16.03.2015 Views

"WINNER II Channel Models", ver 1.1, Sept

"WINNER II Channel Models", ver 1.1, Sept

"WINNER II Channel Models", ver 1.1, Sept

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>WINNER</strong> <strong>II</strong> D<strong>1.1</strong>.2 V<strong>1.1</strong><br />

Table 2-1 (continued).<br />

Scenario Definition LOS/<br />

NLOS<br />

C1<br />

Metropol<br />

Suburban<br />

LOS/<br />

NLOS<br />

Mob.<br />

km/h<br />

Frequ<br />

ency<br />

(GHz)<br />

0–120 2 - 6 WA<br />

CG Note<br />

C2<br />

Metropol<br />

C3<br />

C4<br />

D1<br />

Rural<br />

Typical urban<br />

macro-cell<br />

Bad Urban macrocell<br />

Outdoor to indoor<br />

macro-cell<br />

Rural macro-cell<br />

LOS/<br />

NLOS<br />

0–120 2 - 6 MA<br />

WA<br />

NLOS 0–70 2 - 6 - Same as C2 + long<br />

delays<br />

NLOS 0-5 2 - 6 MA -Outdoor typical<br />

urban C2.<br />

LOS/<br />

NLOS<br />

0–200 2 - 6 WA<br />

-Indoor A1<br />

D2<br />

a) Moving<br />

networks:<br />

BS – MRS, rural<br />

b) Moving<br />

networks:<br />

MRS – MS, rural<br />

LOS 0 –350 2 - 6 WA Very large Doppler<br />

variability.<br />

LOS /<br />

OLOS/<br />

NLOS<br />

0 – 5 2 - 6 LA Same as A1 NLOS<br />

The propagation scenarios listed above have been specified according to the requirements agreed<br />

commonly in the <strong>WINNER</strong> project [WIN1D72]. These are the environments and conditions, where all the<br />

<strong>WINNER</strong> simulations have been carried out. There are a couple of facts that need to be understood about<br />

the scenarios and channel models adapted to them:<br />

1. The scenarios co<strong>ver</strong> some typical cases. They are not intended to co<strong>ver</strong> all possible environments<br />

and conditions: e.g. the mountaineous or even hilly rural environments have not been co<strong>ver</strong>ed.<br />

Similarly the antenna heights do not co<strong>ver</strong> all values that could be seen reasonable. Generally<br />

speaking, the environments are such that are found in urban areas of European and North-<br />

American countries.<br />

2. The environments are described in two levels of details: firstly, most of the scenarios use the<br />

ordinary way placing the transmitters and recei<strong>ver</strong>s, so that the only location parameter is the<br />

distance between transmitter and recei<strong>ver</strong>, called non-grid-based models. Secondly, the other<br />

group of the scenarios is grid-based. This means that there is a grid of streets or a building layout<br />

or both, where the transmitters and recei<strong>ver</strong>s can be located e.g. by Cartesian coordinates.<br />

This latter group of scenarios include A1, A2, B1, B2 and B4, see 2.3.1 to 2.3.13. Other<br />

scenarios belong to the first group.<br />

With these selections we have been able to restrict the number of scenarios reasonable, and still<br />

presumably co<strong>ver</strong>ed representatively the conditions encountered by radio equipment in the field. We have<br />

also been able to run some simulations in grid-based scenarios with higher precision than is possible in<br />

conventional scenarios.<br />

Page 15 (82)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!