Addressing the Challenge of Global Ageing—Funding Issues
Addressing the Challenge of Global Ageing—Funding Issues
Addressing the Challenge of Global Ageing—Funding Issues
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
10<br />
<strong>Addressing</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Challenge</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Global</strong> Ageing—Funding <strong>Issues</strong> and Insurance Solutions<br />
understanding <strong>the</strong> need to pursue a multi-pillar approach, save more (Pillar III) and<br />
mitigate <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> outliving savings through <strong>the</strong> purchase <strong>of</strong> annuities.<br />
Gordon Stewart, Liaison Officer North America, The Geneva Association, complements<br />
<strong>the</strong> global stakeholder view with a specific perspective on retirement security in <strong>the</strong><br />
United States as a major national challenge. The author focuses on <strong>the</strong> consequences<br />
<strong>of</strong> an erosion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> old-age security system in <strong>the</strong> U.S. when a central pillar <strong>of</strong> a noncomprehensive<br />
national retirement system falls. Stewart argues that <strong>the</strong> most serious<br />
threat to <strong>the</strong> stability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> four pillars in <strong>the</strong> U.S. results from <strong>the</strong> virtual demise <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> second pillar <strong>of</strong> employer-sponsored DB plans and <strong>the</strong> inability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> third pillar<br />
<strong>of</strong> individual defined contribution (DC) plans as presently structured to fully carry its<br />
own weight, especially in <strong>the</strong> current environment <strong>of</strong> record-low investment yields.<br />
He diagnoses a “retirement crisis in slow motion, one which can be met, but only if its<br />
government, business community, and individual stakeholders find <strong>the</strong> will and <strong>the</strong> ways<br />
to overcome <strong>the</strong>ir increasingly bitter divisiveness and recover <strong>the</strong>ir historic ability to<br />
transcend political differences when <strong>the</strong> future <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nation itself is threatened.”<br />
Against this backdrop, <strong>the</strong> author addresses <strong>the</strong> key question <strong>of</strong> how <strong>the</strong> deteriorating<br />
outlook for retirement security can be halted and altered. In Stewart’s view, individual<br />
stakeholders cannot do so—whatever <strong>the</strong>ir size, importance, and intentions. He argues<br />
that insurers are near <strong>the</strong> top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> list <strong>of</strong> concerned stakeholders, given that pensions,<br />
annuities and tax-advantaged asset growth are among <strong>the</strong>ir core competencies and reasons<br />
for being. Stewart stresses that insurance concepts and mechanisms will be indispensable<br />
to any comprehensive national solution. “And it should not be beyond <strong>the</strong> financial<br />
capability <strong>of</strong> insurers and <strong>the</strong> political competence <strong>of</strong> government to develop or revise<br />
public policies that will enable insurance concepts and mechanisms to greatly streng<strong>the</strong>n<br />
Pillar III private savings as a foundation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> retirement security <strong>of</strong> those workers who<br />
have access to <strong>the</strong>m and sufficient income to accumulate significant savings,” Stewart<br />
concludes.<br />
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) analyses <strong>the</strong> implications <strong>of</strong> global ageing<br />
and increasing longevity from a public finance and fiscal policy perspective, focusing<br />
on advanced economies. The authors argue that public pension reform and a major<br />
rationalisation <strong>of</strong> public spending will be a key policy challenge in advanced economies<br />
over coming decades, not least as many countries will need to achieve meaningful<br />
fiscal consolidation over that period. The economic and financial crisis has significantly<br />
exacerbated <strong>the</strong> fiscal challenges ahead. At <strong>the</strong> same time, “it is important that pension<br />
reforms do not undermine <strong>the</strong> ability <strong>of</strong> public pension systems to alleviate poverty among<br />
<strong>the</strong> elderly,” <strong>the</strong> authors emphasise.<br />
According to <strong>the</strong> IMF, in advanced economies, public pension spending increased from<br />
5 per cent <strong>of</strong> GDP in 1970 to 8.5 per cent in 2010. The four drivers behind <strong>the</strong> change<br />
in public pension spending as a share <strong>of</strong> GDP are ageing, eligibility rates (<strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong><br />
pensioners as a proportion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> population 65 and older), replacement rates (<strong>the</strong> ratio <strong>of</strong><br />
average pension to average wages) and labour force participation rates.<br />
The authors share <strong>the</strong>ir outlook for public pension spending and expect it to increase by<br />
about 1 percentage point <strong>of</strong> GDP over <strong>the</strong> next two decades. In addition to <strong>the</strong>se projected<br />
increases in public pension spending, governments face o<strong>the</strong>r fiscal challenges, most<br />
notably from <strong>the</strong>ir healthcare systems. In advanced economies, public health spending<br />
is projected to rise in <strong>the</strong>se countries on average by 3 percentage points <strong>of</strong> GDP over <strong>the</strong>