published
published
published
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Smoking in Pregnancy Project Report: June 2012<br />
3.1.4.2 Existing practice for identifying and referring pregnant women<br />
Staff interviewed were asked to describe how they, or their team, would identify and refer<br />
pregnant smokers in their current practice, prior to the implementation of any changes<br />
introduced by the pilot. All members of staff described what they saw as relatively robust<br />
systems that were already in place.<br />
These systems included community midwives asking all women for their smoking status at<br />
the booking appointment and carrying out a CO test, with six parts per million as the cut<br />
off for active smoking. Those women who were identified as smokers would be given brief<br />
advice by the community midwife and then asked if they wished to be referred for further<br />
support. A referral letter, found in the women’s hand held notes would then be either sent<br />
to the specialist stop smoking service midwife directly (in Macclesfield) or sent to the office<br />
of the local stop smoking service (in Leighton), this difference was site dependent.<br />
What we do currently is we already CO monitor at booking, so what happens is when the<br />
woman gets booked with the midwife, the midwife does a CO test, it’s part of the computer<br />
system, it prompts them to ask the question. Every single woman whether they’re a smoker<br />
or not everyone has the test. If that then shows that they are a smoker they do an automatic<br />
referral, which is located in their care plan, the handheld notes (P3)<br />
Women would be asked again throughout their pregnancy, most probably by the community<br />
midwives, whether they were a smoker. It was stated that there was space in the hand held<br />
notes to record the women’s smoking status at these subsequent appointments. In Macclesfield<br />
midwives had been recording smoking status as routine practice for approximately six years,<br />
with routine CO monitoring being in place for approximately two years. It was not known<br />
how long the system in Leighton had been in place for.<br />
It was discussed that it was mandatory for community midwives to ask smoking related<br />
questions, however any HCP could discuss the women’s smoking status with her, and thus<br />
in theory, anyone could carry out the referral.<br />
Other systems were also discussed, including health visitors routinely asking the woman her<br />
smoking status at their initial postnatal visit; however a CO test would not necessarily be<br />
carried out at this point. Health visitors would offer the woman information about the<br />
dangers of smoking, discuss second hand smoke and how to avoid exposure for the baby,<br />
however a specific referral process did not seem to be in place at this stage, at either site.<br />
It was suggested that the woman may be directed to their GP or a pharmacist for support.<br />
25