication (Dublin, Eire)<br />
Stewart, S & Olssen C Comparison of Minspeak Teaching Methods<br />
OT Australia – National (Canberra)<br />
Ziersch, T & Murchland S Linking the country and the city:<br />
outreach services provided by CCA.<br />
2000<br />
International Society for Augmentative and<br />
Alternative Communication (Washington DC, USA)<br />
Raghavendra P Evidence-Based Practice: Where are we in AAC<br />
Raghavendra P, Ferris R, Rapagna A, Bebb, M & McDonald,<br />
F Clinical Pathway for VOCA Recommendation and Training for<br />
Adults with Disabilities.<br />
Balandin S, McNaughton D, Morgan J, Raghavendra P &<br />
Williams M Developing Inclusive <strong>Research</strong> Communities: Issues<br />
in promoting AAC user Participation.<br />
Speech Pathology Australia (Adelaide)<br />
Cootes C, & Hughes A The Rocky road to achieving inclusion at<br />
school for a child who is blind and has no speech: p. 73.<br />
Ferris R Progressive Neurological conditions – AAC intervention<br />
and functional outcomes: p. 72.<br />
Morris, R & Raghavendra P Comparison of feedback conditions<br />
in spelling instruction for a child using AAC: p. 73.<br />
Raghavendra P & Balandin S Augmented Communicators<br />
involvement in AAC: Facilitating inclusion and practical<br />
implications: p. 72.<br />
State OT Australia – SA (Adelaide)<br />
Brayley A Use of a dynamic triceps driven orthosis to assist<br />
feeding for a child with Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita.<br />
DuBois L, Klemm A, Ozols, A & Murchland S The handwriting<br />
of children who have hemiplegia – a profile in children aged<br />
8–13 years.<br />
Durand S, & Murchland S Early Intervention – When is it too late<br />
Durand S, McGregor, P & Murchland S Country <strong>Services</strong><br />
Evaluated: a pilot study comparing the motor and functional<br />
progress of city and country clients of CCA.<br />
Farrall A Expanding horizons: Developing a Youth Group for<br />
teenagers with physical disabilities.<br />
Lian P & Lietzau R Paediatric OT equipment prescription<br />
within CCA.<br />
McPharlin J & Gutschi J Unlocking Imagination to build<br />
cognitive and physical skills – an exploratory study. Poster.<br />
Murchland S More than a Hunch. Keynote presentation.<br />
65<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
66<br />
Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive<br />
Technology Society of North America (RESNA)<br />
Conference (Orlando, USA)<br />
Garrett R, Davies P, Stapleton D Miphone: The Multiple Input<br />
Speaker Telephone.<br />
Cerebral Palsy Support National Network<br />
(Melbourne)<br />
Gibson S A A Comparison of three models of Intensive<br />
Physiotherapy for Children with Cerebral Palsy.<br />
Raghavendra P Evidence Based Practice: Where are we in<br />
Paediatric disability<br />
Australian Cerebral Palsy Association (Melbourne)<br />
Balandin S, Grant G, & Raghavendra P Working Together:<br />
A new dimension to research with people with disabilities.<br />
Bebb M & Raghavendra P Predictors of device<br />
abandonment: Transitioning from school to the community.<br />
Durand S & Murchland S Country outreach services evaluated.<br />
Manson P, Guidera A & Raghavendra P Can preschool<br />
children learn the meaning of picture symbols without<br />
structured teaching<br />
McPharlin J & Gutschi J Unlocking Imagination to build<br />
cognitive and physical skills – an exploratory study. Poster.<br />
Other Presentations<br />
Frogley M Rehabilitation Equipment Interest Group<br />
Seating Seminar<br />
Frogley M Manual Wheelchair prescription and Use Australian<br />
Physiotherapy Association Paediatric Special Interest Group Seminar.<br />
2001<br />
Australian Group on Severe Communication<br />
Impairments (Adelaide)<br />
Bebb M & Raghavendra P Predictors of device abandonment:<br />
