23.02.2015 Views

motion to compel - White Collar Fraud

motion to compel - White Collar Fraud

motion to compel - White Collar Fraud

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ight of privacy; (4) it is vague and ambiguous as <strong>to</strong> the terms and/or phrases "regarding any<br />

employment, consulting," or contracting relationship;" (5) it is vague and ambiguous as <strong>to</strong> the<br />

terms and/or phrases "OVERSTOCK BUYERS," as Overs<strong>to</strong>ck does not itself designate certain<br />

employees, consultants, or contrac<strong>to</strong>rs as an "OVERSTOCK BUYER;" and (6) it is vague and<br />

ambiguous as <strong>to</strong> the meaning of the word "regularly." Nothing in Overs<strong>to</strong>ck's response is<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

intended as or shall be interpreted as a waiver of any applicable privilege or protection of<br />

information from disclosure. <<br />

Subject <strong>to</strong> and without waiving the foregoing objections, Overs<strong>to</strong>ck refers <strong>to</strong> and<br />

incorporates the document produced herewith identified as OSTK8 - OSTK9.<br />

DATED; February 16,2011<br />

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &<br />

SULLIVAN, LLP<br />

Dane W. Reinstedt<br />

At<strong>to</strong>rneys for Defendant OVERSTOCK.COM,<br />

INC.<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

55 51782/3971861.<br />

Case No. RG10-546833<br />

RESPONSES TO FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!