27.03.2015 Views

BASEL II: PROBLEMS AND USAGE

BASEL II: PROBLEMS AND USAGE

BASEL II: PROBLEMS AND USAGE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(thin line), the more accurately the model can distinguish between defaulters<br />

and non-defaulters. A AUC value of 0,5 (dotted line) corresponds<br />

to a model without discriminative power while a AUC value of one characterizes<br />

a perfect model. Within the ROC framework, it is important that<br />

debtors with weak creditworthiness receive worse ratings than those with<br />

strong creditworthiness.<br />

5.2.2. Cumulative Accuracy Profile<br />

Another popular validation technique is the cumulative accuracy profile.<br />

In order to obtain the CAP curve, borrowers are ordered by their credit<br />

score, from the riskiest to the safest. Subsequently, the fraction of debtors<br />

with the worst ratings (WR) is plotted against the hit rates. By repeating<br />

this procedure for every rating category s, the CAP curve is constructed,<br />

which is depicted in figure 11.<br />

HR s<br />

1<br />

Perfect rating<br />

function<br />

Random rating function<br />

WR s<br />

DR<br />

1<br />

Figure 11. Cumulative Accuracy Profile<br />

The straight dotted line below the CAP curve in figure 11 represents a<br />

rating system with random assignment of credit scores whereas the CAP<br />

curve of a rating system with perfect predicting power (thin line) is determined<br />

by the default rate (DR) of the portfolio. Actual rating functions will<br />

typically lie between these two extreme cases.<br />

The predictive power of a rating system is summarized by the accuracy<br />

ratio (AR). This ratio is determined as the ratio of the area between the<br />

CAP curve of the rating function under validation and the random CAP<br />

curve to the area between the perfect and the random CAP curves. 30 The<br />

closer the AR value to one, the better is the rating model.<br />

30 See Sobehart/Keenan/Stein (2003) and Engelmann/Hayden/Tasche (2003).<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!