Transitioning from school to the community.<br />
Iacono T & Raghavendra P What is the evidence base in AAC<br />
Manson P, Guidera, A & Raghavendra P Symbol Learning:<br />
Examining a technique for assisting typically developing preschool<br />
children to learn picture communication symbols.<br />
Morris, R & Raghavendra P Comparison of feedback conditions<br />
in spelling instruction for a child using AAC.<br />
Tilbrook A & Timko B Integrating education, communication and<br />
literacy: Inclusion of a 5 year old AAC user in the classroom.<br />
Australian Physiotherapy Association National<br />
Paediatric Group (Melbourne)<br />
Durand S, McGregor, P & Murchland S Country <strong>Services</strong><br />
Evaluated: a pilot study comparing the motor and functional<br />
progress of city and country clients of CCA.<br />
Durand S & Murchland S Early Intervention: When is it too late<br />
Gibson S Can we deliver better Therapy A Comparison of Three<br />
Models of Intensive Physiotherapy Intervention for Children with<br />
Cerebral Palsy. Old issues: New Focus.<br />
Paediatric Occupational Therapy (Sydney)<br />
DuBois L, Klemm A, Ozols A & Murchland S The handwriting<br />
of children who have hemiplegia – a profile in children aged<br />
8–13 years.<br />
Durand S, McGregor, P & Murchland S Country <strong>Services</strong><br />
Evaluated: a pilot study comparing the motor and functional<br />
progress of city and country clients of CCA.<br />
Durand S & Murchland S Early Intervention: When is it too late<br />
Engineers Australia’s Inaugural Rehabilitation<br />
Engineering Workshop (Brisbane)<br />
Hobbs D How to build a better wheelchair – workshop<br />
presentation.<br />
Australian Rehabilitation and Assistive<br />
Technology Association (Brisbane)<br />
Garrett R, Gregory A, Tilbrook A & Ziersch T Magic For<br />
Everyone: Accessible Website Design.<br />
Hobbs D Hey Presto – are we really getting bums on the right<br />
seats in Australia Interactive seating forum.<br />
Hobbs D Pulling the Bilby out of the Hat – a show and tell<br />
of seating systems designed for the client with complex<br />
multiplanar fixed deformity.<br />
Nguyen T, Garrett R & Downing A Accessible Mobile Phones.<br />
Frogley M Powered Wheelchair Trialling. Poster.<br />
Stewart S Vocabulary Organiser. Workshop.<br />
2002<br />
Speech Pathology Australia (Alice Springs)<br />
Timko B, Guidera A, Hutchinson R & Stewart S Strategies for<br />
Supporting Signing Users.<br />
International Society for Augmentative and<br />
Alternative Communication (Odense, Denmark)<br />
Morris R & Raghavendra P Comparison of feedback conditions<br />
for spelling instruction in AAC.<br />
Guidera A, Raghavendra P & Olsson C Participation of AAC<br />
users in school settings: <strong>Research</strong> Evidence.<br />
Olsson C, Guidera A, Stewart S & Garrett R Easily Managing &<br />
Producing Materials from Customised Vocabulary Sets.<br />
Olsson C, Stewart S Guidera A & Garrett R A tool for managing<br />
vocabulary and producing customised therapy materials.<br />
ISAAC <strong>Research</strong> Symposium (Odense, Denmark)<br />
Raghavendra P, Schlosser R, Iacono, T & Olsson C New Mandate<br />
in AAC: How do we move towards Evidence-based Practice<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
Australian Cerebral Palsy Association Conference<br />
(Sydney)<br />
Bebb M & Hardy M A multipurpose board. Poster.<br />
Slack J & Opperman K Alice in Computerland: The<br />
challenges in integrated System. Poster.<br />
Gibson S, Guidera A, Murchland S & Raghavendra P<br />
Application of evidence based practice in a multi-disciplinary<br />
setting. Poster.<br />
Guidera A, Raghavendra P & Olsson C Participation of AAC<br />
users in school settings: <strong>Research</strong> Evidence.<br />
Raghavendra P, Smith J, Harrison T, Donnelly P, Noble, G<br />
