23.02.2015 Views

motion to compel - White Collar Fraud

motion to compel - White Collar Fraud

motion to compel - White Collar Fraud

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1<br />

V<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

. 7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10.<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

of Civil Procedure Section 2030.300, for an order <strong>compel</strong>ling defendant Overs<strong>to</strong>ck.com, Inc.<br />

(hereafter "Overs<strong>to</strong>ck" or "Defendant") <strong>to</strong> provide farther responses <strong>to</strong> the People's First Set of<br />

Interroga<strong>to</strong>ries <strong>to</strong> Overs<strong>to</strong>ck.<br />

Specifically, the People will and do hereby move for an order <strong>compel</strong>ling Overs<strong>to</strong>ck <strong>to</strong> further<br />

respond <strong>to</strong> Special Interroga<strong>to</strong>ries 8 and 14 by providing current contact information for the former<br />

employees whose names Overs<strong>to</strong>ck disclosed in response <strong>to</strong> these Interroga<strong>to</strong>ries.<br />

The People met and conferred via email in good faith in an attempt <strong>to</strong> informally resolve this<br />

dispute and have offered <strong>to</strong> enter in<strong>to</strong> a protective order as a means of satisfying Overs<strong>to</strong>ck's asserted<br />

privacy objections. Nonetheless, Overs<strong>to</strong>ck has refused <strong>to</strong> provide the People with the information<br />

sought.<br />

Because the People's discovery requests fall properly within the scope of permissible<br />

discovery pursuant <strong>to</strong> the Code of Civil Procedure, Overs<strong>to</strong>ck should be ordered <strong>to</strong> produce the<br />

information requested in response <strong>to</strong> the People's First Set of Interroga<strong>to</strong>ries, Special Interroga<strong>to</strong>ries 8<br />

and 14.<br />

This <strong>motion</strong> is based on this Notice of Motion and Motion, the Separate Statement in Support<br />

of Motion, the Declaration of Matthew L. Beltramo with exhibits attached there<strong>to</strong>, and the<br />

Memorandum of Points and Authorities, as well as such oral argument and other evidence as may be<br />

presented at or before the hearing on this <strong>motion</strong>.<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

Dated: April 1,2011<br />

NANCY E. O'MALLEY<br />

Alameda County District At<strong>to</strong>rney<br />

Matthew L. Beltramo<br />

Deputy District At<strong>to</strong>rney<br />

. 28<br />

Office of<br />

DISTRICT ATTORNEY<br />

Alaincdj County<br />

30<br />

-2- Case No. RG10-546833<br />

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER INTERROGATORY RESPONSES FROM DEFENDANT<br />

31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!