14.02.2015 Views

The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, v. 29, no. 7 (March, 1971)

The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, v. 29, no. 7 (March, 1971)

The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, v. 29, no. 7 (March, 1971)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> Study <strong>of</strong> Medieval<br />

Ecclesiastical Costumes-<br />

A<br />

Bibliography<br />

DOBRILA-DONYA SCHIMANSKY Assistant at <strong>The</strong> Cloisters<br />

W hile medieval ecclesiastical costumes may be examined from several<br />

different viewpoints, <strong>no</strong> one approach should be used exclusively. To acquire<br />

a meaningful understanding <strong>of</strong> their historical and aesthetic value, one should<br />

evaluate the vestments themselves, their stylistic relationship with contemporary<br />

works <strong>of</strong> art, original documents pertaining to them, and historical or<br />

artistic studies about them.<br />

We owe much <strong>of</strong> our k<strong>no</strong>wledge <strong>of</strong> vestments to such primary sources as<br />

medieval inventories <strong>of</strong> royal and <strong>no</strong>ble houses, <strong>of</strong> monasteries, churches,<br />

cathedrals, and papal treasuries, some <strong>of</strong> them dating from the end <strong>of</strong> the<br />

eighth century. <strong>The</strong> 1<strong>29</strong>5 inventory <strong>of</strong> St. Paul's Cathedral, London, even lists<br />

useful technical terms used by embroiderers, such as opus pulvinarum and<br />

opus consutum. <strong>The</strong> names <strong>of</strong> some designers and embroiderers as well as<br />

indications <strong>of</strong> the time and funds spent to make vestments are preserved in<br />

other documents. Medieval chroniclers make frequent mention <strong>of</strong> priestly<br />

vesture, praising the richness <strong>of</strong> the material and design, and sometimes<br />

describing them thoroughly. Early Christian and medieval church writers wrote<br />

on vestments: for example, Durandus, whose Rationale divi<strong>no</strong>rum <strong>of</strong>ficiorum<br />

in eight books (1286) is still considered valuable for the study <strong>of</strong> the Roman<br />

ritual <strong>of</strong> the thirteenth century, gives allegorical explanations <strong>of</strong> vestments.<br />

Valuable information on ecclesiastical dress can be found in church decrees,<br />

council decisions, and liturgical books. Ordines Romani (first printed by Jean<br />

Mabillon in his <strong>Museum</strong> Italicum in 1689), covering the period from the sixth<br />

to the fifteenth centuries, is a ritual book that provides reliable information<br />

on the early liturgical practices <strong>of</strong> the Roman church, as well as on the proper<br />

usage, shape, and colors <strong>of</strong> vestments. For the Middle Ages, the last five<br />

Ordines (X through XV) are essential.<br />

Interest in church embroidery diminished after the Middle Ages, when<br />

pure ornament rather than religious scenes adorned ecclesiastical garments. Inventories<br />

continued to list vestments but- with a few exceptions- <strong>no</strong> important<br />

studies on their liturgical use were written. One <strong>of</strong> the exceptions, Rerum<br />

liturgicarum libri duo by Giovanni Bona, covers subjects relating to the mass,<br />

such as rites and vestments; it was used and commented upon for a long time<br />

313<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Museum</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Art</strong><br />

is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve, and extend access to<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Museum</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Art</strong> <strong>Bulletin</strong> ®<br />

www.jstor.org

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!