& Slattery H CCA Evaluates its services: What are our former<br />
clients with cerebral palsy telling us about services that they<br />
received and what are their ideas for future services<br />
Sprod J & Olsson C CCA involvement in the personal care<br />
support planning in schools and pre-schools in SA.<br />
Australasian Academy of Cerebral Palsy and<br />
Developmental Medicine (Sydney)<br />
Gibson S & Raghavendra R Intensive physiotherapy<br />
intervention for children with cerebral palsy: parents ’<br />
perceptions of outcomes using the Canadian Occupational<br />
Performance Measure.<br />
Raghavendra P, Smith J, Harrison T, Donnelly P,<br />
Noble G, & Slattery H The childhood therapy experiences<br />
of adults with cerebral palsy: What long term impact did it have<br />
and what does it mean for today’s children with cerebral palsy<br />
Gibson S, Guidera A, Murchland S & Raghavendra P<br />
Application of evidence based practice in a multi-disciplinary<br />
setting. Evidence into Practice. Poster.<br />
State OT Australia – SA (Adelaide)<br />
Jones, J & Stewart H How Occupational Therapists teach the<br />
scanning technique<br />
Lyons. T & Foley S School AMPS: An assessment tool that<br />
informs classroom strategies.<br />
Murchland S Evidence Based Practice and Play.<br />
Sandelance M Zooming in: Video education for staff & families.<br />
Slack J & Opperman K Alice in Computerland: The challenges<br />
in integrated System. Poster.<br />
Other Presentations<br />
Hobbs D “Rehabilitation Switches”, aired on the Channel 10<br />
children’s television program “Totally Wild” on Tuesday 19th<br />
November.<br />
Hobbs D “Universal Design (for Earthlings) – What’s it all about”,<br />
31st Annual CCA Auxiliaries Conference, (prior to the 2002 CCA<br />
AGM), 12th November.<br />
Frogley M Wheelchair and Seating Workshop, <strong>Novita</strong>/Independent<br />
Living Centre Workshop.<br />
2003<br />
National Allied Health (Adelaide)<br />
Gibson S, Guidera A, Murchland S & Raghavendra P<br />
(equal authorship) Application of evidence based practice in<br />
a multi-disciplinary setting. Poster.<br />
Lyons T & Raghavendra P The use of Canadian<br />
Occupational Performance Measure by a multi-disciplinary<br />
team: therapists; and parents’ views from a pilot study. Poster.<br />
Murchland S What to count and what to cost: a resource<br />
allocation model for therapy services.<br />
Australian Group on Severe Communication<br />
Impairment (Sydney)<br />
Faulks J, Olsson C & Opperman K Paediatric Dysphagia<br />
and Physical Disability: A review of the literature... and then<br />
some. Workshop.<br />
Grace E, Raghavendra P & Scholten I Vocabulary Use at<br />
School: What do Six Year Olds Say<br />
Guidera A, Raghavendra P & Olsson C Participation of users<br />
in school setting <strong>Research</strong> Evidence. Poster.<br />
Leane J, Raghavendra P & Scholten I Reading Outcomes of<br />
Internet-based Assessment and Intervention.<br />
Raghavendra P, Iacono T, Guidera A, Olsson C Evidence<br />
Based Practice: What does it mean for AAC 1⁄2 day Workshop.<br />
International Conference on Cerebral Palsy<br />
(Quebec City, Canada)<br />
Gibson S, Guidera A, Murchland S & Raghavendra P<br />
Application of evidence based practice in a multi-disciplinary<br />
setting. Poster.<br />
Murchland S How far will the elastic stretch: Resource<br />
Allocation for Community Based Therapy <strong>Services</strong>. Poster.<br />
World Congress on Medical Physics and<br />
Biomedical Engineering (Sydney)<br />
Hobbs D An International Perspective on Rehabilitation Engineering<br />
<strong>Research</strong> & Development – Results from a Churchill Fellowship.<br />
Walker L Regulation versus Information in Australia’s Assistive<br />
Technology Sector.<br />
