03.02.2015 Views

HIERARCHAL INDUCTIVE PROCESS MODELING AND ANALYSIS ...

HIERARCHAL INDUCTIVE PROCESS MODELING AND ANALYSIS ...

HIERARCHAL INDUCTIVE PROCESS MODELING AND ANALYSIS ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Thus, using Proposition 1 we get,<br />

dN l<br />

= (a 21 − N l )a 22<br />

dt<br />

dN u<br />

+ N l a 22 = a 21 a 22<br />

dt<br />

N l (t) = a 21 + N 0 e −a 22t<br />

lim<br />

t→+∞ N l (t) = a 21<br />

To summarize the bounds,<br />

a 21 + N 0 e −a 22<br />

≤ N(t) ≤ γ N +<br />

(N 0 − γ N<br />

)<br />

e −a 22t<br />

When t → ∞ we obtain,<br />

∴ a 21 = 31 ≤ N(t) ≤ ∞ (28)<br />

Nitrate then has constant lower bound, which implies that the concentration will<br />

never go below a 21 for this particular model structure. This make us re-iterate that<br />

these models are very sensitive to parameter selection process. As mentioned above<br />

Iron as the same equation structures, thus using the same analysis we found Iron as<br />

follows:<br />

[<br />

] [<br />

dF<br />

dt = Da 17<br />

+<br />

(a 8 12.0107)<br />

[<br />

P<br />

−<br />

(a 8 12.0107)<br />

]<br />

E T H2 O<br />

(a 23 − F )a<br />

max<br />

− E T H2 O(t)<br />

24<br />

E T H2 O max<br />

− E T H2 O min<br />

[<br />

]<br />

(1 − E ice (t))a 0 e (0.06933∗E T H 2 O(t))<br />

M(t)<br />

]<br />

Thus,<br />

54

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!