27.03.2015 Views

BASEL II: PROBLEMS AND USAGE

BASEL II: PROBLEMS AND USAGE

BASEL II: PROBLEMS AND USAGE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

post-on-site visitations, prudential interviews, annual tripartite meetings<br />

and annual meetings with the board of directors at appropriate phases of the<br />

supervisory cycle.<br />

The risk assessment process of this risk-based supervisory approach<br />

incorporates an AI’s risk profile into the CAMEL rating system. The<br />

HKMA identifies eight types of inherent risks: credit, interest rate, market,<br />

liquidity, operational, reputation, legal and strategic risks. An AI’s level of<br />

risk in each of the inherent risk by business activity, the direction of risk,<br />

the adequacy of existing risk management systems and the impact of external<br />

risk factors are assessed and a risk-matrix method is applied to determine<br />

the AI’s overall risk profile. Based on the risk assessment exercise, a<br />

risk management rating is assigned and factored into the AI’s CAMEL rating.<br />

The rating scale ranges from one to five, where a score of one denotes<br />

the effectiveness of the AI in managing risk and a score of five indicates a<br />

critical absence of effective risk management practices. The latter requires<br />

immediate and close supervisory attention.<br />

The risk-based supervisory approach and the CAMEL rating system<br />

are complimentary to each other. In accordance with the Banking Ordinance,<br />

all AIs have to maintain adequate liquidity and capital adequacy, to<br />

submit to the HKMA on the required financial information, and to comply<br />

with other provisions of the Ordinance. In particular, the Banking (Amendment)<br />

Ordinance enacted in July 2005, which stipulates the Capital Rules<br />

and Disclosure Rules, provides the legal basis for the HKMA to implement<br />

Basel <strong>II</strong>.<br />

The capital adequacy framework in Hong Kong is in line with the requirements<br />

of Basel <strong>II</strong> as set out under Pillar I. All locally incorporated AIs<br />

are required to maintain a minimum capital adequacy ratio (CAR) of 8 %<br />

calculated in accordance with the Capital Rules. The ratio is based on an<br />

AI’s capital base to a value representing the AI’s exposure to credit risk,<br />

market risk and operational risk. The Capital Rules set out in detail the different<br />

calculation approaches that can be adopted. Moreover, in line with<br />

Pillar <strong>II</strong> of Basel <strong>II</strong> the HKMA is empowered to require a licensed bank to<br />

maintain a CAR up to 12 %, and up to 16 % for a restricted licence bank or<br />

a deposit-taking company.<br />

Besides CAR, AIs are required to maintain a statutory liquid ratio of<br />

25 % in accordance with the amendment to the Banking Ordinance in 1986.<br />

An AI has to hold liquefiable assets (currency notes and coins, gold, etc)<br />

against its qualifying liabilities (basically all liabilities due within a month).<br />

To meet the developments in international standards and best practices over<br />

the years, the HKMA has released supervisory policy guidelines (the latest<br />

one released in 2004) so as to strengthen the effectiveness of AIs’ liquidity<br />

44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!