Australian Physiotherapy Association National<br />
Paediatric Group (Perth)<br />
Bostock S Serial casting after Botulinum toxin: A review of<br />
outcomes for dynamic equinus.<br />
Gibson S & Raghavendra P Intensive physiotherapy intervention<br />
for children with cerebral palsy: Functional outcomes and parents’<br />
perceptions of outcomes.<br />
Raghavendra P, Darbyshire P & Gibson S Physiotherapists’,<br />
parents’ and children’s views on intensive physiotherapy<br />
intervention for children with cerebral palsy.<br />
67<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
68<br />
Raghavendra P, Smith J, Harrison T, Donnelly, P & Noble G<br />
Childhood physiotherapy experiences of adults with Cerebral<br />
palsy: Implications for today’s children with cerebral palsy<br />
Awarded Best Paper under “Quality.”<br />
Ward N, Williams M & Bate T The prevalence of low back<br />
pain in parents of children with a physical disability aged 5<br />
years or below.<br />
Sprod J, Frogley, M, & Murchland S Changing paediatric<br />
practice increasing demands on the role of the community<br />
physiotherapist.<br />
Pediatric Occupational Therapy (Brisbane)<br />
Murchland S Evidence based practice and play.<br />
Murchland S & Kernot J Unravelling Handwriting: An<br />
investigation into the factors that influence handwriting ability<br />
in primary school children with hemiplegia.<br />
Smith J, Raghavendra P, Harrison T, Donnelly, P & Noble G<br />
Childhood Occupational Therapy experiences of adults with<br />
cerebral palsy: Implications for today’s children with<br />
cerebral palsy.<br />
Speech Pathology Australia (Sydney)<br />
Faulks J, Olsson C & Oppermann K A training package for<br />
staff assisting children with eating and drinking difficulties<br />
Other Presentations<br />
Hobbs D During his Churchill Fellowship (6th May – 24th<br />
June), David made 11 presentations about <strong>Novita</strong>, <strong>Novita</strong>Tech<br />
and rehabilitation engineering at different Centres in England,<br />
Toronto, and the United States. Two of these were specifically<br />
about Vocabulary Organiser to special groups.<br />
Lyons, T & Occupational Therapy Staff Play for All, SA<br />
Department of Education and Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Early<br />
Childhood Conference Workshop.<br />
2004<br />
Australasian Academy of Cerebral Palsy and<br />
Developmental Medicine (Melbourne)<br />
Crettenden A & Connell T Changing problem behaviour in<br />
children with physical disabilities.<br />
Gibson S, & Raghavendra R Intensive physiotherapy<br />
intervention for children with cerebral palsy: Functional<br />
outcomes and parents’ perceptions of outcomes.<br />
Murchland S & Kernot J Hand function, visual perception and<br />
handwriting in children with hemiplegia.<br />
Opperman K & Faulks J Paediatric dysphagia and physical<br />
disability: a review of the literature. Poster.<br />
Raghavendra P, Darbyshire P, & Gibson S Physiotherapists’<br />
parents’ and children’s views on intensive physiotherapy<br />
intervention for children with cerebral palsy.<br />
Australian Rehabilitation and Assistive<br />
Technology Association (Melbourne)<br />
Gregory A New Software from Regency Park.<br />
Pre-conference workshop.<br />
Guidera A & Olsson C Why are speech generating<br />
devices returned<br />
Guidera A & Garrett R ‘Does your vocabulary need organising’<br />
Guidera A & Garrett R The ‘Vocabulary Organiser’ Software.<br />
Pre-conference workshop.<br />
Hobbs D An International Perspective on Rehabilitation<br />
Engineering – Results from a Churchill Fellowship.<br />
Hobbs D, Nguyen, T & Ward T The Development and<br />
Teaching of a Biomechanics Module in Cambodia.<br />
van de Loo S & Symonds B One Control Everywhere<br />
for Everything.<br />
Nguyen T, Garrett R, Downing A Mobile Phone Access Via<br />
