published
published
published
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Smoking in Pregnancy Project Report: June 2012<br />
Both Leighton and Macclesfield Maternity units reported being compliant with NICE guidance<br />
actions for identifying smoking in pregnancy by midwives. All pregnant women were offered<br />
carbon monoxide screening at booking and identified smokers were offered a referral to<br />
the stop smoking service. Referrals were completed on a dedicated paper form, which was<br />
faxed across to the service. The Macclesfield Maternity Unit had commissioned support for<br />
their pregnant smokers and this was provided by a smoking in pregnancy midwife specialist.<br />
Within the unit, following referral, follow up was proactive and support was provided onsite,<br />
whilst follow up and support for Leighton Maternity Unit’s pregnant smokers was<br />
provided by the stop smoking service.<br />
In addition to implementing level three of the tiered model, the pilot site were keen to<br />
investigate the use of CO testing upon admission to a labour ward in order to improve the<br />
recording of smoking at time of delivery (SATOD) data and as a result it was agreed to also<br />
include this within the pilot.<br />
To support the planning and implementation of the model, a working group was established,<br />
chaired by the local stop smoking service manager, which included representation from<br />
midwives, health visitors, pharmacists and practice nurses.<br />
In line with the tiered model, other HCPs were also included within the pilot, although due<br />
to the short timescales, the working group decided that this could only be managed on a<br />
small scale. Therefore in total, one GP practice and two pharmacies were approached and<br />
agreed to become involved.<br />
The pilot ran from 17 January to 31 March 2012.<br />
2.2.4 Pilot adaptations<br />
During the pilot planning phase, a number of adaptations had to be made.<br />
2.2.4.1 Feedback mechanism<br />
It was found that the feedback mechanism from the stop smoking service database (QM)<br />
to the electronic referral system (NPRS) could not be developed within the anticipated<br />
timescales for the system to go live in the pilot site. Therefore the scope of the testing had<br />
to be reduced to testing the feasibility of implementing the NPRS referral system and<br />
importing of the referral to the stop smoking service only.<br />
17