02.02.2015 Views

Thesis_gd_final_vers.. - Vernimmen

Thesis_gd_final_vers.. - Vernimmen

Thesis_gd_final_vers.. - Vernimmen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

not have been profitable if they had to be financed with a capital requirement of 8%. Thus, the<br />

consolidation of conduits for regulatory matters would have discouraged banks to set them up in<br />

the first place. Regulatory arbitrage is not limited to by-passing regulatory capital requirements by<br />

playing on the difference between on and off-balance sheet. Referring to Acharya and Schnabl<br />

(2009), Nadauld and Sherlund explain that between 2004 and 2007 the growth in risk-weighted<br />

assets was much lower than the growth in total assets, which means that banks have been<br />

investing in safer assets than those which they were holding during this period. When we know<br />

that banks kept as much as 30% of the AAA-rated tranche of all real estate related ABS and<br />

CDOs on their balance sheet, it is easy to understand that banks used securitization as a way to<br />

free-up additional regulatory capital, or let’s say to take on more risk for an equal level o regulatory<br />

capital. This form of regulatory arbitrage is based on the rating arbitrage presented above to<br />

decrease regulatory capital requirements. Exposure to assets which would have require higher<br />

capital levels given their risk are actually hold through the AAA-rated tranche of the ABS, which<br />

requires less regulatory capital. This regulatory arbitrage can be viewed as based on the use of<br />

asymmetric information by banks on the true riskiness of their assets against regulators.<br />

d) The development of financial markets and derivatives<br />

The limitations and restrictions imposed from early on on banks, limiting their size and scope and<br />

thus their ability to support and finance companies which have been getting larger over time, has<br />

fostered the development of broad and active capital markets which are a major source of<br />

financing for the economy. In his book U.S bank deregulation in historical perspective, Calomiris<br />

(200) underlines that a key characteristic of the American uni<strong>vers</strong>al banking model is the growing<br />

integration between commercial banks and financial markets. According to him, leveraging and<br />

using the comparative advantage of US financial markets will be one of the dri<strong>vers</strong> of success for<br />

US commercial banks in the first decades of the twenty-first century. If it is true that US financial<br />

markets have been more developed and active than in other countries, they also experienced a<br />

tremendous growth thanks to technological changes which have allowed to reduce transaction<br />

costs, to compute data and disperse information instantly. Financial innovation reinforced and was<br />

reinforced by technological change. As a consequence, financial markets scope is increasing at a<br />

very high pace thanks to the creation of new products such as complex derivatives. The latest<br />

example is doubtlessly the extraordinary growth of credit derivatives and especially credit default<br />

swaps. The notional amount of credit default swaps stood at $698 billion at the end of June 2001;<br />

- 22 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!