Bridging the Aging and Developmental Disabilities Service ... - rrtcadd

More documents

Recommendations

Info

developmental disabilities require a much broader array of services and supports, and neither the aging network nor most CILs have experience in serving this population. We reviewed data from the Spring 2011 Semi-Annual Reporting Tool (SART), which covers October 1, 2010 through March 31, 2011, to determine the number of people with developmental disabilities each state served. We did not adjust client data to reflect variations in state population because not all states had statewide ADRC coverage. Our goal was to identify states serving large numbers of people with developmental disabilities so we could identify the factors contributing to their successful outreach. The following map depicts the number of people with developmental disabilities served by state ADRCs. SARTs for eight states did not contain any data on people with developmental disabilities: DE, RI, NY, ID, OK, MO, MI, MS. The 2011 Spring SART indicated that 155 local ADRCs in 36 states and the District of Columbia served individuals with developmental disabilities during the six-month reporting period. Two criteria were used to include states in the sample: 1. The total number of people with developmental disabilities states served through their ADRCs. 2. The proportion of people with developmental disabilities served by at least one local ADRC had to account at least 10% of all people with disabilities it served to indicate at least one location with successful outreach to this population. We did not adjust the data to account for population density because individual ADRC start-ups occurred at different times and community visibility also would affect their market draw. The sample consisted of six states: Georgia, Alaska, Massachusetts, Texas, Arizona, and Wisconsin. Bridging the Aging and Developmental Disabilities Service Networks Page 34
Table 3 compares the number of people with developmental disabilities these states served compared to the other target populations. All the states except Texas and Wisconsin have statewide ADRC coverage. The large number of people with developmental disabilities served in Georgia reflects 15,060 people reported and verified by the Atlanta ADRC and verified by its staff. The aggregate number of people with developmental disabilities served by these six states (31,592) represents 94% of the 33,453 people with developmental disabilities served by all ADRCs during this six month period. Table 3. States with ADRCs Serving Large Numbers of People with Developmental Disabilities October 1, 2010 to March 31, 2011 State No. of ADRCs Years Operating I/DD % of All Disabilities Physical Disability Psychiatric Disability TBI Age 60+ GA 12 1 – 6 37,662 70 6,037 1,409 264 40,998 WI 35 1 – 6 8,333 17 29,535 11,154 0 92,810 AZ 5 1 – 4 3,558 62 2,436 209 76 8,145 TX 11
Page 1 and 2: Bridging the Aging and Developmenta
Page 3 and 4: REPORT FUNDING This report was fund
Page 5 and 6: Executive Summary Background People
Page 7 and 8: ADD should support AoA’s proposed
Page 9 and 10: INTRODUCTION Given the demographic
Page 11 and 12: coordinator, staff from the state d
Page 13 and 14: Future Planning. Many older parents
Page 15 and 16: 1. State Councils on Developmental
Page 17 and 18: Similarities between Objectives of
Page 19 and 20: with developmental disabilities, $9
Page 21 and 22: activities which support the indepe
Page 23 and 24: studies will also address health di
Page 25 and 26: The Patient Protection and Affordab
Page 27 and 28: • Risk-based managed care organiz
Page 29 and 30: National Alzheimer’s Project Act
Page 31 and 32: • Encourage middle-aged people to
Page 33: ADRC Outreach to People with Develo
Page 37 and 38: statewide ADRC Advisory Council as
Page 39 and 40: ADRC Role in the ACA CMS and AoA en
Page 41 and 42: concerns include protection from ab
Page 43 and 44: AoA and CMS envision that ADRCs wil
Page 45 and 46: waivers. ADD can increase its voice
Page 47 and 48: Goal C: Develop a workforce with kn
Page 49 and 50: 12 Braddock, D., Hemp, R., Rizzolo,
Page 51 and 52: 37 Centers for Medicare and Medicai
Page 53 and 54: HRSA I/DD IADLs ID IDEA IDHD IHP IL
Page 55 and 56: Appendix 2 Summary of Testimonies o
Page 57 and 58: developed, in most states, a suffic
Page 59 and 60: families. That really needs to chan
Page 61 and 62: utilizing well-trained staff. In pe
Page 63 and 64: Appendix 3 Memorandum of Understand
Page 71 and 72: • The Waisman Center, University
Page 73 and 74: Appendix 5 AoA Aging and Developmen
Page 75 and 76: WISCONSIN Grant Number: 90‐AM‐0
Page 77 and 78: NEW YORK Grant Number: 90‐AJ‐20
Page 79 and 80: VIRGINIA NAIC accession number: 013
Page 81 and 82: VIRGINIA agencies in Maryland and V
Page 83 and 84: MISSOURI Developmentally Disabled P
Page 85 and 86:
HAWAII Grant Number: 90‐AM‐0677
Page 87 and 88:
NATIONAL Grant Number: 90‐AM‐07
Page 89 and 90:
Grant Number: 90‐AM‐0509 (AoA)
Page 91 and 92:
NATIONAL FAMILY CAREGIVER SUPPORT P
Page 93 and 94:
● There is a lack of background k
Page 95 and 96:
National Dementia and Intellectual
Page 97 and 98:
Appendix 7 State Profiles of ADRCs
Page 99 and 100:
eferral phone line which is a colla
Page 101 and 102:
Wisconsin has a county system with
Page 103 and 104:
developing discharge plans with pat
Page 105:
Charlotte McHenry, Vice President o
show all

Bridging the Aging and Developmental Disabilities Service ... - rrtcadd

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?