HIERARCHAL INDUCTIVE PROCESS MODELING AND ANALYSIS ...
HIERARCHAL INDUCTIVE PROCESS MODELING AND ANALYSIS ...
HIERARCHAL INDUCTIVE PROCESS MODELING AND ANALYSIS ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
That being said let’s continue the analysis of Model C with Detritus.<br />
dD<br />
dt = (<br />
+<br />
)<br />
(1 − a 9 )(a 8 P + a 10 Z 2 )<br />
(<br />
(1 − a 9 )(1 − a 11 )<br />
Using (35) and (39) we get,<br />
(a 12 P 2 )<br />
Z<br />
Z 2 + a 12 a 13 P<br />
} {{ 2<br />
}<br />
Z Grazing Rate<br />
)<br />
− D(a 14 + a 17 )<br />
dD<br />
(<br />
)<br />
dt ≤ (1 − a 9 )(a 8 P 0 e αut + a 10 K 2 ) +<br />
((1 − a 9 )(1 − a 11 ) K )<br />
− D(a 14 + a 17 )<br />
a 13<br />
Then solving for the upper bound,<br />
dD u<br />
dt<br />
+ D u (a 14 + a 17 ) =(1 − a 9 )a 8 P 0 e αut +<br />
(<br />
a 10 K + (1 − a )<br />
11)<br />
(1 − a 9 )K<br />
a 13<br />
Using Proposition 1,<br />
(<br />
a 10 K + (1−a 11)<br />
D u a 13<br />
)(1 − a 9 )K<br />
(t) =<br />
+ (1 − a 9)a 8<br />
P 0 e αut<br />
(a 14 + a 17 ) α<br />
} {{ } u + (a 14 + a 17 )<br />
} {{ }<br />
β u1 β u2<br />
)<br />
(D 0 − β u1 − β u2 P 0 e −(a 14+a 17 )t<br />
where β u1 = 1.721033 and β u2 = 1.7508e −04<br />
61