16.03.2015 Views

"WINNER II Channel Models", ver 1.1, Sept

"WINNER II Channel Models", ver 1.1, Sept

"WINNER II Channel Models", ver 1.1, Sept

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>WINNER</strong> <strong>II</strong> D<strong>1.1</strong>.2 V<strong>1.1</strong><br />

Table 6-10 Clustered delay-line model for Scenario C1 NLOS<br />

Cluster # Delay [ns] Power [dB] AoD [º] AoA [º] Ray power [dB]<br />

1 0 5 10 -3.0 -5.2 -7.0 0 0 -13.0<br />

2 25 -7.5 13 -71 -20.5<br />

3 35 -10.5 -15 -84 -23.5<br />

4 35 -3.2 -8 46 -16.2<br />

5 45 50 55 -6.1 -8.3 -10.1 12 -66 -16.1<br />

6 65 -14.0 -17 -97 -27.0<br />

7 65 -6.4 12 -66 -19.4<br />

8 75 -3.1 -8 -46 -16.1<br />

9 145 -4.6 -10 -56 -17.6<br />

10 160 -8.0 -13 73 -21.0<br />

11 195 -7.2 12 70 -20.2<br />

12 200 -3.1 8 -46 -16.1<br />

13 205 -9.5 14 -80 -22.5<br />

14 770 -22.4 22 123 -35.4<br />

Cluster ASD = 2º<br />

Cluster ASA = 10º<br />

XPR = 4 dB<br />

Figure 6-10: PDP and frequency correlation (FCF) of CDL model.<br />

6.7 C2 – Urban macro-cell<br />

The CDL parameters of LOS and NLOS condition are given below. In the LOS model Ricean K-factor is<br />

7.0 dB.<br />

Table 6-11 Scenario C2: LOS Clustered delay line model.<br />

Cluster # Delay [ns] Power [dB] AoD [º] AoA [º] Ray power [dB]<br />

1 0 0.0 0 0 -0.08 * -30.6 **<br />

2 0 5 10 -16.2 -18.4 -20.2 -24 -120 -26.2<br />

3 30 -15.3 26 129 -28.3<br />

4 85 -16.7 -27 -135 -29.7<br />

5 145 150 155 -18.2 -20.4 -22.2 26 -129 -28.2<br />

6 150 -18.2 28 141 -31.2<br />

7 160 -15.3 26 -129 -28.3<br />

8 220 -23.1 -32 -158 -36.1<br />

Cluster ASD = 6º<br />

Cluster ASA = 12º<br />

XPR = 8 dB<br />

* Power of dominant ray,<br />

** Power of each other ray<br />

Page 67 (82)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!