02.02.2015 Views

SFE Assessing Eligibility Guidance 2013/14 - Practitioners - Student ...

SFE Assessing Eligibility Guidance 2013/14 - Practitioners - Student ...

SFE Assessing Eligibility Guidance 2013/14 - Practitioners - Student ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> HE <strong>Student</strong> Finance<br />

<strong>Assessing</strong> <strong>Eligibility</strong> <strong>Guidance</strong><br />

<strong>Student</strong>s who cease work before starting the course<br />

112. <strong>Student</strong>s who voluntarily cease work before starting their course will<br />

retain their status as migrant workers if there is a link between their<br />

work and their studies. There has been little guidance from the ECJ<br />

on what constitutes a sufficient 'link' between the course of study and<br />

the previous employment for these purposes. In the cases of Lair<br />

and Bernini the ECJ indicated that what was important was the<br />

relationship between the purpose or subject matter of the studies<br />

and the previous employment.<br />

113. Article 7, Paragraph 3 of Directive 2004/38, sets out the<br />

circumstances in which an EEA or Swiss national who is no longer a<br />

worker or self-employed person, retains their status as a worker or<br />

as a self-employed person.<br />

1<strong>14</strong>. <strong>SFE</strong> should note that the Department has been advised that an EEA<br />

or Swiss national is not entitled to be classified as a migrant worker<br />

for student support purposes, where they have arrived in the UK<br />

without work, are actively seeking employment but have not yet<br />

worked here.<br />

Remuneration for work<br />

115. EEA or Swiss nationals who came to the UK to work but have<br />

received or receive something less than a market rate salary for their<br />

work, may still fall within the definition of a migrant worker.<br />

In the case of Brown the ECJ set out a definition of a migrant worker:<br />

‘any person who pursues an activity which is effective and genuine,<br />

to the exclusion of activities on such a small scale as to be regarded<br />

as purely marginal and ancillary, is to be treated as a worker. The<br />

essential characteristic of the employment relationship is that for a<br />

certain period of time a person performs services for and under the<br />

direction of another person in return for which he receives<br />

remuneration.’<br />

The ECJ has said that „remuneration‟ means consideration for the<br />

services in question, and therefore if someone works in exchange<br />

for, for example free food, free accommodation or an allowance, they<br />

may still be considered to be a worker.<br />

Effective and genuine/Marginal and ancillary employment<br />

116. In trying to decide whether a person‟s employment is effective and<br />

genuine and not purely marginal and ancillary it may be relevant to<br />

consider, amongst other things, the following factors:<br />

Whether the work is seasonal or temporary. In the case of<br />

Raulin the Court found that in assessing the effective and<br />

genuine nature of the activity in question account should be<br />

had to the irregular nature and limited duration of the<br />

services actually performed under a contract for occasional<br />

employment.<br />

Whether, but for being accepted on the course of studies,<br />

the work would be undertaken at all. In the case of Brown<br />

the Court concluded that where the status of worker derived<br />

exclusively as a result of being accepted for admission to a<br />

Version 1.8 31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!