27.02.2015 Views

Annual report [1997-98] - Family Court of Australia

Annual report [1997-98] - Family Court of Australia

Annual report [1997-98] - Family Court of Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The <strong>Family</strong> <strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Australia</strong> – annual <strong>report</strong> <strong>1997</strong>-<strong>98</strong><br />

able to meet time standards throughout some months <strong>of</strong> the year, it should be noted that<br />

urgent requests for appointments were able to be met within the time standard in all registries.<br />

Single interviews in violence cases<br />

In keeping with the <strong>Court</strong>’s <strong>Family</strong> Violence Policy, single interviews are <strong>of</strong>fered when<br />

there has been a history <strong>of</strong> violence in the relationship and one <strong>of</strong> the parties indicates they<br />

are worried about their physical safety and are afraid <strong>of</strong> attending a joint interview with the<br />

other party. This option is <strong>of</strong>fered in all appointment letters, information sessions and<br />

through notices in waiting rooms. There were 8632 cases where separate interviews were<br />

requested and held because <strong>of</strong> family violence.<br />

Information sessions<br />

These sessions are held regularly in all registries to inform customers <strong>of</strong> what to expect<br />

when they come to <strong>Court</strong> and to prepare them for any conciliation counselling (children’s<br />

matters) or conciliation conferences they may attend with registrars (financial matters). In<br />

smaller registries they are <strong>of</strong>fered on an ‘as needed’basis. These sessions are also provided<br />

in some remote areas through the visiting counselling services. In <strong>1997</strong>-<strong>98</strong>, 1085 hours<br />

were devoted to information sessions.<br />

Community liaison work<br />

In the spirit <strong>of</strong> s43 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Family</strong> Law Act 1975, the Counselling Service has, from the<br />

beginning, sought to be proactive in reducing undue personal and interpersonal conflicts<br />

arising from marital breakdown and to assist other helpers to cope with problems arising<br />

from their client’s marriage breakdown to help avoid the demands placed on services when<br />

conflicts reach crisis point. The Counselling Service’s community work role is a major<br />

expression <strong>of</strong> this aim. Over 3313 hours were spent on this work – down 15% on <strong>1997</strong>-<strong>98</strong>.<br />

The types <strong>of</strong> people contacted included: students, practitioners in allied pr<strong>of</strong>essions<br />

(including, among others, doctors, nurses, police, welfare workers, teachers, interpreters,<br />

lawyers), members <strong>of</strong> community organisations (including refuges and shelters, citizen<br />

advice bureaux, self-help groups, migrant resource centres, government departments, marriage<br />

counselling organisations and community health centres) as well as the general public<br />

through public meetings and the media.<br />

Customersurveys<br />

During <strong>1997</strong>-<strong>98</strong> the <strong>Family</strong> <strong>Court</strong> published a preliminary <strong>report</strong> on ‘Perceptions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Clients <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Family</strong> <strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Australia</strong> on the Location <strong>of</strong> Primary Dispute Resolution<br />

Services’ in its response to the Attorney-General’s Department Discussion Paper on<br />

‘Primary Dispute Resolution Services in <strong>Family</strong> Law’. This preliminary <strong>report</strong> was based<br />

on a survey <strong>of</strong> 553 conciliation counselling and mediation customers who attended the<br />

<strong>Court</strong> Counselling Service and Mediation Service and addressed some <strong>of</strong> the issues raised<br />

in the Attorney-General’s Discussion Paper concerning the accessibility <strong>of</strong> services, preference<br />

as to the location <strong>of</strong> services, the likelihood <strong>of</strong> court-based services increasing litigation,<br />

perceived benefits associated with proximity to the court and legal system, confidence<br />

in the <strong>Court</strong>’s services and issues <strong>of</strong> safety and cost.<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!