16.03.2015 Views

Bulletin of the Sea Fisheries Institute 2 (156) 2002 - CEEMaR

Bulletin of the Sea Fisheries Institute 2 (156) 2002 - CEEMaR

Bulletin of the Sea Fisheries Institute 2 (156) 2002 - CEEMaR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 5. Differences in caught cod length recalculated for <strong>the</strong> standard mesh bar length<br />

Cruise<br />

Month, year<br />

45 mm 50 mm 55 mm 60 mm 65 mm<br />

new new new used new used new used<br />

I March 1994 40.6 43.6 46.1 46.1 47.7<br />

II Dec. 1994 42.4 46.2 45.7 47.7 51.1<br />

III Jan/Feb.1995 43.4 44.6 44.9 48.5 47.4 52.0 50.8<br />

Average 40.6 43.1 45.6 45.6 48.5 47.6 52.0 51.0<br />

Table 6. Selectivity coefficient for various cod gill net mesh sizes<br />

Cruise<br />

Month, year<br />

45 mm 50 mm 55 mm 60 mm 65 mm<br />

new new new used new used new used<br />

I March 1994 4.45 4.30 4.12 4.16 3.89<br />

II Dec. 1994 4.17 4.16 4.09 3.91 3.95<br />

III Jan/Feb.1995 4.25 3.99 4.02 3.99 3.89 3.91 3.89<br />

Table 7. Percentage <strong>of</strong> undersized cod retained by various gillnet mesh sizes<br />

Cruise<br />

Month, year<br />

45 mm 50 mm 55 mm 60 mm 65 mm<br />

new new new used new used new used<br />

I March 1994 2.34 2.95 4.24 1.34 4.06<br />

II Dec. 1994 0.80 1.51 1.14 2.32 0.60<br />

III Jan/Feb.1995 0.50 0.60 0.85 1.04 1.20 2.52 0.60<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> material and mesh size ... 13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!