23.02.2015 Views

motion to compel - White Collar Fraud

motion to compel - White Collar Fraud

motion to compel - White Collar Fraud

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

- 10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

a. Partner Account Manager<br />

b. Category Manager<br />

SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. 3:<br />

Provide an organization chart which indicates the job titles for each EMPLOYEE who<br />

currently SETS COMPARISON PRICES and the job titles of all managers, supervisors or<br />

superiors who are in a direct reporting relationship between that EMPLOYEE and Overs<strong>to</strong>ck<br />

President Jonathan Johnson.<br />

RESPONSE TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. 3:<br />

Each general objection is hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.<br />

Overs<strong>to</strong>ck objects <strong>to</strong> this interroga<strong>to</strong>ry on the grounds that (1) it is overbroad, unduly burdensome,<br />

and oppressive; (2) it seeks information neither relevant nor reasonably calculated <strong>to</strong> lead <strong>to</strong> the<br />

discovery of admissible evidence; (3) it seeks information protected by California's constitutional<br />

right of privacy; (4) it is vague and ambiguous as <strong>to</strong> the terms and/or phrases "regarding any<br />

employment, consulting, or contracting relationship;" (5) it is vague and ambiguous as <strong>to</strong> the<br />

terms and/or phrases "EMPLOYEE who currently SETS COMPARISON PRICES," as Overs<strong>to</strong>ck<br />

does not itself designate certain employees, consultants, or contrac<strong>to</strong>rs as those that set<br />

comparison prices; and (6) it improperly seeks content or production of documents in the form of<br />

an organization chart. Nothing in Overs<strong>to</strong>ck's response is intended as or shall be interpreted as a<br />

waiver of any applicable privilege or protection of information from disclosure.<br />

Subject <strong>to</strong> and without waiving the foregoing objections, Overs<strong>to</strong>ck responds as follows:<br />

EMPLOY-EES do not SET COMPARISON PRICES. EMPLOYEES typically receive and review,<br />

and on occasion may modify COMPARISON PRICES submitted <strong>to</strong> Overs<strong>to</strong>ck by its vendors and<br />

suppliers. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Overs<strong>to</strong>ck does not have an official company-wide<br />

organization chart depicting job titles for each EMPLOYEE who currently receives and reviews,<br />

and on occasion may modify COMPARISON PRICES and the job titles of all managers,<br />

supervisors or superiors who are in a direct reporting relationship between that EMPLOYEE and<br />

55.51782/3971861.<br />

-9- CaseNo. RG10-546833<br />

RESPONSES TO FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!