an Augmentative and Alternative Communication Device.<br />
Nguyen T, Garrett R, Downing A, Walker L & Hobbs D<br />
<strong>Research</strong> into Telecommunications Options for People<br />
with Disabilities.<br />
Nguyen T, Gregory, A & Garrett R Telephone Options for<br />
People with Physical Disabilities. Pre-conference workshop.<br />
Svistounov A & Hobbs D Introduction to Standards Testing<br />
of Rehabilitation Equipment.<br />
Walker L Wheeled Mobility – Today, Tomorrow, Everywhere.<br />
Invited plenary speaker.<br />
Walker L & Hobbs D Good Practice or Best Practice –<br />
Where Do Professional Standards Come In<br />
Walker L, Svistounov, A & Hobbs D NCRE/ARATA TGA<br />
Workshop (a workshop and open forum on the affect the new<br />
TGA regulations will have within the RE/AT industry).<br />
Pre-conference workshop.<br />
Ziersch T and Gregory A Building Accessible Websites<br />
for Everyone.<br />
Other Presentations<br />
The results of our “New technological options for people with<br />
physical disabilities, through the use of telecommunications<br />
equipment trials’ results” research has been presented by:<br />
Garrett R to Australian Communications Industry Forum,<br />
Disability Advisory Body, Sydney, 13 February 2004.<br />
Garrett R to a combined meeting of the Australian<br />
Communications Industry Forum, Disability Advisory Body and<br />
Working Committee 19 “Accessibility Information”, Sydney,<br />
18 May 2004.<br />
Garrett R & Nguyen T to Telstra <strong>Research</strong> Laboratories,<br />
Melbourne, 3 June 2004.<br />
Hobbs D to the funding body – Department of Information<br />
Technology, Communications and the Arts staff, Canberra, 3<br />
March 2004.<br />
<strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong> Incorporated • <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>1999</strong> – June 2004
DESIGN AND PRODUCTION CORPORATE PROFILE PTY LTD
Head Office<br />
Regency Park Centre<br />
171 Days Road<br />
Regency Park SA 5010<br />
PO Box 2438, Regency Park SA 5942<br />
Telephone (08) 8243 8243<br />
Facsimile (08) 8243 8238<br />
Email research@novita.org.au<br />
r&d@novita.org.au<br />
www.novita.org.au<br />
<strong>Novita</strong>Tech (formerly Regency Park<br />
Rehabilitation Engineering)<br />
171 Days Road<br />
Regency Park SA 5010<br />
PO Box 2438, Regency Park SA 5942<br />
Telephone 1300 855 585<br />
Facsimile (08) 8243 8208<br />
Email info@novitatech.org.au<br />
www.novitatech.org.au<br />
Family Support <strong>Services</strong> (formerly<br />
CCA Options Coordination)<br />
171 Days Road<br />
Regency Park SA 5010<br />
PO Box 2438, Regency Park SA 5942<br />
Telephone (08) 8243 8266<br />
Facsimile (08) 8243 8269<br />
Email family.support@novita.org.au<br />
www.novita.org.au/familysupport<br />
Northern Regional Office<br />
422 Salisbury Highway<br />
Parafield Gardens SA 5107<br />
Telephone (08) 8182 1000<br />
Facsimile (08) 8182 1010<br />
Email nro@novita.org.au<br />
www.novita.org.au/north<br />
Southern Regional Office<br />
111 Beach Road<br />
Christies Beach SA 5165<br />
Telephone (08) 8329 5600<br />
Facsimile (08) 8329 5607<br />
Email sro@novita.org.au<br />
www.novita.org.au/south<br />
North Eastern Regional Office<br />
5 Darley Road<br />
Paradise SA 5075<br />
Telephone (08) 8207 8940<br />
Facsimile (08) 8207 8941<br />
Email nero@novita.org.au<br />
www.novita.org.au/northeast<br />
South Eastern Regional Office<br />
151 Greenhill Road<br />
Parkside SA 5063<br />
Telephone (08) 8172 9200<br />
Facsimile (08) 8172 9201<br />
Email sero@novita.org.au<br />
www.novita.org.au/southeast<br />
Northern Western Regional Office<br />
171 Days Road<br />
Regency Park SA 5010<br />
Telephone (08) 8243 8311<br />
Facsimile (08) 8243 8377<br />
Email nwro@novita.org.au<br />
www.novita.org.au/northwest